Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleLevel 1 EBM Expedited Publication
Open Access

Patients Prone to Recurrence after Endovascular Treatment: Periprocedural Results of the PRET Randomized Trial on Large and Recurrent Aneurysms

J. Raymond, R. Klink, M. Chagnon, S.L. Barnwell, A.J. Evans, J. Mocco, B.L. Hoh, A.S. Turk, R.D. Turner, H. Desal, D. Fiorella, S. Bracard, A. Weill, F. Guilbert and D. Roy on behalf of the PRET Collaborative Group
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2014, 35 (9) 1667-1676; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4035
J. Raymond
aFrom the Department of Radiology (J.R., A.W., F.G., D.R.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
bLaboratory of Interventional Neuroradiology (J.R., R.K.), Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Notre-Dame Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Klink
bLaboratory of Interventional Neuroradiology (J.R., R.K.), Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Notre-Dame Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Chagnon
cDépartement de mathématiques et de statistique (M.C.), Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.L. Barnwell
dDepartment of Neurological Surgery (S.L.B.), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A.J. Evans
eDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging (A.J.E.), University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Mocco
fDepartment of Neurosurgery (J.M., B.L.H.), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B.L. Hoh
fDepartment of Neurosurgery (J.M., B.L.H.), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A.S. Turk
gDepartments of Radiology and Neurosurgery (A.S.T., R.D.T.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R.D. Turner
gDepartments of Radiology and Neurosurgery (A.S.T., R.D.T.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Desal
hService de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Interventionnelle (H.D.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Fiorella
iDepartment of Neurological Surgery (D.F.), Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Bracard
jDépartement de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Interventionnelle (S.B.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy, Nancy, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Weill
aFrom the Department of Radiology (J.R., A.W., F.G., D.R.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. Guilbert
aFrom the Department of Radiology (J.R., A.W., F.G., D.R.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Roy
aFrom the Department of Radiology (J.R., A.W., F.G., D.R.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Recruitment. Notice how recruitment decreased progressively from December 2010 to December 2013, a possible sign of case selection.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Flow chart. Diagram shows patient flow from randomization to periprocedural safety end points.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Morbidity and mortality adjudicated per patient

    PRET-1PRET-2PRET
    PlatinumHydrogelPlatinumHydrogelPlatinumHydrogel
    Death
        Total02 (1.6%)0002 (0.9%)
        Treatment-related000000
    Morbidity (mRS > 2)
        Total11 (8.8%)5 (4.0%)2 (2.1%)5 (5.0%)13 (5.9%)10 (4.4%)
        Treatment-related5 (4.0%)2 (1.6%)1 (1.0%)2 (2.0%)6 (2.7%)4 (1.8%)
    Any stroke11 (8.8%)5 (4.0%)8 (8.2%)9 (9.0%)19 (8.6%)14 (6.2%)
    Any complication8 (6.4%)4 (3.2%)1 (1.0%)2 (2.0%)9 (4.1%)6 (2.7%)
    No complication95 (76.0%)107 (85.6%)86 (88.7%)83 (83.0%)181 (81.5%)190 (84.4%)
    Withdrawn02 (1.6%)01 (1.0%)03 (1.3%)
    Fisher exact test P value.052.612.174
    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Safety indices reported at time of the procedure and during follow-up

    PRET-1PRET-2PRET
    PlatinumHydrogelPlatinumHydrogelPlatinumHydrogel
    Procedural complications
        Thromboembolic10 (8.0%)6 (4.9%)1 (1.0%)3 (3.0%)11 (5.0%)9 (4.1%)
        Hemorrhagic2 (1.6%)1 (0.8%)1 (1.0%)1 (1.0%)3 (1.4%)2 (0.9%)
        Other4 (3.2%)6 (4.9%)4 (4.1%)3 (3.0%)8 (3.6%)9 (4.1%)
    Anti-GP IIb/IIIa used during embolization8 (6.4%)11 (8.9%)7 (7.2%)4 (4.0%)15 (6.8%)15 (6.8%)
    Clinical deterioration at end of procedure5 (4.0%)1 (0.8%)2 (2.1%)3 (3.0%)7 (3.2%)4 (1.9%)
    Hospitalization
        Days (median) (min) (max)2 (1) (94)1 (0) (70)1 (0) (51)1 (0) (30)1 (0) (94)1 (0) (70)
        Days >5 for unruptured aneurysms9 (7.2%)7 (5.7%)5 (5.2%)5 (5.1%)14 (6.3%)12 (5.4%)
        Days >15 for ruptured aneurysms10 (8.0%)10 (8.1%)1 (1.0%)011 (5.0%)10 (4.5%)
    New imaging findings at discharge17 (13.6)11 (8.9%)7 (7.2%)9 (9.1%)24 (10.8%)20 (9.0%)
    mRS >2 at discharge17 (13.6%)9 (7.3%)1 (1.0%)5 (5.1%)18 (8.1%)14 (6.3%)
    Discharge destination
        Home107 (85.6%)108 (87.8%)95 (97.9%)92 (92.9%)202 (91.0%)200 (90.1%)
        Other than home18 (14.4%)15 (12.2%)2 (2.1%)7 (7.1%)20 (9.0%)22 (9.2%)
    mRS >2 at 1 month11 (8.8%)6 (4.9%)3 (3.1%)5 (5.1%)14 (6.3%)11 (5%)
    Location at 1 month
        Home117 (93.6%)116 (94.3%)95 (97.9%)95 (96.0%)212 (95.5%)211 (95.0%)
        Other than home8 (6.4%)7 (5.7%)2 (2.1%)4 (4.0%)10 (4.5%)11 (5%)
    AE
        No. reported16187102328
        No. (%) serious10 (62%)8 (44.4%)3 (42.9%)6 (60%)13 (56.5%)14 (50%)
    AE attribution (No.) (% of total No. reported)
        Related to treatment14 (87.5%)14 (77.8%)7 (100%)10 (100%)21 (91.3%)24 (85.7%)
        Related to aneurysm2 (12.5%)3 (16.7%)002 (8.7%)3 (10.7%)
        Unrelated01 (5.5%)0001 (3.6%)
    • Note:—Anti-GP IIb/IIIa indicates antiglycoprotein IIb/IIIa; AE, adverse events; min, minimum; max, maximum.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Operator-assessed immediate angiographic results

    PRET-1PRET-2PRET
    PlatinumHydrogelPlatinumHydrogelPlatinumHydrogel
    No coiling, for any reason3 (2.4%)3 (2.4%)05 (5.0%)3 (1.4%)8 (3.6%)
    Residual aneurysm32 (25.6%)39 (31.2%)12 (12.4%)14 (14.0%)44 (19.8%)53 (23.6%)
    Residual neck48 (38.4%)48 (38.4%)40 (41.2%)40 (40.0%)88 (39.6%)88 (39.1%)
    Complete obliteration42 (33.6%)35 (28.0%)45 (46.4%)41 (41.0%)87 (39.2%)76 (33.8%)
    Fisher exact test P value.723.151.280
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 35 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 35, Issue 9
1 Sep 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patients Prone to Recurrence after Endovascular Treatment: Periprocedural Results of the PRET Randomized Trial on Large and Recurrent Aneurysms
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
J. Raymond, R. Klink, M. Chagnon, S.L. Barnwell, A.J. Evans, J. Mocco, B.L. Hoh, A.S. Turk, R.D. Turner, H. Desal, D. Fiorella, S. Bracard, A. Weill, F. Guilbert, D. Roy
Patients Prone to Recurrence after Endovascular Treatment: Periprocedural Results of the PRET Randomized Trial on Large and Recurrent Aneurysms
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2014, 35 (9) 1667-1676; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4035

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Patients Prone to Recurrence after Endovascular Treatment: Periprocedural Results of the PRET Randomized Trial on Large and Recurrent Aneurysms
J. Raymond, R. Klink, M. Chagnon, S.L. Barnwell, A.J. Evans, J. Mocco, B.L. Hoh, A.S. Turk, R.D. Turner, H. Desal, D. Fiorella, S. Bracard, A. Weill, F. Guilbert, D. Roy
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2014, 35 (9) 1667-1676; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4035
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Flow Diversion in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Pragmatic Randomized Care Trial
  • Five-year results of randomized bioactive versus bare metal coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: the Matrix and Platinum Science (MAPS) Trial
  • Hydrogel versus Bare Platinum Coils in Patients with Large or Recurrent Aneurysms Prone to Recurrence after Endovascular Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Bioactive versus bare platinum coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
  • Inter- and Intrarater Agreement on the Outcome of Endovascular Treatment of Aneurysms Using MRA
  • The Maze-Making and Solving Technique for Coil Embolization of Large and Giant Aneurysms
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Are There Differences between Macrocyclic Gadolinium Contrast Agents for Brain Tumor Imaging? Results of a Multicenter Intraindividual Crossover Comparison of Gadobutrol with Gadoteridol (the TRUTH Study)
  • A Randomized Trial Comparing Balloon Kyphoplasty and Vertebroplasty for Vertebral Compression Fractures due to Osteoporosis
  • Effect of the CT Table Strap on Radiation Exposure and Image Quality during Cervical Spine CT
Show more LEVEL 1 EBM EXPEDITED PUBLICATION

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire