Fast Contrast-Enhanced 4D MRA and 4D Flow MRI Using Constrained Reconstruction (HYPRFlow): Potential Applications for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Heidenreich JO,
   3. Schilling AM,
   4. Unterharnscheidt F, et al

   . Assessment of 3D-TOF-MRA at 3.0 Tesla in the characterization of the angioarchitecture of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a preliminary study. Acta Radiol 2007;48:678–86

   FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Loy DN,
   3. Rich KM,
   4. Simpson J, et al

   . Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography imaging of a residual arteriovenous malformation nidus after Onyx embolization for stereotactic radiosurgery planning: technical note. Neurosurg Focus 2009;26:E13

   PubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Hadizadeh DR,
   3. Kukuk GM,
   4. Steck DT, et al

   . Noninvasive evaluation of cerebral arteriovenous malformations by 4D-MRA for preoperative planning and postoperative follow-up in 56 patients: comparison with DSA and intraoperative findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1095–101

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Gauvrit JY,
   3. Leclerc X,
   4. Oppenheim C, et al

   . Three-dimensional dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using sensitivity encoding for the evaluation of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: a preliminary study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1525–31

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Gauvrit JY,
   3. Oppenheim C,
   4. Nataf F, et al

   . Three-dimensional dynamic magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of radiosurgically treated cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Eur Radiol 2006;16:583–91

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Hadizadeh DR,
   3. von Falkenhausen M,
   4. Gieseke J, et al

   . Cerebral arteriovenous malformation: Spetzler-Martin classification at subsecond-temporal-resolution four-dimensional MR angiography compared with that at DSA. Radiology 2008;246:205–13

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Taschner CA,
   3. Gieseke J,
   4. Le Thuc V, et al

   . Intracranial arteriovenous malformation: time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography with combination of parallel imaging, keyhole acquisition, and k-space sampling techniques at 1.5 T. Radiology 2008;246:871–79

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Petkova M,
   3. Gauvrit JY,
   4. Trystram D, et al

   . Three-dimensional dynamic time-resolved contrast-enhanced MRA using parallel imaging and a variable rate k-space sampling strategy in intracranial arteriovenous malformations. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;29:7–12

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Oleaga L,
   3. Dalal SS,
   4. Weigele JB, et al

   . The role of time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the assessment and grading of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Eur J Radiol 2010;74:e117–21

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Mistretta CA

    . Undersampled radial MR acquisition and highly constrained back projection (HYPR) reconstruction: potential medical imaging applications in the post-Nyquist era. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;29:501–16

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Wu Y,
    3. Chang W,
    4. Johnson KM, et al

    . Fast whole-brain 4D contrast-enhanced MR angiography with velocity encoding using undersampled radial acquisition and highly constrained projection reconstruction: image-quality assessment in volunteer subjects. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:E47–50

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Velikina JV,
    3. Johnson KM,
    4. Wu Y, et al

    . PC HYPR flow: a technique for rapid imaging of contrast dynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:447–56
13. 13.↵
    2. Ansari SA,
    3. Schnell S,
    4. Carroll T, et al

    . Intracranial 4D flow MRI: toward individualized assessment of arteriovenous malformation hemodynamics and treatment-induced changes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1922–28

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Johnson KM,
    3. Markl M

    . Improved SNR in phase contrast velocimetry with five-point balanced flow encoding. Magn Reson Med 2010;63:349–55

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Johnson KM,
    3. Velikina J,
    4. Wu Y, et al

    . Improved waveform fidelity using local HYPR reconstruction (HYPR LR). Magn Reson Med 2008;59:456–62

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Gu T,
    3. Korosec FR,
    4. Block WF, et al

    . PC VIPR: a high-speed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and high-resolution angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:743–49

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Johnson KM,
    3. Francois C,
    4. Lum D, et al

    . Rapid comprehensive evaluation of luminography and hemodynamic function with 3D radially undersampled phase contrast imaging MRI. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009;2009:4057–60

    PubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Spetzler RF,
    3. Martin NA

    . A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 1986;65:476–83

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Cashen TA,
    3. Jeong H,
    4. Shah MK, et al

    . 4D radial contrast-enhanced MR angiography with sliding subtraction. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:962–72

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Wu Y,
    3. Johnson K,
    4. Kecskemeti SR, et al

    . Time resolved contrast enhanced intracranial MRA using a single dose delivered as sequential injections and highly constrained projection reconstruction (HYPR CE). Magn Reson Med 2011;65:956–63

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Willinsky RA,
    3. Taylor SM,
    4. TerBrugge K, et al

    . Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003;227:522–28

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Wang H,
    3. Ye X,
    4. Gao X, et al

    . The diagnosis of arteriovenous malformations by 4D-CTA: a clinical study. J Neuroradiol 2014;41:117–23

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Sadowski EA,
    3. Bennett LK,
    4. Chan MR, et al

    . Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: risk factors and incidence estimation. Radiology 2007;243:148–57

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Buis DR,
    3. Bot JC,
    4. Barkhof F, et al

    . The predictive value of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography in assessment of brain arteriovenous malformation obliteration after radiosurgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:232–38

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Markl M,
    3. Wu C,
    4. Hurley MC, et al

    . Cerebral arteriovenous malformation: complex 3D hemodynamics and 3D blood flow alterations during staged embolization. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013;38:946–50

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Willinek WA,
    3. Hadizadeh DR,
    4. von Falkenhausen M, et al

    . 4D time-resolved MR angiography with keyhole (4D-TRAK): more than 60 times accelerated MRA using a combination of CENTRA, keyhole, and SENSE at 3.0T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27:1455–60

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Yu S,
    3. Yan L,
    4. Yao Y, et al

    . Noncontrast dynamic MRA in intracranial arteriovenous malformation (AVM), comparison with time of flight (TOF) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Magn Reson Imaging 2012;30:869–77

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    2. Raoult H,
    3. Bannier E,
    4. Maurel P, et al

    . Hemodynamic quantification in brain arteriovenous malformations with time-resolved spin-labeled magnetic resonance angiography. Stroke 2014;45:2461–64

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    2. Wu H,
    3. Block WF,
    4. Turski PA, et al

    . Noncontrast dynamic 3D intracranial MR angiography using pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (PCASL) and accelerated 3D radial acquisition. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;39:1320–26

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Eddleman CS,
    3. Jeong HJ,
    4. Hurley MC, et al

    . 4D radial acquisition contrast-enhanced MR angiography and intracranial arteriovenous malformations: quickly approaching digital subtraction angiography. Stroke 2009;40:2749–53

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    2. Chang W,
    3. Landgraf B,
    4. Johnson KM, et al

    . Velocity measurements in the middle cerebral arteries of healthy volunteers using 3D radial phase-contrast HYPRFlow: comparison with transcranial Doppler sonography and 2D phase-contrast MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:54–59

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    2. Jeong HJ,
    3. Cashen TA,
    4. Hurley MC, et al

    . Radial sliding-window magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with highly-constrained projection reconstruction (HYPR). Magn Reson Med 2009;61:1103–13

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Chang W,
    3. Loecher MW,
    4. Wu Y, et al

    . Hemodynamic changes in patients with arteriovenous malformations assessed using high-resolution 3D radial phase-contrast MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1565–72

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    2. Moftakhar R,
    3. Aagaard-Kienitz B,
    4. Johnson K, et al

    . Noninvasive measurement of intra-aneurysmal pressure and flow pattern using phase contrast with vastly undersampled isotropic projection imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1710–14

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    2. Stapf C,
    3. Mast H,
    4. Sciacca RR, et al

    . Predictors of hemorrhage in patients with untreated brain arteriovenous malformation. Neurology 2006;66:1350–55

    CrossRef
36. 36.↵
    2. Mohr JP,
    3. Kejda-Scharler J,
    4. Pile-Spellman J

    . Diagnosis and treatment of arteriovenous malformations. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2013;13:324

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    2. van Beijnum J,
    3. van der Worp HB,
    4. Buis DR, et al

    . Treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2011;306:2011–19

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    2. Kecskemeti S,
    3. Johnson K,
    4. Wu Y, et al

    . High resolution three-dimensional cine phase contrast MRI of small intracranial aneurysms using a stack of stars k-space trajectory. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;35:518–27

    CrossRefPubMed