Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleNEUROVASCULAR/STROKE IMAGING

Hypoperfusion Intensity Ratio is Associated with Early Neurologic Deficit Severity and Deterioration after Mechanical Thrombectomy in Large-Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke

Małgorzata M. Miller, Brian Wideman, Muhib Khan and Nils Henninger
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2024, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8234
Małgorzata M. Miller
aFrom the Department of Neurosciences (M.M.M., B.W.), Corewell Health West, Grand Rapids, Michigan
bCollege of Human Medicine (M.M.M.), Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, Michigan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian Wideman
aFrom the Department of Neurosciences (M.M.M., B.W.), Corewell Health West, Grand Rapids, Michigan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Muhib Khan
cDepartment of Neurology (M.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nils Henninger
dDepartment of Neurology (N.H.), University of Massachusetts, Chan Medical School Worcester, Massachusetts
eDepartment of Psychiatry (N.H.), University of Massachusetts, Chan Medical School Worcester, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nils Henninger
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIG 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1.

    Flow chart of study design and patient selection.

  • FIG 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2.

    Representative imaging demonstrating HIR ≥ 0.54 (A) versus HIR < 0.54 (B) CTP profiles. A, Tmax maps illustrating HIR calculated at 0.7 by RAPID software in a 51-year-old patient who presented with an initial NIHSS score of 9, ASPECTS of 10, and right MCA M1 occlusion and underwent MT with TICI 3 reperfusion. The 24-hour post-MT NIHSS score worsened to 17, indicating the occurrence of END. B, Tmax maps illustrating HIR calculated at 0.1 by RAPID software in a 54-year-old patient who presented with an initial NIHSS score of 10, ASPECTS of 9, and right MCA M1 occlusion and underwent MT with TICI 2b reperfusion. The 24-hour post-MT NIHSS score improved to 4.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Patient characteristics of the entire cohort as stratified according to HIR statusa

    All PatientsHIR < 0.54HIR ≥ 0.54
    (n = 231)(n = 183)(n = 48)P Value
    Characteristics
    Age (yr)70 (58–78)70 (59–79)67 (56–75).323
    Sex, female119 (51.5)96 (52.5)23 (47.9).628
    LKW to presentation 0–6 hr141 (61)111 (60.7)30 (62.6).869
    Initial NIHSS score11 (5–18)9 (4–16)17 (11–21.5)<.001
    NIHSS score at 24 hr post-MT8 (2–14)6 (2–13)13 (7.5–20)<.001
    Presence of END26 (11.3)20 (10.9)6 (12.5).798
    Use of rtPA76 (32.9)62 (33.9)14 (29.2).607
    ASPECTS9 (8–10)9 (8–10)8 (7–9).009
    Occlusion location<.001
     LVO125 (54.1)88 (48.1)37 (77.1)
     DMVO106 (45.9)95 (51.9)11 (22.9)
    LA grade 3–450 (21.6)42 (23)8 (16.7).433
    Poor collateral grade (0–1)86 (37.2)52 (28.4)34 (70.8)<.001
    Core volume (rCBF <30%, mL)8 (0–23.5)5 (0–13)53 (22–76)<.001
    rCBF <38% (mL)17 (6–40)12 (5–24)76 (44–106.5)<.001
    Tmax > 6 sec (mL)87 (50–137.5)71 (45.5–113)147.5 (97.5–209.5)<.001
    Tmax > 10 sec (mL)25 (9.5–53)18 (6–35.5)91.5 (62.5–131.5)<.001
    Mismatch volume (mL)64 (40–112.5)60 (39.5–102)89.5 (46–122.5).048
    Pre-MT SBP (mm Hg)151.5 (137–170)151 (135–170.5)152 (141–163).802
    TICI score1.000
     TICI 0–2a24 (10.4)19 (10.4)5 (10.4)
     TICI 2b–3207 (89.6)164 (89.6)43 (89.6)
    No. of passes1 (1–2)1 (1–2)2 (1–3.5).030
    Stroke etiology.153
     LAA28 (12.1)20 (10.9)8 (16.7)
     Cardioembolic96 (41.6)74 (40.4)22 (45.8)
     Cryptogenic103 (44.6)87 (47.5)16 (33.3)
     Other determined4 (1.7)2 (1.1)2 (4.2)
    • Note:—LAA indicates large artery atherosclerosis.

    • ↵a Data are No. (%) or median (25th–75th quartile).

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Multivariable linear regression models for factors associated with NIHSS score at 24 hours post-MT in the entire cohort, patients with LVOs, and DMVOsa

    B95% CI for BβP Value
    All patients
     Initial NIHSS score0.4180.315–0.5220.427<.001
     LA (grade 3–4)2.6850.716–4.6540.138.008
     HIR ≥ 0.543.2371.156–5.3190.163.002
     Use of rtPA−2.214(−3.924)–(−0.505)−0.129.011
     Pre-MT SBP0.0290.0001–0.0580.101.047
     No. of passes1.3250.731–1.9190.242<.001
     TICI score 2b–3−2.803−5.715–0.109−0.103.059
     Stroke etiology (cryptogenic)1.586−0.019–3.19010.098.053
    LVOs
     Initial NIHSS score0.3730.226–0.5200.366<.001
     HIR ≥ 0.543.9681.194–6.7420.210.005
     Use of rtPA−3.802(−6.428)–(−1.176)−0.206.005
     Pre-MT SBP0.0450.003–0.0870.154.035
     No. of passes1.3040.558–2.0500.250.001
     Stroke etiology (cryptogenic)2.4300.022–4.8370.140.048
    DMVOs
     LA (grade 3–4)3.2800.912–5.6480.202.007
     No. of passes1.0880.181–1.9950.181.019
     TICI score 2b–3−5.978(−9.64)–(−2.316)−0.245.002
     Stroke etiology (LAA)3.7080.184–7.2320.144.039
    • Note:—LAA indicates large artery atherosclerosis.

    • ↵a Models are adjusted for age, sex, initial NIHSS score, ASPECTS, CTA collateral score, rCBF <38%, HIR, LA, rtPA use, pre-MT SBP, time from LKW to presentation, TICI score, number of passes during MT, and stroke etiology. We used P < .1 as a criterion for backward steps. All patients: Adjusted R2 = 0.452, F = 24.180, P <.001. LVOs group: Adjusted R2 = 0.414, F = 15.262, P <.001. DMVOs group: Adjusted R2 = 0.516, F = 22.994, P <.001.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Characteristics in patients with END versus without ENDa

    All PatientsEND AbsentEND Present
    (n = 231)(n = 205)(n = 26)P Value
    Characteristics
    Age (yr)70 (58–78)69 (57–78)73.5 (65–80).095
    Sex, female119 (51.5)104 (50.7)15 (57.7).538
    LKW to presentation 0–6 hr141 (61)128 (62.4)13 (50).286
    Initial NIHSS score11 (5–18)12 (6–19)6 (3–12).005
    NIHSS score at 24 hr post-MT8 (2–14)6 (2–13)18 (12–24)<.001
    Use of rtPA76 (32.9)72 (35.1)4 (15.4).048
    ASPECTS9 (8–10)9 (8–10)9 (8–10).663
    Occlusion location.835
     LVO125 (54.1)110 (53.7)15 (57.7)
     DMVO106 (45.9)95 (46.3)11 (42.3)
    LA grade 3–450 (21.6)43 (21)7 (26.9).613
    CTA collateral score 0–186 (37.2)172 (35.1)14 (53.8).084
    rCBF <38% (mL)17 (6–40)17 (6–45)19 (6.5–32).836
    Core volume (rCBF <30% mL)8 (0–23.5)8 (0–26)6.5 (0–16).451
    Tmax > 6 sec (mL)87 (50–137.5)89 (52–139)66.5 (43–116).278
    Tmax > 10 sec (mL)25 (9–53)28 (11–57)18.5 (8–27).141
    Mismatch volume (mL)64 (40–112.5)66 (40–113)60.5 (35–103).479
    HIR ≥ 0.5448 (20.8)42 (20.5)6 (23.1).798
    Pre-MT SBP (mm Hg)151.5 (137–170)151 (135–167)167.5 (146–189).010
    TICI score<.001
     TICI 0–2a24 (10.4)14 (6.8)10 (38.5)
     TICI 2b–3207 (89.6)191 (93.2)16 (61.5)
    No. of passes1 (1–2)1 (1–2)2 (2–4)<.001
    Stroke etiology.379
     LAA28 (12.1)23 (11.2)5 (19.2)
     Cardioembolic96 (41.6)88 (42.9)8 (30.8)
     Cryptogenic103 (44.6)90 (43.9)13 (50)
     Other determined4 (1.7)4 (2)0 (0)
    • Note:—LAA indicates large artery atherosclerosis.

    • ↵a Data are No. (%) or median (25th–75th quartile).

    • View popup
    Table 4:

    Multivariable logistic regression models for factors associated with END in the entire cohort, patients with LVOs and DMVOsa

    Adjusted OR95% CIP Value
    All patients
     Age, per year1.0431.001–1.088.044
     Initial NIHSS score0.8420.771–0.919<.001
     ASPECTS1.0870.922–1.281.320
     HIR ≥ 0.543.1000.838–11.598.093
     CTA collateral grade 0–13.0131.058–8.582.039
     Pre-MT SBP (per mm Hg)1.0221.004–1.041.018
     TICI score 2b–30.0960.028–0.328<.001
    LVOs
     Initial NIHSS score0.8360.751–0.932.001
     Pre-MT SBP (per mm Hg)1.0281.005–1.051.016
     Use of rtPA5.1950.606–44.535.133
     HIR ≥ 0.545.2631.170–23.674.030
    DMVOs
     TICI 2b–30.0200.003–0.124<.001
     Stroke etiology (LAA)11.9011.684–84.124.013
    • Note:—LAA indicates large artery atherosclerosis.

    • ↵a Models are adjusted for age, sex, initial NIHSS score, ASPECTS, collateral status, rCBF <38%, HIR, LA, rtPA use, pre-MT SBP, time from LKW to presentation, TICI score, number of passes during MT and stroke etiology. We used P < .1 as a criterion for backward steps. All patients: Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness of fit χ2 = 15.563, P = .049; LVOs group: Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness of fit χ2 = 6.235, P = .621; DMVOs group: Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness of fit χ2 = 0.002, P = .962.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Hypoperfusion Intensity Ratio is Associated with Early Neurologic Deficit Severity and Deterioration after Mechanical Thrombectomy in Large-Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Małgorzata M. Miller, Brian Wideman, Muhib Khan, Nils Henninger
Hypoperfusion Intensity Ratio is Associated with Early Neurologic Deficit Severity and Deterioration after Mechanical Thrombectomy in Large-Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2024, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8234

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Hypoperfusion Intensity Ratio is Associated with Early Neurologic Deficit Severity and Deterioration after Mechanical Thrombectomy in Large-Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke
Małgorzata M. Miller, Brian Wideman, Muhib Khan, Nils Henninger
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2024, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8234
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • New insights on the predictive value of hypoperfusion intensity ratio in thrombectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis with multiple cut-offs
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • The insula and malignant cerebral edema
  • ICH Shape & Density Predict Rebleeding after MICE
  • Circle of Willis Variants and Stroke Outcomes
Show more Neurovascular/Stroke Imaging

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire