Acute Cytotoxic and Vasogenic Edema after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Quantitative MRI Study

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Frontera JA,
   3. Provencio JJ,
   4. Sehba FA, et al

   . The role of platelet activation and inflammation in early brain injury following subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 2017;26:48–57 doi:10.1007/s12028-016-0292-4 pmid:27430874

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Wartenberg KE,
   3. Schmidt JM,
   4. Claassen J, et al

   . Impact of medical complications on outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Crit Care Med 2006;34:617–23, quiz 624 pmid:16521258

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Grote E,
   3. Hassler W

   . The critical first minutes after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 1988;22:654–61 doi:10.1227/00006123-198804000-00006 pmid:3287211

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Sehba FA,
   3. Bederson JB

   . Mechanisms of acute brain injury after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurol Res 2006;28:381–98 doi:10.1179/016164106X114991 pmid:16759442

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Sehba FA,
   3. Mostafa G,
   4. Friedrich V Jr., et al

   . Acute microvascular platelet aggregation after subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 2005;102:1094–100 doi:10.3171/jns.2005.102.6.1094 pmid:16028769

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Friedrich V,
   3. Flores R,
   4. Muller A, et al

   . Reduction of neutrophil activity decreases early microvascular injury after subarachnoid haemorrhage. J Neuroinflammation 2011;8:103 doi:10.1186/1742-2094-8-103 pmid:21854561

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Sehba FA,
   3. Friedrich V

   . Early micro vascular changes after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2011;110(Pt 1):49–55 doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-0353-1_9 pmid:21116914

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Frontera JA,
   3. Ahmed W,
   4. Zach V, et al

   . Acute ischaemia after subarachnoid haemorrhage, relationship with early brain injury and impact on outcome: a prospective quantitative MRI study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2015;86:71–78 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2013-307313 pmid:24715224

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Hadeishi H,
   3. Suzuki A,
   4. Yasui N, et al

   . Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 2002;50:741–47; discussion 747–48 pmid:11904024

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Sato K,
    3. Shimizu H,
    4. Fujimura M, et al

    . Acute-stage diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for predicting outcome of poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2010;30:1110–20 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2009.264 pmid:20051974

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Wartenberg KE,
    3. Sheth SJ,
    4. Michael Schmidt J, et al

    . Acute ischemic injury on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging after poor grade subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 2011;14:407–15 doi:10.1007/s12028-010-9488-1 pmid:21174171

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Hunt WE,
    3. Hess RM

    . Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1968;28:14–20 doi:10.3171/jns.1968.28.1.0014 pmid:5635959

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Smith SM

    . Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 2002;17:143–55 doi:10.1002/hbm.10062 pmid:12391568

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Mlynash M,
    3. Campbell DM,
    4. Leproust EM, et al

    . Temporal and spatial profile of brain diffusion-weighted MRI after cardiac arrest. Stroke 2010;41:1665–72 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.582452 pmid:20595666

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Frontera JA,
    3. Claassen J,
    4. Schmidt JM, et al

    . Prediction of symptomatic vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage: the modified Fisher scale. Neurosurgery 2006;59:21–27; discussion 21–27 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000218821.34014.1B pmid:16823296

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Wijman CA,
    3. Mlynash M,
    4. Caulfield AF, et al

    . Prognostic value of brain diffusion-weighted imaging after cardiac arrest. Ann Neurol 2009;65:394–402 doi:10.1002/ana.21632 pmid:19399889

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Veelken JA,
    3. Laing RJC,
    4. Jakubowski J

    . The Sheffield model of subarachnoid hemorrhage in rats. Stroke 1995;26:1279–84; discussion 1284 doi:10.1161/01.STR.26.7.1279 pmid:7604426

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Bederson JB,
    3. Germano IM,
    4. Guarino L

    . Cortical blood flow and cerebral perfusion pressure in a new noncraniotomy model of subarachnoid hemorrhage in the rat. Stroke 1995;26:1086–91; discussion 1091–92 pmid:7762027

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Busch E,
    3. Beaulieu C,
    4. de Crespigny A, et al

    . Diffusion MR imaging during acute subarachnoid hemorrhage in rats. Stroke 1998;29:2155–61 doi:10.1161/01.STR.29.10.2155 pmid:9756598

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Friedrich V,
    3. Flores R,
    4. Muller A, et al

    . Luminal platelet aggregates in functional deficits in parenchymal vessels after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Brain Res 2010;1354:179–87 doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.07.040 pmid:20654597

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Friedrich V,
    3. Flores R,
    4. Muller A, et al

    . Escape of intraluminal platelets into brain parenchyma after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neuroscience 2010;165:968–75 doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.10.038 pmid:19861151

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Hussain S,
    3. Barbarite E,
    4. Chaudhry NS, et al

    . Search for biomarkers of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review. World Neurosurg 2015;84:1473–83 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2015.06.034 pmid:26117089

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Chen S,
    3. Feng H,
    4. Sherchan P, et al

    . Controversies and evolving new mechanisms in subarachnoid hemorrhage. Prog Neurobiol 2014;115:64–91 doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.09.002 pmid:24076160

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. De Marchis GM,
    3. Filippi CG,
    4. Guo X, et al

    . Brain injury visible on early MRI after subarachnoid hemorrhage might predict neurological impairment and functional outcome. Neurocrit Care 2015;22:74–81 doi:10.1007/s12028-014-0008-6 pmid:25012392

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Liu Y,
    3. Soppi V,
    4. Mustonen T, et al

    . Subarachnoid hemorrhage in the subacute stage: elevated apparent diffusion coefficient in normal-appearing brain tissue after treatment. Radiology 2007;242:518–25 doi:10.1148/radiol.2422051698 pmid:17179395

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Shanmuganathan K,
    3. Gullapalli RP,
    4. Mirvis SE, et al

    . Whole-brain apparent diffusion coefficient in traumatic brain injury: correlation with Glasgow Coma Scale score. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:539–44 pmid:15090338

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. Nagesh V,
    3. Welch KMA,
    4. Windham JP, et al

    . Time course of ADCw changes in ischemic stroke: beyond the human eye! Stroke 1998;29:1778–82 pmid:9731594

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Schlaug G,
    3. Siewert B,
    4. Benfield A, et al

    . Time course of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) abnormality in human stroke. Neurology 1997;49:113–19 doi:10.1212/WNL.49.1.113 pmid:9222178

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.
    2. van Swieten JC,
    3. Koudstaal PJ,
    4. Visser MC, et al

    . Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1988;19:604–07 doi:10.1161/01.STR.19.5.604 pmid:3363593

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.
    2. Hartley C,
    3. Cozens A,
    4. Mendelow AD, et al

    . The Apache II scoring system in neurosurgical patients: a comparison with simple Glasgow coma scoring. Br J Neurosurg 1995;9:179–87 doi:10.1080/02688699550041520 pmid:7632364

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.
    2. Hijdra A,
    3. Brouwers PJ,
    4. Vermeulen M, et al

    . Grading the amount of blood on computed tomograms after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 1990;21:1156–61 doi:10.1161/01.STR.21.8.1156 pmid:2389295

    Abstract/FREE Full Text