Whole-Brain Vascular Architecture Mapping Identifies Region-Specific Microvascular Profiles In Vivo

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Hahn A,
   2. Bode J,
   3. Krüwel T, et al

   . Glioblastoma multiforme restructures the topological connectivity of cerebrovascular networks. Sci Rep 2019;9:11757 doi:10.1038/s41598-019-47567-w pmid:31409816

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Granger DN,
   2. Rodrigues SF,
   3. Yildirim A, et al

   . Microvascular responses to cardiovascular risk factors. Microcirculation 2010;17:192–205 doi:10.1111/j.1549-8719.2009.00015.x pmid:20374483

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Wardlaw JM,
   2. Smith C,
   3. Dichgans M

   . Small vessel disease: mechanisms and clinical implications. Lancet Neurol 2019;18:684–96 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30079-1 pmid:31097385

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Hahn A,
   2. Bode J,
   3. Krüwel T, et al

   . Gibbs point field model quantifies disorder in microvasculature of U87-glioblastoma. J Theor Biol 2020;494:110230 doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110230 pmid:32142806

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Emblem KE,
   2. Mouridsen K,
   3. Bjornerud A, et al

   . Vessel architectural imaging identifies cancer patient responders to anti-angiogenic therapy. Nat Med 2013;19:1178–83 doi:10.1038/nm.3289 pmid:23955713

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Kim M,
   2. Park JE,
   3. Emblem K, et al

   . Vessel type determined by vessel architectural imaging improves differentiation between early tumor progression and pseudoprogression in glioblastoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:663–70 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6984 pmid:33541891

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Zhang K,
   2. Yun SD,
   3. Triphan SM, et al

   . Vessel architecture imaging using multiband gradient-echo/spin-echo EPI. PLoS One 2019;14:e0220939 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220939 pmid:31398234

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Kiselev VG,
   2. Strecker R,
   3. Ziyeh S, et al

   . Vessel size imaging in humans. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:553–63 doi:10.1002/mrm.20383 pmid:15723391

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Buschle LR,
   2. Ziener CH,
   3. Zhang K, et al

   . Vessel radius mapping in an extended model of transverse relaxation. MAGMA 2018;31:531–51 doi:10.1007/s10334-018-0677-9 pmid:29478154

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Stadlbauer A,
    2. Zimmermann M,
    3. Oberndorfer S, et al

    . Vascular hysteresis loops and vascular architecture mapping in patients with glioblastoma treated with antiangiogenic therapy. Sci Rep 2017;7:8508 doi:10.1038/s41598-017-09048-w pmid:28819189

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Kim M,
    2. Park JE,
    3. Yoon SK, et al

    . Vessel size and perfusion-derived vascular habitat refines prediction of treatment failure to bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastomas: validation in a prospective cohort. Eur Radiol 2023;33:4475–85 doi:10.1007/s00330-022-09164-w pmid:36242633

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Choi HI,
    2. Ryu CW,
    3. Kim S, et al

    . Changes in microvascular morphology in subcortical vascular dementia: a study of vessel size magnetic resonance imaging. Front Neurol 2020;11:545450 doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.545450 pmid:33192974

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Xu C,
    2. Schmidt WU,
    3. Villringer K, et al

    . Vessel size imaging reveals pathological changes of microvessel density and size in acute ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2011;31:1687–95 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2011.38 pmid:21468091

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Boxerman JL,
    2. Schmainda KM,
    3. Weisskoff RM

    . Relative cerebral blood volume maps corrected for contrast agent extravasation significantly correlate with glioma tumor grade, whereas uncorrected maps do not. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:859–67 pmid:16611779

    PubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Rausch M,
    2. Scheffler K,
    3. Rudin M, et al

    . Analysis of input functions from different arterial branches with gamma variate functions and cluster analysis for quantitative blood volume measurements. Magn Reson Imaging 2000;18:1235–43 doi:10.1016/s0730-725x(00)00219-8 pmid:11167043

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Xu C,
    2. Kiselev VG,
    3. Möller HE, et al

    . Dynamic hysteresis between gradient echo and spin echo attenuations in dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging. Magn Reson Med 2013;69:981–91 doi:10.1002/mrm.24326 pmid:22611004

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Stadlbauer A,
    2. Zimmermann M,
    3. Heinz G, et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers for clinical routine assessment of microvascular architecture in glioma. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2017;37:632–43 doi:10.1177/0271678X16655549 pmid:27317652

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. D'Agostino E,
    2. Maes F,
    3. Vandermeulen D, et al

    . A viscous fluid model for multimodal non-rigid image registration using mutual information. Med Image Anal 2003;7:565–75 doi:10.1016/s1361-8415(03)00039-2 pmid:14561559

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Rolls ET,
    2. Huang CC,
    3. Lin CP, et al

    . Automated anatomical labelling atlas 3. Neuroimage 2020;206:116189 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116189 pmid:31521825

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Brady M,
    3. Smith S

    . Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20:45–57 doi:10.1109/42.906424 pmid:11293691

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Wenz F,
    2. Rempp K,
    3. Brix G, et al

    . Age dependency of the regional cerebral blood volume (rCBV) measured with dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging (DSC). Magn Reson Imaging 1996;14:157–62 doi:10.1016/0730-725x(95)02058-2] pmid:8847971

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Koo TK,
    2. Li MY

    . A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016;15:155–63 doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 pmid:27330520

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Heidemann C,
    2. Scheidt-Nave C,
    3. Beyer AK, et al

    . Health situation of adults in Germany: results from GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS. J Health Monit 2021;6:3–35 doi:10.25646/8459 pmid:35146314

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Bernier M,
    2. Cunnane SC,
    3. Whittingstall K

    . The morphology of the human cerebrovascular system. Hum Brain Mapp 2018;39:4962–75 doi:10.1002/hbm.24337 pmid:30265762

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Reina-De La Torre F,
    2. Rodriguez-Baeza A,
    3. Sahuquillo-Barris J

    . Morphological characteristics and distribution pattern of the arterial vessels in human cerebral cortex: a scanning electron microscope study. Anat Rec 1998;251:87–96 doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199805)251:1<87::AID-AR14>3.0.CO;2-7 pmid:9605225

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Digernes I,
    2. Bjørnerud A,
    3. Vatnehol SA, et al

    . A theoretical framework for determining cerebral vascular function and heterogeneity from dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2017;37:2237–48 doi:10.1177/0271678X17694187 pmid:28273722

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Helenius J,
    2. Soinne L,
    3. Perkiö J, et al

    . Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in normal human brains in various age groups. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:194–99 pmid:11847041

    PubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Caplan LR

    . Lacunar infarction and small vessel disease: pathology and pathophysiology. J Stroke 2015;17:2–6 doi:10.5853/jos.2015.17.1.2 pmid:25692102

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Wolfram-Gabel R,
    2. Maillot C

    . Vascular networks of the nucleus lentiformis. Surg Radiol Anat 1994;16:373–77 doi:10.1007/BF01627656 pmid:7725192

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Kubíková T,
    2. Kochová P,
    3. Tomášek P, et al

    . Numerical and length densities of microvessels in the human brain: correlation with preferential orientation of microvessels in the cerebral cortex, subcortical grey matter and white matter, pons and cerebellum. J Chem Neuroanat 2018;88:22–32

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Manna A,
    2. Piras F,
    3. Caltagirone C, et al

    . Left hippocampus-amygdala complex macro- and microstructural variation is associated with BDNF plasma levels in healthy elderly individuals. Brain Behav 2015;5:e00334 doi:10.1002/brb3.334 pmid:26221568

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. van Lanen RH,
    2. Melchers S,
    3. Hoogland G, et al

    . Microvascular changes associated with epilepsy: a narrative review. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2021;41:2492–509 doi:10.1177/0271678X211010388 pmid:33866850

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Soultati A,
    2. Mountzios G,
    3. Avgerinou C, et al

    . Endothelial vascular toxicity from chemotherapeutic agents: preclinical evidence and clinical implications. Cancer Treat Rev 2012;38:473–83 doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.09.002 pmid:21982720

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. Bálentová S,
    2. Adamkov M

    . Pathological changes in the central nervous system following exposure to ionizing radiation. Physiol Res 2020;69:389–404 doi:10.33549/physiolres.934309 pmid:32469226

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Radbruch A,
    2. Weberling LD,
    3. Kieslich PJ, et al

    . Gadolinium retention in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus is dependent on the class of contrast agent. Radiology 2015;275:783–91 doi:10.1148/radiol.2015150337 pmid:25848905

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Fukuya Y,
    2. Ikuta S,
    3. Maruyama T, et al

    . Tumor recurrence patterns after surgical resection of intracranial low-grade gliomas. J Neurooncol 2019;144:519–28 doi:10.1007/s11060-019-03250-8 pmid:31363908

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Siemonsen S,
    2. Finsterbusch J,
    3. Matschke J, et al

    . Age-dependent normal values of T2* and T2’ in brain parenchyma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:950–55 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0951 pmid:18272561

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    1. Jensen JH,
    2. Lu H,
    3. Inglese M

    . Microvessel density estimation in the human brain by means of dynamic contrast-enhanced echo-planar imaging. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:1145–50 doi:10.1002/mrm.21052 pmid:17029231

    CrossRefPubMed