Full Dose-Reduction Potential of Statistical Iterative Reconstruction for Head CT Protocols in a Predominantly Pediatric Population

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Brady S,
   3. Moore B,
   4. Yee B, et al

   . Pediatric CT: implementation of ASIR for substantial radiation dose reduction while maintaining pre-ASIR image noise. Radiology 2014;270:223–31 doi:10.1148/radiol.13122578 pmid:23901128

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Brady SL,
   3. Yee BS,
   4. Kaufman RA

   . Characterization of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm for dose reduction in CT: a pediatric oncology perspective. Med Phys 2012;39:5520–31 doi:10.1118/1.4745563 pmid:22957619

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Hara AK,
   3. Paden RG,
   4. Silva AC, et al

   . Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:764–71 doi:10.2214/AJR.09.2397 pmid:19696291

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Hong SS,
   3. Lee JW,
   4. Seo JB, et al

   . Evaluation of image quality and radiation dose by adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique level for chest CT examination. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2013;157:163–71 doi:10.1093/rpd/nct127 pmid:23704358

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Sagara Y,
   3. Hara AK,
   4. Pavlicek W, et al

   . Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:713–19 doi:10.2214/AJR.09.2989 pmid:20729451

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Singh S,
   3. Kalra MK,
   4. Gilman MD, et al

   . Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study. Radiology 2011;259:565–73 doi:10.1148/radiol.11101450 pmid:21386048

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Singh S,
   3. Kalra MK,
   4. Hsieh J, et al

   . Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Radiology 2010;257:373–83 doi:10.1148/radiol.10092212 pmid:20829535

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Vorona GA,
   3. Ceschin RC,
   4. Clayton BL, et al

   . Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique in children: a feasibility study. Pediatr Radiol 2011;41:1174–82 doi:10.1007/s00247-011-2063-x pmid:21594551

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Vorona GA,
   3. Zuccoli G,
   4. Sutcavage T, et al

   . The use of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in pediatric head CT: a feasibility study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:205–11 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3122 pmid:22627796

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. McKnight CD,
    3. Watcharotone K,
    4. Ibrahim M, et al

    . Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: reducing dose while preserving image quality in the pediatric head CT examination. Pediatr Radiol 2014;44:997–1003 doi:10.1007/s00247-014-2943-y pmid:24696285

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Kilic K,
    3. Erbas G,
    4. Guryildirim M, et al

    . Lowering the dose in head CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1578–82 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2585 pmid:21835946

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Korn A,
    3. Fenchel M,
    4. Bender B, et al

    . Iterative reconstruction in head CT: image quality of routine and low-dose protocols in comparison with standard filtered back-projection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:218–24 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2749 pmid:22033719

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Niu YT,
    3. Mehta D,
    4. Zhang ZR, et al

    . Radiation dose reduction in temporal bone CT with iterative reconstruction technique. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1020–26 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2941 pmid:22322608

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Rapalino O,
    3. Kamalian S,
    4. Kamalian S, et al

    . Cranial CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: improved image quality with concomitant radiation dose reduction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:609–15 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2826 pmid:22207302

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Samei E,
    3. Richard S

    . Assessment of the dose reduction potential of a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm using a task-based performance metrology. Med Phys 2015;42:314–23 doi:10.1118/1.4903899 pmid:25563271

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Solomon J,
    3. Samei E

    . Quantum noise properties of CT images with anatomical textured backgrounds across reconstruction algorithms: FBP and SAFIRE. Med Phys 2014;41:091908 doi:10.1118/1.4893497 pmid:25186395

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Cornfeld D,
    3. Israel G,
    4. Detroy E, et al

    . Impact of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) on radiation dose and image quality in aortic dissection studies: a qualitative and quantitative analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:W336–40 doi:10.2214/AJR.10.4573 pmid:21343485

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Flicek KT,
    3. Hara AK,
    4. Silva AC, et al

    . Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:126–31 doi:10.2214/AJR.09.3855 pmid:20566805

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Leipsic J,
    3. Nguyen G,
    4. Brown J, et al

    . A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:1095–99 doi:10.2214/AJR.09.4050 pmid:20966312

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Marin D,
    3. Nelson RC,
    4. Schindera ST, et al

    . Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm—initial clinical experience. Radiology 2010;254:145–53 doi:10.1148/radiol.09090094 pmid:20032149

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Miéville FA,
    3. Gudinchet F,
    4. Brunelle F, et al

    . Iterative reconstruction methods in two different MDCT scanners: physical metrics and 4-alternative forced-choice detectability experiments—a phantom approach. Phys Med 2013;29:99–110 doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2011.12.004 pmid:22217444

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Richard S,
    3. Husarik DB,
    4. Yadava G, et al

    . Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms. Med Phys 2012;39:4115–22 doi:10.1118/1.4725171 pmid:22830744

    CrossRefPubMed