Fully Automatic Method for Reliable Spinal Cord Compartment Segmentation in Multiple Sclerosis

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Ginsberg L

   . Disorders of the spinal cord and roots. Pract Neurol 2011;11:259–67 doi:10.1136/practneurol-2011-000069 pmid:21746716

   FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Schapira AHV,
   2. Byrne E,
   3. DiMauro S, et al.

   1. Amukotuwa SA,
   2. Cook MJ

   . Spinal disease: neoplastic, degenerative, and infective spinal cord diseases and spinal cord compression. In: Schapira AHV, Byrne E, DiMauro S, et al., eds. Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience. Mosby; 2007:511–38
3. 3.↵
   1. Bot JC,
   2. Barkhof F,
   3. Polman CH, et al

   . Spinal cord abnormalities in recently diagnosed patients with MS: added value of spinal MRI examination. Neurology 2004;62:226–33 doi:10.1212/wnl.62.2.226 pmid:14745058

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Weier K,
   2. Beck A,
   3. Magon S, et al

   . Evaluation of a new approach for semi-automatic segmentation of the cerebellum in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2012;259:2673–80 doi:10.1007/s00415-012-6569-4 pmid:22711160

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Tsagkas C,
   2. Magon S,
   3. Gaetano L, et al

   . Spinal cord volume loss: a marker of disease progression in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2018;91:e349–58 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000005853 pmid:29950437

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Tsagkas C,
   2. Magon S,
   3. Gaetano L, et al

   . Preferential spinal cord volume loss in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2019;25:947–57 doi:10.1177/1352458518775006 pmid:29781383

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Bonacchi R,
   2. Pagani E,
   3. Meani A, et al

   . Clinical relevance of multiparametric MRI assessment of cervical cord damage in multiple sclerosis. Radiology 2020;296:605–15 doi:10.1148/radiol.2020200430 pmid:32573387

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Petrova N,
   2. Carassiti D,
   3. Altmann DR, et al

   . Axonal loss in the multiple sclerosis spinal cord revisited. Brain Pathol 2018;28:334–48 doi:10.1111/bpa.12516 pmid:28401686

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Schlaeger R,
   2. Papinutto N,
   3. Panara V, et al

   . Spinal cord gray matter atrophy correlates with multiple sclerosis disability. Ann Neurol 2014;76:568–80 doi:10.1002/ana.24241 pmid:25087920

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Wheeler-Kingshott CA,
    2. Stroman PW,
    3. Schwab JM, et al

    . The current state-of-the-art of spinal cord imaging: applications. Neuroimage 2014;84:1082–93 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.014 pmid:23859923

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Weigel M,
    2. Bieri O

    . Spinal cord imaging using averaged magnetization inversion recovery acquisitions. Magn Reson Med 2018;79:1870–81 doi:10.1002/mrm.26833 pmid:28714105

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Prados F,
    2. Cardoso MJ,
    3. Yiannakas MC, et al

    . Fully automated grey and white matter spinal cord segmentation. Sci Rep 2016;6:36151 doi:10.1038/srep36151 pmid:27786306

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Datta E,
    2. Papinutto N,
    3. Schlaeger R, et al

    . Gray matter segmentation of the spinal cord with active contours in MR images. Neuroimage 2017;147:788–99 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.062 pmid:27495383

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Dupont SM,
    2. De Leener B,
    3. Taso M, et al

    . Fully-integrated framework for the segmentation and registration of the spinal cord white and gray matter. Neuroimage 2017;150:358–72 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.026 pmid:27663988

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. De Leener B,
    2. Lévy S,
    3. Dupont SM, et al

    . SCT: Spinal Cord Toolbox, an open-source software for processing spinal cord MRI data. Neuroimage 2017;145:24–43 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.009 pmid:27720818

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Tsagkas C,
    2. Horvath A,
    3. Altermatt A, et al

    . Automatic spinal cord gray matter quantification: a novel approach. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1592–600 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6157 pmid:31439628

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Carneiro G,
    2. Mateus D,
    3. Peter L

    1. Andermatt S,
    2. Pezold S,
    3. Cattin P, et al

    . Multi-dimensional gated recurrent units for the segmentation of biomedical 3D-data. In: Carneiro G, Mateus D, Peter L, eds. Deep Learning and Data Labeling for Medical Applications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag International Publishing; 2016;142–51
18. 18.↵
    1. Horvath A,
    2. Tsagkas C,
    3. Andermatt S, et al

    . Spinal Cord Gray Matter-White Matter Segmentation on Magnetic Resonance AMIRA Images with MD-GRU. Vol 11397. Springer-Verlag; 2019
19. 19.↵
    1. Disanto G,
    2. Benkert P,
    3. Lorscheider J

    ; et al; SMSC Scientific Board. The Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Cohort-Study (SMSC): a prospective Swiss wide investigation of key phases in disease evolution and new treatment options. PLoS One 2016;11:e0152347 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152347 pmid:27032105

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Thompson AJ,
    2. Banwell BL,
    3. Barkhof F, et al

    . Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol 2018;17:162–73 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2 pmid:29275977

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Grabher P,
    2. Mohammadi S,
    3. David G, et al

    . Neurodegeneration in the spinal ventral horn prior to motor impairment in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurotrauma 2017;34:2329–34 doi:10.1089/neu.2017.4980 pmid:28462691

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Huber E,
    2. David G,
    3. Thompson AJ, et al

    . Dorsal and ventral horn atrophy is associated with clinical outcome after spinal cord injury. Neurology 2018;90:e1510–22 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000005361 pmid:29592888

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Reuter M,
    2. Schmansky NJ,
    3. Rosas HD, et al

    . Within-subject template estimation for unbiased longitudinal image analysis. Neuroimage 2012;61:1402–18 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.084 pmid:22430496

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Papinutto N,
    2. Asteggiano C,
    3. Bischof A, et al

    . Intersubject variability and normalization strategies for spinal cord total cross-sectional and gray matter areas. J Neuroimaging 2020;30:110–18 doi:10.1111/jon.12666 pmid:31571307

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Papinutto N,
    2. Schlaeger R,
    3. Panara V, et al

    . Age, gender and normalization covariates for spinal cord gray matter and total cross-sectional areas at cervical and thoracic levels: a 2D phase sensitive inversion recovery imaging study. PLoS One 2015;10:e0118576 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118576 pmid:25781178

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Feltz CJ,
    2. Miller GE

    . An asymptotic test for the equality of coefficients of variation from k populations. Stat Med 1996;15:647–58 doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960330)15:6<647::AID-SIM184>3.0.CO;2-P pmid:8731006

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Asman AJ,
    2. Smith SA,
    3. Reich DS, et al

    . Robust GM/WM segmentation of the spinal cord with iterative non-local statistical fusion. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2013;16(Pt 1):759–67 doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40811-3_95 pmid:24505736

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Tsagkas C,
    2. Horvath A,
    3. Altermatt A, et al

    . Automatic spinal cord gray matter quantification: a novel approach. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1592–1600 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6157 pmid:31439628

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Perone CS,
    2. Calabrese E,
    3. Cohen-Adad J

    . Spinal cord gray matter segmentation using deep dilated convolutions. Sci Rep 2018;8:5966 doi:10.1038/s41598-018-24304-3 pmid:29654236

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Prados F,
    2. Ashburner J,
    3. Blaiotta C, et al

    . Spinal cord gray matter segmentation challenge. Neuroimage 2017;152:312–29 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.010 pmid:28286318

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Cardoso MJ,
    2. Arbel T,
    3. Carneiro G

    1. Porisky A,
    2. Brosch T,
    3. Ljungberg E

    , et al; Gray matter segmentation in spinal cord MRIs via 3D convolutional encoder networks with shortcut connections. In: Cardoso MJ, Arbel T, Carneiro G, et al. eds. Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support. Springer-Verlag International Publishing; 2017:330–337
32. 32.↵
    1. Gros C,
    2. De Leener B,
    3. Badji A, et al

    . Automatic segmentation of the spinal cord and intramedullary multiple sclerosis lesions with convolutional neural networks. Neuroimage 2019;184:901–15 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.081 pmid:30300751

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Schlaeger R,
    2. Papinutto N,
    3. Zhu AH, et al

    . Association between thoracic spinal cord gray matter atrophy and disability in multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol 2015;72:897–904 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.0993 pmid:26053119

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Gilmore CP,
    2. DeLuca GC,
    3. Bö L, et al

    . Spinal cord neuronal pathology in multiple sclerosis. Brain Pathol 2009;19:642–49 doi:10.1111/j.1750-3639.2008.00228.x pmid:19170682

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    1. Lukas C,
    2. Sombekke MH,
    3. Bellenberg B, et al

    . Relevance of spinal cord abnormalities to clinical disability in multiple sclerosis: MR imaging findings in a large cohort of patients. Radiology 2013;269:542–52 doi:10.1148/radiol.13122566 pmid:23737540

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Brownlee WJ,
    2. Altmann DR,
    3. Mota PAD, et al

    . Association of asymptomatic spinal cord lesions and atrophy with disability 5 years after a clinically isolated syndrome. Mult Scler 2017;23:665–74 doi:10.1177/1352458516663034 pmid:27481210

    CrossRefPubMed