Unintended Consequences: Review of New Artifacts Introduced by Iterative Reconstruction CT Metal Artifact Reduction in Spine Imaging

References

1. 1.↵
   2. McDermott KW,
   3. Freeman WJ,
   4. Elixhauser A

   . Overview of Operating Room Procedures During Inpatient Stays in U.S. Hospitals, 2014: Statistical Brief #233. In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2017
2. 2.↵
   2. Weiss AJ,
   3. Elixhauser A,
   4. Andrews RM

   . Characteristics of Operating Room Procedures in U.S. Hospitals, 2011: Statistical Brief #170. In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014
3. 3.↵
   2. Rajaee SS,
   3. Bae HW,
   4. Kanim LEA, et al

   . Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008. Spine 2012;37:67–76 doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820cccfb pmid:21311399

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Skolasky RL,
   3. Wegener ST,
   4. Maggard AM, et al

   . The impact of reduction of pain after lumbar spine surgery: the relationship between changes in pain and physical function and disability. Spine 2014;39:1426–32 doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000428 pmid:24859574

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Chan C,
   3. Peng P

   . Failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Med 2011;12:577–606 doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01089.x pmid:21463472

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Young PM,
   3. Berquist TH,
   4. Bancroft LW, et al

   . Complications of spinal instrumentation. Radiographics 2007;27:775–89 doi:10.1148/rg.273065055 pmid:17495292

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Baber Z,
   3. Erdek MA

   . Failed back surgery syndrome: current perspectives. J Pain Res 2016;9:979–87 doi:10.2147/JPR.S92776 pmid:27853391

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Barrett JF,
   3. Keat N

   . Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiographics 2004;24:1679–91 doi:10.1148/rg.246045065 pmid:15537976

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Stradiotti P,
   3. Curti A,
   4. Castellazzi G, et al

   . Metal-related artifacts in instrumented spine: techniques for reducing artifacts in CT and MRI: state of the art. Eur Spine J 2009;18:102–08 doi:10.1007/s00586-009-0998-5 pmid:19437043

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. White LM,
    3. Buckwalter KA

    . Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2002;06:5–17 doi:10.1055/s-2002-23160 pmid:11917267

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Gjesteby L,
    3. Man BD,
    4. Jin Y, et al

    . Metal artifact reduction in CT: where are we after four decades? IEEE Access 2016;4:5826–49 doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2608621

    CrossRef
12. 12.↵
    2. Kotsenas AL,
    3. Michalak GJ,
    4. DeLone DR, et al

    . CT metal artifact reduction in the spine: can an iterative reconstruction technique improve visualization? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:2184–90 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4416 pmid:26251433

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Zhou P,
    3. Zhang C,
    4. Gao Z, et al

    . Evaluation of the quality of CT images acquired with smart metal artifact reduction software. Open Life Science 2018;13:155–62 doi:10.1515/biol-2018-0021

    CrossRef
14. 14.↵
    GE Healthcare. GE Healthcare. Smart Metal Artifact Reduction (MAR). 2013 https://www.gehealthcare.com/products/computed-tomography/radiation-therapy-planning/metal-artifact-reduction. Accessed May 30, 2019
15. 15.↵
    2. Katsura M,
    3. Sato J,
    4. Akahane M, et al

    . Current and novel techniques for metal artifact reduction at CT: practical guide for radiologists. Radiographics 2018;38:450–61 doi:10.1148/rg.2018170102 pmid:29528826

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Wang Y,
    3. Qian B,
    4. Li B, et al

    . Metal artifacts reduction using monochromatic images from spectral CT: evaluation of pedicle screws in patients with scoliosis. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:e360–66 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.02.024 pmid:23518146

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Huang JY,
    3. Kerns JR,
    4. Nute JL, et al

    . An evaluation of three commercially available metal artifact reduction methods for CT imaging. Phys Med Biol 2015;60:1047–67 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/60/3/1047 pmid:25585685

    CrossRefPubMed