Middle Cerebral Artery Bifurcation Aneurysms Treated by Extrasaccular Flow Diverters: Midterm Angiographic Evolution and Clinical Outcome

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Pistocchi S,
   3. Blanc R,
   4. Bartolini B, et al

   . Flow diverters at and beyond the level of the circle of Willis for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2012;43:1032–38 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.636019 pmid:22282890

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Brinjikji W,
   3. Lanzino G,
   4. Cloft HJ, et al

   . Patency of the posterior communicating artery after flow diversion treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2014;120:84–88 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.02.018 pmid:24731582

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Cekirge HS,
   3. Saatci I

   . A new aneurysm occlusion classification after the impact of flow modification. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:19–24 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4489 pmid:26316566

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Yavuz K,
   3. Geyik S,
   4. Saatci I, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms with flow modification with the use of the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:529–35 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3692 pmid:24072620

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Saleme S,
   3. Iosif C,
   4. Ponomarjova S, et al

   . Flow-diverting stents for intracranial bifurcation aneurysm treatment. Neurosurgery 2014;75:623–31; quiz 631 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000522 pmid:25121791

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Iosif C,
   3. Camilleri Y,
   4. Saleme S, et al

   . Diffusion-weighted imaging-detected ischemic lesions associated with flow-diverting stents in intracranial aneurysms: safety, potential mechanisms, clinical outcome, and concerns. J Neurosurg 2015;122:627–36 doi:10.3171/2014.10.JNS132566 pmid:25559933

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Saatci I,
   3. Yavuz K,
   4. Ozer C, et al

   . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the Pipeline flow-diverter embolization device: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1436–46 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3246 pmid:22821921

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Santiago-Dieppa DR,
   3. Pannell JS,
   4. Khalessi AA

   . Endovascular and surgical options for ruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms: review of the literature. Stroke Res Treat 2014;2014:315906 doi:10.1155/2014/315906 pmid:25097795

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Nussbaum ES,
   3. Defillo A

   . Surgical management and alternative strategies for neighboring intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg Sci 2012;56:345–48 pmid:3111295

   PubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Becske T,
    3. Kallmes DF,
    4. Saatci I, et al

    . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Zhou Y,
    4. Yang P, et al

    . Comparison of the flow diverter and stent-assisted coiling in large and giant aneurysms: safety and efficacy based on a propensity score-matched analysis. Eur Radiol 2016;26:2369–77 doi:10.1007/s00330-015-4052-51 pmid:26471273

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Caroff J,
    3. Neki H,
    4. Mihalea C, et al

    . Flow-diverter stents for the treatment of saccular middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:279–84 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4540 pmid:26405085

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Zanaty M,
    3. Chalouhi N,
    4. Tjoumakaris SI, et al

    . Flow diversion for complex middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Neuroradiology 2014;56:381–87 doi:10.1007/s00234-014-1339-x pmid:24535072

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Fischer S,
    3. Perez MA,
    4. Kurre W, et al

    . Pipeline embolization device for the treatment of intra- and extracranial fusiform and dissecting aneurysms: initial experience and long-term follow-up. Neurosurgery 2014;75:364–74; discussion 374 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000431 pmid:24871140

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Iosif C,
    3. Saleme S,
    4. Ponsonnard S, et al

    . Intravascular optical coherence tomography for the evaluation of arterial bifurcations covered by flow diverters. J Neurointerv Surg 2016 Jan 27. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012084 pmid:26819448

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Iosif C,
    3. Berg P,
    4. Ponsonnard S, et al

    . Role of terminal and anastomotic circulation in the patency of arteries jailed by flow-diverting stents: from hemodynamic changes to ostia surface modifications. J Neurosurg 2016:1–12 [Epub ahead of print] pmid:27203141
17. 17.↵
    2. Iosif C,
    3. Berg P,
    4. Ponsonnard S, et al

    . Role of terminal and anastomotic circulation in the patency of arteries jailed by flow-diverting stents: animal flow model evaluation and preliminary results. J Neurosurg 2016;125:898–908 doi:10.3171/2015.8.JNS151296 pmid:26771853

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Gawlitza M,
    3. Januel AC,
    4. Tall P, et al

    . Flow diversion treatment of complex bifurcation aneurysms beyond the circle of Willis: a single-center series with special emphasis on covered cortical branches and perforating arteries. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:481–87 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011682 pmid:25878068

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Topcuoglu OM,
    3. Akgul E,
    4. Daglioglu E, et al

    . Flow diversion in middle cerebral artery aneurysms: is it really an all-purpose treatment? World Neurosurg 2016;87:317–27 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2015.11.073 pmid:26723288

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Washington CW,
    3. Ju T,
    4. Zipfel GJ, et al

    . Middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms: an anatomic classification scheme for planning optimal surgical strategies. Neurosurgery 2014;10(suppl 1):145–53; discussion 153–55 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000250 pmid:24226424

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    Epilepsy: a clinical and experimental research—Proceedings of the Second European Regional Conference on Epilepsy, Warsaw, October 5–7, 1978. Monogr Neural Sci 1980;5:1–306 pmid:6119608

    PubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Berge J,
    3. Biondi A,
    4. Machi P, et al

    . Flow-diverter Silk stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: 1-year follow-up in a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1150–55 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2907 pmid:22300924

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Pierot L,
    3. Spelle L,
    4. Molyneux A, et al

    . Clinical and anatomical follow-up in patients with aneurysms treated with the WEB device: 1-year follow-up report in the cumulated population of 2 prospective, multicenter series (WEBCAST and French Observatory). Neurosurgery 2016;78:133–41 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000001106 pmid:26552042

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Spiotta AM,
    3. Hui F,
    4. Schuette A, et al

    . Patterns of aneurysm recurrence after microsurgical clip obliteration. Neurosurgery 2013;72:65–69; discussion 69 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318276b46b pmid:23096416

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Cekirge HS,
    3. Islak C,
    4. Firat MM, et al

    . Endovascular coil embolization of residual or recurrent aneurysms after surgical clipping. Acta Radiol 2000;41:111–15 doi:10.1034/j.1600-0455.2000.041002111.x pmid:10741780

    FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Lubicz B,
    3. Leclerc X,
    4. Gauvrit JY, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of remnants of intracranial aneurysms following incomplete clipping. Neuroradiology 2004;46:318–22 doi:10.1007/s00234-004-1165-67 pmid:14999436

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Ding D,
    3. Starke RM,
    4. Evans AJ, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of recurrent intracranial aneurysms following previous microsurgical clipping with the Pipeline Embolization Device. J Clin Neurosci 2014;21:1241–44 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2013.12.008 pmid:24529950

    CrossRefPubMed