Correlation between Histopathology and Signal Loss on Spin-Echo T2-Weighted MR Images of the Inner Ear: Distinguishing Artifacts from Anatomy

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Lopez-Escamez JA,
   2. Attye A

   . Systematic review of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of Meniere disease. J Vestib Res 2019;29:121–29 doi:10.3233/VES-180646 pmid:31356219

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.
   1. Pyykko I,
   2. Zou J,
   3. Poe D, et al

   . Magnetic resonance imaging of the inner ear in Meniere's disease. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2010;43:1059–80 doi:10.1016/j.otc.2010.06.001 pmid:20713245

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Gerb J,
   2. Ahmadi SA,
   3. Kierig E, et al

   . VOLT: a novel open-source pipeline for automatic segmentation of endolymphatic space in inner ear MRI. J Neurol 2020;267:185–96 pmid:32666134

   PubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Oehler MC,
   2. Schmalbrock P,
   3. Chakeres D, et al

   . Magnetic susceptibility artifacts on high-resolution MR of the temporal bone. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:1135–43 pmid:7639140

   PubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Lane JI,
   2. Ward H,
   3. Witte RJ, et al

   . 3-T imaging of the cochlear nerve and labyrinth in cochlear-implant candidates: 3D fast recovery fast spin-echo versus 3D constructive interference in the steady state techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:618–22 pmid:15090354

   PubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Naganawa S,
   2. Koshikawa T,
   3. Fukatsu H, et al

   . MR cisternography of the cerebellopontine angle: comparison of three-dimensional fast asymmetrical spin-echo and three-dimensional constructive interference in the steady-state sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1179–85 pmid:11415916

   PubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Fedorov A,
   2. Beichel R,
   3. Kalpathy-Cramer J, et al

   . 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012;30:1323–41 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 pmid:22770690

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Mugler JP, 3rd.,
   2. Bao S,
   3. Mulkern RV, et al

   . Optimized single-slab three-dimensional spin-echo MR imaging of the brain. Radiology 2000;216:891–99 doi:10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00au46891 pmid:10966728

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Ucar M,
   2. Guryildirim M,
   3. Tokgoz N, et al

   . Evaluation of aqueductal patency in patients with hydrocephalus: three-dimensional high-sampling-efficiency technique (SPACE) versus two-dimensional turbo spin echo at 3 Tesla. Korean J Radiol 2014;15:827–35 doi:10.3348/kjr.2014.15.6.827 pmid:25469096

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Lisanti C,
    2. Carlin C,
    3. Banks KP, et al

    . Normal MRI appearance and motion-related phenomena of CSF. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:716–25 doi:10.2214/AJR.05.0003 pmid:17312059

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Kartal MG,
    2. Algin O

    . Evaluation of hydrocephalus and other cerebrospinal fluid disorders with MRI: an update. Insights Imaging 2014;5:531–41 doi:10.1007/s13244-014-0333-5 pmid:24903254

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.
    1. Bradley WG Jr.,
    2. Scalzo D,
    3. Queralt J, et al

    . Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation with cerebrospinal fluid flow measurements at MR imaging. Radiology 1996;198:523–29 doi:10.1148/radiology.198.2.8596861 pmid:8596861

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.
    1. Sherman JL,
    2. Citrin CM

    . Magnetic resonance demonstration of normal CSF flow. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1986;7:3–6 pmid:3082142

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Algin O,
    2. Turkbey B,
    3. Ozmen E, et al

    . Evaluation of spontaneous third ventriculostomy by three-dimensional sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip-angle evolutions (3D-SPACE) sequence by 3T MR imaging: preliminary results with variant flip-angle mode. J Neuroradiol 2013;40:11–18 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2011.12.003 pmid:22305437

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Obrist D

    . Flow phenomena in the inner ear. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2019;51:487–510 doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040454

    CrossRef
16. 16.↵
    1. Roberts DC,
    2. Marcelli V,
    3. Gillen JS, et al

    . MRI magnetic field stimulates rotational sensors of the brain. Curr Biol 2011;21:1635–40 doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.029 pmid:21945276

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Ward BK,
    2. Roberts DC,
    3. Otero-Millan J, et al

    . A decade of magnetic vestibular stimulation: from serendipity to physics to the clinic. J Neurophysiol 2019;121:2013–19 doi:10.1152/jn.00873.2018 pmid:30969883

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Bradley WG Jr.

    Carmen lecture: flow phenomena in MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;150:983–94 doi:10.2214/ajr.150.5.983 pmid:3258729

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Buki B,
    2. Mair A,
    3. Pogson JM, et al

    . Three-dimensional high-resolution temporal bone histopathology identifies areas of vascular vulnerability in the inner ear. Audiol Neurootol 2022;27:249–59 doi:10.1159/000521397] pmid:4965531

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Buki B,
    2. Ward BK

    . Length of the narrow bony channels may not be the sole cause of differential involvement of the nerves in vestibular neuritis. Otol Neurotol 2021;42:e918–24 doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000003161 pmid:34260510

    CrossRefPubMed