Evaluation of Posterior Fossa Biometric Measurements on Fetal MRI in the Evaluation of Dandy-Walker Continuum

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Dandy W

   . The diagnosis and treatment of hydrocephalus due to occlusions of the foramina of Magendie and Luschka. Surgery, Gyencology, and Obstetrics 1921;32:112–24
2. 2.↵
   2. Taggart JK,
   3. Walker AE

   . Congenital atresia of the foramens of Luschka and Magendie. Archives of Neurology And Psychiatry 1942;48:583–612 doi:10.1001/archneurpsyc.1942.02290100083008

   CrossRef
3. 3.↵
   2. Benda C

   . The Dandy-Walker syndrome or the so-called atresia of the foramen Magendie. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1954;13:14–29 doi:10.1093/jnen/13.1.14 pmid:13118372

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Barkovich AJ,
   3. Kjos BO,
   4. Norman D, et al

   . Revised classification of posterior fossa cysts and cystlike malformations based on the results of multiplanar MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1989;10:977–88 pmid:2816648

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Tortori-Donati P,
   3. Fondelli MP,
   4. Rossi A, et al

   . Cystic malformations of the posterior cranial fossa originating from a defect of the posterior membranous area. Child’s Nerv Syst 1996;12:303–08 doi:10.1007/BF00301017 pmid:8816293

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Robinson AJ

   . Inferior vermian hypoplasia: preconception, misconception. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;43:123–36 doi:10.1002/uog.13296 pmid:24497418

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Robinson AJ,
   3. Ederies MA

   . Diagnostic imaging of posterior fossa anomalies in the fetus. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2016;21:312–20 doi:10.1016/j.siny.2016.04.007 pmid:27209280

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Kollias SS,
   3. Ball WS,
   4. Prenger EC

   . Cystic malformations of the posterior fossa: differential diagnosis clarified through embryologic analysis. Radiographics 1993;13:1211–31 doi:10.1148/radiographics.13.6.8031352 pmid:8031352

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Garel C

   . Fetal cerebral biometry: normal parenchymal findings and ventricular size. Eur Radiol 2005;15:809–13 doi:10.1007/s00330-004-2610-z pmid:15726378

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Tilea B,
    3. Alberti C,
    4. Adamsbaum C, et al

    . Cerebral biometry in fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:173–81 doi:10.1002/uog.6276 pmid:19172662

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Chapman T,
    3. Menashe SJ,
    4. Zare M, et al

    . Establishment of normative values for the fetal posterior fossa by magnetic resonance imaging. Prenat Diagn 2018;38:1035–41 doi:10.1002/pd.5367 pmid:30280395

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Kline-Fath B,
    3. Bulas DI,
    4. Lee W

    . Fundamental and Advanced Fetal Imaging. 2nd ed. Wolters Kluwer Health; 2020
13. 13.↵
    2. Wan X,
    3. Qu Y,
    4. Huang Y, et al

    . Nonparametric estimation of age-specific reference percentile curves with radial smoothing. Contemp Clin Trials 2012;33:13–22 doi:10.1016/j.cct.2011.09.002 pmid:21983622

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Calabrò Arcuri JR,
    3. Jinkins FT,
    4. Ospedali Galliera EO, et al

    . Blake’s pouch cyst: an entity within the Dandy-Walker continuum. Neuroradiology 2000;42:290–95 doi:10.1007/s002340050888 pmid:10872175

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Griffiths PD,
    3. Bradburn M,
    4. Campbell MJ, et al

    . MERIDIAN collaborative group. Use of MRI in the diagnosis of fetal brain abnormalities in utero (MERIDIAN): a multicentre, prospective cohort study. Lancet 2017;389:538–46 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8 pmid:27988140

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Griffiths PD,
    3. Brackley K,
    4. Bradburn M, et al

    . Anatomical subgroup analysis of the MERIDIAN cohort: posterior fossa abnormalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017;50:745–52 doi:10.1002/uog.17485 pmid:28397323

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Arroyo MS,
    3. Hopkin RJ,
    4. Nagaraj UD, et al

    . Fetal brain MRI findings and neonatal outcome of common diagnosis at a tertiary care center. J Perinatol 2019;39:1072–77 doi:10.1038/s41372-019-0407-9 pmid:31213636

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Volpe P,
    3. Contro E,
    4. De Musso F, et al

    . Brainstem-vermis and brainstem-tentorium angles allow accurate categorization of fetal upward rotation of cerebellar vermis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;39:632–35 doi:10.1002/uog.11101 pmid:22253138

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Gandolfi Colleoni G,
    3. Contro E,
    4. Carletti A, et al

    . Prenatal diagnosis and outcome of fetal posterior fossa fluid collections. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;39:625–31 doi:10.1002/uog.11071 pmid:22173885

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Cornips EM,
    3. Overvliet GM,
    4. Weber JW, et al

    . The clinical spectrum of Blake’s pouch cyst: report of six illustrative cases. Childs Nerv Syst 2010;26:1057–64 doi:10.1007/s00381-010-1085-2 pmid:20198375

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Nagaraj UD,
    3. Kline-Fath BM,
    4. Calvo-Garcia MA, et al

    . Fetal and postnatal MRI findings of Blake pouch remnant causing obstructive hydrocephalus. Radiol Case Rep 2020;15:2535–39 doi:10.1016/j.radcr.2020.09.039 pmid:33072233

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Tarui T,
    3. Limperopoulos C,
    4. Sullivan NR, et al

    . Long-term developmental outcome of children with a fetal diagnosis of isolated inferior vermian hypoplasia. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2014;99:F54–58 doi:10.1136/archdischild-2013-304054 pmid:23964086

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Klein O,
    3. Pierre-Kahn A,
    4. Boddaert N, et al

    . Dandy-Walker malformation: prenatal diagnosis and prognosis. Child’s Nerv Syst 2003;19:484–89 doi:10.1007/s00381-003-0782-5 pmid:12879343

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Patek KJ,
    3. Kline-Fath BM,
    4. Hopkin RJ, et al

    . Posterior fossa anomalies diagnosed with fetal MRI: associated anomalies and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Prenat Diagn 2012;32:75–82 doi:10.1002/pd.2911 pmid:22367673

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. D’Antonio F,
    3. Khalil A,
    4. Garel C, et al

    . Systematic review and meta-analysis of isolated posterior fossa malformations on prenatal ultrasound imaging (Part 1): nomenclature, diagnostic accuracy and associated anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;47:690–97 doi:10.1002/uog.14900 pmid:25970099

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Dovjak GO,
    3. Diogo MC,
    4. Brugger PC, et al

    . Quantitative fetal magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cystic posterior fossa malformations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020;56:78–85 doi:10.1002/uog.21890 pmid:31595598

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Ber R,
    3. Bar-Yosef O,
    4. Hoffmann C, et al

    . Normal fetal posterior fossa in MR imaging: new biometric data and possible clinical significance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:795–802 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4258 pmid:25655869

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Paladini D,
    3. Volpe P

    . Posterior fossa and vermian morphometry in the characterization of fetal cerebellar abnormalities: a prospective three-dimensional ultrasound study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:482–89 doi:10.1002/uog.2748 pmid:16619375

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Ghi T,
    3. Contro E,
    4. De Musso F, et al

    . Normal morphometry of fetal posterior fossa at midtrimester: brainstem-tentorium angle and brainstem-vermis angle. Prenat Diagn 2012;32:440–43 doi:10.1002/pd.3834 pmid:22495736

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Contro E,
    3. Volpe P,
    4. De Musso F, et al

    . Open fourth ventricle prior to 20 weeks’ gestation: a benign finding? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;43:154–58 doi:10.1002/uog.13227 pmid:24151160

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Le Strange E,
    3. Saeed N,
    4. Cowan FM, et al

    . MR imaging quantification of cerebellar growth following hypoxic-ischemic injury to the neonatal brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:463–68 pmid:15037473

    PubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    2. Robinson AJ,
    3. Goldstein R

    . The cisterna magna septa. J Ultrasound Med 2007;26:83–95 doi:10.7863/jum.2007.26.1.83 pmid:17182713

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    2. Wüest A,
    3. Surbek D,
    4. Wiest R, et al

    . Enlarged posterior fossa on prenatal imaging: differential diagnosis, associated anomalies and postnatal outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2017;96:837–43 doi:10.1111/aogs.13131 pmid:28295149

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Bernardo S,
    3. Vinci V,
    4. Saldari M, et al

    . Dandy-Walker malformation: is the “tail sign” the key sign? Prenat Diagn 2015;35:1358–64 doi:10.1002/pd.4705 pmid:26448595

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Chapman T,
    3. Kapur RP

    . Cerebellar vermian dysplasia: the tale of the tail. J Pediatr Neurol Neurosci 2018;2:17–22 doi:10.36959/595/399

    CrossRef
36. 36.↵
    2. Aldinger KA,
    3. Timms AE,
    4. Thomson Z, et al

    . Redefining the etiologic landscape of cerebellar malformations. Am J Hum Genet 2019;105:606–15 doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.07.019 pmid:31474318

    CrossRefPubMed