Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBrain

New Morphologic Variants of the Hand Motor Cortex as Seen with MR Imaging in a Large Study Population

M. Caulo, C. Briganti, P.A. Mattei, B. Perfetti, A. Ferretti, G.L. Romani, A. Tartaro and C. Colosimo
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2007, 28 (8) 1480-1485; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0597
M. Caulo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Briganti
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P.A. Mattei
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Perfetti
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Ferretti
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G.L. Romani
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Tartaro
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Colosimo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The hand motor cortex (HMC) has been classically described as having an omega or epsilon shape in axial-plane images obtained with CT and MR imaging. The aim of this study was to use MR imaging and Talairach normalization in a large sample population that was homogeneous for age and handedness to evaluate in a sex model a new classification with 5 morphologic variants of the HMC in the axial plane (omega, medially asymmetric epsilon, epsilon, laterally asymmetric epsilon, and null).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Structural brain MR images were obtained from 257 right-handed healthy subjects (143 men and 114 women; mean age, 23.1 ± 1.1 years) via a Talairach space transformed 3D magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo sequence. The frequencies of the different HMC variants were reported for hemisphere and sex.

RESULTS: The new variants of the HMC (medially asymmetric epsilon, laterally asymmetric epsilon, and null) were observed in 2.9%, 7.0%, and 1.8% of the hemispheres, respectively. Statistically significant sex differences were observed: The epsilon variant was twice as frequent in men, and an interhemispheric concordance for morphologic variants was observed only for women.

CONCLUSION: The large study population permitted the description of a new morphologic classification that included 3 new variants of the HMC. This new morphologic classification should facilitate the identification of the precentral gyrus in subsequent studies and in everyday practice.

MR imaging allows a noninvasive study of the morphology of the cortical surface of the brain with a high degree of spatial resolution. The cortical anatomy of cerebral gyri is complex and presents tremendous intra- and intersubject variability. Therefore, the identification of specific cortical regions based only on morphologic features can be challenging. The presence of space-occupying lesions in the brain, such as tumors or vascular malformations, can further complicate this procedure by distorting normal anatomy, thereby making the identification of specific cortical regions difficult or impossible.

With the development of the concept of “homunculus,” the cortical representation of motor hand function is known to be located in the superior aspect of the precentral gyrus.1–3 Even though functional techniques have recently permitted the identification of anatomic regions based on the correspondence with regions of activation,4,5 the knowledge of pure anatomic landmarks of the cerebral cortex remains of fundamental importance in research and everyday clinical practice. In fact, functional imaging is not widely available and requires extra time for data acquisition/analysis and a high-field MR imaging unit equipped with strong and rapid gradients.

Several authors have studied the radiologic anatomy of the central region,6–9 applying different methods based on various morphologic features to localize the precentral gyrus.10–12 Previous articles described the hand motor cortex (HMC) in dissected brains or on CT or MR imaging as having either the shape of a typical hook,13 bayonet, step, or zigzag on the sagittal plane.14 Other authors15 described this structure as a knuckle or as a structure like an omega on the axial plane.16 Yousry et al17 defined the “omega” as the most reliable landmark for the identification of the precentral gyrus. The characteristic inverted omega (Ω) shape of the HMC in the axial plane was explained by the presence of 2 anteriorly directed small fissures, which stem from the middle genu of the precentral sulcus. Occasionally, the presence of a third fissure, placed between the first 2, confers a characteristic horizontal epsilon (ε) shape.17 They also localized blood oxygen level–dependent (BOLD) functional MR imaging (fMRI) activation, obtained during hand movement exactly on the omega region of the precentral gyrus. The cortical representation of hand motor function was, therefore, localized in the precentral gyrus and characterized as having either an inverted omega shape or, sometimes, a horizontal epsilon shape in axial scans, whereas it assumed the shape of a posteriorly directed hook in the sagittal plane.17

Our clinical and research experience in MR imaging studies suggested that the different shapes that the HMC can assume in the axial plane are more varied than the 2 classic types previously described. Specifically, we postulated that the classic epsilon morphologic variant could be further subdivided into 3 forms: medially asymmetric epsilon, epsilon, and laterally asymmetric epsilon. We also included the null variant that, although previously reported, has not, to our knowledge, been adequately described and classified.

Sex-related differences in the complexity of sulcal and gyral arrangement of the cerebral cortex have been reported.18 Similar results have not been reported for handedness, but morphometric variations have been described.19,20

The aim of this study was to use MR imaging and Talairach normalization in a large sample population that was homogeneous for age and handedness to evaluate in a sex model a new classification of the morphologic variants of the HMC in the axial plane. We also investigated sex-related differences in the distribution of the different HMC variants and their hemispheric combinations.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

As part of the continuing investigations of brain structures and functions of our institution, we obtained structural brain MR images from 257 young healthy right-handed subjects, all of whom provided written informed consent to participate in these studies. The subjects were recruited from hospital and institutional staff, student body, and the local community by either word of mouth or by advertisement. No subject had a history or MR imaging evidence of overt cerebral pathology as judged by a radiologist, and none had a history of alcohol or substance abuse or of any medical illness known to affect brain morphology. Additional exclusion criteria were history of head injury sufficient to have caused a coma; past or current history of central nervous system disease or a focal lesion incidentally discovered during this study; current or past history of a significant major medical disease; history of hypertension, diabetes, or current treatment with antihypertensives, insulin, or oral hypoglycemic; current pregnancy; significant use of drugs or stimulants in the 12 months before this study; and major mental illnesses as assessed by using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R—Patient Version (SCID-P).21

The inclusion criteria were subjects who were strongly right-handed and between 22 and 35 years of age. The former inclusion criteria were implemented as part of the experimental design to exclude, as an experimental variable, the known relationship between handedness and the laterality of certain cerebral structures.22 Although this design implies that the potentially important relationship between degree of handedness and morphologic variants was not studied, we wished to study initially potential differences in a sex model in which we expected, on the basis of reports in literature, to observe variations.

Handedness was assessed by asking which hand the subject used for writing and was subsequently confirmed and quantified in all subjects by using the Italian revised version of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory,23 adapted by Salmaso and Longoni.24 The questionnaire was self-reported and consisted of 12 items covering several daily actions. Subjects were asked to indicate which hand they would use to perform each task. A laterality quotient (LQ) ranging from −100 to 100 was calculated for each subject. In accordance with previous studies,24,25 subjects who obtained an LQ < 0 were considered left-handers and were excluded.

The mean age of the 143 men was 23.1 years with an SD of 1.1 years. The mean age of the 114 women was 23.0 years with an SD of 0.6 years. The difference between the 2 groups with regard to age was not significant (t = −0.823 with 256 degrees of freedom, P = .411, 2-tailed t test).

Imaging

MR images were acquired by using a 1.5T Magnetom Vision MR imaging scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Structural imaging of the entire brain volume was obtained with a 3D magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo (MPRAGE) T1-weighted sequence. The TR was 9.7 ms, TE was 4 ms, the FOV was 256 mm, section thickness was 1 mm, and flip angle was 12°. All images were obtained by using a matrix of 256 × 256 voxels and the in-plane voxel size of 1 × 1 mm. Structural data were transferred by using a digital format to a workstation equipped with an image-processing software (Brain Voyager 4.9; Brain Innovation, Maastricht, the Netherlands).

The entire scanned volume of each brain was transformed into Talairach space26 in 2 steps: 1) translation and rotation of the cerebrum into the anterior/posterior commissure (ACPC) plane, and 2) identification of the borders of the cerebrum.

The software permitted the multiplanar reformatting of the 3D scanning volume and navigation within the brain by using navigation bars while allowing the simultaneous visualization of a selected point on the 3 spatial planes, thus permitting the extraction of 3D Talairach coordinates (x, y, z) for each selected voxel.

Morphologic Evaluation of the HMC

Before the morphologic evaluation of the HMC, all images were coded so that the operators were blinded to subjects’ identities and sex. Hemispheres were randomly flipped so that the readers were also blinded for this characteristic. The operators first identified the precentral gyrus by using 2 methods: 1) recognizing the relationship between the foot of the precentral gyrus and the posterior aspect of the pars opercularis of the inferior frontal gyrus on the low hemispheric convexity,12 and 2) identifying the typical course of the superior frontal and precentral sulci.10 The HMC was then localized by using standardized mean Talairach coordinates derived from a review of previously published articles,27–31 which focused on the functional and anatomic localization of the HMC: x = ±34, y = −29, z = 50. After positioning the z-axis 50 Talairach mm above the ACPC line, we performed a visual morphologic classification of the HMC for the right and left hemispheres. If the resulting morphologic features of the HMC were not well defined, the positioning of the z-axis was varied by ±2 Talairach mm to obtain a more-defined shape. The readers not only considered the previously described inverted omega and epsilon shapes17 but were also permitted to describe aberrant morphologic variants. To classify the variability observed in the epsilon form, we used an arbitrary method of visually separating the hand knob into 3 equal parts: lateral, central, and medial. Depending on the position of the third fissure, which segments the knob and modifies its appearance from an omega to an epsilon in the lateral, central, or medial part of the hand knob, we defined the variants as “medially asymmetric epsilon,” “epsilon,” and “laterally asymmetric epsilon,” respectively (Fig 1). The height of the knob must be greater than the thickness of the precentral gyrus measured at the base of the knob to distinguish an “omega” from a “null.” If the height was smaller than the thickness, the HMC was classified as “null.”

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Schematic representation of the criteria used for morphologic classification and corresponding MR image of a typical example. The position of the third fissure, which segments the knob, modifying its appearance from an omega to an epsilon in the lateral, central, or medial part of the hand knob indicates a medially asymmetric epsilon, epsilon, and laterally asymmetric epsilon, respectively. To distinguish an omega from a null, the height of the knob must be greater than the thickness of the precentral gyrus measured at the base of the knob. If the height is smaller than the thickness, the HMC is classified as null. Multiplanar reformatted MR imaging axial sections were obtained from left hemispheres 50 ± 2 mm above the Talairach ACPC plane. The red area in the MR images highlights the morphologic variant.

Evaluation of Inter-Reader Variability

Two different expert neuroradiologists then independently evaluated the MR imaging studies of all the subjects, and interobserver reliability was evaluated by using the Kendall W test, which expresses the degree of association between 3 or more variables.

Statistical Analysis

An age difference between men and women was evaluated with a 2-tailed t test. The frequencies and percentages of the different morphologic variants of the HMC were calculated for right, left, and both hemispheres for all the 257 subjects, men only, and women only. Statistically significant differences in the frequencies of the different morphologic variants of the HMC were assessed by using the χ2 test. This comparison was performed treating the 3 variants of epsilon as a single group and then by separating the 3 variants. If a statistically significant difference was observed, then each morphologic variant was compared with all other morphologic variants by using the χ2 test. A 5-by-5 table correlating the morphologic variants of the HMC between the 2 hemispheres was constructed. A subject was considered as concordant when the 2 hemispheres had the same morphologic variant or disconcordant when the 2 variants differed. The concordance of the morphologic variants between the 2 hemispheres for each sex was tested with the kappa test. All statistical calculations were performed with SPSS (Version 11.5 for Windows, SPSS, Chicago, Ill) and Medcalc (MedCalc Software, Mariakerke, Belgium). A P < .01 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Morphologic Variants of the HMC

The resulting morphologic features of the HMC were not well defined, requiring the repositioning of the z-axis by ±2 Talairach mm in 42 (16.3%) cases. This variability was analogous to that observed in our routine practice and was not considered significant.

The 2 neuroradiologists described the shape of the HMC in the axial plane for all 514 hemispheres. The 3 new morphologic variants of HMC (laterally asymmetric epsilon, medially asymmetric epsilon, and null), other then the classic variants, were observed in both hemispheres for both sexes (Fig 1). Overall frequencies and percentages are reported in Table 1 and indicated that the most frequent morphologic variant of the HMC was the omega, followed by the epsilon, the laterally asymmetric epsilon, and the medially asymmetric epsilon; the null variant was the least frequent.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

HMC morphologic variants by gender

Frequencies of the Morphologic Variants

The frequencies and the percentage distribution of the 5 different HMC morphologic variants are reported for each hemisphere and sex in Table 1. The frequencies and the percentage distribution of the different combinations of the 5 morphologic variants of the HMC in the 2 hemispheres are reported in Table 2 and illustrated in Fig 2.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Multiplanar reformatted axial sections obtained 50 ± 2 mm above the Talairach anterior AC-PC plane. Images are shown using the right-left radiologic convention. The following are representative examples of the different combinations of HMC morphologic variants (red highlight) in the 2 hemispheres: A, Omega-omega. B, Epsilon-epsilon. C, Medially asymmetric epsilon-medially asymmetric epsilon. D, Laterally asymmetric epsilon-laterally asymmetric epsilon. E, Null-null. F, Epsilon-omega. G, Omega-laterally asymmetric epsilon. H, Omega-epsilon. I, Omega-medially asymmetric epsilon. J, Medially asymmetric epsilon-omega. The first 5 indicate concordant combinations, and the latter 5, the most common disconcordant combinations.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Correlation of morphologic variants of the HMC for hemispheres in men and women

Sex Differences Between Hemispheres

A statistically significant difference between the 2 hemispheres was not observed overall (Table 1). When considering the 3 HMC morphologic variants of epsilon as a single group, we did not observe a statistically significant difference for sex, whereas we observed a statistically significant difference when considering the 3 epsilon variants as separate groups (χ2 = 13.675 with 4 df, P = .008). Comparison of each morphologic variant with all the other variants for sex indicated that the frequency of epsilon in men was twice that in women (χ2 = 7.933 with 1 df, P = .005).

Table 2 shows the concordance of the morphologic variants for the 2 hemispheres for men and women. Statistical analysis indicated that the concordance for morphologic variants between hemispheres was significant for women (z = 3.03, P < .01) but not for men (z = 2.09, not significant).

Inter-Reader Variability

The evaluation performed to estimate the interobserver reliability yielded a W = 0.98 (P = .017). These results indicated that the classification is highly repeatable. Most of the errors made by the 2 independent readers were between omega-null and between asymmetric epsilons-epsilon morphologic variants.

Discussion

Other than the classic variants proposed by Yousry et al,17 we observed and classified 3 morphologic variants of HMC: laterally asymmetric epsilon, medially asymmetric epsilon, and null. Given the large sample group studied, these variants probably describe all the possible morphologic variants of the HMC and their combinations in the 2 hemispheres that radiologists and neuroscientists are likely to encounter in acquisitions on the axial plane.

The identification of the precentral gyrus on the cortical surface is the crucial initial step before the localization of other cortical regions or lesions of the brain. Therefore, a classification system that describes all the possible presenting forms of the HMC would be an aid in this step and would simplify the communication between neuroradiologists.

Several methods are currently used for recognizing and localizing the precentral gyrus on the basis of its relationship with other anatomic structures.10,12,15,32 The interindividual variability and discordance of the described anatomic landmarks33 reduce the reliability of these methods for the identification of the precentral gyrus.34

In addition to the use of morphologic methods for localizing cortical regions, fMRI with BOLD contrast technique has been used in the past few years to localize a region of the cerebral cortex on the basis of its activation during the execution of a specific task. The major drawbacks of this technique consist of a discrepancy between functional activations and their real anatomic positioning on the cerebral cortex35 and in the limited availability of MR imaging systems and radiologists capable of performing fMRI and analysis. Furthermore, techniques other than or combined with structural imaging and fMRI have been used to localize the precentral gyrus and the HMC: direct electric cortical stimulation,2 positron-emission tomography,11 transcranial magnetic stimulation,30,36 and magnetoencephalography.37 All these techniques localize the HMC in the same cortical region of the precentral gyrus but have major limits: They are time-consuming, invasive, or unavailable. Therefore, a practical method to easily recognize the cortical convolutions of the cerebral cortex by using anatomic landmarks remains fundamental in both healthy subjects and patients with brain lesions.

Yousry et al17 proposed a reliable method for localizing the precentral gyrus based on the morphology of the HMC on the axial plane by using MR imaging. Due to the typical and constant inverted omega or epsilon shape, this anatomic landmark was the most sensitive for the identification of the precentral gyrus. This study was performed on a limited group of subjects and, therefore, given the tremendous interindividual variability of sulcation and gyrification of the cerebral cortex, probably did not include all the anatomic variants. To test this opinion and to complete the spectrum of morphologic variants of the HMC, the present study evaluated the morphology of the HMC in structural brain MR images of a larger group consisting of 257 right-handed men and women.

Adjusting the cerebral size of all subjects to fit in the Talairach space minimized operator-dependent variability in the identification of the HMC. Neuroscientists consider the Talairach atlas the standard reference for locating structural and functional areas.38,39 The 3D normalization approach described by Talairach and Tournoux26 does not modify the morphology of sulcal and gyral arrangements40,41: in particular, with this transformation, the central sulcus and the precentral gyrus present a minimal variability in position and morphology between individuals.27,42

Only young subjects were included in this study to avoid any brain atrophy. In fact, clinical observations suggest that the normal aging process affects gyrification, with the brain appearing more atrophic with increasing age. Gyri become more sharply and steeply curved, while the sulci become more flattened with time.43 In addition, cortical complexity and modification of sulcal topography of the frontal and parietal lobes, likely reflecting the ongoing process of myelination and synaptic remodeling, are known to continue until the second decade of life.44 Therefore, subjects younger than 20 years of age were not enrolled in this study.

Statistical analysis of the frequencies of the different morphologic variants for the 2 hemispheres did not yield a statistically significant difference. Differences were observed in the frequencies of the different morphologies between men and women. In particular, men had a statistically significant higher frequency of epsilon variant compared with women. However, when considering the 3 morphologic variants of epsilon (laterally asymmetric epsilon, epsilon, and medially symmetric epsilon) as a single group, we did not observe a statistically significant sex difference. The concordance for morphologic variants between hemispheres in men was not significant, indicating a higher interhemispheric asymmetry compared with that in women.

Sex-differences in the cortical arrangement have already been reported and correlate to a greater gyrification and cortical complexity in frontal and parietal regions in women than in men.18 If we consider the epsilon as the most complex morphologic variant of the HMC, due to its more complex underlying cortical anatomy, then the results of our study do not confirm those previously reported in literature. This discrepancy could be related to the use of 2D sequences in this study instead of the 3D reconstructions used by Luders et al.18

Differences in brain asymmetry between men and women have been demonstrated, indicating that the male brain is more asymmetric than the female brain.45 Differences in the degree of structural asymmetry have been reported in cortical regions such as the planum temporale, the parietal lobe, and the posterior end of the Sylvian fissure.46 Our results are in agreement with these findings.

The main limitation of this study was that the morphology of the HMC was evaluated on the axial plane, but this scanning plane is the most used by clinicians and neuroscientists and the one in which they have the most experience.

In this study, we included only right-handed subjects in view of the fact that handedness is known to influence the morphometry of the HMC, but an influence on morphology, to our knowledge, has not been reported. Interhemispheric differences of the HMC correlated with handedness have been described in terms of asymmetry of the depth of the central sulcus, which in right-handers is higher in the left hemisphere than in the right.19,20 Functional imaging studies in humans have indicated that the knob is larger and more active in the hemisphere contralateral to the subject's preferred hand, which, in most cases, is the right hand.20,47

Although we did not investigate correlations between morphologies and handedness, whether morphologic variants of the HMC and their interhemispheric combinations could reflect functional differences in hand motor behavior is an important question. Differences in morphology, in fact, can result in differences among some anatomic properties of the cortex, such as neuronal attenuation and connections, which, in turn, are known to correlate with differences in human behavior.48 We therefore consider the possibility of a correlation between the anatomic variants of the HMC and differences in handedness. The validation of this hypothesis requires further study correlating HMC variants and behavioral data.

Conclusions

Five possible morphologic variants of the HMC in the axial plane and their different distributions in the brains of men and women were described. The new classification will be helpful for clinicians and neuroscientists in the routine localization of the central region of the brain.

Acknowledgments

We thank P.M. Rossini for his helpful comments concerning specific aspects of the interpretation of results.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported in part by a grant from the Italian Ministry of Research to the Center of Excellence on Aging of the University “G. d’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara.

    Paper previously presented in part at: Annual Meeting of the American Society of Neuroradiology, May 3, 2006; San Diego, Calif.

References

  1. ↵
    Foerster O. Motorische Felder und Bahnen. In: Bumse H, Foerster O, eds. Handbuch der Neurologie. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag;1936 :1–37
  2. ↵
    Penfield W, Boldrey E. Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain 1937;60:389–443
    FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Penfield W, Rasmussen T. The cerebral cortex of man. New York: McMillan;1950
  4. ↵
    Hlustik P, Solodkin A, Gullapalli RP, et al. Somatotopy in human primary motor and somatosensory hand representations revisited. Cereb Cortex 2001;11:312–21
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Hanakawa T, Parikh S, Bruno MK, et al. Finger and face representation in the ipsilateral pre-central motor areas in humans. J Neurophysiol 2005;93:2950–08
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Cunningham DJ. Contributions to the Surface Anatomy of the Cerebral Hemispheres. Dublin, Ireland: Academy House;1892
  7. Dejerine J. Anatomie des Centres Nerveux. Vol 1. Paris, France: Rueff;1895
  8. Testut L. Traite d’Anatomie Humaine. Paris, France: Octave Doin et Fils;1911
  9. ↵
    Ono M, Kubik S, Abernathey CD. Atlas of the Cerebral Sulci. New York: Thieme;1990
  10. ↵
    Kido DK, LeMay M, Levinson AW, et al. Computed tomographic localization of the precentral gyrus. Radiology 1980;135:373–77
    PubMed
  11. ↵
    Rumeau C, Tzourio N, Murayama N, et al. Location of hand function in the sensorimotor cortex: MR and functional correlation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:567–72
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Naidich TP, Valavanis AG, Kubik S. Anatomic relationships along the low-middle convexity. Part I. Normal specimens and magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 1995;36:517–32
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Salamon G, Martini P, Ternier F, et al. Topographical study of supratentorial brain tumors. J Neuroradiol 1991;18:123–40
    PubMed
  14. ↵
    Talairach J, Tournoux P. Referentially oriented cerebral MRI anatomy. New York: Thieme;1993
  15. ↵
    Naidich TP, Brightbill TC. The pars marginalis: Part I: A ‘bracket’ sign for the central sulcus in axial plane CT and MRI. Int J Neuroradiol 1996;2:3–19
  16. ↵
    Puce A, Constable RT, Luby ML, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of sensory and motor cortex: comparison with electrophysiological localization. J Neurosurg 1995;83:262–70
    PubMed
  17. ↵
    Yousry TA, Schmid UD, Alkadhi H, et al. Localization of the hand motor area to a knob on the precentral gyrus: a new landmark. Brain 1997;120:141–57
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Luders E, Narr KL, Thompson PM, et al. Gender differences in cortical complexity. Nat Neurosci 2004;7:799–800
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Zilles K, Schleicher A, Langemann C, et al. Quantitative analysis of sulci in the human cerebral cortex: development, regional heterogeneity, gender difference, asymmetry, intersubject variability and cortical architecture. Hum Brain Mapp 1997;5:218–21
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Hopkins WD, Pilcher DL. Neuroanatomical localization of the hand motor area with magnetic resonance imaging: the left hemisphere is larger in great apes. Behav Neurosci 2001;115:1159–64
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Gibbon M, et al. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R—Patient Edition (SCID-P) Version 1.0. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press;1990 .
  22. ↵
    Barta P, Dazzan P. Hemispheric surface area: sex, laterality and age effects. Cereb Cortex 2003;13:364–70
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971;9:97–113
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Salmaso D, Longoni AM. Problems in the assessment of hand preference. Cortex 1985;21:533–49
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Pia Viggiano M, Borelli P, Vannucci M, et al. Hand preference in Italian students. Laterality 2001;6:283–86
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Talairach J, Tournoux P. Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. New York: Thieme;1988
  27. ↵
    Sastre-Janer FA, Regis J, Belin P, et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the human central sulcus reveals a morphologic correlate of the hand area. Cereb Cortex 1998;8:641–47
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  28. Carey LM, Abbott DF, Egan GF, et al. The functional neuroanatomy and long-term reproducibility of brain activation associated with a simple finger tapping task in older healthy volunteers: a serial PET study. Neuroimage 2000;11:124–44
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. Beisteiner R, Windischberger C, Lanzenberger R, et al. Finger somatotopy in human motor cortex. Neuroimage 2001;13:1016–26
    PubMed
  30. ↵
    Lotze M, Kaethnerc RJ, Erb M, et al. Comparison of representational maps using functional magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Clin Neuropsychol 2003;114:306–12
  31. ↵
    Agnew JA, Zeffiro TA, Edena GF. Left hemisphere specialization for the control of voluntary movement rate. Neuroimage 2004;22:289–303
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Ebeling U, Steinmetz H, Huang YX, et al. Topography and identification of the inferior precentral sulcus in MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;153:1051–56
    PubMed
  33. ↵
    Steinmetz H, Furst G, Freund HJ. Variation of perisylvian and calcarine anatomic landmarks within stereotaxic proportional coordinates. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1990;11:1123–30
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Sobel DF, Gallen CC, Schwartz BJ, et al. Locating the central sulcus: comparison of MR anatomic and magnetoencephalographic functional methods. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1993;14:915–25
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Yousry TA, Schmid UD, Schmidt D, et al. The central sulcal vein: a landmark identifying the central sulcus by functional MRI. J Neurosurg 1996;85:608–17
    PubMed
  36. ↵
    Boroojerdi B, Foltys H, Krings T, et al. Localization of the motor hand area using transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Neurophysiol 1999;110:699–704
    CrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Volkmann J, Schnitzler A, Witte OW, et al. Handedness and asymmetry of hand representation in human motor cortex. J Neurophysiol 1998;79:2149–54
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    Carmack PS, Spence J, Gunst RF, et al. Improved agreement between Talairach and MNI coordinate spaces in deep brain regions. Neuroimage 2004;22:367–71
    CrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Mayka MA, Colcos DM, Leurgans SE, et al. Three-dimensional locations and boundaries of motor and premotor cortices as defined by functional brain imaging: a meta-analysis Neuroimage 2006;31:1453–74
    CrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    Fischl B, Sereno MI, Tootell RBH, et al. High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Hum Brain Mapp 1999;8:272–84
    CrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Roland PE, Geyer S, Amunts K, et al. Cytoarchitectural maps of the human brain in standard anatomical space. Hum Brain Mapp 1997;5:222–27
    CrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Rademacher J, Burgel U, Geyer S, et al. Variability and asymmetry in the human precentral motor system: a cytoarchitectonic and myeloarchitectonic brain mapping study. Brain 2001;124:2232–58
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Magnotta VA, Andreasen NC, Schultz SK, et al. Quantitative in vivo measurement of gyrification in the human brain: changes associated with aging. Cereb Cortex 1999;9:151–60
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    Blanton RE, Levitt JG, Thompson PM, et al. Mapping cortical asymmetry and complexity patterns in normal children. Psychiatry Res 2001;107:29–43
    CrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    Toga AW, Thompson PM. Mapping brain asymmetry. Nat Rev Neurosci 2003;4:37–48
    CrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    Jancke L, Schlaug G, Huang Y, et al. Asymmetry of the planum parietale. Neuroreport 1994;5:1161–63
    CrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    Triggs WJ, Calvanio R, Levine M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals a hemisphere asymmetry correlate of intermanual differences in motor performance. Neuropsychologia 1997;35:1355–63
    CrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    Witelson SF, Beresh H, Kigar DL. Intelligence and brain size in 100 postmortem brains: sex, lateralization and age factors. Brain 2006;129:386–98
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received November 2, 2006.
  • Accepted after revision January 25, 2007.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 28 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 28, Issue 8
September 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
New Morphologic Variants of the Hand Motor Cortex as Seen with MR Imaging in a Large Study Population
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
M. Caulo, C. Briganti, P.A. Mattei, B. Perfetti, A. Ferretti, G.L. Romani, A. Tartaro, C. Colosimo
New Morphologic Variants of the Hand Motor Cortex as Seen with MR Imaging in a Large Study Population
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2007, 28 (8) 1480-1485; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0597

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
New Morphologic Variants of the Hand Motor Cortex as Seen with MR Imaging in a Large Study Population
M. Caulo, C. Briganti, P.A. Mattei, B. Perfetti, A. Ferretti, G.L. Romani, A. Tartaro, C. Colosimo
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2007, 28 (8) 1480-1485; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0597
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Functional Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Prolonged Motor Activation using Conventional and Spectral GLM Analyses
  • A roadmap for implanting microelectrode arrays to evoke tactile sensations through intracortical microstimulation
  • Increased cortical inhibition immediately following brief motor memory reactivation supports reconsolidation and overnight offline learning gains
  • Early excitatory and inhibitory modifications in the motor cortex following skill learning support motor memory consolidation and cortical plasticity overnight
  • Morphologic Variants of the Hand Motor Cortex in Developing Brains from Neonates through Childhood Assessed by MR Imaging
  • White matter variability, cognition, and disorders: a systematic review
  • Reduced asymmetry of the hand knob area and decreased sensorimotor u-fiber connectivity in middle-aged adults with autism
  • Laminar perfusion imaging with zoomed arterial spin labeling at 7 Tesla
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating the Effects of White Matter Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on the Volume Estimation of 6 Brain Tissue Segmentation Methods
  • Quiet PROPELLER MRI Techniques Match the Quality of Conventional PROPELLER Brain Imaging Techniques
  • Predictors of Reperfusion in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire