Application of Automatic Segmentation on Super-Resolution Reconstruction MR Images of the Abnormal Fetal Brain

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Pugash D,
   2. Brugger PC,
   3. Bettelheim D, et al

   . Prenatal ultrasound and fetal MRI: the comparative value of each modality in prenatal diagnosis. Eur J Radiol 2008;68:214–26 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.031 pmid:18790583

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Ebner M,
   2. Wang G,
   3. Li W, et al

   . An automated framework for localization, segmentation and super-resolution reconstruction of fetal brain MRI. Neuroimage 2020;206:116324 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116324 pmid:31704293

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Jiang S,
   2. Xue H,
   3. Glover A, et al

   . MRI of moving subjects using multislice snapshot images with volume reconstruction (SVR): application to fetal, neonatal, and adult brain studies. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2007;26:967–80 doi:10.1109/TMI.2007.895456 pmid:17649910

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Gholipour A,
   2. Estroff JA,
   3. Warfield SK

   . Robust super-resolution volume reconstruction from slice acquisitions: application to fetal brain MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2010;29:1739–58 doi:10.1109/TMI.2010.2051680 pmid:20529730

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Kuklisova-Murgasova M,
   2. Quaghebeur G,
   3. Rutherford MA, et al

   . Reconstruction of fetal brain MRI with intensity matching and complete outlier removal. Med Image Anal 2012;16:1550–64 doi:10.1016/j.media.2012.07.004 pmid:22939612

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Kainz B,
   2. Steinberger M,
   3. Wein W, et al

   . Fast volume reconstruction from motion corrupted stacks of 2D slices. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2015;34:1901–13 doi:10.1109/TMI.2015.2415453 pmid:25807565

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Prayer D,
   2. Kasprian G,
   3. Krampl E, et al

   . MRI of normal fetal brain development. Eur J Radiol 2006;57:199–216 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.11.020 pmid:16413984

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Litjens G,
   2. Kooi T,
   3. Bejnordi BE, et al

   . A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med Image Anal 2017;42:60–88 doi:10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005 pmid:28778026

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Akkus Z,
   2. Galimzianova A,
   3. Hoogi A, et al

   . Deep learning for brain MRI segmentation: state of the art and future directions. J Digit Imaging 2017;30:449–59 doi:10.1007/s10278-017-9983-4 pmid:28577131

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Makropoulos A,
    2. Counsell SJ,
    3. Rueckert D

    . A review on automatic fetal and neonatal brain MRI segmentation. Neuroimage 2018;170:231–48 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.074 pmid:28666878

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Khalili N,
    2. Lessmann N,
    3. Turk E, et al

    . Automatic brain tissue segmentation in fetal MRI using convolutional neural networks. Magn Reson Imaging 2019;64:77–89 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2019.05.020 pmid:31181246

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Wang Q,
    2. Gomez A,
    3. Hutter J, et al

    . Smart Ultrasound Imaging and Perinatal, Preterm and Paediatric Image Analysis. Springer-Verlag International Publishing; 2019
13. 13.↵
    1. Aertsen M,
    2. Diogo MC,
    3. Dymarkowski S, et al

    . MRI for dummies: what the fetal medicine specialist should know about acquisitions and sequences. Prenatal Diagnosis 2020;40:6–17 doi:10.1002/pd.5579 pmid:31618472

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Chouzenoux E,
    2. Gérard H,
    3. Pesquet JC

    . General risk measures for robust machine learning. arXiv [Internet] May 24, 2019. http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.11707. Accessed March 13, 2021
15. 15.↵
    1. Duchi J,
    2. Glynn P,
    3. Namkoong H

    . Statistics of robust optimization: a generalized empirical likelihood approach. arXiv [Internet] October 11, 2016. http://arxiv.org/abs/1610.03425. Accessed April 13, 2021
16. 16.↵
    1. Namkoong H,
    2. Duchi JC

    . Stochastic gradient methods for distributionally robust optimization with f-divergences. In: Proceedings of the Thirtieth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Barcelona, Spain. December 5–10, 2016
17. 17.↵
    1. Rafique H,
    2. Liu M,
    3. Lin Q, et al

    . Non-convex min-max optimization: provable algorithms and applications in machine learning. arXiv October 4, 2018. http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.02060. Accessed April 13, 2021
18. 18.↵
    1. Fidon L,
    2. Ourselin S,
    3. Vercauteren T

    . Distributionally robust deep learning using hardness weighted sampling. arXiv July 14, 2022, http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.02658. Accessed November 5, 2020
19. 19.↵
    1. Sudre CH,
    2. Licandro K,
    3. Baumgartner C

    1. Fidon L,
    2. Aertsen M,
    3. Mufti N, et al

    . Distributionally robust segmentation of abnormal fetal brain 3D MRI. In: Sudre CH, Licandro K, Baumgartner C, et al., eds. Uncertainty for Safe Utilization of Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, and Perinatal Imaging, Placental and Preterm Image Analysis. 2021;12959:263–73 doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87735-4_25

    CrossRef
20. 20.↵
    1. Bystron I,
    2. Blakemore C,
    3. Rakic P

    . Development of the human cerebral cortex: Boulder Committee revisited. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008;9:110–22 doi:10.1038/nrn2252 pmid:18209730

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Yushkevich PA,
    2. Piven J,
    3. Hazlett HC, et al

    . User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 2006;31:1116–28 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.015 pmid:16545965

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Bakas S,
    2. Reyes M,
    3. Jakab A, et al

    . Identifying the best machine learning algorithms for brain tumor segmentation, progression assessment, and overall survival prediction in the BRATS Challenge. arXiv July 14, 2019. http://arxiv.org/abs/1811.02629. Accessed December 22, 2020
23. 23.↵
    1. Zijdenbos AP,
    2. Dawant BM,
    3. Margolin RA, et al

    . Morphometric analysis of white matter lesions in MR images: method and validation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1994;13:716–24 doi:10.1109/42.363096 pmid:18218550

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Trigo L,
    2. Eixarch E,
    3. Bottura I, et al

    . Prevalence of supratentorial anomalies assessed by fetal magnetic resonance in fetuses with open spina bifida. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022;59:804–12 doi:10.1002/UOG.23761 pmid:34396624

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Fidon L,
    2. Viola E,
    3. Mufti N, et al

    . A spatio-temporal atlas of the developing fetal brain with spina bifida aperta. Open Research Europe 2021;1:123 doi:10.12688/openreseurope.13914.1

    CrossRef
26. 26.
    1. Habas PA,
    2. Kim K,
    3. Rousseau F, et al

    . Atlas-based segmentation of developing tissues in the human brain with quantitative validation in young fetuses. Hum Brain Mapp 2010;31:1348–58 doi:10.1002/hbm.20935 pmid:20108226

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.
    1. Serag A,
    2. Kyriakopoulou V,
    3. Rutherford MA, et al

    . Multi-channel 4D probabilistic atlas of the developing brain: application to fetuses and neonates. Ann Br Mach Vis Assoc 2012;2012:1–14