Does 3T Fetal MRI Improve Image Resolution of Normal Brain Structures between 20 and 24 Weeks' Gestational Age?

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Smith FW,
   3. Adam AH,
   4. Phillips WD

   . NMR imaging in pregnancy. Lancet 1983;1:61–62 pmid:6129387

   PubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Levine D,
   3. Barnes PD,
   4. Sher S, et al

   . Fetal fast MR imaging: reproducibility, technical quality, and conspicuity of anatomy. Radiology 1998;206:549–54 doi:10.1148/radiology.206.2.9457211 pmid:9457211

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Mack A,
   3. Wolff R,
   4. Scheib S, et al

   . Analyzing 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging units for implementation in radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 2005;102(suppl):158–64 doi:10.3171/jns.2005.102.s_supplement.0158 pmid:15662802

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. De Marzi R,
   3. Seppi K,
   4. Högl B, et al

   . Loss of dorsolateral nigral hyperintensity on 3.0 Tesla susceptibility-weighted imaging in idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder. Ann Neurol 2016;79:1026–30 doi:10.1002/ana.24646 pmid:27016314

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Peng L,
   3. Xiao Y,
   4. Liu L, et al

   . Evaluation of cochlear nerve diameter and cross-sectional area in ANSD patients by 3.0-Tesla MRI. Acta Otolaryngol 2016;136:792–99 doi:10.3109/00016489.2016.1159329 pmid:27003148

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Schwarz ST,
   3. Afzal M,
   4. Morgan PS, et al

   . The ‘swallow tail' appearance of the healthy nigrosome: a new accurate test of Parkinson's disease—a case-control and retrospective cross-sectional MRI study at 3T. PLoS One 2014;9:e93814 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093814 pmid:24710392

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Victoria T,
   3. Jaramillo D,
   4. Roberts T, et al

   . Fetal magnetic resonance imaging: jumping from 1.5 to 3 Tesla (preliminary experience). Pediatr Radiol 2014;44:376–86; quiz 373–75 doi:10.1007/s00247-013-2857-0 pmid:24671739

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Victoria T,
   3. Johnson A,
   4. Edgar J, et al

   . Comparison between 1.5 T and 3 T MRI for fetal imaging: is there an advantage to imaging with a higher field strength? AJR Am J Reontgenol 2016;206:195–201 doi:10.2214/AJR.14.14205 pmid:26700352

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Krishnamurthy U,
   3. Neelavalli J,
   4. Mody S, et al

   . MR imaging of the fetal brain at 1.5T and 3.0T field strengths: comparing specific absorption rate (SAR) and image quality. J Perinat Med 2015;43:209–20 doi:10.1515/jpm-2014-0268 pmid:25324440

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Qiu Al,
    3. Mori S,
    4. Miller MI

    . Diffusion tensor imaging for understanding brain development in early life. Annu Rev Psychol 2015;66:853–76 doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015340 pmid:25559117

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Cetin I,
    3. Barberis B,
    4. Brusati V, et al

    . Lactate detection in the brain of growth-restricted fetuses with magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:350.e1–7 doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.020 pmid:21861968

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Glenn OA

    . MR imaging of the fetal brain. Pediatr Radiol 2009;40:68–81 doi:10.1007/s00247-009-1459-3

    CrossRef
13. 13.↵
    2. Hothorn T,
    3. Bretz F,
    4. Westfall P

    . Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J 2008;50:346–63 doi:10.1002/bimj.200810425 pmid:18481363

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Garel C,
    3. Chantrel E,
    4. Brisse H, et al

    . Fetal cerebral cortex: normal gestational landmarks identified using prenatal MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:184–89 pmid:11158907

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Rossi AC,
    3. Prefumo F

    . Additional value of fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system anomalies: a systematic review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;44:388–93 doi:10.1002/uog.13429 pmid:24890732

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Graf H,
    3. Schick F,
    4. Claussen CD, et al

    . MR visualization of the inner ear structures: comparison of 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla images. Rofo 2004;176:17–20 doi:10.1055/s-2004-814672 pmid:14712402

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Inui H,
    3. Sakamoto T,
    4. Ito T, et al

    . Volumetric measurements of the inner ear in patients with Meniere's disease using three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Otolaryngol 2016;136:888–93 doi:10.3109/00016489.2016.1168940 pmid:27187035

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Katorza E,
    3. Bertucci E,
    4. Perlman S, et al

    . Development of the fetal vermis: new biometry reference data and comparison of 3 diagnostic modalities: 3D ultrasound, 2D ultrasound, and MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1359–66 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4725 pmid:27032974

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Komiyama M,
    3. Ishiguro T,
    4. Kitano S, et al

    . Serial antenatal sonographic observation of cerebral dural sinus malformation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1446–48 pmid:15466350

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. McInnes M,
    3. Fong K,
    4. Grin A, et al

    . Malformations of the fetal dural sinuses. Can J Neurol Sci 2009;36:72–77 doi:10.1017/S031716710000634X pmid:19294892

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Widjaja E,
    3. Geibprasert S,
    4. Mahmoodabadi SZ, et al

    . Alteration of human fetal subplate layer and intermediate zone during normal development on MR and diffusion tensor imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1091–99 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1985 pmid:20075102

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Mellerio C,
    3. Labeyrie MA,
    4. Chassoux F, et al

    . 3T MRI improves the detection of transmantle sign in type 2 focal cortical dysplasia. Epilepsia 2014;55:117–22 doi:10.1111/epi.12464 pmid:24237393

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Murbach M,
    3. Neufeld E,
    4. Samaras T, et al

    . Pregnant women models analyzed for RF exposure and temperature increase in 3T RF shimmed birdcages. Magn Reson Med 2017;77:2048–56 doi:10.1002/mrm.26268 pmid:27174499

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Shen SH,
    3. Guo WY,
    4. Hung JH

    . Two-dimensional fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA) cine acquisition of fetal non-central nervous system abnormalities. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:672–77 doi:10.1002/jmri.21054 pmid:17729346

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Griffiths PD,
    3. Jarvis D,
    4. McQuillan H, et al

    . MRI of the foetal brain using a rapid 3D steady-state sequence. Br J Radiol 2013;86:20130168 doi:10.1259/bjr.20130168 pmid:24043616

    Abstract/FREE Full Text