Identification of Small, Regularly Shaped Cerebral Aneurysms Prone to Rupture

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Rinkel GJ,
   2. Djibuti M,
   3. Algra A, et al

   . Prevalence and risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review. Stroke 1998;29:251–56 doi:10.1161/01.str.29.1.251 pmid:9445359

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Agarwal N,
   2. Gala NB,
   3. Choudhry OJ, et al

   . Prevalence of asymptomatic incidental aneurysms: a review of 2685 computed tomographic angiograms. World Neurosurg 2014;82:1086–90 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2013.01.082 pmid:23336985

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Qian Y,
   2. Takao H,
   3. Umezu M, et al

   . Risk analysis of unruptured aneurysms using computational fluid dynamics technology: preliminary results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1948–55 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2655 pmid:21903914

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Etminan N,
   2. Brown RD,
   3. Beseoglu K, et al

   . The unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment score: a multidisciplinary consensus. Neurology 2015;85:881–89 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001891 pmid:26276380

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Greving JP,
   2. Wermer MJ,
   3. Brown RD Jr., et al

   . Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies. Lancet Neurol 2014;13:59–66 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70263-1 pmid:21903914

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Beck J,
   2. Rohde S,
   3. El Beltagy M, et al

   . Difference in configuration of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms determined by biplanar digital subtraction angiography. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2003;145:861–65; discussion 865 doi:10.1007/s00701-003-0124-0 pmid:14577007

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Raghavan ML,
   2. Ma B,
   3. Harbaugh RE

   . Quantified aneurysm shape and rupture risk. J Neurosurg 2005;102:355–62 doi:10.3171/jns.2005.102.2.0355 pmid:15739566

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Björkman J,
   2. Frösen J,
   3. Tähtinen O, et al

   . Irregular shape identifies ruptured intracranial aneurysm in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients with multiple aneurysms. Stroke 2017;48:1986–89 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017147 pmid:28468927

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Kim BJ,
   2. Kang HG,
   3. Kwun BD, et al

   . Small versus large ruptured intracranial aneurysm: concerns with the site of aneurysm. Cerebrovasc Dis 2017;43:139–44 doi:10.1159/000452347 pmid:28088803

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Joo SW,
    2. Lee SI,
    3. Noh SJ, et al

    . What is the significance of a large number of ruptured aneurysms smaller than 7 mm in diameter? J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2009;45:85–89 doi:10.3340/jkns.2009.45.2.85 pmid:19274117

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Cebral JR,
    2. Castro MA,
    3. Appanaboyina S, et al

    . Efficient pipeline for image-based patient-specific analysis of cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: technique and sensitivity. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005;24:457–67 doi:10.1109/tmi.2005.844159 pmid:15822804

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Mut F,
    2. Aubry R,
    3. Löhner R, et al

    . Fast numerical solutions of patient‐specific blood flows in 3D arterial systems. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 2010;26:73–85 doi:10.1002/cnm.1235 pmid:21076685

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Cebral JR,
    2. Mut F,
    3. Gade P, et al

    . Combining data from multiple sources to study mechanisms of aneurysm disease: tools and techniques. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 2018;34:e3133 doi:10.1002/cnm.3133 pmid:30055087

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Mut F,
    2. Löhner R,
    3. Chien A, et al

    . Computational hemodynamics framework for the analysis of cerebral aneurysms. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 2011;27:822–39 doi:10.1002/cnm.1424 pmid:21643491

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Ma B,
    2. Harbaugh RE,
    3. Raghavan ML

    . Three-dimensional geometrical characterization of cerebral aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng 2004;32:264–73 doi:10.1023/B:ABME.0000012746.31343.92 pmid:15008374

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Guyon I,
    2. Weston J,
    3. Barnhill S, et al

    . Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Machine Learning 2002;46:389–422 doi:10.1023/A:1012487302797

    CrossRef
17. 17.↵
    1. Ikawa F,
    2. Morita A,
    3. Tominari S, et al

    . Rupture risk of small unruptured cerebral aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2020;132:69–78 doi:10.3171/2018.9.JNS181736 pmid:30684948

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Kotowski M,
    2. Naggara O,
    3. Darsaut TE, et al

    . Safety and occlusion rates of surgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature from 1990 to 2011. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013;84:42–48 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2011-302068 pmid:23012447

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Naggara ON,
    2. Lecler A,
    3. Oppenheim C, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial unruptured aneurysms: a systematic review of the literature on safety with emphasis on subgroup analyses. Radiology 2012;263:828–35 doi:10.1148/radiol.12112114 pmid:22623696

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Liu Q,
    2. Jiang P,
    3. Jiang Y, et al

    . Prediction of aneurysm stability using a machine learning model based on PyRadiomics-derived morphological features. Stroke 2019;50:2314–21 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025777 pmid:31288671

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Ou C,
    2. Liu J,
    3. Qian Y, et al

    . Rupture risk assessment for cerebral aneurysm using interpretable machine learning on multidimensional data. Front Neurol 2020;11:570181 doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.570181 pmid:33424738

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Cho KC,
    2. Yang H,
    3. Kim JJ, et al

    . Prediction of rupture risk in cerebral aneurysms by comparing clinical cases with fluid–structure interaction analyses. Sci Rep 2020;10:1–8 doi:10.1038/s41598-020-75362-5 pmid:33106591

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Ban VS,
    2. El Ahmadieh TY,
    3. Aoun SG, et al

    . Prediction of outcomes for ruptured aneurysm surgery: the Southwestern aneurysm severity index. Stroke 2019;50:595–601 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023771 pmid:30776998

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Nakao T,
    2. Hanaoka S,
    3. Nomura Y, et al

    . Deep neural network-based computer-assisted detection of cerebral aneurysms in MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018;47:948–53 doi:10.1002/jmri.25842 pmid:28836310

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Stember JN,
    2. Chang P,
    3. Stember DM, et al

    . Convolutional neural networks for the detection and measurement of cerebral aneurysms on magnetic resonance angiography. J Digit Imaging 2019;32:808–15 doi:10.1007/s10278-018-0162-z pmid:30511281

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Chung BJ,
    2. Mut F,
    3. Putman CM, et al

    . Identification of hostile hemodynamics and geometries of cerebral aneurysms: a case-control study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1860–66 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5764 pmid:30166431

    Abstract/FREE Full Text