Factors Associated with Major Re-Recanalization following Second Coiling for Recanalized Aneurysms: A Multicenter Experience over 20 Years during Long-Term Follow-up

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Luther E,
   2. McCarthy DJ,
   3. Brunet MC, et al

   . Treatment and diagnosis of cerebral aneurysms in the post-International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) era: trends and outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:682–87 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015418 pmid:31959634

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Murias Quintana E,
   2. Gil Garcia A,
   3. Vega Valdés P, et al

   . Anatomical results, rebleeding and factors that affect the degree of occlusion in ruptured cerebral aneurysms after endovascular therapy. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:892–97 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011300 pmid:25358516

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Hanel RA,
   2. Yoon N,
   3. Sauvageau E, et al

   . Neuroform Atlas stent for treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: 1-year outcomes from Neuroform Atlas stent pivotal trial. Neurosurgery 2021;89:102–08 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyab090 pmid:33826707

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Fuga M,
   2. Ishibashi T,
   3. Aoki K, et al

   . Intermediate catheter use is associated with complete occlusion and dense packing in coil embolization of unruptured cerebral aneurysms: a propensity score matched study. J Neurointerv Surg 2025;17:174–80 doi:10.1136/jnis-2023-021258

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Campi A,
   2. Ramzi N,
   3. Molyneux AJ, et al

   . Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke 2007;38:1538–44 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.466987 pmid:17395870

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Bernat AL,
   2. Clarençon F,
   3. André A, et al

   . Risk factors for angiographic recurrence after treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: outcomes from a series of 178 unruptured aneurysms treated by regular coiling or surgery. J Neuroradiol 2017;44:298–307 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2017.05.003 pmid:28602498

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Funakoshi Y,
   2. Imamura H,
   3. Tani S, et al

   . Predictors of cerebral aneurysm rupture after coil embolization: single-center experience with recanalized aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:828–35 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6558 pmid:32381548

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Tachi R,
   2. Fuga M,
   3. Tanaka T, et al

   . Characteristics of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with delayed rupture following coil embolization: case series and review of the literature. J Neuroendovasc Ther 2022;16:387–94 doi:10.5797/jnet.oa.2021-0089 pmid:37502635

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Fuga M,
   2. Tanaka T,
   3. Irie K, et al

   . Proposed predictors of the need for retreatment after coil embolization of unruptured cerebral aneurysms with major or minor recanalization: analysis of a single center’s experience. Interdiscip Neurosurg 2021;26:101296 doi:10.1016/j.inat.2021.101296

   CrossRef
10. 10.↵
    1. Cho YD,
    2. Lee JY,
    3. Seo JH, et al

    . Does stent implantation improve the result of repeat embolization in recanalized aneurysms? Neurosurgery 2012;71:ons253–9; discussion ons259 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182647a97 pmid:23160430

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Lee J,
    2. Lim JW,
    3. Cho YD

    . Follow-up outcomes after re-embolization for recanalized aneurysms after initial coiling: further recurrence rates and related risk factors. World Neurosurg 2018;114:e508–e17 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.017 pmid:29530696

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Han YF,
    2. Jiang P,
    3. Tian ZB, et al

    . Risk factors for repeated recurrence of cerebral aneurysms treated with endovascular embolization. Front Neurol 2022;13:938333 doi:10.3389/fneur.2022.938333 pmid:36247772

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Bae JW,
    2. Oh HS,
    3. Hong CE, et al

    . Extended monitoring of re-coiled cerebral aneurysms after initial postcoiling recanalization: safety and durability of repeat coil embolization. J Neuroradiol 2024;51:59–65 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2023.05.006 pmid:37247754

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Tamatani S,
    2. Ito Y,
    3. Abe H, et al

    . Evaluation of the stability of aneurysms after embolization using detachable coils: correlation between stability of aneurysms and embolized volume of aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:762–67pmid:12006273

    PubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Chalouhi N,
    2. Jabbour P,
    3. Singhal S, et al

    . Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms: predictors of complications, recanalization, and outcome in 508 cases. Stroke 2013;44:1348–53 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000641 pmid:23512976

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Ogilvy CS,
    2. Chua MH,
    3. Fusco MR, et al

    . Stratification of recanalization for patients with endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2015;76:390–95; discussion 395 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000651 pmid:25621984

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Huang DZ,
    2. Jiang B,
    3. He W, et al

    . Risk factors for the recurrence of an intracranial saccular aneurysm following endovascular treatment. Oncotarget 2017;8:33676–82 doi:10.18632/oncotarget.16897 pmid:28430600

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Zhang Q,
    2. Jing L,
    3. Liu J, et al

    . Predisposing factors for recanalization of cerebral aneurysms after endovascular embolization: a multivariate study. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:252–57 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013041 pmid:28377443

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Hara T,
    2. Satow T,
    3. Hamano E, et al

    . Aspect ratio is associated with recanalization after coiling of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2022;62:377–83 doi:10.2176/jns-nmc.2022-0052 pmid:35831123

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Fuga M,
    2. Tanaka T,
    3. Irie K, et al

    . Risk factors for recanalization of dense coil packing for unruptured cerebral aneurysms in endovascular coil embolization: analysis of a single center's experience. J Clin Neurosci 2022;98:175–81 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2022.02.009 pmid:35183894

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Hainsworth AH,
    2. Markus HS,
    3. Schneider JA

    . Cerebral small vessel disease, hypertension, and vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia. Hypertension 2024;81:75–86 doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.19943 pmid:38044814

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Murayama Y,
    2. Viñuela F,
    3. Ishii A, et al

    . Initial clinical experience with Matrix detachable coils for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2006;105:192–99 doi:10.3171/jns.2006.105.2.192 pmid:17219822

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Higashida T,
    2. Uchida T,
    3. Osakabe M, et al

    . Efficacy of a 14-coil for framing in coil embolization of small cerebral aneurysms. J Neuroendovasc Ther 2020;14:351–57 doi:10.5797/jnet.oa.2020-0027 pmid:37501670

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Bendok BR,
    2. Abi-Aad KR,
    3. Ward JD

    ; HEAT Study Investigators, et al. The Hydrogel Endovascular Aneurysm Treatment trial (HEAT): a randomized controlled trial of the second-generation hydrogel coil. Neurosurgery 2020;86:615–24 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyaa006 pmid:32078692

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Takao H,
    2. Ishibashi T,
    3. Saguchi T, et al

    . Validation and initial application of a semiautomatic aneurysm measurement software: a tool for assessing volumetric packing attenuation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:721–26 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3777 pmid:24231852

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Roy D,
    2. Milot G,
    3. Raymond J

    . Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke 2001;32:1998–2004 doi:10.1161/hs0901.095600 pmid:11546888

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Kanda Y

    . Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013;48:452–58 doi:10.1038/bmt.2012.244 pmid:23208313

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Teleb MS,
    2. Pandya DJ,
    3. Castonguay AC, et al

    . Safety and predictors of aneurysm retreatment for remnant intracranial aneurysm after initial endovascular embolization. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;6:490–94 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010836 pmid:23956245

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Bavinzski G,
    2. Richling B,
    3. Gruber A, et al

    . Endosaccular occlusion of basilar artery bifurcation aneurysms using electrically detachable coils. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1995;134:184–89 doi:10.1007/BF01417687 pmid:8748779

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    1. Fernandez Zubillaga A,
    2. Guglielmi G,
    3. Viñuela F, et al

    . Endovascular occlusion of intracranial aneurysms with electrically detachable coils: correlation of aneurysm neck size and treatment results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:815–20 pmid:8059647

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. Luo B,
    2. Yang X,
    3. Wang S, et al

    . High shear stress and flow velocity in partially occluded aneurysms prone to recanalization. Stroke 2011;42:745–53 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.593517 pmid:21233477

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. Ferns SP,
    2. Sprengers ME,
    3. van Rooij WJ, et al

    . Coiling of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review on initial occlusion and reopening and retreatment rates. Stroke 2009;40:e523–29 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.553099 pmid:19520984

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    1. Tachi R,
    2. Fuga M,
    3. Tanaka T, et al

    . The white-collar sign after Neuroform Atlas stent-assisted coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neuroradiol J 2024;37:593–602 doi:10.1177/19714009241242657 pmid:38549037

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Vanninen R,
    2. Manninen H,
    3. Ronkainen A

    . Broad-based intracranial aneurysms: thrombosis induced by stent placement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:263–66 pmid:12591645

    PubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Albuquerque FC,
    3. Han P, et al

    . Preliminary experience using the Neuroform stent for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2004;54:6–16; discussion 16–7 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000097194.35781.ea pmid:14683536

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    1. Ries T,
    2. Siemonsen S,
    3. Thomalla G, et al

    . Long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms after endovascular therapy prediction and outcome of retreatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1755–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0649 pmid:17885238

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    1. Chalouhi N,
    2. Chitale R,
    3. Starke RM, et al

    . Treatment of recurrent intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;6:19–23 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010612 pmid:23345630

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    1. Benaissa A,
    2. Januel AC,
    3. Herbreteau D, et al

    . Endovascular treatment with flow diverters of recanalized and multitreated aneurysms initially treated by endovascular approach. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:44–49 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-011046 pmid:24449174

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    1. Daou B,
    2. Starke RM,
    3. Chalouhi N, et al

    . The use of the Pipeline embolization device in the management of recurrent previously coiled cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2015;77:692–97; discussion 697 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000901 pmid:26186670

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Akgul E,
    2. Onan HB,
    3. Islek I, et al

    . Flow diverter stents in the treatment of recanalized intracranial aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol 2021;27:481–89 doi:10.1177/1591019921990507 pmid:33509011

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Li W,
    2. Zhu W,
    3. Sun X, et al

    . Retreatment with flow diverters and coiling for recurrent aneurysms after initial endovascular treatment: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis. Front Neurol 2021;12:625652 doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.625652 pmid:34149588

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    1. Daou B,
    2. Starke RM,
    3. Chalouhi N, et al

    . Pipeline embolization device in the treatment of recurrent previously stented cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:849–55 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4613 pmid:26611991

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
43. 43.↵
    1. Li YD,
    2. Li MH,
    3. Gao BL, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of recurrent intracranial aneurysms with re-coiling or covered stents. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2010;81:74–79 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2009.171967 pmid:19687026

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
44. 44.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Guilbert F,
    3. Weill A, et al

    . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–403 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000073841.88563.E9 pmid:12775880

    Abstract/FREE Full Text