Clinical Outcome of Pipeline Embolization Device with and without Coils to Treat Intracranial Aneurysm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Briganti F,
   2. Leone G,
   3. Marseglia M, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms using flow-diverter devices: a systematic review. Neuroradiol J 2015;28:365–75 doi:10.1177/1971400915602803 pmid:26314872

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Fiorella D,
   2. Woo HH,
   3. Albuquerque FC, et al

   . Definitive reconstruction of circumferential, fusiform intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery 2008;62:1115–20; discussion 1120–21 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000325873.44881.6e pmid:18580809

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Nelson PK,
   2. Lylyk P,
   3. Szikora I, et al

   . The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:34–40 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2421 pmid:21148256

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Meyers PM,
   2. Coon AL,
   3. Kan PT, et al

   . SCENT trial. Stroke 2019;50:1473–79 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024135 pmid:31084335

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Gory B,
   2. Berge J,
   3. Bonafé A, et al

   ; DIVERSION Investigators. Flow diverters for intracranial aneurysms: the DIVERSION National Prospective Cohort Study. Stroke 2019;50:3471–80 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.024722 pmid:31765296

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Becske T,
   2. Kallmes DF,
   3. Saatci I, et al

   . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Kallmes DF,
   2. Brinjikji W,
   3. Boccardi E, et al

   . Aneurysm Study of Pipeline in an Observational Registry (ASPIRe). Interv Neurol 2016;5:89–99 doi:10.1159/000446503 pmid:27610126

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Crowley RW,
   2. Abla AA,
   3. Ducruet AF, et al

   . Novel application of a balloon-anchoring technique for the realignment of a prolapsed Pipeline Embolization Device: a technical report. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;6:439–44 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010806 pmid:23832416

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Brinjikji W,
   2. Kallmes DF,
   3. Kadirvel R

   . Mechanisms of healing in coiled intracranial aneurysms: a review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1216–22 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4175 pmid:25430855

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Zhou Y,
    2. Yang PF,
    3. Fang YB, et al

    . A novel flow-diverting device (Tubridge) for the treatment of 28 large or giant intracranial aneurysms: a single-center experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2326–33 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3925 pmid:24722307

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Chen SQ,
    2. Li L,
    3. Gao B-L, et al

    . Safety and effect of Pipeline Flex Embolization Device for complex unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Sci Rep 2023;13:4570 doi:10.1038/s41598-023-31638-0 pmid:36941312

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Oğuz Ş,
    2. Tabakci ÖN,
    3. Uysal E, et al

    . Pipeline Flex Embolization Device (PED Flex) for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: periprocedural outcomes and first-year angiographic results. Turk J Med Sci 2019;49:1640–46 doi:10.3906/sag-1906-116 pmid:31655536

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Kallmes DF,
    2. Hanel R,
    3. Lopes D, et al

    . International retrospective study of the Pipeline Embolization Device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:108–15 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4111 pmid:25355814

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Zhang Q,
    2. Shao Q,
    3. Chang K, et al

    . Safety and efficacy of coils in conjunction with the Pipeline Flex Embolization Device for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Front Neurol 2021;12:651465 doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.651465 pmid:34759878

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Lin N,
    2. Brouillard AM,
    3. Krishna C, et al

    . Use of coils in conjunction with the Pipeline Embolization Device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2015;76:142–49 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000579 pmid:25255261

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Tong X,
    2. Han M,
    3. Xue X, et al

    . Coiling embolization strategy for medium-to-giant-sized intracranial aneurysms treated with Pipeline Embolization Device: a propensity score-weighted study. Eur Radiol 2023;33:7967–77 doi:10.1007/s00330-023-09800-z pmid:37314476

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Peschillo S,
    2. Caporlingua A,
    3. Resta MC, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of large and giant carotid aneurysms with flow-diverter stents alone or in combination with coils: a multicenter experience and long-term follow-up. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2017;13:492–502 doi:10.1093/ons/opx032 pmid:28838114

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Park MS,
    2. Nanaszko M,
    3. Sanborn MR, et al

    . Re-treatment rates after treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device alone versus Pipeline and coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: a single-center experience. J Neurosurg 2016;125:137–44 doi:10.3171/2015.7.JNS15582 pmid:26684772

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Kang H,
    2. Luo B,
    3. Liu J, et al

    . Postoperative occlusion degree after flow-diverter placement with adjunctive coiling: analysis of complications. J Neurointerv Surg 2022;14:371–75 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017445 pmid:33986109

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Jinguei L,
    2. Guilin L,
    3. Shengpan C, et al

    . Roles of Pipeline Embolization Device in combination with coils in the treatment of large and giant unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms. Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases 2018;15:4–9 doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5921.2018.01.002

    CrossRef
21. 21.↵
    1. Park MS,
    2. Kilburg C,
    3. Taussky P, et al

    . Pipeline Embolization Device with or without adjunctive coil embolization: analysis of complications from the IntrePED Registry. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1127–31 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4678 pmid:26767709

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Sweid A,
    2. Atallah E,
    3. Herial N, et al

    . Pipeline-assisted coiling versus Pipeline in flow diversion treatment of intracranial aneurysms. J Clin Neurosci 2018;58:20–24 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.081 pmid:30454690

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Wang C,
    2. Luo B,
    3. Li TX, et al

    . Comparison of the Pipeline Embolisation Device alone or combined with coiling for treatment of different sizes of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke Vasc Neurol 2022;7:345–52 doi:10.1136/svn-2021-001258 pmid:35387893

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Wells GA,
    2. Shea B,
    3. O’Connell D, et al

    . The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. 2021. https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed ??????
25. 25.↵
    1. Akiyama T,
    2. Imamura H,
    3. Goto M, et al

    . Pipeline flow diversion with adjunctive coil embolization for internal carotid artery aneurysms following an intradural component: results in 46 consecutive aneurysms from a Japanese single-center experience. Neurosurg Rev 2022;45:2221–30 doi:10.1007/s10143-021-01719-7 pmid:35066661

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Hanel RA,
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Lopes DK, et al

    . Prospective study on embolization of intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline device: the PREMIER study 1 year results. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:62–66 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015091 pmid:31308197

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Kulcsár Z,
    2. Houdart E,
    3. Bonafé A, et al

    . Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:20–25 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2370 pmid:21071538

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Cebral JR,
    2. Mut F,
    3. Raschi M, et al

    . Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:27–33 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2398 pmid:21071533

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Hou K,
    2. Li G,
    3. Lv X, et al

    . Delayed rupture of intracranial aneurysms after placement of intra-luminal flow diverter. Neuroradiol J 2020;33:451–64 doi:10.1177/1971400920953299 pmid:32851918

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Rinne J,
    2. Hernesniemi J,
    3. Niskanen M, et al

    . Analysis of 561 patients with 690 middle cerebral artery aneurysms: anatomic and clinical features as correlated to management outcome. Neurosurgery 1996;38:2–11 doi:10.1097/00006123-199601000-00002 pmid:8747945

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Adeeb N,
    2. Moore JM,
    3. Wirtz M, et al

    . Predictors of incomplete occlusion following Pipeline embolization of intracranial aneurysms: is it less effective in older patients? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:2295–300 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5375 pmid:28912285

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. Akiyama R,
    2. Ishii A,
    3. Kikuchi T, et al

    . Predictors of aneurysm shrinkage after flow diversion treatment for internal carotid artery aneurysms: quantitative volume analysis with MRI. Front Neurol 2023;14:1266460 doi:10.3389/fneur.2023.1266460 pmid:38187156

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Bender MT,
    2. Jiang B,
    3. Campos JK, et al

    . Single-stage flow diversion with adjunctive coiling for cerebral aneurysm: outcomes and technical considerations in 72 cases. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:843–50 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013739 pmid:29802165

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    1. Ding D,
    2. Starke RM,
    3. Hope A, et al

    . Flow-diverting stent-assisted coil embolization of a ruptured internal carotid artery blister aneurysm with the Pipeline Flex Embolization Device. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2017;8:664–67 doi:10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_336_17 pmid:29204036

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Haider AS,
    2. Osumah T,
    3. Cambron H, et al

    . Coil now, pipe later: two-stage treatment for acute intracranial aneurysm rupture. Cureus 2017;9:e1876 doi:10.7759/cureus.1876 pmid:29487765

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Howard BM,
    2. Frerich JM,
    3. Madaelil TP, et al

    . “Plug and pipe” strategy for treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:43–48 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014058 pmid:29982224

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    1. Dornbos D 3rd.,
    2. Pillai P,
    3. Sauvageau E

    . Flow diverter assisted coil embolization of a very small ruptured ophthalmic artery aneurysm. BMJ Case Rep 2013;2013:bcr2013010876 doi:10.1136/bcr-2013-010876 pmid:24319025

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    1. Biondi A,
    2. Janardhan V,
    3. Katz JM, et al

    . Neuroform stent-assisted coil embolization of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: strategies in stent deployment and midterm follow-up. Neurosurgery 2007;61:460–68; discussion 468–69 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000290890.62201.A9 pmid:17881956

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 39.↵
    1. Ferrigno AS,
    2. Caro-Osorio E,
    3. Martinez HR, et al

    . Coiling as a rescue strategy for flow diverter prolapse into a giant intracranial aneurysm. World Neurosurg 2020;133:392–97 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.141 pmid:31476475

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Kandemirli SG,
    2. Baltacioglu F,
    3. Jesser J, et al

    . Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) with or without adjunctive coiling in treatment of very large and giant cerebral aneurysms. Clin Neuroradiol 2022;32:471–80 doi:10.1007/s00062-021-01061-x pmid:34309708

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Shi M,
    2. Feng Y,
    3. Zhang CD, et al

    . Tubridge flow diverter alone vs. Tubridge flow diverter and coils for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a propensity score matching analysis. Front Neurol 2022;13:974354. doi:10.3389/fneur.2022.974354 pmid:36570460

    CrossRefPubMed