There Is Poor Agreement between the Subjective and Quantitative Adjudication of Aneurysm Wall Enhancement

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Wang X,
   2. Zhu C,
   3. Leng Y, et al

   . Intracranial aneurysm wall enhancement associated with aneurysm rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Radiol 2019;26:664–73 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2018.05.005 pmid:29908979

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Molenberg R,
   2. Aalbers MW,
   3. Appelman AP, et al

   . Intracranial aneurysm wall enhancement as an indicator of instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Neurol 2021;28:3837–48 doi:10.1111/ene.15046 pmid:34424585

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Mossa-Basha M,
   2. Zhu C,
   3. Yuan C, et al

   . Survey of the American Society of Neuroradiology membership on the use and value of intracranial vessel wall MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2022;43:951–57 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7541 pmid:35710122

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Mandell DM,
   2. Mossa-Basha M,
   3. Qiao Y, et al

   ; Vessel Wall Imaging Study Group of the American Society of Neuroradiology. Intracranial vessel wall MRI: principles and expert consensus recommendations of the American Society of Neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:218–29 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4893 pmid:27469212

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Nagahata S,
   2. Nagahata M,
   3. Obara M, et al

   . Wall enhancement of the intracranial aneurysms revealed by magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging using three-dimensional turbo spin-echo sequence with motion-sensitized driven-equilibrium: a sign of ruptured aneurysm? Clin Neuroradiol 2016;26:277–83 doi:10.1007/s00062-014-0353-z pmid:25332151

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Hashimoto Y,
   2. Matsushige T,
   3. Kawano R, et al

   . Focal aneurysm wall enhancement in vessel wall imaging as a surrogate marker for predicting aneurysm instability. Stroke, Vascular and Interventional Radiol 2023;3:e001029 doi:10.1161/SVIN.123.001029

   CrossRef
7. 7.↵
   1. Edjlali M,
   2. Guédon A,
   3. Ben Hassen W, et al

   . Circumferential thick enhancement at vessel wall MRI has high specificity for intracranial aneurysm instability. Radiology 2018;289:181–87 doi:10.1148/radiol.2018172879 pmid:29969070

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Raghuram A,
   2. Varon A,
   3. Roa JA, et al

   . Semiautomated 3D mapping of aneurysmal wall enhancement with 7T-MRI. Sci Rep 2021;11:18344 doi:10.1038/s41598-021-97727-0 pmid:34526579

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Raghuram A,
   2. Sanchez S,
   3. Wendt L, et al

   . 3D aneurysm wall enhancement is associated with symptomatic presentation. J Neurointerv Surg 2023;15:747–52 doi:10.1136/jnis-2022-019125 pmid:35853699

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Collins GS,
    2. Reitsma JB,
    3. Altman DG, et al

    . Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ 2015;350:g7594 doi:10.1136/bmj.g7594 pmid:25569120

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Sanchez S,
    2. Hickerson M,
    3. Patel RR, et al

    . Morphological characteristics of ruptured brain aneurysms: a systematic literature review and meta‐analysis. Stroke, Vascular and Interventional Radiol 2023;3:e000707 doi:10.1161/SVIN.122.000707

    CrossRef
12. 12.↵
    1. Dhar S,
    2. Tremmel M,
    3. Mocco J, et al

    . Morphology parameters for intracranial aneurysm rupture risk assessment. Neurosurgery 2008;63:185–96; discussion 196–87 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000316847.64140.81 pmid:18797347

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Ujiie H,
    2. Tamano Y,
    3. Sasaki K, et al

    . Is the aspect ratio a reliable index for predicting the rupture of a saccular aneurysm? Neurosurgery 2001;48:495–503 doi:10.1097/00006123-200103000-00007 pmid:11270538

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Lindgren AE,
    2. Koivisto T,
    3. Björkman J, et al

    . Irregular shape of intracranial aneurysm indicates rupture risk irrespective of size in a population-based cohort. Stroke 2016;47:1219–26 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012404 pmid:27073241

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Sanchez S,
    2. Miller JM,
    3. Samaniego EA

    . Clinical scales in aneurysm rupture prediction. Stroke, Vascular and Interventional Radiol 2024;4:e000625 doi:10.1161/SVIN.123.000625

    CrossRef
16. 16.↵
    1. Zhong W,
    2. Su W,
    3. Li T, et al

    . Aneurysm wall enhancement in unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a histopathological evaluation. J Am Heart Assoc 2021;10:e018633 doi:10.1161/JAHA.120.018633 pmid:33410330

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Fedorov A,
    2. Beichel R,
    3. Kalpathy-Cramer J, et al

    . 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012;30:1323–41 doi:10.1016/j.MRI.2012.05.001 pmid:22770690

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Satogami N,
    2. Miki Y,
    3. Koyama T, et al

    . Normal pituitary stalk: high-resolution MR imaging at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:355–59 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1836 pmid:19797792

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Simmons GE,
    2. Suchnicki JE,
    3. Rak KM, et al

    . MR imaging of the pituitary stalk: size, shape, and enhancement pattern. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;159:375–77 doi:10.2214/ajr.159.2.1632360 pmid:1632360

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Roa JA,
    2. Zanaty M,
    3. Osorno-Cruz C, et al

    . Objective quantification of contrast enhancement of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a high-resolution vessel wall imaging validation study. J Neurosurg 2021;134:862–69 doi:10.3171/2019.12.JNS192746 pmid:32032948

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Peng F,
    2. Fu M,
    3. Xia J, et al

    . Quantification of aneurysm wall enhancement in intracranial fusiform aneurysms and related predictors based on high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: a validation study. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2022;15:17562864221105342 doi:10.1177/17562864221105342 pmid:35847373

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Liang X,
    2. Peng F,
    3. Yao Y, et al

    . Aneurysm wall enhancement, hemodynamics, and morphology of intracranial fusiform aneurysms. Front Aging Neurosci 2023;15:1145542 doi:10.3389/fnagi.2023.1145542 pmid:36993906

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Vach W,
    2. Gerke O

    . Gwet’s AC1 is not a substitute for Cohen’s kappa: a comparison of basic properties. MethodsX 2023;10:102212 doi:10.1016/j.mex.2023.102212 pmid:37234937

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Lv N,
    2. Karmonik C,
    3. Chen S, et al

    . Relationship between aneurysm wall enhancement in vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging and rupture risk of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2019;84:E385–91 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyy310 pmid:30011026

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Edjlali M,
    2. Gentric JC,
    3. Régent-Rodriguez C, et al

    . Does aneurysmal wall enhancement on vessel wall MRI help to distinguish stable from unstable intracranial aneurysms? Stroke 2014;45:3704–06 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006626 pmid:25325912

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Samaniego EA,
    2. Roa JA,
    3. Hasan D

    . Vessel wall imaging in intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:1105–12 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014938 pmid:31337731

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Kang N,
    2. Qiao Y,
    3. Wasserman BA

    . Essentials for interpreting intracranial vessel wall MRI results: state of the art. Radiology 2021;300:492–505 doi:10.1148/radiol.2021204096 pmid:34313475

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Fu Q,
    2. Wang Y,
    3. Zhang Y, et al

    . Qualitative and quantitative wall enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging is associated with symptoms of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2021;52:213–22 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029685 pmid:33349014

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Veeturi SS,
    2. Pinter NK,
    3. Monteiro A, et al

    . An image-based workflow for objective vessel wall enhancement quantification in intracranial aneurysms. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021;11:1742 doi:10.3390/diagnostics11101742 pmid:34679440

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Texakalidis P,
    2. Hilditch CA,
    3. Lehman V, et al

    . Vessel wall imaging of intracranial aneurysms: systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2018;117:453–58.e451 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.008 pmid:29902602

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Backes D,
    2. Hendrikse J,
    3. van der Schaaf I, et al

    . Determinants of gadolinium-enhancement of the aneurysm wall in unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2018;83:719–25 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyx487 pmid:29088454

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Lindenholz A,
    2. van der Kolk AG,
    3. Zwanenburg JJM, et al

    . The use and pitfalls of intracranial vessel wall imaging: how we do it. Radiology 2018;286:12–28 doi:10.1148/radiol.2017162096 pmid:29261469

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Cornelissen BM,
    2. Leemans EL,
    3. Slump CH, et al

    . Vessel wall enhancement of intracranial aneurysms: fact or artifact? Neurosurg Focus 2019;47:E18 doi:10.3171/2019.4.FOCUS19236 pmid:31261122

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Khan MO,
    2. Toro Arana V,
    3. Rubbert C, et al

    . Association between aneurysm hemodynamics and wall enhancement on 3D vessel wall MRI. J Neurosurg 2021;134:565–75 doi:10.3171/2019.10.JNS191251 pmid:31923894

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Wang GX,
    2. Gong MF,
    3. Zhang D, et al

    . Wall enhancement ratio determined by vessel wall MRI associated with symptomatic intracranial aneurysms. Eur J Radiol 2019;112:88–92 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.01.016 pmid:30777225

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Matouk CC,
    2. Mandell DM,
    3. Günel M, et al

    . Vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging identifies the site of rupture in patients with multiple intracranial aneurysms: proof of principle. Neurosurgery 2013;72:492–96; discussion 496 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827d1012 pmid:23151622

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Nehls DG,
    2. Flom RA,
    3. Carter LP, et al

    . Multiple intracranial aneurysms: determining the site of rupture. J Neurosurg 1985;63:342–48 doi:10.3171/jns.1985.63.3.0342 pmid:4020459

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science