Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticlePediatric Neuroimaging

Noninvasive Assessment of Hemodynamic Stress Distribution after Indirect Revascularization for Pediatric Moyamoya Vasculopathy

D. Tortora, M. Severino, M. Pacetti, G. Morana, M.M. Mancardi, V. Capra, A. Cama, M. Pavanello and A. Rossi
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2018, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5627
D. Tortora
aFrom the Neuroradiology (D.T., M.S., G.M., A.R.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D. Tortora
M. Severino
aFrom the Neuroradiology (D.T., M.S., G.M., A.R.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Severino
M. Pacetti
bNeurosurgery (M.P., V.C., A.C., M.P.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Pacetti
G. Morana
aFrom the Neuroradiology (D.T., M.S., G.M., A.R.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for G. Morana
M.M. Mancardi
cNeuropsychiatry Units (M.M.M.), Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M.M. Mancardi
V. Capra
bNeurosurgery (M.P., V.C., A.C., M.P.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for V. Capra
A. Cama
bNeurosurgery (M.P., V.C., A.C., M.P.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Cama
M. Pavanello
bNeurosurgery (M.P., V.C., A.C., M.P.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Pavanello
A. Rossi
aFrom the Neuroradiology (D.T., M.S., G.M., A.R.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Rossi
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Indirect revascularization surgery is an effective treatment in children with Moyamoya vasculopathy. In the present study, we hypothesized that DSC-PWI may reliably assess the evolution of CBF-related parameters after revascularization surgery, monitoring the outcome of surgical pediatric patients with Moyamoya vasculopathy. Thus, we aimed to evaluate differences in DSC-PWI parameters, including the hemodynamic stress distribution, in surgical and nonsurgical children with Moyamoya vasculopathy and to correlate them with long-term postoperative outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pre- and postoperative DSC parameters of 28 patients (16 females; mean age, 5.5 ± 4.8 years) treated with indirect revascularization were compared with those obtained at 2 time points in 10 nonsurgical patients (6 females; mean age, 6.9 ± 4.7 years). We calculated 4 normalized CBF-related parameters and their percentage variance: mean normalized CBF of the MCA territory, mean normalized CBF of the proximal MCA territory, mean normalized CBF of cortical the MCA territory, and hemodynamic stress distribution. The relationship between perfusion parameters and postoperative outcomes (poor, fair, good, excellent) was explored using 1-way analysis of covariance (P < .05).

RESULTS: A significant decrease of the mean normalized CBF of the proximal MCA territory and hemodynamic stress distribution and an increase of the mean normalized CBF of the cortical MCA territory were observed after revascularization surgery (P < .001). No variations were observed in nonsurgical children. Postoperative hemodynamic stress distribution and its percentage change were significantly different in outcome groups (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS: DSC-PWI indices show postoperative hemodynamic changes that correlate with clinical outcome after revascularization surgery in children with Moyamoya disease.

ABBREVIATIONS:

central nCBF
mean nCBF of the proximal MCA territory
cortical nCBF
mean nCBF of cortical MCA territory
EDAMS
encephalo-duro-arterio-myosynangiosis
EEG
electroencephalography
hdSD
hemodynamic stress distribution
IQ
intelligence quotient
mean nCBF
mean nCBF of all MCA territories
MM
Moyamoya vasculopathy
nCBF
normalized CBF

Moyamoya vasculopathy (MM) is characterized by progressive occlusion of the supraclinoidal internal carotid artery with development of leptomeningeal collaterals. Stenosis of the proximal part of the anterior, middle, and posterior cerebral arteries may be associated.1,2 These vascular changes result from a wide range of genetic and environmental triggers, either idiopathic (Moyamoya disease) or associated with systemic diseases (Moyamoya syndrome or quasi-Moyamoya disease).1,3,4 Independent of the underlying causes, the natural history includes occurrence of transient ischemic attacks, ischemic infarcts, or intracerebral hemorrhage. Because medical treatment is not effective in preventing clinical events, patients with compromised cerebral hemodynamics and/or neurologic symptoms may benefit from surgical revascularization.1,2

Brain PWI is commonly used to estimate cerebral hemodynamics in patients with MM, depicting regions of decreased cerebral perfusion and cerebrovascular reserve that can improve after revascularization surgery. Nuclear medicine studies, including H2[150]-PET and iodine 123 iodoamphetamine SPECT, are still considered the criterion standard for evaluating both preoperative cerebral hemodynamic impairment and postoperative perfusion changes in MM.1,2,5 On the other hand, several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of dynamic susceptibility contrast PWI to depict regions of critically reduced brain perfusion while avoiding radiation exposure.6⇓–8 Furthermore, the acetazolamide challenge test used to underpin the cerebrovascular reserve is not devoid of potential complications.9⇓–11 Hence, there has been an effort to find alternative methods for evaluating cerebral hemodynamics in patients with MM.12⇓⇓–15 In 1996, Kashiwagi et al12 proposed the ratio of mean CBF values in the lentiform nucleus (central CBF) and cortical MCA territories (cortical CBF) as an index of hemodynamic stress distribution (hdSD) using xenon-enhanced CT.12 More recently, Schubert et al14 demonstrated that hdSD could be a more robust parameter than CBF alone for disease assessment in adults with MM. At present, no studies have evaluated the results of indirect revascularization in children with MM using the hdSD obtained with noninvasive PWI techniques.

Here, we hypothesized that DSC-PWI may reliably assess the evolution of CBF-related parameters after revascularization surgery and that hdSD may better correlate with the long-term neurologic outcome of children with MM. To test this hypothesis, we looked for differences of DSC perfusion parameters (including hdSD) among surgical and nonsurgical children with MM evaluated at both an early time point after surgery and last follow-up.

Materials and Methods

Our institutional review board approved this retrospective study and parents provided informed consent.

Subjects

We identified 45 consecutive children with MM confirmed at angiography who underwent brain MR imaging and MRA studies at our institution from 2009 to 2016. Inclusion criteria were the following: 1) the presence of DSC-PWI performed at multiple time points, before and after the operation and/or during follow-up (3 patients excluded); 2) good-quality DSC-PWI—that is, unaffected by motion artifacts (4 patients excluded); and 3) available clinical and electroencephalography (EEG) data before and after surgical revascularization (no patients excluded). Patients were categorized into those who underwent indirect revascularization and those without surgical treatment. The indirect revascularization procedures consisted of encephalo-duro-arterio-myosynangiosis (EDAMS), performed as previously described.16 For the group of patients who underwent EDAMS, we selected PWI performed at 3 consecutive times points: before the operation (time point 1), 3 months after the operation (time point 2), and at last follow-up (time point 3). In the second group of patients, we included 2 PWI studies performed at first examination and last follow-up.

MR Perfusion Techniques

MR imaging was performed on a 1.5T scanner (Achieva; Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands) using an 8-channel head array coil. Uncooperative patients were sedated during the examinations with sevoflurane during spontaneous breathing via a facemask. Brain MR imaging protocol included 3D T1-weighted fast-field echo gradient-recalled, axial FLAIR, T2-weighted, and DWI sequences and 3D TOF MRA. PWI-DSC was performed with a gradient-echo EPI sequence with the following parameters: TR/TE, 2000/60 ms; flip angle, 90°; matrix, 128 × 128; FOV, 240 × 240 mm; section thickness, 5 mm; gap, 0 mm; 28 axial sections. A series of images (10 sections, 50 images per section) was obtained before, during, and after the administration of contrast agent (gadoterate meglumine, 0.5-mmol/mL, 0.2 mL/kg of body weight at 3 mL/s) using a power injector (Spectris MR injector; MedRad, Indianola, Pennsylvania), followed by a 30-mL bolus of saline administered at the same injection rate. Perfusion CBF maps were computed after eliminating the effect of contrast agent recirculation using a γ-variate curve-fitting via commercially available postprocessing software (IB Neuro, Version 2.0; Imaging Biometrics, Elm Grove, Wisconsin).17

Perfusion Imaging Analysis

The perfusion analysis was independently performed for each hemisphere at each time point. Because the revascularization procedures were performed in all patients in the MCA territory, the quantitative analysis of perfusion was restricted to this area. In addition, the nontreated hemispheres of patients who underwent unilateral revascularization were excluded from the analysis of nonsurgical hemispheres because it was demonstrated that these may benefit from surgery performed on the contralateral brain.18 For the quantitative analysis, CBF maps were registered to the Montreal Neurological Institute space through a linear registration process using the FMRIB Linear Image Registration Tool (FLIRT; http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/FLIRT).19 An atlas-based segmentation of the MCA, linearly registered in the Montreal Neurological Institute space, was performed for each brain hemisphere, dividing the MCA territory into 3 VOIs: the proximal, the middle, and the distal portions.20 Subsequently, an additional VOI, including the white and gray matter of both cerebellar hemispheres, was manually drawn for normalization because Moyamoya vasculopathy typically spares cerebellar arteries (On-line Fig 1). The fslmeants function of FSL (http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/Fslutils) was finally used to calculate the mean CBF of each VOI. The normalized CBF (nCBF) values were calculated as the ratio of mean CBF values of each MCA VOI to the mean CBF values of the cerebellum.

Four CBF-related parameters were calculated at rest in surgical and nonsurgical hemispheres: 1) mean nCBF of all MCA territories (mean nCBF); 2) mean nCBF of the proximal MCA territory (central nCBF); 3) mean nCBF of the cortical MCA territory (cortical nCBF), considering both middle and distal MCA portions; and 4) the hemodynamic stress distribution, defined as the ratio of mean CBF in the central versus cortical regions (central nCBF/cortical nCBF).12 Finally, we calculated the percentage variance of all CBF-related parameters between the selected MR imaging time points. In surgical patients, the percentage variance of all CBF-related parameters between time points 1 and 2 corresponded to an “early percentage variance,” while the percentage variance between time points 1 and 3 was considered a “late percentage variance.”

Clinical Outcome

The neurologic outcome in the 28 surgical patients was evaluated on the basis of the following: 1) resolution or improvement of neurologic symptoms, 2) absence of new ischemic events (transient ischemic attack and/or stroke), 3) stability or improvement of the global intelligence quotient (IQ) score at neuropsychological evaluations, and 4) resolution or improvement of EEG abnormalities. Patients were assigned to 1 of the following 4 categories by the same blinded neurologist at the last outpatient visit: 4, excellent (preoperative symptoms totally gone without fixed neurologic deficits and EEG abnormalities and improved global IQ score); 3, good (symptoms totally gone with persistent EEG abnormalities and stable or improved global IQ score); 2, fair (persistent symptoms and EEG abnormalities but with decreased frequency and stable or decreased global IQ score); and 1, poor (unchanged or worsened symptoms and EEG abnormalities and decreased global IQ score).7

Statistical Analysis

A paired t test was used to compare the mean CBF-related parameters evaluated by DSC between the first and the last MR imaging time points. A 1-way analysis of covariance was used to test statistically significant differences of CBF-related parameters between surgical and nonsurgical hemispheres controlling for age, sex, side of revascularization, and time interval between MR imaging examinations.

The Jonckheere-Terpstra test was used to test trends in CBF-related parameters evaluated both in the earlier and later stages after the operation, with outcome categories. Perfusion parameters that survived the latter test were considered independent variables of a 1-way analysis of covariance to evaluate the relationship with clinical outcome (dependent variable); results of this analysis were corrected for confounding effects of age, sex, and duration of clinical follow-up. Moreover, estimated marginal means of the selected perfusion parameters were used to obtain Sidak-corrected post hoc comparisons. Statistical analysis was performed using commercially available software (SPSS, Version 21.0 for Windows; IBM, Armonk, New York), and a significant P value was set at .05.

Results

Patients

Thirty-eight of 45 patients with MM satisfied the inclusion criteria (18 females; mean age at clinical onset, 6 ± 1.8 years; range, 6 months to 16.3 years). The first group was composed of 28 children who underwent indirect revascularization (16 females; mean age at clinical onset, 5.5 ± 4.8 years; range, 6 months to 10 years). Bilateral revascularization was performed in 10, and unilateral revascularization, in 18 patients. The second group included 10 patients with bilateral MM who did not undergo surgical synangiosis (6 females; mean age at clinical onset, 6.9 ± 4.7 years; range, 1–14 years). Thus, 38 surgical hemispheres (ie, 20 from bilateral surgery and 18 from unilateral surgery) and 20 nonsurgical hemispheres were included in the study. Overall, we analyzed 84 DSC-PWIs for surgical patients (28 performed at each time point) and 20 DSC-PWIs for nonsurgical patients (10 performed at each time point). In the first patient group, the mean period between preoperative PWI and the operation (time point 1) was 4.5 days (range, 1–15 days). The mean period between the operation and the first postoperative PWI (time point 2) was 3.1 ± 0.5 months (range, 2.6–3.6 months), and the mean period between the operation and the last postoperative PWI (time point 3) was 38.5 ± 25 months (range, 13.5–63.5 months). No significant difference in the interval between the first and the last MR imaging studies was observed between the 2 groups (P = .246). On-line Table 1 summarizes the clinical-radiologic data of the 38 patients, including MRA findings.

DSC Perfusion Imaging

The mean values of CBF-related parameters evaluated by DSC-PWI at the first MR imaging study and at the last follow-up are reported in Table 1. In surgical hemispheres, significant reduction of the central nCBF and a significant increase of cortical nCBF were noticed at last follow-up (P < .001) (Fig 1 and On-line Fig 2). Moreover, a significant reduction of the hdSD index was observed in surgical hemispheres (P < .001). No variations of CBF-related parameters were observed in nonsurgical hemispheres (P > .05). The 1-way analysis of covariance showed a significant effect of surgical revascularization on central nCBF (P = .005), cortical nCBF (P = .011), the hdSD index (P < .001), and the hdSD percentage age variation (P < .001) after controlling for age, sex, and the time interval between MR imaging examinations (On-line Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Comparison of CBF-related parameters between 2 time points in surgical and nonsurgical brain hemispheres

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Representative T2-weighted images (A and D), DSC-CBF (B and E), and noncontrast MR angiography (C and F) of pre- (A–C) and postoperative (D–F) images in a 10-year-old patient with left Moyamoya disease (asterisk) treated with surgical indirect revascularization (EDAMS) (white arrow). The empty arrow indicates the left frontal region with reduced CBF values before the operation (B). DSC-PWI acquired 36 months after left EDAMS shows an improvement in CBF in the left frontal lobe (empty arrow, E). Arrowheads indicate preoperative hyperperfusion of the proximal MCA region (B) that returns to normal at postoperative PWI (E). The color scale unit of the CBF map is mL/100 mg/min.

Relation between Perfusion MR Imaging Data and Clinical Outcomes

At the last outpatient visit, 14/28 surgical children had an excellent outcome; 7/28, a good outcome; and 7/28, a fair outcome. No patients had a new stroke or intracranial hemorrhage during the interval between the MR imaging studies. Table 2 shows results of the Jonckheere-Terpstra test. A significant trend toward better outcome was observed in patients who had lower hdSD values at time point 2 (P = .003) and time point 3 (P < .001), higher early (P < .001) and late (P < .001) percentage decreases in hdSD indices, and higher early (P = .046) and late (P = .047) percentage increases in cortical nCBF. Of these, only hdSD at time point 2, hdSD at time point 3, early percentage variance of hdSD, and late percentage variance of hdSD remained significantly different in the clinical outcome categories after covariance analysis (Fig 2 and On-line Table 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Relation between CBF-related parameters and clinical outcome in surgical patients

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

The relation between change in DSC hdSD values and clinical outcomes 3 months after revascularization (time point 2 [TP2], A) and at last follow-up (time point 3 [TP3], B). The relation between the percentage variation of DSC hdSD and clinical outcomes 3 months after the operation (early percentage variation, C) and at last follow-up (late percentage variation, D). Note that these perfusion indices are significantly different in the 3 clinical outcome categories, especially when comparing excellent and good versus fair categories. The “poor” category was not included in the graphs because no surgical patients had poor clinical outcome. Three asterisks indicate P < .001; 2 asterisks, P = .001; 1 asterisk, P = .01.

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated that nCBF in the central and cortical MCA territories and the hdSD index obtained with DSC-PWI may be used to noninvasively evaluate postsurgical variations of brain perfusion in children with MM. We found a significant reduction of central nCBF and hdSD and a significant increase of cortical nCBF in surgical hemispheres, while no relative perfusion changes were observed in the hemispheres of nonsurgical patients with Moyamoya disease. Most interesting, hdSD was a more robust parameter for postsurgical assessment than central nCBF and cortical nCBF. These results confirm and expand the initial observations on xenon CT by Kashiwagi et al,12 reporting a significant reduction of the hdSD index in the surgical hemispheres of 4 children with MM, and by Takahashi et al,13 showing postsurgical hdSD reduction in 3 adult patients who underwent a bypass operation and in 1 who underwent indirect revascularization. The variations of these CBF-related parameters correspond well to the pathologic mechanisms of MM and postsurgical hemodynamic changes. In the initial phases of the disease, collateral networks of dilated vessels at the base of the brain attempt to compensate for the hypoperfusion of the peripheral cortical territories. This attempt generates an abnormal arterial pressure gradient between deep and superficial brain regions, corresponding to a high hdSD. After the operation, progressive superficial angiogenesis and arteriogenesis at the site of indirect revascularization restore an adequate cortical CBF through the external carotid artery system, with reduction of central nCBF related to the regression of the MM vessels in the basal ganglia. Perfusion gradient redistribution through the newly formed pial circulation thus determines significant reduction of the hdSD.3,7,15,21

Most interesting, hdSD at the last MR imaging evaluation and postoperative variations of hdSD obtained with DSC-PWI were related to postoperative outcome after controlling for age, sex, and the duration of clinical follow-up. These perfusion indices were significantly different in the 4 clinical outcome categories at the last follow-up point (average, 38.5 months after the operation). Patients with a higher percentage decrease of hdSD after the operation experienced resolution or improvement of neurologic symptoms and EEG anomalies and improved cognitively. In 2015, Takahashi et al13demonstrated that cortical CBF after acetazolamide load and hdSD at rest reflected ischemic symptoms of adult patients with MM, suggesting that these parameters could be used as ischemic symptom markers in this vasculopathy.

Notably, we found that reduction of hdSD at 3 months after the operation correlated with an excellent outcome at last follow-up, thus representing a potential early postoperative prognostic marker in pediatric patients with MM. This finding is relevant because hdSD may provide the advantage of noninvasively identifying patients with MM at higher risk for suboptimal clinical outcome after a revascularization operation, thereby helping select which patients require closer clinical-radiologic follow-up and additional surgical interventions. Indeed, repeat revascularization procedures are clinically effective in preventing future ischemic events and can be safely performed in patients who are clinically symptomatic and have inadequate collateral vessels following indirect procedures.22,23 Therefore, we suggest that early hdSD variations may play a role in the selection of patients who require further revascularization procedures.24 However, future investigations performed on larger cohorts of surgical patients with MM, focusing on the comparison between hdSD and cerebrovascular reserve, are awaited to confirm this preliminary observation.

There are some limitations to our study, including its retrospective design and the relatively small number of patients. Moreover, masks created for measuring CBF in the MCA territory could include subarachnoid spaces in addition to the brain parenchyma. This feature can affect the CBF measurements and could be a confounder because some patients could have more CSF included in the mask than others. Moreover, we did not evaluate the cerebrovascular reserve, and DSC MR imaging was not compared with PET or SPECT perfusion studies because they were not available for all patients. Considering that even surgical hemispheres may have benefited from the operation performed on the contralateral brain, another limit derives from the potential overestimation of the perfusion improvement in the hemispheres of patients with bilateral revascularization. Indeed, we could not separately estimate the direct effect of the revascularization on the first surgical hemisphere from the indirect effect due to the subsequent revascularization procedure on the contralateral hemisphere. Finally, another limitation of this study was the lack of a direct comparison of CBF-related parameters between patients with MM and healthy controls. However, for ethical reasons, we do not administer contrast media in patients with normal brain MR imaging findings.

Conclusions

CBF in the central and cortical MCA territories and hdSD obtained with DSC may be used to noninvasively evaluate postsurgical variations of brain perfusion in children with MM. Postsurgical hdSD variations correlate well with clinical outcome, even when assessed shortly after the operation, thus being a promising tool for monitoring and predictive purposes. The relative noninvasiveness of PWI makes this technique better suited for studying brain hemodynamics in the pediatric population compared with radiation-exposing techniques. Further investigations testing the same perfusion indices obtained with even less invasive perfusion techniques, such as arterial spin-labeling MR perfusion, could potentially reduce the need for contrast material administration in these patients.

Footnotes

  • Domenico Tortora and Mariasavina Severino contributed equally as first authors.

  • Disclosures: Mattia Pacetti—UNRELATED: Employment: Istituto Giannina Gaslini Children's Hospital, Comments: employed as a neurosurgeon.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Kuroda S,
    2. Houkin K
    . Moyamoya disease: current concepts and future perspectives. Lancet Neurol 2008;7:1056–66 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70240-0 pmid:18940695
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Scott RM,
    2. Smith ER
    . Moyamoya disease and Moyamoya syndrome. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1226–37 doi:10.1056/NEJMra0804622 pmid:19297575
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Tortora D,
    2. Severino M,
    3. Accogli A, et al
    . Moyamoya vasculopathy in PHACE syndrome: six new cases and review of the literature. World Neurosurg 2017;108:291–302 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.176 pmid:28887276
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Hu J,
    2. Luo J,
    3. Chen Q
    . The susceptibility pathogenesis of Moyamoya disease. World Neurosurg 2017;101:731–41 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.083 pmid:28153617
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Lee M,
    2. Zaharchuk G,
    3. Guzman R, et al
    . Quantitative hemodynamic studies in Moyamoya disease: a review. Neurosurg Focus 2009;26:E5 doi:10.3171/2009.1.FOCUS08300 pmid:19335131
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Kim SK,
    2. Wang KC,
    3. Oh CW, et al
    . Evaluation of cerebral hemodynamics with perfusion MRI in childhood Moyamoya disease. Pediatr Neurosurg 2003;38:68–75 doi:10.1159/000068050 pmid:12566838
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Yun TJ,
    2. Cheon JE,
    3. Na DG, et al
    . Childhood Moyamoya disease: quantitative evaluation of perfusion MR imaging—correlation with clinical outcome after revascularization surgery. Radiology 2009;251:216–23 doi:10.1148/radiol.2511080654 pmid:19332853
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Lee SK,
    2. Kim DI,
    3. Jeong EK, et al
    . Postoperative evaluation of Moyamoya disease with perfusion-weighted MR imaging: initial experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:741–47 pmid:12695215
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Ogasawara K,
    2. Tomitsuka N,
    3. Kobayashi M, et al
    . Stevens-Johnson syndrome associated with intravenous acetazolamide administration for evaluation of cerebrovascular reactivity: case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2006;46:161–63 doi:10.2176/nmc.46.161 pmid:16565588
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Saito H,
    2. Ogasawara K,
    3. Suzuki T, et al
    . Adverse effects of intravenous acetazolamide administration for evaluation of cerebrovascular reactivity using brain perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with major cerebral artery steno-occlusive diseases. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2011;51:479–83 doi:10.2176/nmc.51.479 pmid:21785240
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Gallerani M,
    2. Manzoli N,
    3. Fellin R, et al
    . Anaphylactic shock and acute pulmonary edema after a single oral dose of acetazolamide. Am J Emerg Med 2002;20:371–72 doi:10.1053/ajem.2002.33774 pmid:12098191
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Kashiwagi S,
    2. Yamashita T,
    3. Katoh S, et al
    . Regression of Moyamoya vessels and hemodynamic changes after successful revascularization in childhood Moyamoya disease. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl 1996;93:85–88 doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.1996.tb00557.x pmid:8686450
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Takahashi S,
    2. Tanizaki Y,
    3. Kimura H, et al
    . Hemodynamic stress distribution reflects ischemic clinical symptoms of patients with Moyamoya disease. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2015;138:104–10 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.08.010 pmid:26318361
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Schubert GA,
    2. Czabanka M,
    3. Seiz M, et al
    . Perfusion characteristics of Moyamoya disease: an anatomically and clinically oriented analysis and comparison. Stroke 2014;45:101–06 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003370 pmid:24193795
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Laiwalla AN,
    2. Kurth F,
    3. Leu K, et al
    . Evaluation of encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis efficacy using probabilistic independent component analysis applied to dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:507–14 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5041 pmid:28104642
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Kinugasa K,
    2. Mandai S,
    3. Kamata I, et al
    . Surgical treatment of Moyamoya disease: operative technique for encephalo-duro-arterio-myo-synangiosis, its follow-up, clinical results, and angiograms. Neurosurgery 1993;32:527–31 doi:10.1227/00006123-199304000-00006 pmid:8474642
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Ostergaard L,
    2. Sorensen AG,
    3. Kwong KK, et al
    . High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages, Part II: experimental comparison and preliminary results. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:726–36 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910360511 pmid:8916023
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Yun TJ,
    2. Paeng JC,
    3. Sohn CH, et al
    . Monitoring cerebrovascular reactivity through the use of arterial spin labeling in patients with Moyamoya disease. Radiology 2016;278:205–13 doi:10.1148/radiol.2015141865 pmid:26197057
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Jenkinson M,
    2. Beckmann CF,
    3. Behrens TE, et al
    . FSL. Neuroimage 2012;62:782–90 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015 pmid:21979382
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Mutsaerts HJ,
    2. van Dalen JW,
    3. Heijtel DF, et al
    . Cerebral perfusion measurements in elderly with hypertension using arterial spin labeling. PLoS One 2015;10:e0133717 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133717 pmid:26241897
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Nakamura M,
    2. Imai H,
    3. Konno K, et al
    . Experimental investigation of encephalomyosynangiosis using gyrencephalic brain of the miniature pig: histopathological evaluation of dynamic reconstruction of vessels for functional anastomosis—laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2009;3:488–95 doi:10.3171/2008.6.PEDS0834 pmid:19485733
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Pandey P,
    2. Steinberg GK
    . Outcome of repeat revascularization surgery for Moyamoya disease after an unsuccessful indirect revascularization: clinical article. J Neurosurg 2011;115:328–36 doi:10.3171/2011.3.JNS101908 pmid:21529138
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Hayashi T,
    2. Shirane R,
    3. Tominaga T
    . Additional surgery for postoperative ischemic symptoms in patients with Moyamoya disease: the effectiveness of occipital artery-posterior cerebral artery bypass with an indirect procedure—technical case report. Neurosurgery 2009;64:E195–96; discussion E196 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000336311.60660.26 pmid:19145147
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Fujimura M,
    2. Niizuma K,
    3. Endo H, et al
    . Quantitative analysis of early postoperative cerebral blood flow contributes to the prediction and diagnosis of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after revascularization surgery for Moyamoya disease. Neurol Res 2015;37:131–38 doi:10.1179/1743132814Y.0000000432 pmid:25082550
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received December 21, 2017.
  • Accepted after revision February 14, 2018.
  • © 2018 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
Next
Back to top
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Noninvasive Assessment of Hemodynamic Stress Distribution after Indirect Revascularization for Pediatric Moyamoya Vasculopathy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
D. Tortora, M. Severino, M. Pacetti, G. Morana, M.M. Mancardi, V. Capra, A. Cama, M. Pavanello, A. Rossi
Noninvasive Assessment of Hemodynamic Stress Distribution after Indirect Revascularization for Pediatric Moyamoya Vasculopathy
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2018, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5627

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Noninvasive Assessment of Hemodynamic Stress Distribution after Indirect Revascularization for Pediatric Moyamoya Vasculopathy
D. Tortora, M. Severino, M. Pacetti, G. Morana, M.M. Mancardi, V. Capra, A. Cama, M. Pavanello, A. Rossi
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2018, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5627
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Frontal Paraventricular Cysts
  • Sodium MRI in Pediatric Brain Tumors
  • FRACTURE MR in Congenital Vertebral Anomalies
Show more Pediatric Neuroimaging

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire