Optimal Fat Suppression in Head and Neck MRI: Comparison of Multipoint Dixon with 2 Different Fat-Suppression Techniques, Spectral Presaturation and Inversion Recovery, and STIR

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Del Grande FD,
   3. Santini F,
   4. Herzka DA, et al

   . Fat-suppression techniques for 3-T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Radiographics 2014;34:217–33 doi:10.1148/rg.341135130 pmid:24428292

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Ma J

   . Dixon techniques for water and fat imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:543–58 doi:10.1002/jmri.21492 pmid:18777528

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Ma J,
   3. Singh SK,
   4. Kumar AJ, et al

   . T2-weighted spine imaging with a fast three-point Dixon technique: comparison with chemical shift selective fat suppression. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:1025–29 doi:10.1002/jmri.20201 pmid:15558561

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Ma J,
   3. Jackson EF,
   4. Kumar AJ, et al

   . Improving fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging of the head and neck with 2 fast spin-echo Dixon techniques: initial experiences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:42–45 pmid:18653688

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Rybicki FJ,
   3. Mulkern RV,
   4. Robertson RL, et al

   . Fast three-point Dixon MR imaging of the retrobulbar space with low-resolution images for phase correction: comparison with fast spin-echo inversion recovery imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1798–802

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Tien RD

   . Fat-suppression MR imaging in neuroradiology: techniques and clinical application. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:369–79 doi:10.2214/ajr.158.2.1729800 pmid:1729800

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Bydder GM,
   3. Steiner RE,
   4. Blumgart LH, et al

   . MR imaging of the liver using short TI inversion recovery sequences. J Comp Assist Tomogr 1985;9:1084–89 doi:10.1097/00004728-198511000-00015 pmid:4056142

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Bydder GM,
   3. Young IR

   . MR imaging: clinical use of the inversion recovery sequence. J Comp Assist Tomogr 1985;9:659–75 doi:10.1097/00004728-198507010-00002 pmid:2991345

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Shuman WP,
   3. Baron RL,
   4. Peters MJ, et al

   . Comparison of STIR and spin-echo MR imaging at 1.5 T in 90 lesions of the chest, liver, and pelvis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;152:853–59 doi:10.2214/ajr.152.4.853 pmid:2784268

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Dixon WT

    . Simple proton spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 1984;153:189–94 doi:10.1148/radiology.153.1.6089263 pmid:6089263

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Hardy PA,
    3. Hinks RS,
    4. Tkach JA

    . Separation of fat and water in fast spin-echo MR imaging with the three-point Dixon technique. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995;5:181–85 doi:10.1002/jmri.1880050213 pmid:7766980

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Low RN,
    3. Austin MJ,
    4. Ma J

    . Fast spin-echo triple echo Dixon: initial clinical experience with a novel pulse sequence for simultaneous fat-suppressed and nonfat-suppressed T2-weighted spine magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;33:390–400 doi:10.1002/jmri.22453 pmid:21274981

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Yeung HN,
    3. Kormos DW

    . Separation of true fat and water images by correcting magnetic field inhomogeneity in situ. Radiology 1986;159:783–86 doi:10.1148/radiology.159.3.3704157 pmid:3704157

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Glover GH,
    3. Schneider E

    . Three-point Dixon technique for true water/fat decomposition with B0 inhomogeneity correction. Magn Reson Med 1991;18:371–83 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910180211 pmid:2046518

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Glover GH

    . Multipoint Dixon technique for water and fat proton and susceptibility imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1991;1:521–30 doi:10.1002/jmri.1880010504 pmid:1790376

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Maas M,
    3. Hollak CE,
    4. Akkerman EM, et al

    . Quantification of skeletal involvement in adults with type I Gaucher's disease: fat fraction measured by Dixon quantitative chemical shift imaging as a valid parameter. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:961–65 doi:10.2214/ajr.179.4.1790961 pmid:12239046

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Wang Y,
    3. Li D,
    4. Haacke EM, et al

    . A three-point Dixon method for water and fat separation using 2D and 3D gradient-echo techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:703–10 doi:10.1002/jmri.1880080329 pmid:9626890

    CrossRefPubMed