A Review of Intracranial Aneurysm Imaging Modalities, from CT to State-of-the-Art MR

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Vlak MH,
   2. Algra A,
   3. Brandenburg R, et al

   . Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2011;10:626–36 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70109-0 pmid:21641282

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Forget TR,
   2. Benitez R,
   3. Veznedaroglu E, et al

   . A review of size and location of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2001;49:1322–25; discussion 1325–26 doi:10.1097/00006123-200112000-00006 pmid:11846931

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Lehman VT,
   2. Brinjikji W

   . Vessel wall imaging of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: ready for prime time? Not so fast!. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:E26–29 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6048 pmid:31048296

   FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Tryfonidis M,
   2. Evans AL,
   3. Coley SC, et al

   . The value of radio-anatomical features on non-contrast CT scans in localizing the source in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Clin Anat 2007;20:618–23 doi:10.1002/ca.20475 pmid:17674417

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Backes D,
   2. Rinkel GJE,
   3. Kemperman H, et al

   . Time-dependent test characteristics of head computed tomography in patients suspected of nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 2012;43:2115–19 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.658880 pmid:22821609

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Edlow JA,
   2. Caplan LR

   . Avoiding pitfalls in the diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage. N Engl J Med 2000;342:29–36 doi:10.1056/NEJM200001063420106 pmid:10620647

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Haller S,
   2. Haacke EM,
   3. Thurnher MM, et al

   . Susceptibility-weighted imaging: technical essentials and clinical neurologic applications. Radiology 2021;299:3–26 doi:10.1148/radiol.2021203071 pmid:33620291

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Verma RK,
   2. Kottke R,
   3. Andereggen L, et al

   . Detecting subarachnoid hemorrhage: comparison of combined FLAIR/SWI versus CT. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:1539–45 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.03.021 pmid:23632159

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Rustemi O,
   2. Alaraj A,
   3. Shakur SF, et al

   . Detection of unruptured intracranial aneurysms on noninvasive imaging: is there still a role for digital subtraction angiography? Surg Neurol Int 2015;6:175 doi:10.4103/2152-7806.170029pmid:26674519

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Wong SC,
    2. Nawawi O,
    3. Ramli N, et al

    . Benefits of 3D rotational DSA compared with 2D DSA in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysm. Acad Radiol 2012;19:701–07 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2012.02.012 pmid:22578227

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Dhar S,
    2. Tremmel M,
    3. Mocco J, et al

    . Morphology parameters for intracranial aneurysm rupture risk assessment. Neurosurgery 2008;63:185–97 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000316847.64140.81 pmid:18797347

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Willinsky RA,
    2. Taylor SM,
    3. TerBrugge K, et al

    . Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003;227:522–28 doi:10.1148/radiol.2272012071 pmid:12637677

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Bendszus M,
    2. Koltzenburg M,
    3. Burger R, et al

    . Silent embolism in diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures: a prospective study. Lancet 1999;354:1594–97 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(99)07083-X pmid:10560674

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Gibbs GF,
    2. Huston J,
    3. Bernstein MA, et al

    . Improved image quality of intracranial aneurysms: 3.0-T versus 1.5-T time-of-flight MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:84–87 pmid:14729534

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Yanamadala V,
    2. Sheth SA,
    3. Walcott BP, et al

    . Non-contrast 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for visualization of intracranial aneurysms in patients with absolute contraindications to CT or MRI contrast. J Clin Neurosci 2013;20:1122–26 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2012.12.005 pmid:23685107

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Kodama T,
    2. Watanabe K

    . Influence of imaging parameters, flow velocity, and pulsatile flow on three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography: experimental studies. Eur J Radiol 1997;26:83–91 doi:10.1016/S0720-048X(96)01152-7

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Wilcock DJ,
    2. Jaspan T,
    3. Worthington BS

    . Problems and pitfalls of 3-D TOF magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial circulation. Clin Radiol 1995;50:526–32 doi:10.1016/s0009-9260(05)83186-1 pmid:7656518

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. HaiFeng L,
    2. YongSheng X,
    3. YangQin X, et al

    . Diagnostic value of 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for detecting intracranial aneurysm: a meta-analysis. Neuroradiology 2017;59:1083–92 doi:10.1007/s00234-017-1905-0 pmid:28887618

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Cirillo M,
    2. Scomazzoni F,
    3. Cirillo L, et al

    . Comparison of 3D TOF-MRA and 3D CE-MRA at 3T for imaging of intracranial aneurysms. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:e853–59 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.08.052 pmid:24103356

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Maki JH,
    2. Chenevert TL,
    3. Prince MR

    . Contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Abdom Imaging 1998;23:469–84 doi:10.1007/s002619900384 pmid:9841060

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Chen X,
    2. Liu Y,
    3. Tong H, et al

    . Meta-analysis of computed tomography angiography versus magnetic resonance angiography for intracranial aneurysm. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97:e10771 doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000010771 pmid:29768368

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. van Gelder JM

    . Computed tomographic angiography for detecting cerebral aneurysms: implications of aneurysm size distribution for the sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios. Neurosurgery 2003;53:597–605; discussion 605–06 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000080060.97293.ee pmid:12943576

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Kim ST,
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Kallmes DF

    . Prevalence of intracranial aneurysms in patients with connective tissue diseases: a retrospective study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1422–26 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4718 pmid:26992822

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Marchese E,
    2. Vignati A,
    3. Albanese A, et al

    . Comparative evaluation of genome-wide gene expression profiles in ruptured and unruptured human intracranial aneurysms. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 2010;24:185–95 pmid:20487632

    PubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Pera J,
    2. Korostynski M,
    3. Krzyszkowski T, et al

    . Gene expression profiles in human ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms: what is the role of inflammation? Stroke 2010;41:224–31 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.562009 pmid:20044533

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Frösen J,
    2. Piippo A,
    3. Paetau A, et al

    . Remodeling of saccular cerebral artery aneurysm wall is associated with rupture: histological analysis of 24 unruptured and 42 ruptured cases. Stroke 2004;35:2287–93 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000140636.30204.da pmid:15322297

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Hasan D,
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Jabbour P, et al

    . Macrophage imbalance (M1 vs. M2) and upregulation of mast cells in wall of ruptured human cerebral aneurysms: preliminary results. J Neuroinflammation 2012;9:222 doi:10.1186/1742-2094-9-222 pmid:22999528

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Vergouwen MDI
    2. Backes D,
    3. van der Schaaf IC, et al

    . Gadolinium enhancement of the aneurysm wall in unruptured intracranial aneurysms is associated with an increased risk of aneurysm instability: a follow-up study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1112–16 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6105 pmid:31221634

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Leao DJ,
    2. Agarwal A,
    3. Mohan S, et al

    . Intracranial vessel wall imaging: applications, interpretation, and pitfalls. Clin Radiol 2020;75:730–39 doi:10.1016/j.crad.2020.02.006 pmid:32197916

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Bae H,
    2. Suh S-I,
    3. Yoon WK, et al

    . Correlation of aneurysmal wall enhancement of unruptured intracranial aneurysms on high-resolution vessel-wall imaging with clinical indices and surgical findings. Neurosurgery 2021;89:420–27 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyab178 pmid:34114036

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Lv N,
    2. Karmonik C,
    3. Chen S, et al

    . Wall enhancement, hemodynamics, and morphology in unruptured intracranial aneurysms with high rupture risk. Transl Stroke Res 2020;11:882–89 doi:10.1007/s12975-020-00782-4 pmid:31960286

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Larsen N,
    2. Flüh C,
    3. Saalfeld S, et al

    . Multimodal validation of focal enhancement in intracranial aneurysms as a surrogate marker for aneurysm instability. Neuroradiology 2020;62:1627–35 doi:10.1007/s00234-020-02498-6 pmid:32681192

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Patel A,
    2. Abdalla R,
    3. Allaw R, et al

    . Temporal changes on postgadolinium MR vessel wall imaging captures enhancement kinetics of intracranial atherosclerotic plaques and aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2024;45:1206–13 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A8370 pmid:39054289

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    1. Edjlali M,
    2. Guédon A,
    3. Ben Hassen W, et al

    . Circumferential thick enhancement at vessel wall MRI has high specificity for intracranial aneurysm instability. Radiology 2018;289:181–87 doi:10.1148/radiol.2018172879 pmid:29969070

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Matsushige T,
    2. Shimonaga K,
    3. Mizoue T, et al

    . Focal aneurysm wall enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging indicates intraluminal thrombus and the rupture point. World Neurosurg 2019;127:e578–84 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.209 pmid:30928597

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Cornelissen BM,
    2. Leemans EL,
    3. Coolen BF, et al

    . Insufficient slow-flow suppression mimicking aneurysm wall enhancement in magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging: a phantom study. Neurosurg Focus 2019;47:E19 doi:10.3171/2019.4.FOCUS19235 pmid:31261123

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Qi H,
    2. Liu X,
    3. Liu P, et al

    . Complementary roles of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and postcontrast vessel wall imaging in detecting high-risk intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:490–96 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5983 pmid:30792252

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    1. Larsen N,
    2. von der Belie C,
    3. Trick D, et al

    . Vessel wall enhancement in unruptured intracranial aneurysms: an indicator for higher risk of rupture? High-resolution MR imaging and correlated histologic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1617–21 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5731 pmid:30026386

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    1. Hudson JS,
    2. Zanaty M,
    3. Nakagawa D, et al

    . Magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging in human intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2019;50:e1 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023701 pmid:30580739

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Meng H,
    2. Tutino VM,
    3. Xiang J, et al

    . High WSS or low WSS? Complex interactions of hemodynamics with intracranial aneurysm initiation, growth, and rupture: toward a unifying hypothesis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1254–62 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3558 pmid:23598838

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
41. 41.↵
    1. Texakalidis P,
    2. Hilditch CA,
    3. Lehman V, et al

    . Vessel wall imaging of intracranial aneurysms: systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2018;117:453–58.e1 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.008 pmid:29902602

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    1. Kalsoum E,
    2. Chabernaud Negrier A,
    3. Tuilier T, et al

    . Blood flow mimicking aneurysmal wall enhancement: a diagnostic pitfall of vessel wall MRI using the postcontrast 3D turbo spin-echo MR imaging sequence. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1065–67 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5616 pmid:29599170

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
43. 43.↵
    1. Lindenholz A,
    2. van der Kolk AG,
    3. Zwanenburg JJM, et al

    . The use and pitfalls of intracranial vessel wall imaging: how we do it. Radiology 2018;286:12–28 doi:10.1148/radiol.2017162096 pmid:29261469

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    1. Sheinberg DL,
    2. McCarthy DJ,
    3. Elwardany O, et al

    . Endothelial dysfunction in cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurg Focus 2019;47:E3 doi:10.3171/2019.4.FOCUS19221 pmid:31389675

    CrossRefPubMed
45. 45.↵
    1. Baharoglu MI,
    2. Schirmer CM,
    3. Hoit DA, et al

    . Aneurysm inflow-angle as a discriminant for rupture in sidewall cerebral aneurysms: morphometric and computational fluid dynamic analysis. Stroke 2010;41:1423–30 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.570770 pmid:20508183

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
46. 46.↵
    1. Nixon AM,
    2. Gunel M,
    3. Sumpio BE

    . The critical role of hemodynamics in the development of cerebral vascular disease. J Neurosurg 2010;112:1240–53 doi:10.3171/2009.10.JNS09759 pmid:19943737

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
47. 47.↵
    1. Fukuda S,
    2. Hashimoto N,
    3. Naritomi H, et al

    . Prevention of rat cerebral aneurysm formation by inhibition of nitric oxide synthase. Circulation 2000;101:2532–38 doi:10.1161/01.cir.101.21.2532 pmid:10831529

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
48. 48.↵
    1. Zhou G,
    2. Zhu Y,
    3. Yin Y, et al

    . Association of wall shear stress with intracranial aneurysm rupture: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2017;7:5331 doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05886-w pmid:28706287

    CrossRefPubMed
49. 49.↵
    1. Koseki H,
    2. Miyata H,
    3. Shimo S, et al

    . Two diverse hemodynamic forces, a mechanical stretch and a high wall shear stress, determine intracranial aneurysm formation. Transl Stroke Res 2020;11:80–92 doi:10.1007/s12975-019-0690-y pmid:30737656

    CrossRefPubMed
50. 50.↵
    1. Cebral J,
    2. Ollikainen E,
    3. Chung BJ, et al

    . Flow conditions in the intracranial aneurysm lumen are associated with inflammation and degenerative changes of the aneurysm wall. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:119–26 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4951 pmid:27686488

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
51. 51.↵
    1. Boussel L,
    2. Rayz V,
    3. McCulloch C, et al

    . Aneurysm growth occurs at region of low wall shear stress: patient-specific correlation of hemodynamics and growth in a longitudinal study. Stroke 2008;39:2997–3002 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.521617 pmid:18688012

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
52. 52.↵
    1. Ren Y,
    2. Chen GZ,
    3. Liu Z, et al

    . Reproducibility of image-based computational models of intracranial aneurysm: a comparison between 3D rotational angiography, CT angiography and MR angiography. Biomed Eng Online 2016;15:50 doi:10.1186/s12938-016-0163-4 pmid:27150439

    CrossRefPubMed
53. 53.↵
    1. Geers AJ,
    2. Larrabide I,
    3. Radaelli AG, et al

    . Patient-specific computational hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms from 3D rotational angiography and CT angiography: an in vivo reproducibility study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:581–86doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2306 pmid:21183614

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
54. 54.↵
    1. Paritala PK,
    2. Anbananthan H,
    3. Hautaniemi J, et al

    . Reproducibility of the computational fluid dynamic analysis of a cerebral aneurysm monitored over a decade. Sci Rep 2023;13:219 doi:10.1038/s41598-022-27354-w pmid:36604495

    CrossRefPubMed
55. 55.↵
    1. Valen-Sendstad K,
    2. Mardal K-A,
    3. Mortensen M, et al

    . Direct numerical simulation of transitional flow in a patient-specific intracranial aneurysm. J Biomech 2011;44:2826–32 doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.08.015 pmid:21924724

    CrossRefPubMed
56. 56.↵
    1. Rayz VL,
    2. Cohen-Gadol AA

    . Hemodynamics of cerebral aneurysms: connecting medical imaging and biomechanical analysis. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2020;22:231–56 doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-092419-061429 pmid:32212833

    CrossRefPubMed
57. 57.↵
    1. Han S,
    2. Schirmer CM,
    3. Modarres-Sadeghi Y

    . A reduced-order model of a patient-specific cerebral aneurysm for rapid evaluation and treatment planning. J Biomech 2020;103:109653 doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109653 pmid:32037019

    CrossRefPubMed
58. 58.↵
    1. Formaggia L,
    2. Lamponi D,
    3. Quarteroni A

    . One-dimensional models for blood flow in arteries. J Eng Math 2003;47:251–76 doi:10.1023/B:ENGI.0000007980.01347.29

    CrossRef
59. 59.↵
    1. Kallmes DF

    . Point: CFD: computational fluid dynamics or confounding factor dissemination. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:395–96 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2993 pmid:22268081

    FREE Full Text
60. 60.↵
    1. Oda S,
    2. Shimoda M,
    3. Hirayama A, et al

    . Neuroradiologic diagnosis of minor leak prior to major SAH: diagnosis by T1-FLAIR mismatch. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1616–22 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4325 pmid:25977479

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
61. 61.↵
    1. Larsson HB,
    2. Courivaud F,
    3. Rostrup E, et al

    . Measurement of brain perfusion, blood volume, and blood-brain barrier permeability, using dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2009;62:1270–81 doi:10.1002/mrm.22136 pmid:19780145

    CrossRefPubMed
62. 62.↵
    1. Gordon Y,
    2. Partovi S,
    3. Müller-Eschner M, et al

    . Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: fundamentals and application to the evaluation of the peripheral perfusion. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2014;4:147–64 doi:10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2014.03.01 pmid:24834412

    CrossRefPubMed
63. 63.↵
    1. Tofts PS,
    2. Brix G,
    3. Buckley DL, et al

    . Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:223–32 doi:10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199909)10:3<223::AID-JMRI2>3.0.CO;2-S pmid:10508281

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
64. 64.↵
    1. Vakil P,
    2. Ansari SA,
    3. Cantrell CG, et al

    . Quantifying intracranial aneurysm wall permeability for risk assessment using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a pilot study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:953–59 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4225 pmid:25655875

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
65. 65.↵
    1. Kerwin W. S,
    2. Oikawa M,
    3. Yuan C, et al

    . MR imaging of adventitial vasa vasorum in carotid atherosclerosis. Magn Reson Med 2008;59:507–14 doi:10.1002/mrm.21532 pmid:18306402

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
66. 66.↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Sun J,
    3. Li R, et al

    . Increased aneurysm wall permeability colocalized with low wall shear stress in unruptured saccular intracranial aneurysm. J Neurol 2022;269:2715–19 doi:10.1007/s00415-021-10869-z pmid:34731309

    CrossRefPubMed
67. 67.↵
    1. Aref M,
    2. Handbury JD,
    3. Xiuquan Ji J, et al

    . Spatial and temporal resolution effects on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography. Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:14–34 doi:10.1016/j.MRI.2006.09.025 pmid:17222712

    CrossRefPubMed
68. 68.↵
    1. Hu B,
    2. Shi Z,
    3. Lu L, et al

    ; China Aneurysm AI Project Group. A deep-learning model for intracranial aneurysm detection on CT angiography images in China: a stepwise, multicentre, early-stage clinical validation study. Lancet Digit Health 2024;6:e261–71 doi:10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00268-6 pmid:38519154

    CrossRefPubMed
69. 69.↵
    1. Heit JJ,
    2. Honce JM,
    3. Yedavalli VS, et al

    . RAPID aneurysm: artificial intelligence for unruptured cerebral aneurysm detection on CT angiography. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2022;31:106690 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106690

    CrossRefPubMed
70. 70.↵
    1. Feng X,
    2. Tong X,
    3. Chen J, et al

    . External validation of the PHASES score in patients with multiple intracranial aneurysms. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2021;30:105643 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105643 pmid:33631473

    CrossRefPubMed
71. 71.↵
    1. Bizjak Ž,
    2. Pernuš F,
    3. Špiclin Ž

    . Deep shape features for predicting future intracranial aneurysm growth. Front Physiol 2021;12:644349 doi:10.3389/fphys.2021.644349 pmid:34276391

    CrossRefPubMed
72. 72.↵
    1. Xie Y,
    2. Liu S,
    3. Lin H, et al

    . Automatic risk prediction of intracranial aneurysm on CTA image with convolutional neural networks and radiomics analysis. Front Neurol 2023;14:1126949 doi:10.3389/fneur.2023.1126949 pmid:37456640

    CrossRefPubMed
73. 73.↵
    1. Habibi MA,
    2. Fakhfouri A,
    3. Mirjani MS, et al

    . Prediction of cerebral aneurysm rupture risk by machine learning algorithms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18,670 participants. Neurosurg Rev 2024;47:34 doi:10.1007/s10143-023-02271-2 pmid:38183490

    CrossRefPubMed
74. 74.↵
    1. Zech JR,
    2. Badgeley MA,
    3. Liu M, et al

    . Variable generalization performance of a deep learning model to detect pneumonia in chest radiographs: a cross-sectional study. PLOS Med 2018;15:e1002683 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002683 pmid:30399157

    CrossRefPubMed