Endovascular Treatment of Wide-Neck Intracranial Aneurysms Using the Novel Contour Neurovascular System: 5-Year Follow-Up

References

1. 1.↵
   1. De Leacy RA,
   2. Fargen KM,
   3. Mascitelli JR, et al

   . Wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms of the middle cerebral artery and basilar apex treated by endovascular techniques: a multicentre, core lab adjudicated study evaluating safety and durability of occlusion (BRANCH). J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:31–36 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-013771 pmid:29858397

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Fiorella D,
   2. Arthur AS,
   3. Chiacchierini R, et al

   . How safe and effective are existing treatments for wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms? Literature-based objective performance criteria for safety and effectiveness. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:1197–201 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013223 pmid:28798268

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Zhao B,
   2. Yin R,
   3. Lanzino G, et al

   . Endovascular coiling of wide-neck and wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1700–05 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4834 pmid:27256850

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Lawson A,
   2. Goddard T,
   3. Ross S, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms using the Woven EndoBridge technique in a single center: preliminary results. J Neurosurg 2017;126:17–28 doi:10.3171/2015.4.JNS142456 pmid:27081907

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Clajus C,
   2. Strasilla C,
   3. Fiebig T, et al

   . Initial and mid-term results from 108 consecutive patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with the WEB device. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:411–17 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012276 pmid:27075486

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Piotin M,
   2. Biondi A,
   3. Sourour N, et al

   . The LUNA aneurysm embolization system for intracranial aneurysm treatment: short-term, mid-term and long-term clinical and angiographic results. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:e34 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-013767 pmid:29669856

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Akhunbay-Fudge CY,
   2. Deniz K,
   3. Tyagi AK, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms using the novel Contour Neurovascular System: a single-center safety and feasibility study. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:987–92 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015628 pmid:31974281

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Mascitelli JR,
   2. Lawton MT,
   3. Hendricks BK, et al

   . Analysis of wide-neck aneurysms in the Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial. Neurosurgery 2019;85:622–31 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyy439 pmid:30346618

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Roy D,
   2. Milot G,
   3. Raymond J

   . Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke 2001;32:1998–204 doi:10.1161/hs0901.095600 pmid:11546888

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Mascitelli JR,
    2. Oermann EK,
    3. De Leacy RA, et al

    . Angiographic outcome of intracranial aneurysms with neck remnant following coil embolization. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:484–89 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011226 pmid:24792578

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Liebig T,
    2. Killer-Oberpfalzer M,
    3. Gal G, et al

    . The safety and effectiveness of the Contour neurovascular system (Contour) for the treatment of bifurcation aneurysms: the CERUS Study. Neurosurgery 2022;90:270–77 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000001783 pmid:35113830

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Biondi A,
    2. Primikiris P,
    3. Vitale G, et al

    . Endosaccular flow disruption with the Contour Neurovascular System: angiographic and clinical results in a single-center study of 60 unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2023;15:838–43 doi:10.1136/jnis-2022-019271 pmid:35995545

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Spelle L,
    3. Molyneux A, et al

    ; WEBCAST and French Observatory Investigators. Clinical and anatomical follow-up in patients with aneurysms treated with the WEB device: 1-year follow-up report in the cumulated population of 2 prospective, multicenter series (WEBCAST and French Observatory). Neurosurgery 2016;78:133–41 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000001106 pmid:26552042

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Costalat V,
    3. Moret J, et al

    . Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB: results of the WEBCAST study. J Neurosurg 2016;124:1250–56 doi:10.3171/2015.2.JNS142634 pmid:26381253

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Bhogal P,
    2. Udani S,
    3. Cognard C, et al

    . Endosaccular flow disruption: where are we now? J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:1024–25 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014623 pmid:31197026

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Molyneux A,
    3. Coon A, et al

    ; WEB-IT Study Investigators. Demographic, procedural and 30-day safety results from the WEB Intra-saccular Therapy Study (WEB-IT). J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:1191–96 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012841 pmid:28096478

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Lv X,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Jiang W

    . Systematic review of Woven EndoBridge for wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms: complications, adequate occlusion rate, morbidity, and mortality. World Neurosurg 2018;110:20–25 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.113 pmid:29107726

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Hecker C,
    2. Broussalis E,
    3. Pfaff JAR, et al

    . Comparison of the Contour Neurovascular System and Woven EndoBridge device for treatment of wide-necked cerebral aneurysms at a bifurcation or sidewall. J Neurosurg 2023;139:563–72 doi:10.3171/2022.12.JNS222268 pmid:36708532

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Lubicz B,
    2. Klisch J,
    3. Gauvrit JY, et al

    . WEB-DL endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms: short- and midterm results in a European study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:432–38 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3869 pmid:24457823

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Klisch J,
    3. Liebig T, et al

    . WEB-DL endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms: long-term results in a European series. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:2314–19 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4445 pmid:26228882

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Kim YD,
    2. Bang JS,
    3. Lee SU, et al

    . Long-term outcomes of treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysms in South Korea: clipping versus coiling. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:1218–22 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-013757 pmid:29875276

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Molyneux A,
    2. Kerr R,
    3. Stratton I, et al

    ; International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267–74 doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11314-6 pmid:12414200

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Bhogal P,
    2. Martinez Moreno R,
    3. Ganslandt O, et al

    . Use of flow diverters in the treatment of unruptured saccular aneurysms of the anterior cerebral artery. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:283–89 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012648 pmid:27789789

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Bhogal P,
    2. AlMatter M,
    3. Hellstern V, et al

    . Difference in aneurysm characteristics between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms in patients with multiple intracranial aneurysms. Surg Neurol Int 2018;9:1 doi:10.4103/sni.sni_339_17 pmid:29399373

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Cognard C,
    2. Januel AC

    . Remnants and recurrences after the use of the WEB intrasaccular device in large-neck bifurcation aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2015;76:522–30 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000669 pmid:25710103

    CrossRefPubMed