Glioma-Induced Disruption of Resting-State Functional Connectivity and Amplitude of Low-Frequency Fluctuations in the Salience Network

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Schagen SB,
   2. Klein M,
   3. Reijneveld JC, et al

   . Monitoring and optimising cognitive function in cancer patients: present knowledge and future directions. EJC Suppl 2014;12:29–24 doi:10.1016/j.ejcsup.2014.03.003 pmid:26217164

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Taphoorn MJ,
   2. Klein M

   . Cognitive deficits in adult patients with brain tumours. Lancet Neurol 2004;3:159–68 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00680-5 pmid:14980531

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Bergo E,
   2. Lombardi G,
   3. Guglieri I, et al

   . Neurocognitive functions and health-related quality of life in glioblastoma patients: a concise review of the literature. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2019;28:e12410 doi:10.1111/ecc.12410 pmid:26531122

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Uddin LQ

   . Salience processing and insular cortical function and dysfunction. Nat Rev Neurosci 2015;16:55–61 doi:10.1038/nrn3857 pmid:25406711

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Goulden N,
   2. Khusnulina A,
   3. Davis NJ, et al

   . The salience network is responsible for switching between the default mode network and the central executive network: replication from DCM. Neuroimage 2014;99:180–90 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.052 pmid:24862074

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Seeley WW,
   2. Menon V,
   3. Schatzberg AF, et al

   . Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. J Neurosci 2007;27:2349–56 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5587-06.2007 pmid:17329432

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Menon V

   . Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: a unifying triple network model. Trends Cogn Sci 2011;15:483–506 doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.08.003 pmid:21908230

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Chand GB,
   2. Wu J,
   3. Hajjar I, et al

   . Interactions of the salience network and its subsystems with the default-mode and the central-executive networks in normal aging and mild cognitive impairment. Brain Connect 2017;7:401–12 doi:10.1089/brain.2017.0509 pmid:28707959

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Esposito R,
   2. Mattei PA,
   3. Briganti C, et al

   . Modifications of default-mode network connectivity in patients with cerebral glioma. PLoS One 2012;7:e40231 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040231 pmid:22808124

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Maesawa S,
    2. Bagarinao E,
    3. Fujii M, et al

    . Evaluation of resting state networks in patients with gliomas: connectivity changes in the unaffected side and its relation to cognitive function. PLoS One 2015;10:e0118072 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118072 pmid:25659130

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Liu D,
    2. Hu X,
    3. Liu Y, et al

    . Potential intra- or cross-network functional reorganization of the triple unifying networks in patients with frontal glioma. World Neurosurg 2019;128:e732–43 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.248 pmid:31077892

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Pillai JJ,
    2. Zaca D

    . Clinical utility of cerebrovascular reactivity mapping in patients with low grade gliomas. World J Clin Oncol 2011;2:397–403 doi:10.5306/wjco.v2.i12.397 pmid:22171282

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Pak RW,
    2. Hadjiabadi DH,
    3. Senarathna J, et al

    . Implications of neurovascular uncoupling in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of brain tumors. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2017;37:3475–87 doi:10.1177/0271678X17707398 pmid:28492341

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Hou BL,
    2. Bradbury M,
    3. Peck KK, et al

    . Effect of brain tumor neovasculature defined by rCBV on BOLD fMRI activation volume in the primary motor cortex. Neuroimage 2006;32:489–97 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.04.188 pmid:16806983

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Gupta L,
    2. Gupta RK,
    3. Postma AA, et al

    . Advanced and amplified BOLD fluctuations in high-grade gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018;47:1616–25 doi:10.1002/jmri.25869 pmid:28963852

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Zhang N,
    2. Xia M,
    3. Qiu T, et al

    . Reorganization of cerebro-cerebellar circuit in patients with left hemispheric gliomas involving language network: a combined structural and resting-state functional MRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 2018;39:4802 19 doi:10.1002/hbm.24324 pmid:30052314

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Liu D,
    2. Chen J,
    3. Hu X, et al

    . Contralesional homotopic functional plasticity in patients with temporal glioma. J Neurosurg 2020 Jan 10. [Epub ahead of print]doi:10.3171/2019.11.JNS191982 pmid:31923896

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Agarwal S,
    2. Lu H,
    3. Pillai JJ

    . Value of frequency domain resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging metrics amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation and fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation in the assessment of brain tumor-induced neurovascular uncoupling. Brain Connect 2017;7:382–89 doi:10.1089/brain.2016.0480 pmid:28657344

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Agarwal S,
    2. Sair HI,
    3. Airan R, et al

    . Demonstration of brain tumor-induced neurovascular uncoupling in resting-state fMRI at ultrahigh field. Brain Connect 2016;6:267–72 doi:10.1089/brain.2015.0402 pmid:26918887

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Harris RJ,
    2. Bookheimer SY,
    3. Cloughesy TF, et al

    . Altered functional connectivity of the default mode network in diffuse gliomas measured with pseudo-resting state fMRI. J Neurooncol 2014;116:373–79 doi:10.1007/s11060-013-1304-2 pmid:24234804

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Gohel S,
    2. Laino ME,
    3. Rajeev-Kumar G, et al

    . Resting-state functional connectivity of the middle frontal gyrus can predict language lateralization in patients with brain tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:319–25 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5932 pmid:30630835

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Sun H,
    2. Vachha B,
    3. Laino ME, et al

    . Decreased hand motor resting-state functional connectivity in patients with glioma: analysis of factors including neurovascular uncoupling. Radiology 2020;294:610–21 doi:10.1148/radiol.2019190089 pmid:31934827

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Zhang H,
    2. Shi Y,
    3. Yao C, et al

    . Alteration of the intra- and cross- hemisphere posterior default mode network in frontal lobe patients with glioma. Sci Rep 2016;6:26972 doi:10.1038/srep26972 pmid:27248706

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Nooner KB,
    2. Colcombe SJ,
    3. Tobe RH, et al

    . The NKI-Rockland Sample: a model for accelerating the pace of discovery science in psychiatry. Front Neurosci 2012;6:152 doi:10.3389/fnins.2012.00152 pmid:23087608

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Cox RW

    . AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res 1996;29:162–73 doi:10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014 pmid:8812068

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Friston KJ,
    2. Williams S,
    3. Howard R, et al

    . Movement-related effects in fMRI time-series. Magn Reson Med 1996;35:346–55 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910350312 pmid:8699946

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Jenkinson M,
    2. Bannister P,
    3. Brady M, et al

    . Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 2002;17:825–41 doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1132 pmid:12377157

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Baur V,
    2. Hanggi J,
    3. Langer N, et al

    . Resting-state functional and structural connectivity within an insula-amygdala route specifically index state and trait anxiety. Biol Psychiatry 2013;73:85–92 doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.06.003 pmid:22770651

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Gohel S,
    2. Gallego JA,
    3. Robinson DG, et al

    . Frequency specific resting state functional abnormalities in psychosis. Hum Brain Mapp 2018;39:4509–18 doi:10.1002/hbm.24302 pmid:30160325

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Dosenbach NU,
    2. Nardos B,
    3. Cohen AL, et al

    . Prediction of individual brain maturity using fMRI. Science 2010;329:1358–61 doi:10.1126/science.1194144 pmid:20829489

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. Schuirmann DJ

    . A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1987;15:657–80 doi:10.1007/BF01068419 pmid:3450848

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Louis DN,
    2. Perry A,
    3. Reifenberger G, et al

    . The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 2016;131:803–20 doi:10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1 pmid:27157931

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Menon V,
    2. Uddin LQ

    . Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function. Brain Struct Funct 2010;214:655–67 doi:10.1007/s00429-010-0262-0 pmid:20512370

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. Uddin LQ,
    2. Nomi JS,
    3. Hebert-Seropian B, et al

    . Structure and function of the human insula. J Clin Neurophysiol 2017;34:300–06 doi:10.1097/WNP.0000000000000377 pmid:28644199

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Sridharan D,
    2. Levitin DJ,
    3. Menon V

    . A critical role for the right fronto-insular cortex in switching between central-executive and default-mode networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:12569–74 doi:10.1073/pnas.0800005105 pmid:18723676

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    1. Agarwal S,
    2. Sair HI,
    3. Yahyavi-Firouz-Abadi N, et al

    . Neurovascular uncoupling in resting state fMRI demonstrated in patients with primary brain gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016;43:620–26 doi:10.1002/jmri.25012 pmid:26201672

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Hadjiabadi DH,
    2. Pung L,
    3. Zhang J, et al

    . Brain tumors disrupt the resting-state connectome. Neuroimage Clin 2018;18:279–89 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.01.026 pmid:29876248

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    1. Holodny AI,
    2. Schulder M,
    3. Liu WC, et al

    . Decreased BOLD functional MR activation of the motor and sensory cortices adjacent to a glioblastoma multiforme: implications for image-guided neurosurgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:609–12 pmid:10319970

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    1. Cheng X,
    2. Gao PY

    . Abnormal neural activity in children with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma had manifested deficit in behavioral inhibition: a resting-state functional MRI study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2019;43:547–52 doi:10.1097/RCT.0000000000000881 pmid:31162235

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Di X,
    2. Kim EH,
    3. Huang CC, et al

    . The influence of the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations on resting-state functional connectivity. Front Hum Neurosci 2013;7:118 doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00118 pmid:23565090

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Zou QH,
    2. Zhu CZ,
    3. Yang Y, et al

    . An improved approach to detection of amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) for resting-state fMRI: fractional ALFF. J Neurosci Methods 2008;172:137 141 doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.04.012 pmid:18501969

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. 42.↵
    1. Zuo XN,
    2. Di Martino A,
    3. Kelly C, et al

    . The oscillating brain: complex and reliable. Neuroimage 2010;49:1432–45 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.037 pmid:19782143

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
43. 43.↵
    1. Biswal BB,
    2. Mennes M,
    3. Zuo XN, et al

    . Toward discovery science of human brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:4734–39 doi:10.1073/pnas.0911855107 pmid:28686856

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
44. 44.↵
    1. Liu P,
    2. Welch BG,
    3. Li Y, et al

    . Multiparametric imaging of brain hemodynamics and function using gas-inhalation MRI. Neuroimage 2017;146:715–23 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.063 pmid:27693197

    CrossRefPubMed