Application of Reduced-FOV Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Evaluation of Normal Pituitary Glands and Pituitary Macroadenomas

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Lomban E,
   3. Bonneville F,
   4. Karachi C, et al

   . Massive stroke in a patient with pituitary apoplexy, cervical carotid artery stenosis and hypotension. J Neuroradiol 2006;33:259–62 doi:10.1016/S0150-9861(06)77272-8 pmid:17041531

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Takayasu T,
   3. Yamasaki F,
   4. Tominaga A, et al

   . A pituitary abscess showing high signal intensity on diffusion-weighted imaging. Neurosurg Rev 2006;29:246–48 doi:10.1007/s10143-006-0021-0 pmid:16614868

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Boxerman JL,
   3. Rogg JM,
   4. Donahue JE, et al

   . Preoperative MRI evaluation of pituitary macroadenoma: imaging features predictive of successful transsphenoidal surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:720–28 doi:10.2214/AJR.09.4128 pmid:20729452

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Hiwatashi A,
   3. Yoshiura T,
   4. Togao O, et al

   . Evaluation of diffusivity in the anterior lobe of the pituitary gland: 3D turbo field echo with diffusion-sensitized driven-equilibrium preparation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:95–98 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3620 pmid:23868152

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Mahmoud OM,
   3. Tominaga A,
   4. Amatya VJ, et al

   . Role of PROPELLER diffusion weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient in the diagnosis of sellar and parasellar lesions. Eur J Radiol 2010;74:420–27 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.03.031 pmid:19394778

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Le Bihan D,
   3. Poupon C,
   4. Amadon A, et al

   . Artifacts and pitfalls in diffusion MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:478–88 doi:10.1002/jmri.20683 pmid:16897692

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Suzuki C,
   3. Maeda M,
   4. Hori K, et al

   . Apparent diffusion coefficient of pituitary macroadenoma evaluated with line-scan diffusion-weighted imaging. J Neuroradiol 2007;34:228–35 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2007.06.007 pmid:17719632

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Wei XE,
   3. Li WB,
   4. Li MH, et al

   . Detection of brain lesions at the skull base using diffusion-weighted imaging with readout-segmented echo-planar imaging and generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions. Neurol India 2011;59:839–43 doi:10.4103/0028-3886.91361 pmid:22234195

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Yiping L,
   3. Ji X,
   4. Daoying G, et al

   . Prediction of the consistency of pituitary adenoma: a comparative study on diffusion-weighted imaging and pathological results. J Neuroradiol 2016;43:186–94 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2015.09.003 pmid:26585529

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Mahmoud OM,
    3. Tominaga A,
    4. Amatya VJ, et al

    . Role of PROPELLER diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient in the evaluation of pituitary adenomas. Eur J Radiol 2011;80:412–17 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.05.023 pmid:20580505

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Yiping L,
    3. Hui L,
    4. Kun Z, et al

    . Diffusion-weighted imaging of the sellar region: a comparison study of BLADE and single-shot echo planar imaging sequences. Eur J Radiol 2014;83:1239–44 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.03.011 pmid:24755049

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Theodros D,
    3. Patel M,
    4. Ruzevick J, et al

    . Pituitary adenomas: historical perspective, surgical management and future directions. CNS Oncol 2015;4:411–29 doi:10.2217/cns.15.21 pmid:26497533

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Saritas EU,
    3. Cunningham CH,
    4. Lee JH, et al

    . DWI of the spinal cord with reduced FOV single-shot EPI. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:468–73 doi:10.1002/mrm.21640 pmid:18666126

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Vidiri A,
    3. Minosse S,
    4. Piludu F, et al

    . Feasibility study of reduced field of view diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck tumors. Acta Radiol 2017;58:292–300 doi:10.1177/0284185116652014 pmid:27287402

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Ma C,
    3. Li YJ,
    4. Pan CS, et al

    . High resolution diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas using reduced field of view single-shot echo-planar imaging at 3 T. Magn Reson Imaging 2014;32:125–31 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2013.10.005 pmid:24231348

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Dong H,
    3. Li Y,
    4. Li H, et al

    . Study of the reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast. Clin Breast Cancer 2014;14:265–71 doi:10.1016/j.clbc.2013.12.001 pmid:24462803

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Korn N,
    3. Kurhanewicz J,
    4. Banerjee S, et al

    . Reduced-FOV excitation decreases susceptibility artifact in diffusion-weighted MRI with endorectal coil for prostate cancer detection. Magn Reson Imaging 2015;33:56–62 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2014.08.040 pmid:25200645

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Riffel P,
    3. Michaely HJ,
    4. Morelli JN, et al

    . Zoomed EPI-DWI of the head and neck with two-dimensional, spatially-selective radiofrequency excitation pulses. Eur Radiol 2014;24:2507–12 doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3287-6 pmid:24996796

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Pereira FP,
    3. Martins G,
    4. Figueiredo E, et al

    . Assessment of breast lesions with diffusion-weighted MRI: comparing the use of different b values. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:1030–35 doi:10.2214/AJR.09.2522 pmid:19770326

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Mohamed FF,
    3. Abouhashem S

    . Diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in assessment of pituitary macroadenoma consistency. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine 2013;44:617–24 doi:10.1016/j.ejrnm.2013.05.012

    CrossRef
21. 21.↵
    2. Zaharchuk G,
    3. Saritas EU,
    4. Andre JB, et al

    . Reduced field-of-view diffusion imaging of the human spinal cord: comparison with conventional single-shot echo-planar imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:813–20 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2418 pmid:21454408

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Singer L,
    3. Wilmes LJ,
    4. Saritas EU, et al

    . High-resolution diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Acad Radiol 2012;19:526–34 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2011.11.003 pmid:22197382

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Hiwatashi A,
    3. Togao O,
    4. Yamashita K, et al

    . Evaluation of diffusivity in pituitary adenoma: 3D turbo field echo with diffusion-sensitized driven-equilibrium preparation. British J Radiol 2016;89:20150755 doi:10.1259/bjr.20150755 pmid:27187598

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Pierallini A,
    3. Caramia F,
    4. Falcone C, et al

    . Pituitary macroadenomas: preoperative evaluation of consistency with diffusion-weighted MR imaging—initial experience. Radiology 2006;239:223–31 doi:10.1148/radiol.2383042204 pmid:16452397

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Noh S,
    3. Kim SH,
    4. Cho NH, et al

    . Rapid reticulin fiber staining method is helpful for the diagnosis of pituitary adenoma in frozen section. Endocr Pathol 2015;26:178–84 doi:10.1007/s12022-015-9370-y pmid:25952080

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Jarzembowski J,
    3. Lloyd R,
    4. McKeever P

    . Type IV collagen immunostaining is a simple, reliable diagnostic tool for distinguishing between adenomatous and normal pituitary glands. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007;131:931–35 pmid:17550321

    PubMed