Diagnostic Accuracy of Preoperative Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for Detecting Histologic Intraplaque Hemorrhage in Cervical ICA Stenosis in Patients Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Liu XS,
   2. Zhao HL,
   3. Cao Y, et al

   . Comparison of carotid atherosclerotic plaque characteristics by high-resolution black-blood MR imaging between patients with first-time and recurrent acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1257–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2965 pmid:22345496

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Saam T,
   2. Hetterich H,
   3. Hoffmann V, et al

   . Meta-analysis and systematic review of the predictive value of carotid plaque hemorrhage on cerebrovascular events by magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:1081–91 doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.06.015 pmid:23850912

   FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Rothwell PM,
   2. Eliasziw M,
   3. Gutnikov SA, et al

   .; Carotid Endarterectomy Trialists’ Collaboration. Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet 2003;361:107–16 doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12228-3 pmid:12531577

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Walker MD,
   2. Marler JR,
   3. Goldstein M, et al

   . Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 1995;273:1421–28 doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520420037035

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Brott TG,
   2. Hobson RW, 2nd.,
   3. Howard G, et al

   .; CREST Investigators. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 2010;363:11–23 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0912321 pmid:20505173

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Brinjikji W,
   2. Huston J, 3rd.,
   3. Rabinstein AA, et al

   . Contemporary carotid imaging: from degree of stenosis to plaque vulnerability. J Neurosurg 2016;124:27–42 doi:10.3171/2015.1.JNS142452 pmid:26230478

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Altaf N,
   2. Beech A,
   3. Goode SD, et al

   . Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage detected by magnetic resonance imaging predicts embolization during carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2007;46:31–36 doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2007.02.072 pmid:17543492

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Sitzer M,
   2. Müller W,
   3. Siebler M, et al

   . Plaque ulceration and lumen thrombus are the main sources of cerebral microemboli in high-grade internal carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 1995;26:1231–33 doi:10.1161/01.str.26.7.1231 pmid:7604420

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Kobayashi M,
   2. Ogasawara K,
   3. Inoue T, et al

   . Urgent endarterectomy using pretreatment with free radical scavenger, edaravone, and early clamping of the parent arteries for cervical carotid artery stenosis with crescendo transient ischemic attacks caused by mobile thrombus and hemodynamic cerebral ischemia. Neurol MedChir (Tokyo) 2007;47:121–25 doi:10.2176/nmc.47.121 pmid:17384494

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Bijuklic K,
    2. Wandler A,
    3. Hazizi F, et al

    . The PROFI study (Prevention of Cerebral Embolization by Proximal Balloon Occlusion Compared to Filter Protection During Carotid Artery Stenting): a prospective randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1383–89 doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.035 pmid:22284330

    FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Stabile E,
    2. Sannino A,
    3. Schiattarella GG, et al

    . Cerebral embolic lesions detected with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging following carotid artery stenting: a meta-analysis of 8 studies comparing filter cerebral protection and proximal balloon occlusion. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:1177–83 doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2014.05.019 pmid:25240544

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Sato Y,
    2. Ogasawara K,
    3. Narumi S, et al

    . Optimal MR plaque imaging for cervical carotid artery stenosis in predicting the development of microembolic signals during exposure of carotid arteries in endarterectomy: comparison of 4 T1-weighted imaging techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1146–54 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4674 pmid:26846926

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Yoshida K,
    2. Narumi O,
    3. Chin M, et al

    . Characterization of carotid atherosclerosis and detection of soft plaque with use of black-blood MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:868–74 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1015 pmid:18296548

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Yoshimura S,
    2. Yamada K,
    3. Kawasaki M, et al

    . High-intensity signal on time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography indicates carotid plaques at high risk for cerebral embolism during stenting. Stroke 2011;42:3132–37 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.615708 pmid:21868725

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Saito A,
    2. Sasaki M,
    3. Ogasawara K, et al

    . Carotid plaque signal differences among four kinds of T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging techniques: a histopathological correlation study. Neuroradiology 2012;54:1187–94 doi:10.1007/s00234-012-1025-9 pmid:22430326

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Bradley WG, Jr.

    . MR appearance of hemorrhage in the brain. Radiology 1993;189:15–26 doi:10.1148/radiology.189.1.8372185 pmid:8372185

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. de Rochefort L,
    2. Liu T,
    3. Kressler B, et al

    . Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction from MR phase data using Bayesian regularization: validation and application to brain imaging. Magn Reson Med 2010;63:194–206 doi:10.1002/mrm.22187 pmid:19953507

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Liu T,
    2. Surapaneni K,
    3. Lou M, et al

    . Cerebral microbleeds: burden assessment by using quantitative susceptibility mapping. Radiology 2012;262:269–78 doi:10.1148/radiol.11110251 pmid:22056688

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Chang S,
    2. Zhang J,
    3. Liu T, et al

    . Quantitative susceptibility mapping of intracerebral hemorrhages at various stages. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016;44:420–25 doi:10.1002/jmri.25143 pmid:26718014

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Chen W,
    2. Zhu W,
    3. Kovanlikaya I, et al

    . Intracranial calcifications and hemorrhages: characterization with quantitative susceptibility mapping. Radiology 2014;270:496–505 doi:10.1148/radiol.13122640 pmid:24126366

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Azuma M,
    2. Maekawa K,
    3. Yamashita A, et al

    . Characterization of carotid plaque components by quantitative susceptibility mapping. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:310–17 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6374 pmid:31879331

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Ikebe Y,
    2. Ishimaru H,
    3. Imai H, et al

    . Quantitative susceptibility mapping for carotid atherosclerotic plaques: a pilot study. Magn Reson Med Sci 2020;19:135–40

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Wang C,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Du J, et al

    . Quantitative susceptibility mapping for characterization of intraplaque hemorrhage and calcification in carotid atherosclerotic disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 2020;52:534–41 doi:10.1002/jmri.27064 pmid:32039515

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Sun H,
    2. Wilman HA

    . Background field removal using spherical mean value filtering and Tikhonov regularization. Magn Reson Med 2014;71:1151–57 doi:10.1002/mrm.24765 pmid:23666788

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Shirai T,
    2. Sato R,
    3. Taniguchi Y, et al

    . Quantitative susceptibility mapping using adaptive edge-pre-serving filtering. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of ISMRM. International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; 2015:3319
26. 26.↵
    1. Shirai T,
    2. Sato R,
    3. Kawata Y, et al

    . Region expansion of background field removal with local spherical harmonics approximation for whole-brain quantitative susceptibility mapping. Magn Reson Med Sci 2023;22:497–514 doi:10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0043 pmid:36372397

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Yamaguchi A,
    2. Kudo K,
    3. Sato R, et al

    . Efficacy of quantitative susceptibility mapping with brain surface correction and vein removal for detecting increase magnetic susceptibility in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Magn Reson Med Sci 2023;22:87–94 doi:10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0015 pmid:35264494

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Rutgers DR,
    2. Blankensteijn JD,
    3. van der Grond J

    . Preoperative MRA flow quantification in CEA patients: flow differences between patients who develop cerebral ischemia and patients who do not develop cerebral ischemia during cross-clamping of the carotid artery. Stroke 2000;31:3021–28 doi:10.1161/01.str.31.12.3021 pmid:11108766

    Abstract/FREE Full Text