Predictors of Favorable Outcome after Endovascular Thrombectomy in MRI: Selected Patients with Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Mattle HP,
   2. Arnold M,
   3. Lindsberg PJ, et al

   . Basilar artery occlusion. Lancet Neurol 2011;10:1002–14 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70229-0 pmid:22014435

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Goyal M,
   2. Menon BK,
   3. van Zwam WH, et al

   ; HERMES collaborators. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet 2016;387:1723–31 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X pmid:26898852

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Kayan Y,
   2. Meyers PM,
   3. Prestigiacomo CJ

   , Society of Neuro-Interventional Surgery, et al. Current endovascular strategies for posterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke: report of the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery Standards and Guidelines Committee. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:1055–62 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014873 pmid:31103994

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Liu X,
   2. Dai Q,
   3. Ye R, et al

   ; BEST Trial Investigators. Endovascular treatment versus standard medical treatment for vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (BEST): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2020;19:115–22 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30395-3 pmid:31831388

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Tei H,
   2. Uchiyama S,
   3. Usui T, et al

   . Posterior circulation ASPECTS on diffusion-weighted MRI can be a powerful marker for predicting functional outcome. J Neurol 2010;257:767–73 doi:10.1007/s00415-009-5406-x pmid:19943167

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Mourand I,
   2. Machi P,
   3. Nogué E, et al

   . Diffusion-weighted imaging score of the brain stem: a predictor of outcome in acute basilar artery occlusion treated with the Solitaire FR device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1117–23 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3870 pmid:24524920

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Archer CR,
   2. Horenstein S

   . Basilar artery occlusion: clinical and radiological correlation. Stroke 1977;8:383–90 doi:10.1161/01.str.8.3.383 pmid:860293

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Goyal N,
   2. Tsivgoulis G,
   3. Nickele C, et al

   . Posterior circulation CT angiography collaterals predict outcome of endovascular acute ischemic stroke therapy for basilar artery occlusion. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:783–86 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011883 pmid:26283714

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Hacke W,
   2. Kaste M,
   3. Bluhmki E, et al

   ; ECASS Investigators. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1317–29 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0804656 pmid:18815396

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Sakamoto Y,
    2. Kimura K,
    3. Iguchi Y, et al

    . Hemorrhagic transformation in acute cerebellar infarction. Cerebrovasc Dis 2011;32:327–33 doi:10.1159/000329259 pmid:21921595

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Maus V,
    2. Styczen H,
    3. Liman J, et al

    . Intracranial mechanical thrombectomy of large vessel occlusions in the posterior circulation using SAVE. BMC Neurol 2019;19:197 doi:10.1186/s12883-019-1428-x pmid:31419959

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Ducroux C,
    2. Piotin M,
    3. Gory B, et al

    ; ASTER Trial investigators. First pass effect with contact aspiration and stent retrievers in the Aspiration versus Stent Retriever (ASTER) trial. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:386–91 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015215 pmid:31471527

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Zaidat OO,
    2. Yoo AJ,
    3. Khatri P, et al

    ; Cerebral Angiographic Revascularization Grading (CARG) Collaborators; STIR Re-vascularization working group; STIR Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) Task Force. Recommendations on angiographic revascularization grading standards for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2013;44:2650–63 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001972 pmid:23920012

    FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Heinze G

    . A comparative investigation of methods for logistic regression with separated or nearly separated data. Stat Med 2006;25:4216–26 doi:10.1002/sim.2687 pmid:16955543

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Harrell FE,
    2. Lee KL,
    3. Mark DB

    . Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Statist Med 1996;15:361–87 doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO;2-4

    CrossRef
16. 16.↵
    1. Allison PD

    . Multiple Regression: A Primer. Pine Forge Press; 1999
17. 17.↵
    1. Gory B,
    2. Mazighi M,
    3. Labreuche J

    , et al. ETIS (Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke) Investigators. Predictors for mortality after mechanical thrombectomy of acute basilar artery occlusion. Cerebrovasc Dis 2018;45:61–67 doi:10.1159/000486690 pmid:29393092

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Gory B,
    2. Eldesouky I,
    3. Sivan-Hoffmann R, et al

    . Outcomes of stent retriever thrombectomy in basilar artery occlusion: an observational study and systematic review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2016;87:520–25 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2014-310250 pmid:25986363

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Singer OC,
    2. Berkefeld J,
    3. Nolte CH, et al

    ; ENDOSTROKE Study Group. Mechanical recanalization in basilar artery occlusion: the ENDOSTROKE study—Recanalization in BA Occlusion. Ann Neurol 2015;77:415–24 doi:10.1002/ana.24336 pmid:25516154

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Deb-Chatterji M,
    2. Flottmann F,
    3. Leischner H, et al

    . Recanalization is the key for better outcome of thrombectomy in basilar artery occlusion. Clin Neuroradiol 2019 Dec 23. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1007/s00062-019-00850-9 pmid:31872288

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Ravindren J, A,
    2. Pérez M,
    3. Hellstern V, et al

    . Predictors of outcome after endovascular thrombectomy in acute basilar artery occlusion and the 6 hr time window to recanalization. Front Neurol 2019;10:923 doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.00923 pmid:31608001

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Gory B,
    2. Mazighi M,
    3. Blanc R, et al

    . Mechanical thrombectomy in basilar artery occlusion: influence of reperfusion on clinical outcome and impact of the first-line strategy (ADAPT vs stent retriever). J Neurosurg 2018;129:1482–91 doi:10.3171/2017.7.JNS171043 pmid:29327997

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Mokin M,
    2. Sonig A,
    3. Sivakanthan S, et al

    . Clinical and procedural predictors of outcomes from the endovascular treatment of posterior circulation strokes. Stroke 2016;47:782–88 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011598 pmid:26888533

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Dargazanli C,
    2. Consoli A,
    3. Barral M, et al

    . Impact of modified TICI 3 versus modified TICI 2b reperfusion score to predict good outcome following endovascular therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:90–96 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4968 pmid:27811134

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Kang D,
    2. Jung C,
    3. Yoon W, et al

    . Endovascular thrombectomy for acute basilar artery occlusion: a multicenter retrospective observational study. J Am Heart Assoc 2018;7:e009419 doi:10.1161/JAHA.118.009419 pmid:29982231

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Li C,
    2. Zhao W,
    3. Wu C, et al

    . Outcome of endovascular treatment for acute basilar artery occlusion in the modern era: a single institution experience. Neuroradiology 2018;60:651–59 doi:10.1007/s00234-018-2011-7

    CrossRef
27. 27.↵
    1. Phan K,
    2. Phan S,
    3. Huo YR, et al

    . Outcomes of endovascular treatment of basilar artery occlusion in the stent retriever era: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neuronterv Surg 2016;8:1107–15 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012089 pmid:26610730

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Yoon W,
    2. Kim SK,
    3. Heo TW, et al

    . Predictors of good outcome after stent-retriever thrombectomy in acute basilar artery occlusion. Stroke 2015;46:2972–75 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010840 pmid:26330448

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Tran AT,
    2. Nguyen HA,
    3. Vu DL, et al

    . Basilar artery thrombectomy: assessment of outcome and identification of prognostic factors. Acta Neurol Belg 2020;120:99–105 doi:10.1007/s13760-019-01223-2 pmid:31679149

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Bouslama M,
    2. Haussen DC,
    3. Aghaebrahim A, et al

    . Predictors of good outcome after endovascular therapy for vertebrobasilar occlusion stroke. Stroke 2017;48:3252–57 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018270 pmid:29089457

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. Mourand I,
    2. Machi P,
    3. Milhaud D, et al

    . Mechanical thrombectomy with the Solitaire device in acute basilar artery occlusion. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;6:200–04 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010629 pmid:23645572

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. Guillaume M,
    2. Lapergue B,
    3. Gory B, et al

    . Rapid successful reperfusion of basilar artery occlusion strokes with pretreatment diffusion-weighted imaging posterior-circulation ASPECTS <8 is associated with good outcome. J Am Heart Assoc 2019;8:e010962 doi:10.1161/JAHA.118.010962 pmid:31070075

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Schonewille WJ,
    2. Wijman CA,
    3. Michel P, et al

    ; BASICS study group. Treatment and outcomes of acute basilar artery occlusion in the Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study (BASICS): a prospective registry study. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:724–30 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70173-5 pmid:19577962

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. Nagel S,
    2. Schellinger PD,
    3. Hartmann M, et al

    . Therapy of acute basilar artery occlusion: intraarterial thrombolysis alone vs bridging therapy. Stroke 2009;40:140–46 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.526566 pmid:18927446

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    1. Caplan LR

    . Vertebrobasilar embolism. Clin Exp Neurol 1991;28:1–22 pmid:1821819

    PubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Cross DT,
    2. Moran CJ,
    3. Akins PT, et al

    . Relationship between clot location and outcome after basilar artery thrombolysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1221–28 pmid:9282845

    Abstract
37. 37.↵
    1. van der Hoeven EJ,
    2. McVerry F,
    3. Vos JA, et al

    ; BASICS registry investigators. Collateral flow predicts outcome after basilar artery occlusion: the posterior circulation collateral score. Int J Stroke 2016;11:768–75 doi:10.1177/1747493016641951 pmid:27016515

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    1. Bang OY,
    2. Saver JL,
    3. Kim SJ, et al

    . Collateral flow predicts response to endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2011;42:693–99 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.595256 pmid:21233472

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    1. Kim JT,
    2. Cho BH,
    3. Cho KH, et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography angiography based selection for endovascular therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2019;50:365–72 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023173 pmid:30612537

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. van der Hoeven EJ,
    2. Schonewille WJ,
    3. Vos J, et al

    ; BASICS Study Group, The Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study (BASICS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2013;14:200 doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-200 pmid:23835026

    CrossRefPubMed