Patients Prone to Recurrence after Endovascular Treatment: Periprocedural Results of the PRET Randomized Trial on Large and Recurrent Aneurysms

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Molyneux A,
   2. Kerr R,
   3. Stratton I,
   4. et al

   . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267–74

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Molyneux AJ,
   2. Kerr RS,
   3. Yu LM,
   4. et al

   . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809–17

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Ferns SP,
   2. Sprengers ME,
   3. van Rooij WJ,
   4. et al

   . Coiling of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review on initial occlusion and reopening and retreatment rates. Stroke 2009;40:e523–29

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   Carat Investigators. Rates of delayed rebleeding from intracranial aneurysms are low after surgical and endovascular treatment. Stroke 2006;37:1437–42

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Campi A,
   2. Ramzi N,
   3. Molyneux AJ,
   4. et al

   . Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke 2007;38:1538–44

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Raymond J

   . Counterpoint: has the last word been said? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1649–52

   FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Darsaut TE,
   2. Findlay JM,
   3. Raymond J

   . The design of the Canadian UnRuptured Endovascular versus Surgery (CURES) trial. Can J Neurol Sci 2011;38:236–41

   PubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Raymond J,
   2. Molyneux AJ,
   3. Fox AJ,
   4. et al

   . The TEAM trial: safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the prevention of aneurysmal hemorrhages—a randomized comparison with indefinite deferral of treatment in 2002 patients followed for 10 years. Trials 2008;9:43

   PubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Naggara ON,
   2. Lecler A,
   3. Oppenheim C,
   4. et al

   . Endovascular treatment of intracranial unruptured aneurysms: a systematic review of the literature on safety with emphasis on subgroup analyses. Radiology 2012;263:828–35

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. White PM,
    2. Raymond J

    . Endovascular coiling of cerebral aneurysms using “bioactive” or coated-coil technologies: a systematic review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:219–26

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. McDougall CG,
    2. Johnston SC,
    3. Gholkar A,
    4. et al

    . Bioactive versus bare platinum coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: the MAPS (Matrix and Platinum Science) Trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:935–42

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Molyneux AJ,
    2. Clarke A,
    3. Sneade M,
    4. et al

    . Cerecyte Coil Trial: angiographic outcomes of a prospective randomized trial comparing endovascular coiling of cerebral aneurysms with either Cerecyte or bare platinum coils. Stroke 2012;43:2544–50

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. White PM,
    2. Lewis SC,
    3. Gholkar A,
    4. et al

    . Hydrogel-coated coils versus bare platinum coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (HELPS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011;377:1655–62

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Roy D,
    3. White PM,
    4. et al

    . A randomized trial comparing platinum and hydrogel-coated coils in Patients Prone to Recurrence after Endovascular Treatment (the PRET Trial). Interv Neuroradiol 2008;14:73–83

    PubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Guilbert F,
    3. Weill A,
    4. et al

    . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–403

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Roy D,
    2. Milot G,
    3. Raymond J

    . Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke 2001;32:1998–2004

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Coley S,
    2. Sneade M,
    3. Clarke A,
    4. et al

    . Cerecyte coil trial: procedural safety and clinical outcomes in patients with ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:474–80

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. White PM,
    2. Lewis SC,
    3. Nahser H,
    4. et al

    . HydroCoil Endovascular Aneurysm Occlusion and Packing Study (HELPS trial): procedural safety and operator-assessed efficacy results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:217–23

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Cloft HJ,
    2. Kallmes DF

    . Cerebral aneurysm perforations complicating therapy with Guglielmi detachable coils: a meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1706–09

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Nguyen TN,
    2. Raymond J,
    3. Guilbert F,
    4. et al

    . Association of endovascular therapy of very small ruptured aneurysms with higher rates of procedure-related rupture. J Neurosurg 2008;108:1088–92

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Pelz DM,
    2. Lownie SP,
    3. Fox AJ

    . Thromboembolic events associated with the treatment of cerebral aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1541–47

    Abstract
22. 22.↵
    1. Meyers PM,
    2. Lavine SD,
    3. Fitzsimmons BF,
    4. et al

    . Chemical meningitis after cerebral aneurysm treatment using two second-generation aneurysm coils: report of two cases. Neurosurgery 2004;55:1222

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Turner RD,
    2. Byrne JV,
    3. Kelly ME,
    4. et al

    . Delayed visual deficits and monocular blindness after endovascular treatment of large and giant paraophthalmic aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2008;63:469–74, discussion 474–75

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Xu DS,
    2. Hurley MC,
    3. Batjer HH,
    4. et al

    . Delayed cranial nerve palsy after coiling of carotid cavernous sinus aneurysms: case report. Neurosurgery 2010;66:E1215–16

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Im SH,
    2. Han MH,
    3. Kwon BJ,
    4. et al

    . Aseptic meningitis after embolization of cerebral aneurysms using hydrogel-coated coils: report of three cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:511–12

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Tollard E,
    2. Darsaut TE,
    3. Bing F,
    4. et al

    . Outcomes of endovascular treatments of aneurysms: observer variability and implications for interpreting case series and planning randomized trials. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:626–31

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Rezek I,
    2. Lingineni RK,
    3. Sneade M,
    4. et al

    . Differences in the angiographic evaluation of coiled cerebral aneurysms between a core laboratory reader and operators: results of the Cerecyte Coil Trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:124–27

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Becske T,
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Saatci I,
    4. et al

    . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science