Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBrain

Iron Particles Enhance Visualization of Experimental Gliomas with High-Resolution Sonography

Ingo Nolte, Giles H. Vince, Mathias Maurer, Christian Herbold, Roland Goldbrunner, Laszlo Solymosi, Guido Stoll and Martin Bendszus
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2005, 26 (6) 1469-1474;
Ingo Nolte
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giles H. Vince
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mathias Maurer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian Herbold
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roland Goldbrunner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laszlo Solymosi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guido Stoll
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Bendszus
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intraoperative MR imaging and sonography are used for navigation during neurosurgical procedures. The purpose of this experimental study was to evaluate the potential of high-resolution sonography using superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) particles as a contrast medium to delineate brain tumors and to relate these findings with those of MR imaging.

METHODS: C6 gliomas were implanted in 36 rats. Eleven days after tumor implantation, the animals underwent MR imaging with a 1.5-T MR imaging unit. Twelve animals received gadopentetate dimeglumine immediately before the MR examination, 12 animals were injected with SPIO particles 24 hours before MR imaging, and 12 animals received no contrast agent. Immediately after MR imaging, the animals were sacrificed and their brains were removed and placed in saline. Sonography was performed instantly after brain removal. Brains were embedded in paraffin, and sections were stained for iron with Perl’s stain and for macrophages with ED-1 immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS: At MR imaging, the tumors appeared hyperintense on T2-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images. After application of SPIO particles, they became markedly hypointense on T2-weighted images and hypo- to hyperintense on T1-weighted images. On sonograms, gliomas were iso- to slightly hyperechoic to normal brain parenchyma on nonenhanced and on gadolinium-enhanced images. After application of SPIO particles, tumors became markedly hyperechoic and were distinctly demarcated from the surrounding brain tissue.

CONCLUSION: SPIO particles improved the detection and demarcation of the experimental gliomas on sonograms, which may improve intraoperative neuronavigation with sonography.

The treatment of choice for malignant gliomas is tumor resection followed by adjuvant radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy. The extent of surgical tumor removal has an effect on tumor regrowth and patient prognosis (1). Intraoperative MR imaging has been shown to reduce the amount of residual tumor tissue in glioblastomas (2). Several clinical studies also report on the value of sonography in the intraoperative resection control of brain tumors (3–5). In addition, residual tumor mass delineated by sonography correlates with postoperative survival of patients with high-grade gliomas (6). In general, brain tumors are slightly hyperechoic on intraoperative sonograms; however, in a substantial number of cases the tumor margins are poorly defined on sonograms (4, 5). Superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) particles have been shown to accumulate both in experimental as well as in human gliomas (7, 8). Our purpose was to evaluate the potential of high-resolution sonography using SPIO particles as a contrast medium to delineate brain tumors and to relate these findings with those of MR imaging.

Methods

Tumor Implantation

The C6 rat glioma cell line was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD). Clones were grown as a monolayer in 75-mL flasks in Dulbecco’s minimum essential medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Flow Laboratories), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 mg/mL streptomycin (Flow Laboratories). Cells were grown at 37°C, 5.0% CO2, and 100% humidity. Reaggregations of in vitro monolayer tumor cells (spheroids) were produced by seeding 5 × 106 cells into a 75-mL flask that had been coated previously with 1.0% Noble agar (Difco, Detroit, MI) covered by a liquid medium overlay (9). Spheroids were screened for signs of necrosis by using inverted light microscopy to avoid confusion of in vitro tumor necrosis with in vivo tumor necrosis (in vivo, the spheroid can recruit tumor vessels and can thereby grow to a larger size before necrosis occurs [9]). Necrotic centers were observed when a diameter of more than 400–500 μm was reached. After 5 days, spheroids of each clone with a diameter of 400 μm and without a necrotic core were selected for implantation.

All experimental procedures were approved by the animal care committee of the University of Würzburg and in accordance with the State of Bavaria guidelines for the care of laboratory animals. The hosts were 36 male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 300–350 g. They were kept on a regular daylight schedule with rodent animal chow and water ad libidum. For implantation surgery, each animal was deeply anesthetized with an intramuscular application of ketamine 100 mg/kg (Ketanest; Parke-Davis, Morris Plains, NJ) and xylazine 10 mg/kg (Rompun; Bayer Vital, Leverkusen, Germany). The head was mounted in a headholder, and a midline skin incision was performed. The skull was trephined at the bregma, and the dura was exposed. The dura was then excised around the bone under microscopic control to prevent vascularization by dural vessels. The pia and the cortex were incised in an X shape with a microscalpel. A single spheroid was then placed subcortically into the X-shaped incision.

MR Imaging Measurements

All measurements were performed with a 1.5-T unit (Vision; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) by using a round surface coil (diameter 4 cm). Animals were deeply anesthetized with an intramuscular application of ketamine 100 mg/kg (Ketanest; Parke-Davis) and xylazine 10 mg/kg (Rompun; Bayer Vital). In 12 animals, gadopentetate dimeglumine 0.2 mL/kg (Magnevist; Schering, Berlin, Germany) was injected before the MR examination. Twelve animals had received SPIO particles (Resovist 300 μmol/kg of body weight; Schering) 24 hours before imaging, and 12 animals received no contrast agent. SPIO particles are mostly taken up by the reticuloendothelial sytem of liver and spleen (10) and are therefore mainly used for hepatic imaging. A minor portion is taken up by circulating macrophages that subsequently leave the circulation and can be visualized with MR imaging because of their strong paramagnetic effect (11). The MR protocol consisted of T2-weighted (2500/96 TR/TE) and T1-weighted (600/14) turbo spin-echo sequences in the coronal plane (60-mm FOV, 3-mm section thickness). The section position was perpendicular to the skull base.

Sonography

After the MR examinations, animals were euthanized by intracardiac injection of pentobarbital 50 mg/kg under deep ketamin anesthesia. The brains were rapidly and carefully removed and placed into a water tank on a navigable mechanical table. Sonography was performed ex vivo by using a color-coded, phased-array sonographic system (Sonoline Elegra; Siemens) equipped with a VX 13.5 13-MHz transducer with an emission frequency of 12 MHz. The axial resolution in the focus zone is about 0.7 mm. The sonographic system indexes chosen were penetration depth 1.5 cm, dynamic range 60 dB, low persistence, focus length 1 cm. Image brightness and gain (26 dB) were not changed for sonification of the different groups. The sonographic transducer was fixed directly above the brain, which was imaged in coronal and sagittal planes by continuously moving the tank with the mechanical table.

Histologic Examination

Brains were immersed in 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. Then, 10-μm coronal sections were cut through the cortical hemispheres and stained with Perl’s stain for iron detection and either counterstained with hematoxylin-eosin or, in addition, stained for macrophages by immunohistochemistry by using the monoclonal antibody ED-1, as described in detail elsewhere (12).

Results

Both on sonograms and MR images, the tumors appeared round to ellipsoid (Fig 1). Imaging characteristics are summarized in the Table. On nonenhanced MR images, the tumors were isointense on T1-weighted images and predominantly hyperintense on T2-weighted images, whereas on sonograms they were slightly hyperechoic to the surrounding brain parenchyma. After application of gadopentetate dimeglumine, the lesions revealed a marked contrast enhancement. On T2-weighted MR images and sonograms, the signal intensity and echogenicity, respectively, were unchanged compared with that on nonenhanced images. Twenty-four hours after systemic SPIO application, the tumors revealed a predominant hypointensity on T2-weighted images and a mixed hypo- to hyperintensity on T1-weighted images. On sonograms, the application of SPIO particles markedly increased tumor hyperechogenicity. This was most pronounced at the tumor margins where the glioma was sharply demarcated from the surrounding brain tissue. Two brains underwent additional histologic analysis. After Perl’s stain, islets of blue iron-positive cells with the typical morphology of tumor cells were detectable within the tumor parenchyma (Fig 2, A). In addition, small iron-positive cells were found diffusely within the tumors, and more prominently at their margins (Fig 2B). Most of these scattered iron-positive cells could be identified as ED-1–positive macrophages by double labeling (Fig 2C and 2D).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

A–M, MR images (T2-weighted, 2500/96; T1-weighted, 600/14), sonograms (US), and photomicrographs of paraffin sections (hematoxylin-eosin stain; original magnification, X2) of C6 glioma in rat brain. Each row shows the different modalities in one animal. Images in the first row (A–D) were obtained without contrast media, the second row of images (E–H) was gadolinium-enhanced, and images in the third row (J–M) were SPIO-enhanced.

A–D, On the nonenhanced images, the C6 glioma is predominantly hyperintense on the T2-weighted image (A) and isointense on the T1-weighted image (B). On the sonogram (C), the tumor appears iso- to slightly hyperechoic to brain tissue. With hematoxylin-eosin staining (D), the corresponding area is clearly identifiable.

E–H, After injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine, the tumor is hyperintense on the T1-weighted image (F) and reveals similar characteristics on T2-weighted image (E), sonogram (G), and hematoxylin-eosin staining (H) to those of the tumor on nonenhanced images.

J–M, Twenty-four hours after injection of SPIO particles, the tumor is inhomogeneously hypo- to hyperintense on T2-weighted (J) and T1-weighted (K) images. On the sonogram (L), the tumor appears inhomogeneously hyperechoic to brain tissue with hyperechogic margins.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

A–D, Histologic and immunohistologic localization of iron, tumor cells, and macrophages. Photomicrographs (original magnification, X500 [A, C, and D] and X330 [B]) of paraffin sections stained with Perl’s stain (A and B) for detection of SPIO particles show iron-laden tumor cells in the center of the tumor in A and mostly mononuclear cells in the periphery of the tumor in B. These cells represent iron-labeled macrophages as shown by double labeling with the antibody ED-1 (C). The black-appearing (due to overlap of blue and brown staining product) macrophages in C show discernible blue staining for iron and brown ED-1 immunoreactivity in D when the same section is examined by using a different optic filter of the microscope (identical cells are marked by arrows).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Imaging characteristics of the 36 experimental gliomas

Discussion

Intraoperative neuronavigation and image-guided resection control have gained importance during the past years. The most commonly applied intraoperative imaging modalities include MR imaging and sonography. In the present study, we compared the imaging characteristics of experimental glioma with different imaging modalities (nonenhanced MR imaging and sonography, gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging and sonography, SPIO-enhanced MR imaging and sonography) in order to compare tumor visualization and demarcation of the tumor edges.

As a principal and novel finding, we have shown that SPIO administration increases tumor echogenicity on sonograms. On nonenhanced sonograms, gliomas have been reported to appear iso- to hyperechoic (3, 4, 13) to the surrounding brain tissue. Especially on intraoperative sonograms, tumor demarcation can be difficult because blood clots in the resection cavity and superimposing tissue margins may also be slightly hyperechoic (5). Moreover, tumor echogenicity may not differ significantly from that of surrounding normal brain tissue (3, 4).

Intraoperative MR imaging has been shown to increase the extent of tumor resection in patients with high-grade glioma (14). Nevertheless, intraoperative imaging has several limitations including brain shift (15–18) and surgically induced extravasation of gadolinium-based contrast agents, potentially mimicking residual tumor (19, 20). Ultrasmall iron oxide particles have been suggested as a possible solution for the latter problem since they are applied preoperatively and are already cleared from the blood pool at the time of surgery (21).

Previous experimental and clinical studies have shown an increase of tissue echogenicity due to local iron deposition. Stereotactically injected FeCl3 into rat substantia nigra causes hyperechogenicity (22). In a postmortem brain analysis of 20 patients without extrapyramidal disorders, hyperechogenicity of the substantia nigra on sonograms was related to a higher tissue iron level (23). The change of impedance is generally accepted as the mechanism of iron-induced hyperechogenicity, though additional effects such as the specific molecular environment may play a role as well, as ferritin does not show a comparable hyperechogenic effect (22).

Uptake of iron particles in experimental and human glioma (7, 8, 24–28) has already been demonstrated both on MR images and at histologic examination. In the view of these previous findings, we tested the effect of systemic iron particle application on tumor echogenicity on sonograms. Administration of iron particles induced an increase of echogenicity on sonograms compared with nonenhanced sonograms, thereby demarcating the tumor margins from the surrounding brain tissue. In a clinical setting, sonography may assist in tumor resection.

Even though the increase in tumor visualization on sonograms was obvious, some potential limitations have to be considered. In the present study, we have shown that iron particles can be used to enhance echogenicity on sonograms in a rat brain tumor model. However, the C6 glioma model—although one of the most recognized models for human glioblastoma—does not adequately reflect the infiltrating nature of the human glioblastoma. Because of this limitation, we were not able to prove that SPIO particles can be used to delineate infiltrating glioma cells. Nevertheless, Varallyay et al (7) and Enochs et al (29) reported that infiltrating human glioma could effectively be labeled by iron particles as shown on MR images.

Second, controversy appears in the literature regarding the specific type of cell within the tumor that takes up the iron particles. Zimmer et al (8, 24) reported in vivo uptake of monocrystalline iron oxide nanoparticles (MIONs) exclusively in gliosarcoma cells. Moore et al (25) quantified in vivo MION uptake in GFP-expressing 9L glioma and found labeled MION to be co-localized predominantly with GFP-expressing tumor cells and, to a lesser degree, within tumor-associated macrophages and tumor vascular endothelium. Fleige et al (28) used labeled ultrasmall SPIO in GFP-expressing F98 glioma cells in vivo and detected the ultrasmall SPIO predominantly in microglia and macrophages but hardly in tumor cells. Varallyay et al (7) applied ferrumoxtran in 17 patients with different histologic types of brain tumors and found tumor iron enhancement in 15 cases. In one patient with an anaplastic oligodendroglioma, histologic work-up revealed most iron staining in cells with astrocytic morphology and, to a lesser degree, in tumor cells. In our study, accumulation of systemically applied SPIO particles occurred in both tumor cells and macrophages, with the latter predominantly located at the tumor margins. Tumor cells could be identified on the basis of their typical morphology, and macrophages by double labeling with the monoclonal antibody ED-1. Therefore, we believe that the capsule-like appearance on SPIO-enhanced sonograms is due to iron particles within macrophages. Uptake of SPIO particles in macrophages is consistent with our previous findings in neurodegeneration, cerebral ischemia, and autoimmune disorders of the nervous system (12, 30, 31). Most important, we could show that the presence of iron-laden macrophages in these neurologic disorders reflected recent infiltration from the circulation into the nervous system, whereas resident macrophages/microglia were not labeled. Although tumor cells clearly must have taken up SPIO particles locally within the brain, it is very likely that iron-laden macrophages represent an acute inflammatory response from the circulation. Thus, at the present stage, sensitivity and specificity of iron enhancement is limited, a problem well known from nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT and MR imaging (32–36); however, as proof of principle we were able to show that SPIO particles improve the detection and demarcation of experimental glioma on sonograms.

Moreover, detection of iron particles on MR images is also possible in extracerebral human tumor cell lines (breast carcinoma, colon carcinoma, and small lung cell carcinoma [25]). Our results imply that SPIO particles may also improve sonographic delineation in extracerebral tumors that show SPIO-enhancement on MR images.

More experimental data are needed to exactly clarify the mechanism of iron uptake in tumor cells and macrophages in glioma before a clinical application can be considered.

Conclusion

The intravenous injection of SPIO particles improved the detection and demarcation of experimental gliomas on sonograms. This finding may assist intraoperative neuronavigation with sonography.

Footnotes

  • M.B. is a stiftungs professor supported by a grant from Schering Deutschland GmbH, Berlin. I.N. is supported by a grant from the faculty of clinical medicine, Mannheim.

References

  1. ↵
    Albert FK, Forsting M, Sartor K, Adams HP, Kunze S. Early postoperative magnetic resonance imaging after resection of malignant glioma: objective evaluation of residual tumor and its influence on regrowth and prognosis. Neurosurgery 1994;34:45–60; discussion 60–61
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Wirtz CR, Knauth M, Staubert A, et al. Clinical evaluation and follow-up results for intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 2000;46:1112–1120; discussion 1120–1122
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Hammoud MA, Ligon BL, elSouki R, Shi WM, Schomer DF, Sawaya R. Use of intraoperative ultrasound for localizing tumors and determining the extent of resection: a comparative study with magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 1996;84:737–741
    PubMed
  4. ↵
    Le Roux PD, Berger MS, Wang K, Mack LA, Ojemann GA. Low grade gliomas: comparison of intraoperative ultrasound characteristics with preoperative imaging studies. J Neurooncol 1992;13:189–198
    PubMed
  5. ↵
    Chacko AG, Kumar NK, Chacko G, Athyal R, Rajshekhar V. Intraoperative ultrasound in determining the extent of resection of parenchymal brain tumours: a comparative study with computed tomography and histopathology. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2003;145:743–748; discussion 748
    PubMed
  6. ↵
    Maurer M, Becker G, Wagner R, et al. Early postoperative transcranial sonography (TCS), CT, and MRI after resection of high grade glioma: evaluation of residual tumour and its influence on prognosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2000;142:1089–1097
    PubMed
  7. ↵
    Varallyay P, Nesbit G, Muldoon LL, et al. Comparison of two superparamagnetic viral-sized iron oxide particles ferumoxides and ferumoxtran-10 with a gadolinium chelate in imaging intracranial tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:510–519
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Zimmer C, Weissleder R, Poss K, Bogdanova A, Wright SC Jr, Enochs WS. MR imaging of phagocytosis in experimental gliomas. Radiology 1995;197:533–538
    PubMed
  9. ↵
    Goldbrunner RH, Wagner S, Roosen K, Tonn JC. Models for assessment of angiogenesis in gliomas. J Neurooncol 2000;50:53–62
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Hamm B, Staks T, Taupitz M, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of liver and spleen: first experience in humans with a new superparamagnetic iron oxide. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994;4:659–668
    PubMed
  11. ↵
    Chen F, Ward J, Robinson PJ. MR imaging of the liver and spleen: a comparison of the effects on signal intensity of two superparamagnetic iron oxide agents. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17:549–556
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Bendszus M, Stoll G. Caught in the act: in vivo mapping of macrophage infiltration in nerve injury by magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 2003;23:10892–10896
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Enzmann DR, Wheat R, Marshall WH, et al. Tumors of the central nervous system studied by computed tomography and ultrasound. Radiology 1985;154:393–399
    PubMed
  14. ↵
    Knauth M, Wirtz CR, Tronnier VM, Aras N, Kunze S, Sartor K. Intraoperative MR imaging increases the extent of tumor resection in patients with high-grade gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1642–1646
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Kelly PJ, Earnest F 4th, Kall BA, Goerss SJ, Scheithauer B. Surgical options for patients with deep-seated brain tumors: computer-assisted stereotactic biopsy. Mayo Clin Proc 1985;60:223–229
    PubMed
  16. Kelly PJ, Kall BA, Goerss S, Earnest F. Present and future developments of stereotactic technology. Appl Neurophysiol 1985;48:1–6
  17. Kelly PJ, Kall BA, Goerss S, Earnest F 4th. Computer-assisted stereotaxic laser resection of intra-axial brain neoplasms. J Neurosurg 1986;64:427–439
    PubMed
  18. ↵
    Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Cerny S, Hastreiter P, Greiner G, Fahlbusch R. Quantification of, visualization of, and compensation for brain shift using intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 2000;47:1070–1079; discussion 1079–1080
    PubMed
  19. ↵
    Knauth M, Aras N, Wirtz CR, Dorfler A, Engelhorn T, Sartor K. Surgically induced intracranial contrast enhancement: potential source of diagnostic error in intraoperative MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1547–1553
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Dietrich J, Schneider JP, Schulz T, Seifert V, Trantakis C, Kellermann S. Appearance of the resection area of brain tumors in intraoperative MRI imaging. Radiologe 1998;38:935–942
    PubMed
  21. ↵
    Knauth M, Egelhof T, Roth SU, Wirtz CR, Sartor K. Monocrystalline iron oxide nanoparticles: possible solution to the problem of surgically induced intracranial contrast enhancement in intraoperative MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:99–102
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Berg D, Grote C, Rausch WD, et al. Iron accumulation in the substantia nigra in rats visualized by ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999;25:901–904
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Berg D, Roggendorf W, Schroder U, et al. Echogenicity of the substantia nigra: association with increased iron content and marker for susceptibility to nigrostriatal injury. Arch Neurol 2002;59:999–1005
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Zimmer C, Wright SC Jr, Engelhardt RT, et al. Tumor cell endocytosis imaging facilitates delineation of the glioma-brain interface. Exp Neurol 1997;143:61–69
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Moore A, Marecos E, Bogdanov A Jr, Weissleder R. Tumoral distribution of long-circulating dextran-coated iron oxide nanoparticles in a rodent model. Radiology 2000;214:568–574
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. Moore A, Marecos E, Simonova M, Weissleder R, Bogdanov A Jr. Novel gliosarcoma cell line expressing green fluorescent protein: a model for quantitative assessment of angiogenesis. Microvasc Res 1998;56:145–153
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. Moore A, Weissleder R, Bogdanov A Jr. Uptake of dextran-coated monocrystalline iron oxides in tumor cells and macrophages. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:1140–1145
    PubMed
  28. ↵
    Fleige G, Nolte C, Synowitz M, Seeberger F, Kettenmann H, Zimmer C. Magnetic labeling of activated microglia in experimental gliomas. Neoplasia 2001;3:489–499
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Enochs WS, Harsh G, Hochberg F, Weissleder R. Improved delineation of human brain tumors on MR images using a long-circulating, superparamagnetic iron oxide agent. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:228–232
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Kleinschnitz C, Bendszus M, Frank M, Solymosi L, Toyka KV, Stoll G. In vivo monitoring of macrophage infiltration in experimental ischemic brain lesions by magnetic resonance imaging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2003;23:1356–1361
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Stoll G, Wesemeier C, Gold R, Solymosi L, Toyka KV, Bendszus M. In vivo monitoring of macrophage infiltration in experimental autoimmune neuritis by magnetic resonance imaging. J Neuroimmunol 2004;149:142–146
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Shaw EG, Scheithauer BW, O’Fallon JR, Tazelaar HD, Davis DH. Oligodendrogliomas: the Mayo Clinic experience. J Neurosurg 1992;76:428–434
    PubMed
  33. Vonofakos D, Marcu H, Hacker H. Oligodendrogliomas: CT patterns with emphasis on features indicating malignancy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1979;3:783–788
    PubMed
  34. Daumas-Duport C, Tucker ML, Kolles H, et al. Oligodendrogliomas, II: a new grading system based on morphological and imaging criteria. J Neurooncol 1997;34:61–78
    CrossRefPubMed
  35. Barker FG 2nd, Chang SM, Huhn SL, et al. Age and the risk of anaplasia in magnetic resonance-nonenhancing supratentorial cerebral tumors. Cancer 1997;80:936–941
    CrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Scott JN, Brasher PM, Sevick RJ, Rewcastle NB, Forsyth PA. How often are nonenhancing supratentorial gliomas malignant? A population study. Neurology 2002;59:947–949
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received August 31, 2004.
  • Accepted after revision October 20, 2004.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 26 (6)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 26, Issue 6
1 Jun 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Iron Particles Enhance Visualization of Experimental Gliomas with High-Resolution Sonography
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Ingo Nolte, Giles H. Vince, Mathias Maurer, Christian Herbold, Roland Goldbrunner, Laszlo Solymosi, Guido Stoll, Martin Bendszus
Iron Particles Enhance Visualization of Experimental Gliomas with High-Resolution Sonography
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2005, 26 (6) 1469-1474;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Iron Particles Enhance Visualization of Experimental Gliomas with High-Resolution Sonography
Ingo Nolte, Giles H. Vince, Mathias Maurer, Christian Herbold, Roland Goldbrunner, Laszlo Solymosi, Guido Stoll, Martin Bendszus
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2005, 26 (6) 1469-1474;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • White Matter Alterations in the Brains of Patients with Active, Remitted, and Cured Cushing Syndrome: A DTI Study
  • Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of MR Imaging Findings in Patients with Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Implanted with Mesenchymal Stem Cells
  • Fast Contrast-Enhanced 4D MRA and 4D Flow MRI Using Constrained Reconstruction (HYPRFlow): Potential Applications for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire