Exploratory Study of the Brain Response in Facial Synkinesis after Bell Palsy with Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Literature

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Husseman J,
   2. Mehta RP

   . Management of synkinesis. Facial Plast Surg 2008;24:242–49 doi:10.1055/s-2008-1075840 pmid:18470836

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Angelov DN,
   2. Neiss WF,
   3. Streppel M, et al

   . Nimodipine accelerates axonal sprouting after surgical repair of rat facial nerve. J Neurosci 1996;16:1041–48 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-03-01041.1996 pmid:8558232

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Choi D,
   2. Raisman G

   . Somatotopic organization of the facial nucleus is disrupted after lesioning and regeneration of the facial nerve: the histological representation of synkinesis. Neurosurgery 2002;50:355–62; discussion 362–63 doi:10.1097/00006123-200202000-00022 pmid:11844271

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Yagi N,
   2. Nakatani H

   . Crocodile tears and thread test of lacrimation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1986;122:13–16 doi:10.1177/00034894860950s103 pmid:3082273

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Baker RS,
   2. Stava MW,
   3. Nelson KR, et al

   . Aberrant reinnervation of facial musculature in a subhuman primate: a correlative analysis of eyelid kinematics, muscle synkinesis, and motoneuron localization. Neurology 1994;44:2165–73 doi:10.1212/wnl.44.11.2165 pmid:7969978

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Moran CJ,
   2. Neely JG

   . Patterns of facial nerve synkinesis. Laryngoscope 1996;106:1491–96 doi:10.1097/00005537-199612000-00009 pmid:8948609

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Klingner CM,
   2. Volk GF,
   3. Maertin A, et al

   . Cortical reorganization in Bell's palsy. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2011;29:203–14 doi:10.3233/RNN-2011-0592 pmid:21586826

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.
   1. Rijntjes M,
   2. Tegenthoff M,
   3. Liepert J, et al

   . Cortical reorganization in patients with facial palsy. Ann Neurol 1997;41:621–30 doi:10.1002/ana.410410511 pmid:9153524

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Smit A,
   2. van der Geest J,
   3. Metselaar M, et al

   . Long-term changes in cerebellar activation during functional recovery from transient peripheral motor paralysis. Exp Neurol 2010;226:33–39 doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.07.026 pmid:20691681

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Wang WW,
    3. Hua XY, et al

    . Patterns of cortical reorganization in facial synkinesis: a task functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neural Regen Res 2018;13:1637–42 doi:10.4103/1673-5374.235304 pmid:30127126

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Song W,
    2. Cao Z,
    3. Lang C, et al

    . Disrupted functional connectivity of striatal sub-regions in Bell’s palsy patients. Neuroimage Clin 2017;14:122–29 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2017.01.008 pmid:28180070

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Turkeltaub PE,
    2. Eickhoff SB,
    3. Laird AR, et al

    . Minimizing within-experiment and within-group effects in activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses. Hum Brain Mapp 2012;33:1–13 doi:10.1002/hbm.21186 pmid:21305667

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Eickhoff SB,
    2. Bzdok D,
    3. Laird AR, et al

    . Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited. Neuroimage 2012;59:2349–61 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.017 pmid:21963913

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Eickhoff SB,
    2. Laird AR,
    3. Grefkes C, et al

    . Coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: a random-effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty. Hum Brain Mapp 2009;30:2907–26 doi:10.1002/hbm.20718 pmid:19172646

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Banks CA,
    2. Bhama PK,
    3. Park J, et al

    . Clinician-graded Electronic Facial Paralysis Assessment: the eFACE. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;136:223e–30e doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000001447 pmid:26218397

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Mehta RP,
    2. WernickRobinson M,
    3. Hadlock TA

    . Validation of the Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire. Laryngoscope 2007;117:923–26 doi:10.1097/MLG.0b013e3180412460 pmid:17473697

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Oldfield RC

    . The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971;9:97–113 doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 pmid:5146491

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Chen G,
    2. Saad ZS,
    3. Britton JC, et al

    . Linear mixed-effects modeling approach to FMRI group analysis. Neuroimage 2013;73:176–90 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.047 pmid:23376789

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Buendia J,
    2. Loayza FR,
    3. Luis EO, et al

    . Functional and anatomical basis for brain plasticity in facial palsy rehabilitation using the masseteric nerve. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016;69:417–26 doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2015.10.033 pmid:26683008

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Calistri V,
    2. Mancini P,
    3. Raz E, et al

    . fMRI in Bell’s palsy: cortical activation is associated with clinical status in the acute and recovery phases. J Neuroimaging 2021;31:90–97 doi:10.1111/jon.12798 pmid:33146926

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Hesselmann V,
    2. Sorger B,
    3. Lasek K, et al

    . Discriminating the cortical representation sites of tongue and up movement by functional MRI. Brain Topogr 2004;16:159–67 doi:10.1023/B:BRAT.0000019184.63249.e8 pmid:15162913

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Yang L,
    3. Wang WW, et al

    . Decreased distance between representation sites of distinct facial movements in facial synkinesis: a task fMRI study. Neuroscience 2019;397:12–17 doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.11.036 pmid:30500612

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Klingner CM,
    2. Volk GF,
    3. Brodoehl S, et al

    . The effects of deefferentation without deafferentation on functional connectivity in patients with facial palsy. Neuroimage Clin 2014;6:26–31 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2014.08.011 pmid:25379413

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Klingner CM,
    2. Brodoehl S,
    3. Witte OW, et al

    . The impact of motor impairment on the processing of sensory information. Behav Brain Res 2019;359:701–08 doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2018.09.016 pmid:30248364

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Nikolajsen L,
    2. Jensen TS

    . Phantom limb pain. Br J Anaesth 2001;87:107–16 doi:10.1093/bja/87.1.107 pmid:11460799

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Kleinjung T,
    2. Steffens T,
    3. Strutz J, et al

    . Curing tinnitus with a cochlear implant in a patient with unilateral sudden deafness: a case report. Cases J 2009;2:7462 doi:10.1186/1757-1626-2-7462 pmid:19829970

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Lotze M,
    2. Flor H,
    3. Grodd W, et al

    . Phantom movements and pain: an fMRI study in upper limb amputees. Brain 2001;124:2268–77 doi:10.1093/brain/124.11.2268 pmid:11673327

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Engineer ND,
    2. Moller AR,
    3. Kilgard MP

    . Directing neural plasticity to understand and treat tinnitus. Hear Res 2013;295:58–66 doi:10.1016/j.heares.2012.10.001 pmid:23099209

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Newbold DJ,
    2. Laumann TO,
    3. Hoyt CR, et al

    . Plasticity and spontaneous activity pulses in disused human brain circuits. Neuron 2020;107:580–86 doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.05.007 pmid:32778224

    CrossRefPubMed