Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleSPINE IMAGING AND SPINE IMAGE-GUIDED INTERVENTIONS

Density and Time Characteristics of CSF-Venous Fistulas on CT Myelography in Patients with Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension

Diogo G.L. Edelmuth, Timothy J. Amrhein and Peter G. Kranz
American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2025, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8516
Diogo G.L. Edelmuth
aFrom the Department of Radiology and Oncology (D.G.L.E.), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
bDepartamento de Radiologia e Centro de Medicina Intervencionista (D.G.L.E.), Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
cHospital Sírio-Libanês (D.G.L.E.), São Paulo, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Diogo G.L. Edelmuth
Timothy J. Amrhein
dDuke University Medical Center (T.J.A., P.G.K.), Durham, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Timothy J. Amrhein
Peter G. Kranz
dDuke University Medical Center (T.J.A., P.G.K.), Durham, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Peter G. Kranz
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • FIG 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1.

    Flowchart of case selection.

  • FIG 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2.

    Each row in A and B represents a single patient. Each dot represents a CTM acquisition. In A, the x-axis denotes the thecal sac attenuation on the level of a known CVF. In B, the x-axis denotes the time passed between contrast injection and the acquisition. Colors represent the subjective visibility of the CVF on that acquisition.

  • FIG 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3.

    Boxplot graph showing the distribution of thecal sac contrast attenuation in each group of CVF visibility. The group with visible CVF showed a marked and statistically significant higher mean attenuation than the other 2 groups. Flowchart of case selection.

  • FIG 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4.

    The y-axis in both images represents the attenuation of the draining vein of the known CVF. Each dot represents a CTM acquisition. Colors represent the subjective visibility of the CVF on that acquisition. In A, the x-axis denotes the thecal sac attenuation on the level of a known CVF, with a statistically significant relationship, even after multivariate regression analysis correcting for time and position. In B, the x-axis denotes the time passed between contrast injection and the acquisition, without a significant relationship to the attenuation of the vein, before and after multivariate regression correction.

  • FIG 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5.

    Axial images from different acquisitions during 2 separate CTMs at the level of a confirmed CVF in a patient with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. A, Left static decubitus CTM with indefinite but suspicious finding for a CVF in the T10-T11 left epidural venous plexus (thecal sac attenuation: 1578 HU, vein attenuation: 180 HU, time passed: 21 minutes). As an isolated image, it could also represent the dural emergence of the dorsal nerve root. B, Left static decubitus CTM with a definitive CVF in the left T10-T11 foramen, represented by multiple epidural, foraminal, and extraforaminal vessels opacifying by contrast (thecal sac attenuation: 3070 HU, vein attenuation: 692 HU, time passed: 4 minutes). C, Prone acquisition after static decubitus CTM without any recognizable venous opacification (thecal sac attenuation: 1332HU, vein attenuation: 43 HU, time passed: 51 minutes).

  • FIG 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 6.

    Axial images from different acquisitions during a single CTM at the level of a confirmed CVF in a patient with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. A, Right static decubitus CTM with a definite right T11-T12 CVF draining to the paraspinal vein (thecal sac attenuation: 3020 HU, vein attenuation: 1871 HU, time passed: 4 minutes). B, Right static decubitus CTM with an equivocal finding for a CVF represented by a single faint contrast uptake apparently separate from the nerve root sleeve and diverticula (thecal sac attenuation: 685 HU, vein attenuation: 217 HU, time passed: 8 minutes). C, Prone acquisition after static decubitus CTM without any recognizable venous opacification (thecal sac attenuation: 988 HU, vein attenuation: 77 HU, time passed: 24 minutes).

  • FIG 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 7.

    Axial 5.7-mm maximum intensity projection images from 2 different acquisitions during a single CTM at the level of a confirmed CVF in a patient with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. A, Right static decubitus CTM at the T7-T8 level without any recognizable venous opacification (thecal sac attenuation: 996 HU, vein attenuation: 32 HU, time passed: 12 min). B, Right static decubitus CTM with a definite right T7-T8 CVF draining to the paraspinal vein (thecal sac attenuation: 1439 HU, vein attenuation: 321 HU, time passed: 21 minutes).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Overall characteristics of the acquisitions studied

    Scan ProtocolStatic DecubitusUltrafast/DynamicConventionalTotal
    Examinations (n)254534
    Acquisitions (n)971321131
    Sac attenuation (HU)153114155831368
    CVF side down235217367392164
    Other side down542344547534
    Time after injection (min)15.2524.815.8
    CVF
    C7-T11
    T1-T22
    T2-T31
    T5-T63
    T6-T74
    T7-T83
    T8-T93
    T9-T101
    T10-T117
    T11-T121
    Right-sided16 (67%)
    CVF visibilityDefiniteEquivocalNot visible
    Acquisitions (n)601952
    Vein (HU)6391985
    Sac (HU)2282751538
    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Contingency table of CVF visibility relative to patient position during the acquisitiona,b

    DefiniteEquivocalNot Visible
    Same side as CVF facing down50512
    Other side facing down101440
    • ↵a Relative rate of definite CVF 4.8 (95% CI: 2.7–8.6) higher when CVF facing down (P < .001).

    • ↵b Counts represent acquisitions, not patients.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Contingency table of CVF visibility relative to intrathecal contrast dosea,b

    DefiniteEquivocalNot Visible
    20 mL501734
    10 mL10218
    • ↵a Relative rate of definite CVF 1.9 (95% CI: 0.8–4.4) higher when CVF facing down (P = .14).

    • ↵b Counts represent acquisitions, not patients.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Density and Time Characteristics of CSF-Venous Fistulas on CT Myelography in Patients with Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Diogo G.L. Edelmuth, Timothy J. Amrhein, Peter G. Kranz
Density and Time Characteristics of CSF-Venous Fistulas on CT Myelography in Patients with Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2025, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8516

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
CSF-Venous Fistulas on CT Myelography: Features
Diogo G.L. Edelmuth, Timothy J. Amrhein, Peter G. Kranz
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2025, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8516
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Technical Aspects of Dynamic CT Myelography: Optimizing Patient Positioning for the Detection of CSF Leaks
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Optimization of Photon Counting CT Myelography
  • Characteristics of SIH Type I Culprit Lesions
  • Management Outcomes For VO Spine Biopsy
Show more Spine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire