Flow Patterns in Carotid Webs: A Patient-Based Computational Fluid Dynamics Study

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Choi PM,
   3. Singh D,
   4. Trivedi A, et al

   . Carotid webs and recurrent ischemic strokes in the era of CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:2134–39 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4431 pmid:26228877

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Joux J,
   3. Chausson N,
   4. Jeannin S, et al

   . Carotid-bulb atypical fibromuscular dysplasia in young Afro-Caribbean patients with stroke. Stroke 2014;45:3711–13 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007313 pmid:25358695

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Haussen DC,
   3. Grossberg JA,
   4. Bouslama M, et al

   . Carotid web (intimal fibromuscular dysplasia) has high stroke recurrence risk and is amenable to stenting. Stroke 2017;48:3134–37 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019020 pmid:29018133

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Malek AM,
   3. Alper SL,
   4. Izumo S

   . Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA 1999;282:2035–42 doi:10.1001/jama.282.21.2035 pmid:10591386

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Sui B,
   3. Gao P,
   4. Lin Y, et al

   . Blood flow pattern and wall shear stress in the internal carotid arteries of healthy subjects. Acta Radiol 2008;49:806–14 doi:10.1080/02841850802068624 pmid:19143065

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Perktold K,
   3. Resch M,
   4. Florian H

   . Pulsatile non-Newtonian flow characteristics in a three-dimensional human carotid bifurcation model. J Biomech Eng 1991;113:464–75 doi:10.1115/1.2895428 pmid:1762445

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Kamenskiy AV,
   3. Dzenis YA,
   4. Mactaggart JN, et al

   . In vivo three-dimensional blood velocity profile shapes in the human common, internal, and external carotid arteries. J Vasc Surg 2011;54:1011–20 doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2011.03.254 pmid:21620627

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Cebral JR,
   3. Yim PJ,
   4. Löhner R, et al

   . Blood flow modeling in carotid arteries with computational fluid dynamics and MR imaging. Acad Radiol 2002;9:1286–99 doi:10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80562-7 pmid:12449361

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Lee SE,
   3. Lee SW,
   4. Fischer PF, et al

   . Direct numerical simulation of transitional flow in a stenosed carotid bifurcation. J Biomech 2008;41:2551–61 doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.03.038 pmid:18656199

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Stroud JS,
    3. Berger SA,
    4. Saloner D

    . Numerical analysis of flow through a severely stenotic carotid artery bifurcation. J Biomech Eng 2002;124:9–20 doi:10.1115/1.1427042 pmid:11871610

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Steinman DA,
    3. Thomas JB,
    4. Ladak HM, et al

    . Reconstruction of carotid bifurcation hemodynamics and wall thickness using computational fluid dynamics and MRI. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:149–59 doi:10.1002/mrm.10025 pmid:11754454

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Marshall I,
    3. Zhao S,
    4. Papathanasopoulou P, et al

    . MRI and CFD studies of pulsatile flow in healthy and stenosed carotid bifurcation models. J Biomech 2004;37:679–87 doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.09.032 pmid:15046997

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Lancellotti RM,
    3. Vergara C,
    4. Valdettaro L, et al

    . Large eddy simulations for blood dynamics in realistic stenotic carotids. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 2017;33 doi:10.1002/cnm.2868 pmid:28124821

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Carallo C,
    3. Lucca LF,
    4. Ciamei M, et al

    . Wall shear stress is lower in the carotid artery responsible for a unilateral ischemic stroke. Atherosclerosis 2006;185:108–13 doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.05.019 pmid:16005010

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Peiffer V,
    3. Sherwin SJ,
    4. Weinberg PD

    . Computation in the rabbit aorta of a new metric, the transverse wall shear stress, to quantify the multidirectional character of disturbed blood flow. J Biomech 2013;46:2651–58 doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.08.003 pmid:24044966

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Mohamied Y,
    3. Sherwin SJ,
    4. Weinberg PD

    . Understanding the fluid mechanics behind transverse wall shear stress. J Biomech 2017;50:102–09 doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.035 pmid:27863740

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. He X,
    3. Ku DN

    . Pulsatile flow in the human left coronary artery bifurcation: average conditions. J Biomech Eng 1996;118:74–82 doi:10.1115/1.2795948 pmid:8833077

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Cheng C,
    3. Tempel D,
    4. van Haperen R, et al

    . Atherosclerotic lesion size and vulnerability are determined by patterns of fluid shear stress. Circulation 2006;113:2744–53 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.590018 pmid:16754802

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Berkhemer OA,
    3. Fransen PS,
    4. Beumer D, et al

    . A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:11–20 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1411587 pmid:25517348

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    Horos Project. DICOM image viewing and measuring. Horos. https://horosproject.org/about/. Accessed March 5, 2019.
21. 21.↵
    2. Cheng C,
    3. Helderman F,
    4. Tempel D, et al

    . Large variations in absolute wall shear stress levels within one species and between species. Atherosclerosis 2007;195:225–35 doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2006.11.019 pmid:17169362

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Groen HC,
    3. Simons L,
    4. van den Bouwhuijsen QJ, et al

    . MRI-based quantification of outflow boundary conditions for computational fluid dynamics of stenosed human carotid arteries. J Biomech 2010;43:2332–38 doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.04.039 pmid:20627249

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Seo T,
    3. Schachter LG,
    4. Barakat AI

    . Computational study of fluid mechanical disturbance induced by endovascular stents. Ann Biomed Eng 2005;33:444–56 doi:10.1007/s10439-005-2499-y pmid:15909650

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Lee SW,
    3. Antiga L,
    4. Spence JD, et al

    . Geometry of the carotid bifurcation predicts its exposure to disturbed flow. Stroke 2008;39:2341–47 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.510644 pmid:18556585

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Schrauwen JT,
    3. Karanasos A,
    4. van Ditzhuijzen NS, et al

    . Influence of the accuracy of angiography-based reconstructions on velocity and wall shear stress computations in coronary bifurcations: a phantom study. PLoS One 2015;10:e0145114 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145114 pmid:26690897

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Schoephoerster RT,
    3. Oynes F,
    4. Nunez G, et al

    . Effects of local geometry and fluid dynamics on regional platelet deposition on artificial surfaces. Arterioscler Thromb 1993;13:1806–13 doi:10.1161/01.ATV.13.12.1806 pmid:8241101

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. Slager CJ,
    3. Wentzel JJ,
    4. Gijsen FJ, et al

    . The role of shear stress in the destabilization of vulnerable plaques and related therapeutic implications. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2005;2:456–64 doi:10.1038/ncpcardio0298 pmid:16265586

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    2. Botnar R,
    3. Rappitsch G,
    4. Scheidegger MB, et al

    . Hemodynamics in the carotid artery bifurcation: a comparison between numerical simulations and in vitro MRI measurements. J Biomech 2000;33:137–44 doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00164-5 pmid:10653026

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Chatzizisis YS,
    3. Coskun AU,
    4. Jonas M, et al

    . Role of endothelial shear stress in the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling: molecular, cellular, and vascular behavior. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:2379–93 doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.059 pmid:17599600

    FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    2. Zhang Q,
    3. Gao B,
    4. Gu K, et al

    . The study on hemodynamic effect of varied support models of BJUT-II VAD on coronary artery: a primary CFD study. ASAIO J 2014;60:643–51 doi:10.1097/MAT.0000000000000137 pmid:25373559

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Sherman TF

    . On connecting large vessels to small: the meaning of Murray's law. J Gen Physiol 1981;78:431–53 doi:10.1085/jgp.78.4.431 pmid:7288393

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    2. von Schulthess GK,
    3. Higgins CB

    . Blood flow imaging with MR: spin-phase phenomena. Radiology 1985;157:687–95 doi:10.1148/radiology.157.3.2997836 pmid:2997836

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    2. Gijsen FJ,
    3. Palmen DE,
    4. van der Beek MH, et al

    . Analysis of the axial flow field in stenosed carotid artery bifurcation models: LDA experiments. J Biomech 1996;29:1483–89 doi:10.1016/0021-9290(96)84544-1 pmid:8894929

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Compagne KC,
    3. van Es AC,
    4. Berkhemer OA, et al

    ; MR CLEAN Trial Investigators. Prevalence of carotid web in patients with acute intracranial stroke due to intracranial large vessel occlusion. Radiology 2018;286:1000–07 doi:10.1148/radiol.2017170094 pmid:29040040

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Pereira BJ,
    3. Batista UC,
    4. Tosello RT, et al

    . Web vessels: literature review and neurointerventional management. World Neurosurg 2018;110:e907–16 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.115 pmid:29191528

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    2. Coutinho JM,
    3. Derkatch S,
    4. Potvin AR, et al

    . Carotid artery web and ischemic stroke: a case-control study. Neurology 2017;88:65–69 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000003464 pmid:27864523

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    2. Kirchhof P,
    3. Benussi S,
    4. Kotecha D, et al

    . 2016 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2017;70:50 doi:10.1016/j.rec.2016.11.033 pmid:28038729

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    2. Elmokadem AH,
    3. Ansari SA,
    4. Sangha R, et al

    . Neurointerventional management of carotid webs associated with recurrent and acute cerebral ischemic syndromes. Interv Neuroradiol 2016;22:432–37 doi:10.1177/1591019916633245 pmid:26922976

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Agid R,
    4. Pereira VM

    . Carotid stenting for treatment of symptomatic carotid webs: a single-center case series. Interv Neurol 2018;7:233–40 doi:10.1159/000486537 pmid:29765392

    CrossRefPubMed