Research ArticleBrain
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion Processing for Neuroradiologists: Model-Dependent Analysis May Not Be Necessary for Determining Recurrent High-Grade Glioma versus Treatment Effect
J.D. Hamilton, J. Lin, C. Ison, N.E. Leeds, E.F. Jackson, G.N. Fuller, L. Ketonen and A.J. Kumar
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2015, 36 (4) 686-693; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4190
J.D. Hamilton
aFrom the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Section of Neuroimaging (J.D.H., C.I., N.E.L., L.K., A.J.K.)
dRadiology Partners Houston (J.D.H.), Houston, Texas
J. Lin
bDepartment of Imaging Physics, Section of MRI Physics (J.L., E.F.J.)
eRice University (J.L.), Houston, Texas
fBaylor College of Medicine (J.L.), Houston, Texas.
C. Ison
aFrom the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Section of Neuroimaging (J.D.H., C.I., N.E.L., L.K., A.J.K.)
N.E. Leeds
aFrom the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Section of Neuroimaging (J.D.H., C.I., N.E.L., L.K., A.J.K.)
E.F. Jackson
bDepartment of Imaging Physics, Section of MRI Physics (J.L., E.F.J.)
G.N. Fuller
cDepartment of Pathology, Section of Neuropathology (G.N.F.), The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
L. Ketonen
aFrom the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Section of Neuroimaging (J.D.H., C.I., N.E.L., L.K., A.J.K.)
A.J. Kumar
aFrom the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Section of Neuroimaging (J.D.H., C.I., N.E.L., L.K., A.J.K.)

Submit a Response to This Article
Jump to comment:
No eLetters have been published for this article.
In this issue
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 36, Issue 4
1 Apr 2015
Advertisement
J.D. Hamilton, J. Lin, C. Ison, N.E. Leeds, E.F. Jackson, G.N. Fuller, L. Ketonen, A.J. Kumar
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion Processing for Neuroradiologists: Model-Dependent Analysis May Not Be Necessary for Determining Recurrent High-Grade Glioma versus Treatment Effect
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2015, 36 (4) 686-693; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4190
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion Processing for Neuroradiologists: Model-Dependent Analysis May Not Be Necessary for Determining Recurrent High-Grade Glioma versus Treatment Effect
J.D. Hamilton, J. Lin, C. Ison, N.E. Leeds, E.F. Jackson, G.N. Fuller, L. Ketonen, A.J. Kumar
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2015, 36 (4) 686-693; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4190
Jump to section
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Cited By...
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Arterial Spin-Labeling, Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced, and DSC Perfusion Imaging in the Diagnosis of Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas: A Prospective Study
- "Early Imaging Marker of Progressive Glioblastoma: a window of opportunity"
- Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhancement Parameters between Gadobutrol and Gadoterate Meglumine in Posttreatment Glioma: A Prospective Intraindividual Study
- The Initial Area Under the Curve Derived from Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Improves Prognosis Prediction in Glioblastoma with Unmethylated MGMT Promoter
This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.
More in this TOC Section
Similar Articles
Advertisement