Treatment of Intra- and Extracranial Aneurysms Using the Flow-Redirection Endoluminal Device: Multicenter Experience and Follow-Up Results

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Fischer S,
   3. Vajda Z,
   4. Aguilar Perez M, et al

   . Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections. Neuroradiology 2012;54:369–82 doi:10.1007/s00234-011-0948-x pmid:21881914

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Brinjikji W,
   3. Murad MH,
   4. Lanzino G, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2013;44:442–47 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.678151 pmid:23321438

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. D'Urso PI,
   3. Lanzino G,
   4. Cloft HJ, et al

   . Flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms: a review. Stroke 2011;42:2363–68 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.620328 pmid:21737793

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Briganti F,
   3. Napoli M,
   4. Tortora F, et al

   . Italian multicenter experience with flow-diverter devices for intracranial unruptured aneurysm treatment with periprocedural complications: a retrospective data analysis. Neuroradiology 2012;54:1145–52 doi:10.1007/s00234-012-1047-3 pmid:22569955

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Rankin J

   . Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60, II: prognosis. Scott Med J 1957;2:254–68 pmid:13432835

   PubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Joshi MD,
   3. O'Kelly CJ,
   4. Krings T, et al

   . Observer variability of an angiographic grading scale used for the assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated with flow-diverting stents. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1589–92 doi:0.3174/ajnr.A3431 pmid:23449648

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Colby GP,
   3. Lin LM,
   4. Caplan JM, et al

   . Immediate procedural outcomes in 44 consecutive Pipeline Flex cases: the first North American single-center series. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:702–09 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011894 pmid:26136500

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Möhlenbruch M,
   3. Herweh C,
   4. Jestaedt L, et al

   . The FRED flow-diverter stent for intracranial aneurysms: clinical study to assess safety and efficacy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1155–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4251 pmid:25721079

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Sadasivan C,
   3. Cesar L,
   4. Seong J, et al

   . An original flow diversion device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: evaluation in the rabbit elastase-induced model. Stroke 2009;40:952–58 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.533760 pmid:19150864

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Tan LA,
    3. Keigher KM,
    4. Munich SA, et al

    . Thromboembolic complications with Pipeline Embolization Device placement: impact of procedure time, number of stents and pre-procedure P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) value. J NeuroIntervent Surg 2015;7:217–21 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011111 pmid:24553344

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.
    2. Poncyljusz W,
    3. Sagan L,
    4. Safranow , et al

    . Initial experience with implantation of a novel dual layer-flow diverter FRED. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2013;8:258–64 doi:10.5114/wiitm.2011.35794 pmid:24130644

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.
    2. Briganti F,
    3. Leone G,
    4. Ugga G, et al

    . Safety and efficacy of flow re-direction endoluminal device (FRED) in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms: a single center experience. Acta Neurochir 2016;158:1745–55 doi:10.1007/s00701-016-2875-4 pmid:27357157

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.
    2. Lubicz B,
    3. Van der Elst O,
    4. Collignon L, et al

    . Silk flow-diverter stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a series of 58 patients with emphasis on long-term results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:542–46 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4143 pmid:25376806

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.
    2. De Vries J,
    3. Boogarts J,
    4. Van Norden A, et al

    . New generation of flow diverter (Surpass) for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a prospective single-center study in 37 patients. Stroke 2013;44:1567–77 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000434 pmid:23686973

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.
    2. Fischer S,
    3. Aguilar-Pérez M,
    4. Henkes E, et al

    . Initial experience with p64: a novel mechanically detachable flow diverter for the treatment of intracranial saccular sidewall aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:2082–89 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4420 pmid:26272970

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Buyukkaya R,
    3. Kocaeli H,
    4. Yildirim N, et al

    . Treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms using flow diverting Silk® stents: an analysis of 32 consecutive patients. Interv Neuroradiol 2014;20:729–35 doi:10.15274/INR-2014-10070 pmid:25496683

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Faragò G,
    3. Caldiera V,
    4. Tempra G, et al

    . Advanced digital subtraction angiography and MR fusion imaging protocol applied to accurate placement of flow diverter device. J NeuroInterv Surg 2016;8:e5 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011428.rep pmid:25589548

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Gurbel PA,
    3. Bliden KP,
    4. Hiatt BL, et al

    . Clopidogrel for coronary stenting: response variability, drug resistance, and the effect of pretreatment platelet reactivity. Circulation 2003;107:2908–13 doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000072771.11429.83 pmid:12796140

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Petricevic M,
    3. Milicic D,
    4. White A, et al

    . Development of a concept for a personalized approach in the perioperative antiplatelet therapy administration/discontinuation management based on multiple electrode aggregometry in patients undergoing coronary artery surgery. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2015;40:383–91 doi:10.1007/s11239-015-1246-y pmid:26143174

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Fifi JT,
    3. Brockington C,
    4. Narang J, et al

    . Clopidogrel resistance is associated with thromboembolic complications in patients undergoing neurovascular stenting. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:716–20 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3405 pmid:23194833

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Nakagawa I,
    3. Park HS,
    4. Yokoyama S, et al

    . Influence of diabetes mellitus and cigarette smoking on the variability of the clopidogrel-induced antiplatelet effect and efficacy of active management of the target P2Y12 reaction unit range in patients undergoing neurointerventional procedures. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2016;25:163–71 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.09.010 pmid:26493334

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Oran I,
    3. Cinar C,
    4. Bozkaya H, et al

    . Tailoring platelet inhibition according to multiple electrode aggregometry decreases the rate of thromboembolic complications after intracranial flow-diverting stent implantation. J NeuroIntervent Surg 2015;7:357–62 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-011023 pmid:24721755

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Kocer N,
    3. Islak C,
    4. Kizilkilic O, et al

    . Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device in treatment of cerebral aneurysms: initial experience with short-term follow-up results. J Neurosurg 2014;120:1158–71 doi:10.3171/2014.1.JNS131442 pmid:24628615

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Rouchaud A,
    3. Brinjikji W,
    4. Lanzino G, et al

    . Delayed hemorrhagic complications after flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms: a literature overview. Neuroradiology 2016;58:171–77 doi:10.1007/s00234-015-1615-4 pmid:26553302

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Kulcsár Z,
    3. Houdart E,
    4. Bonafé A, et al

    . Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:20–25 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2370 pmid:21071538

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Hanel R,
    4. Lopes D, et al

    . International retrospective study of the Pipeline Embolization Device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:108–15 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4111 pmid:25355814

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. Turowski B,
    3. Macht S,
    4. Kulcsar Z, et al

    . Early fatal hemorrhage after endovascular cerebral aneurysm treatment with a flow diverter (SILK-Stent): do we need to rethink our concepts? Neuroradiology 2011;53:37–41 doi:10.1007/s00234-010-0676-77 pmid:20339842

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    2. Thielen E,
    3. McClure M,
    4. Rauchaud A, et al

    . Concomitant coiling reduces metalloproteinase levels in flow-diverter treated aneurysms but anti-inflammatory treatment has no effect. J Neurointervent Surg 2016 Mar 14. [Epub ahead of print] pmid:26975840

    Abstract/FREE Full Text