Evaluation of MR Elastography as a Noninvasive Diagnostic Test for Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Schievink WI,
   2. Maya MM,
   3. Jean-Pierre S, et al

   . A classification system of spontaneous spinal CSF leaks. Neurology 2016;87:673–79 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002986 pmid:27440149

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. D’Antona L,
   2. Jaime Merchan MA,
   3. Vassiliou A, et al

   . Clinical presentation, investigation findings, and treatment outcomes of spontaneous intracranial hypotension syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol 2021;78:329–37 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4799 pmid:33393980

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Schievink WI

   . Spontaneous intracranial hypotension. N Engl J Med 2021;385:2173–78 doi:10.1056/NEJMra2101561 pmid:34874632

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Kranz PG,
   2. Gray L,
   3. Amrhein TJ

   . Spontaneous intracranial hypotension: 10 myths and misperceptions. Headache 2018;58:948–59 doi:10.1111/head.13328 pmid:29797515

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Schievink WI,
   2. Maya MM,
   3. Harris J, et al

   . Infratentorial superficial siderosis and spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Ann Neurol 2023;93:64–75 doi:10.1002/ana.26521 pmid:36200700

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Murphy MC,
   2. Huston J, 3rd.,
   3. Ehman RL

   . MR elastography of the brain and its application in neurological diseases. Neuroimage 2019;187:176–83 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.008 pmid:28993232

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Yin Z,
   2. Romano AJ,
   3. Manduca A, et al

   . Stiffness and beyond: What MR elastography can tell us about brain structure and function under physiologic and pathologic conditions. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2018;27:305–18 doi:10.1097/RMR.0000000000000178 pmid:30289827

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Hiscox LV,
   2. Johnson CL,
   3. Barnhill E, et al

   . Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) of the human brain: technique, findings and clinical applications. Phys Med Biol 2016;61:R401–37 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/61/24/R401 pmid:27845941

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Dobrocky T,
   2. Grunder L,
   3. Breiding PS, et al

   . Assessing spinal cerebrospinal fluid leaks in spontaneous intracranial hypotension with a scoring system based on brain magnetic resonance imaging findings. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:580–87 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4921 pmid:30776059

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Arani A,
    2. Murphy MC,
    3. Glaser KJ, et al

    . Measuring the effects of aging and sex on regional brain stiffness with MR elastography in healthy older adults. Neuroimage 2015;111:59–64 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.016 pmid:25698157

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Foo TK,
    2. Laskaris E,
    3. Vermilyea M, et al

    . Lightweight, compact, and high-performance 3T MR system for imaging the brain and extremities. Magn Reson Med 2018;80:2232–45 doi:10.1002/mrm.27175 pmid:29536587

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Foo TFK,
    2. Laskaris E,
    3. Vermilyea M, et al

    . Lightweight, compact, and high-performance 3T MR system for imaging the brain and extremities. Magn Reson Med 2018;80:2232–45 doi:10.1002/mrm.27175 pmid:29536587

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Cogswell PM,
    2. Murphy MC,
    3. Madhavan AA, et al

    . Features of idiopathic intracranial hypertension on MRI with MR elastography: prospective comparison with control individuals and assessment of postintervention changes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2022;219:940–51 doi:10.2214/AJR.22.27904 pmid:35822642

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Scott JM,
    2. Arani A,
    3. Manduca A, et al

    . Artificial neural networks for magnetic resonance elastography stiffness estimation in inhomogeneous materials. Med Image Anal 2020;63:101710 doi:10.1016/j.media.2020.101710 pmid:32442867

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Manduca A,
    2. Oliphant TE,
    3. Dresner MA, et al

    . Magnetic resonance elastography: non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity. Med Image Anal 2001;5:237–54 doi:10.1016/s1361-8415(00)00039-6 pmid:11731304

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Manduca A,
    2. Bayly PJ,
    3. Ehman RL, et al

    . MR elastography: principles, guidelines, and terminology. Magn Reson Med 2021;85:2377–90 doi:10.1002/mrm.28627 pmid:33296103

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Scott JM,
    2. Pavuluri K,
    3. Trzasko JD, et al

    . Impact of material homogeneity assumption on cortical stiffness estimates by MR elastography. Magn Reson Med 2022;88:916–29 doi:10.1002/mrm.29226 pmid:35381121

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Abadi M,
    2. Agarwal A,
    3. Barham P, et al

    . Tensorflow: a system for large-scale machine learning. arXiv: CS 1605.08695v2. May 31, 2016. https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.08695v2. Accessed December 15, 2023
19. 19.↵
    1. Chollet F

    . Keras. https://keras.io. Accessed December 15, 2023
20. 20.↵
    1. Kingma DP,
    2. Ba J

    . Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv CS1412.6980. January 30, 2017. https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980. Accessed December 15, 2023
21. 21.↵
    1. Ashburner J,
    2. Friston KJ

    . Unified segmentation. Neuroimage 2005;26:839–51 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.018 pmid:15955494

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Schwarz CG,
    2. Gunter JL,
    3. Ward CP, et al

    . [P2–415]: the Mayo Clinic adult lifespan template: better quantification across the lifespan. Alzheimer’s & Dementia 2017;13:P792 doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2017.06.1071

    CrossRef
23. 23.↵
    1. Murphy MC,
    2. Huston J, 3rd.,
    3. Jack CR, Jr., et al

    . Measuring the characteristic topography of brain stiffness with magnetic resonance elastography. PLoS One 2013;8:e81668 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081668 pmid:24312570

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Bioucas-Dias JM,
    2. Valadão G

    . Phase unwrapping via graph cuts. IEEE Trans Image Process 2007;16:698–709 doi:10.1109/tip.2006.888351 pmid:17357730

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Murphy MC,
    2. Cogswell PM,
    3. Trzasko JD, et al

    . Identification of normal pressure hydrocephalus by disease-specific patterns of brain stiffness and damping ratio. Invest Radiol 2020;55:200–08 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000630 pmid:32058331

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Mark I,
    2. Madhavan A,
    3. Oien M, et al

    . Temporal characteristics of CSF-venous fistulas on digital subtraction myelography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2023;44:492–95 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7809 pmid:36894299

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Kim DK,
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Morris PP, et al

    . Lateral decubitus digital subtraction myelography: tips, tricks, and pitfalls. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:21–28 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6368 pmid:31857327

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Madhavan AA,
    2. Cutsforth-Gregory JK,
    3. Brinjikji W, et al

    . Diagnostic performance of decubitus photon-counting detector CT myelography for the detection of CSF-venous fistulas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2023;44:1445–50 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A8040 pmid:37945523

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Shah LM,
    2. McLean LA,
    3. Heilbrun ME, et al

    . Intracranial hypotension: improved MRI detection with diagnostic intracranial angles. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:400–07 doi:10.2214/AJR.12.8611 pmid:23345364

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Farb RI,
    2. Forghani R,
    3. Lee SK, et al

    . The venous distension sign: a diagnostic sign of intracranial hypotension at MR imaging of the brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1489–93 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0621 pmid:17846197

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Kranz PG,
    2. Tanpitukpongse TP,
    3. Choudhury KR, et al

    . Imaging signs in spontaneous intracranial hypotension: prevalence and relationship to CSF pressure. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1374–78 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4689 pmid:26869465

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. Schievink WI,
    2. Maya M,
    3. Prasad RS, et al

    . Spontaneous spinal cerebrospinal fluid-venous fistulas in patients with orthostatic headaches and normal conventional brain and spine imaging. Headache 2021;61:387–91 doi:10.1111/head.14048 pmid:33484155

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Arani A,
    2. Min HK,
    3. Fattahi N, et al

    . Acute pressure changes in the brain are correlated with MR elastography stiffness measurements: initial feasibility in an in vivo large animal model. Magn Reson Med 2018;79:1043–51 doi:10.1002/mrm.26738 pmid:28488326

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Kolipaka A,
    2. Wassenaar PA,
    3. Cha S, et al

    . Magnetic resonance elastography to estimate brain stiffness: measurement reproducibility and its estimate in pseudotumor cerebri patients. Clin Imaging 2018;51:114–22 doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.02.005 pmid:29459315

    CrossRefPubMed