Visualization of Human Inner Ear Anatomy with High-Resolution MR Imaging at 7T: Initial Clinical Assessment

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Verbist BM

   . Imaging of sensorineural hearing loss: a pattern-based approach to diseases of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle. Insights Imaging 2012;3:139–53

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Casselman JW

   . Diagnostic imaging in clinical neuro-otology. Curr Opin Neurol 2002;15:23–30

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. St Martin MB,
   3. Hirsch BE

   . Imaging of hearing loss. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2008;41:157–78, vi-vii

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Mohan S,
   3. Hoeffner E,
   4. Bigelow DC, et al

   . Applications of magnetic resonance imaging in adult temporal bone disorders. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2012;20:545–72

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Davidson HC

   . Imaging evaluation of sensorineural hearing loss. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2001;22:229–49

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Robitaille P,
   3. Berliner L

   . Ultra High Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Biological Magnetic Resonance), Vol. 26. Berlin: Springer; 2006
7. 7.↵
   2. Sled JG,
   3. Pike GB

   . Standing-wave and RF penetration artifacts caused by elliptic geometry: an electrodynamic analysis of MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998;17:653–62

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Takahara T,
   3. Hoogduin H,
   4. Visser F, et al

   . Imaging of the inner ear at 7T: initial results. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden. May 1–7, 2010:4448. Vol 17
9. 9.↵
   2. van Egmond SL,
   3. Visser F,
   4. Pameijer FA, et al.

   Ex vivo and in vivo imaging of the inner ear at 7 Tesla MRI. Otol Neurotol 2014;35:725–29

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Brink WM,
    3. van der Jagt AM,
    4. Versluis MJ, et al

    . High permittivity dielectric pads improve high spatial resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the inner ear at 7 T. Invest Radiol 2014;49:271–77

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Rosset A,
    3. Spadola L,
    4. Ratib O

    . OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digit Imaging 2004;17:205–16

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Sennaroglu L

    . Cochlear implantation in inner ear malformations: a review article. Cochlear Implants Int 2010;11:4–41

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Sennaroglu L,
    3. Sarac S,
    4. Ergin T

    . Surgical results of cochlear implantation in malformed cochlea. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:615–23

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Millar DA,
    3. Hillman TA,
    4. Shelton C

    . Implantation of the ossified cochlea: management with the split electrode array. Laryngoscope 2005;115:2155–60

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. van der Marel KS,
    3. Briaire JJ,
    4. Wolterbeek R, et al

    . Diversity in cochlear morphology and its influence on cochlear implant electrode position. Ear Hear 2014;35:e9–20

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Holden LK,
    3. Finley CC,
    4. Firszt JB, et al

    . Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2013;34:342–60

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Wargo CJ,
    3. Moore J,
    4. Gore JC

    . A comparison and evaluation of reduced-FOV methods for multi-slice 7T human imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2013;31:1349–59

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Heilmaier C,
    3. Theysohn JM,
    4. Maderwald S, et al

    . A large-scale study on subjective perception of discomfort during 7 and 1.5 T MRI examinations. Bioelectromagnetics 2011;32:610–19

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Theysohn JM,
    3. Maderwald S,
    4. Kraff O, et al

    . Subjective acceptance of 7 Tesla MRI for human imaging. MAGMA 2008;21:63–72

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Versluis MJ,
    3. Teeuwisse WM,
    4. Kan HE, et al

    . Subject tolerance of 7 T MRI examinations. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013;38:722–25

    CrossRefPubMed