Preoperative Prognostic Value of MRI Findings in 108 Patients with Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Adams RD,
   3. Fisher CM,
   4. Hakim S, et al

   . Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with “normal” cerebrospinal-fluid pressure: a treatable syndrome. N Engl J Med 1965;273:117–26

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Klinge P,
   3. Hellstrom P,
   4. Tans J, et al

   . One-year outcome in the European multicentre study on iNPH. Acta Neurol Scand 2012;126:145–53

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Virhammar J,
   3. Laurell K,
   4. Cesarini KG, et al

   . The callosal angle measured on MRI as a predictor of outcome in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 2014;120:178–84

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Hellström P,
   3. Klinge P,
   4. Tans J, et al

   . A new scale for assessment of severity and outcome in iNPH. Acta Neurol Scand 2012;126:229–37

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Ishii K,
   3. Kanda T,
   4. Harada A, et al

   . Clinical impact of the callosal angle in the diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Eur Radiol 2008;18:2678–83

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Sasaki M,
   3. Honda S,
   4. Yuasa T, et al

   . Narrow CSF space at high convexity and high midline areas in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus detected by axial and coronal MRI. Neuroradiology 2008;50:117–22

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Kitagaki H,
   3. Mori E,
   4. Ishii K, et al

   . CSF spaces in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: morphology and volumetry. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1277–84

   Abstract
8. 8.↵
   2. Hashimoto M,
   3. Ishikawa M,
   4. Mori E, et al

   . Diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus is supported by MRI-based scheme: a prospective cohort study. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 2010;7:18

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Algin O,
   3. Hakyemez B,
   4. Taskapilioglu O, et al

   . Morphologic features and flow void phenomenon in normal pressure hydrocephalus and other dementias: are they really significant? Acad Radiol 2009;16:1373–80

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Fazekas F,
    3. Chawluk JB,
    4. Alavi A, et al

    . MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer's dementia and normal aging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;149:351–56

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Holodny AI,
    3. George AE,
    4. de Leon MJ, et al

    . Focal dilation and paradoxical collapse of cortical fissures and sulci in patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 1998;89:742–47

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Wikkelsö C,
    3. Andersson H,
    4. Blomstrand C, et al

    . Computed tomography of the brain in the diagnosis of and prognosis in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neuroradiology 1989;31:160–65

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Svendsen P,
    3. Duru O

    . Visibility of the temporal horns on computed tomography. Neuroradiology 1981;21:139–44

    PubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Tans JT

    . Differentiation of normal pressure hydrocephalus and cerebral atrophy by computed tomography and spinal infusion test. J Neurol 1979;222:109–18

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Scheltens P,
    3. Leys D,
    4. Barkhof F, et al

    . Atrophy of medial temporal lobes on MRI in “probable” Alzheimer's disease and normal ageing: diagnostic value and neuropsychological correlates. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992;55:967–72

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Golomb J,
    3. de Leon MJ,
    4. George AE, et al

    . Hippocampal atrophy correlates with severe cognitive impairment in elderly patients with suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:590–93

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Benzel EC,
    3. Pelletier AL,
    4. Levy PG

    . Communicating hydrocephalus in adults: prediction of outcome after ventricular shunting procedures. Neurosurgery 1990;26:655–60

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Wardlaw JM,
    3. Smith C,
    4. Dichgans M

    . Mechanisms of sporadic cerebral small vessel disease: insights from neuroimaging. Lancet Neurol 2013;12:483–97

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Tullberg M,
    3. Jensen C,
    4. Ekholm S, et al

    . Normal pressure hydrocephalus: vascular white matter changes on MR images must not exclude patients from shunt surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1665–73

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Poca MA,
    3. Mataro M,
    4. Del Mar Matarin M, et al

    . Is the placement of shunts in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus worth the risk? Results of a study based on continuous monitoring of intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg 2004;100:855–66

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Børgesen SE,
    3. Gjerris F

    . The predictive value of conductance to outflow of CSF in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Brain 1982;105:65–86

    FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Milhorat TH,
    3. Clark RG,
    4. Hammock MK, et al

    . Structural, ultrastructural, and permeability changes in the ependyma and surrounding brain favoring equilibration in progressive hydrocephalus. Arch Neurol 1970;22:397–407

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Ishii K,
    3. Hashimoto M,
    4. Hayashida K, et al

    . A multicenter brain perfusion SPECT study evaluating idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus on neurological improvement. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2011;32:1–10

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Tedeschi E,
    3. Hasselbalch SG,
    4. Waldemar G, et al

    . Heterogeneous cerebral glucose metabolism in normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1995;59:608–15

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Malm J,
    3. Graff-Radford NR,
    4. Ishikawa M, et al

    . Influence of comorbidities in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: research and clinical care—a report of the ISHCSF task force on comorbidities in INPH. Fluids Barriers CNS 2013;10:22

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Bradley WG Jr.,
    3. Scalzo D,
    4. Queralt J, et al

    . Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation with cerebrospinal fluid flow measurements at MR imaging. Radiology 1996;198:523–29

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science