Long-Term Imaging Follow-up from the Management of Myelomeningocele Study

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Agopian AJ,
   2. Canfield MA,
   3. Olney RS, et al

   ; National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Spina bifida subtypes and sub-phenotypes by maternal race/ethnicity in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Am J Med Genet A 2012;158A:109–15 doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.34383 pmid:22140002

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Boulet SL,
   2. Yang Q,
   3. Mai C, et al

   ; National Birth Defects Prevention Network. Trends in the postfortification prevalence of spina bifida and anencephaly in the United States. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2008;82:527–32 doi:10.1002/bdra.20468 pmid:18481813

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Parker SE,
   2. Mai CT,
   3. Canfield MA, et al

   ; National Birth Defects Prevention Network. Updated national birth prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004-2006. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2010;88:1008–16 doi:10.1002/bdra.20735 pmid:20878909

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Rossi A,
   2. Gandolfo C,
   3. Morana G, et al

   . Current classification and imaging of congenital spinal abnormalities. Semin Roentgenol 2006;41:250–73 doi:10.1053/j.ro.2006.07.001 pmid:17010690

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. McLone DG,
   2. Knepper PA

   . The cause of Chiari II malformation: a unified theory. Pediatr Neurosci 1989;15:1–12 doi:10.1159/000120432 pmid:2699756

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Maurice P,
   2. Garel J,
   3. Garel C, et al

   . New insights in cerebral findings associated with fetal myelomeningocele: a retrospective cohort study in a single tertiary centre. BJOG 2021;128:376–83 doi:10.1111/1471-0528.16185 pmid:32112473

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Ben Miled S,
   2. Loeuillet L,
   3. Duong Van Huyen JP, et al

   . Severe and progressive neuronal loss in myelomeningocele begins before 16 weeks of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020;223:256 e1–e9 doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.052 pmid:32283072

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Vachha B,
   2. Adams R

   . Language differences in young children with myelomeningocele and shunted hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg 2003;39:184–89 doi:10.1159/000072469 pmid:12944698

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Foss S,
   2. Flanders TM,
   3. Heuer GG, et al

   . Neurobehavioral outcomes in patients with myelomeningocele. Neurosurg Focus 2019;47:E6 doi:10.3171/2019.7.FOCUS19445 pmid:31574480

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Johnson MP,
    2. Sutton LN,
    3. Rintoul N, et al

    . Fetal myelomeningocele repair: short-term clinical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:482–87 doi:10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00295-3 pmid:14520222

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Tulipan N,
    2. Bruner JP,
    3. Hernanz-Schulman M, et al

    . Effect of intrauterine myelomeningocele repair on central nervous system structure and function. Pediatr Neurosurg 1999;31:183–88 doi:10.1159/000028859 pmid:10705927

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Adzick NS,
    2. Thom EA,
    3. Spong CY, et al

    ; MOMS Investigators. A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med 2011;364:993–1004 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1014379 pmid:21306277

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Tulipan N,
    2. Wellons JC 3rd.,
    3. Thom EA, et al

    ; MOMS Investigators. Prenatal surgery for myelomeningocele and the need for cerebrospinal fluid shunt placement. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2015;16:613–20 doi:10.3171/2015.7.PEDS15336 pmid:26369371

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Farmer DL,
    2. Thom EA,
    3. Brock JW 3rd., et al

    ; Management of Myelomeningocele Study Investigators. The Management of Myelomeningocele Study: full cohort 30-month pediatric outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;218:256.e13 doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.001 pmid:29246577

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Flanders TM,
    2. Heuer GG,
    3. Madsen PJ, et al

    . Detailed analysis of hydrocephalus and hindbrain herniation after prenatal and postnatal myelomeningocele closure: report from a single institution. Neurosurgery 2020;86:637–45 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyz302 pmid:31432079

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Nagaraj UD,
    2. Bierbrauer KS,
    3. Zhang B, et al

    . Hindbrain herniation in Chiari II malformation on fetal and postnatal MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1031–36 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5116 pmid:28279990

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Houtrow AJ,
    2. Thom EA,
    3. Fletcher JM, et al

    . Prenatal repair of myelomeningocele and school-age functional outcomes. Pediatrics 2020;145:e2019154 doi:10.1542/peds.2019-1544 pmid:31980545

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Rethmann C,
    2. Scheer I,
    3. Meuli M, et al

    . Evolution of posterior fossa and brain morphology after in utero repair of open neural tube defects assessed by MRI. Eur Radiol 2017;27:4571–80 doi:10.1007/s00330-017-4807-y pmid:28500367

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Sutton LN,
    2. Adzick NS,
    3. Bilaniuk LT, et al

    . Improvement in hindbrain herniation demonstrated by serial fetal magnetic resonance imaging following fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. JAMA 1999;282:1826–31 doi:10.1001/jama.282.19.1826 pmid:10573273

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Aertsen M,
    2. Verduyckt J,
    3. De Keyzer F, et al

    . Reliability of MR imaging-based posterior fossa and brainstem measurements in open spinal dysraphism in the era of fetal surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:191–98 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5930 pmid:30591508

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. da Costa MDS,
    2. Nicacio JM,
    3. Dastoli PA, et al

    . Alterations in skull base anatomy in intrauterine and postnatal repaired myelomeningoceles. Childs Nerv Syst 2020;36:2757–63 doi:10.1007/s00381-020-04587-6 pmid:32239293

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Grant RA,
    2. Heuer GG,
    3. Carrion GM, et al

    . Morphometric analysis of posterior fossa after in utero myelomeningocele repair. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2011;7:362–68 doi:10.3171/2011.1.PEDS10234 pmid:21456906

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Glenn OA,
    2. Cuneo AA,
    3. Barkovich AJ, et al

    . Malformations of cortical development: diagnostic accuracy of fetal MR imaging. Radiology 2012;263:843–55 doi:10.1148/radiol.12102492 pmid:22495681

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Kunpalin Y,
    2. Richter J,
    3. Mufti N, et al

    . Cranial findings detected by second-trimester ultrasound in fetuses with myelomeningocele: a systematic review. BJOG 2021;128:366–74 doi:10.1111/1471-0528.16496 pmid:32926566

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Morais BA,
    2. Solla DJ,
    3. Yamaki VN, et al

    . Brain abnormalities in myelomeningocele patients. Childs Nerv Syst 2020;36:1507–13 doi:10.1007/s00381-019-04386-8 pmid:31664560

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. de Wit OA,
    2. den Dunnen WF,
    3. Sollie KM, et al

    . Pathogenesis of cerebral malformations in human fetuses with meningomyelocele. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 2008;5:4 doi:10.1186/1743-8454-5-4 pmid:18312688

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Dennis M,
    2. Salman MS,
    3. Juranek J, et al

    . Cerebellar motor function in spina bifida meningomyelocele. Cerebellum 2010;9:484–98 doi:10.1007/s12311-010-0191-8 pmid:20652468

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Williams VJ,
    2. Juranek J,
    3. Stuebing K, et al

    . Examination of frontal and parietal tectocortical attention pathways in spina bifida meningomyelocele using probabilistic diffusion tractography. Brain Connect 2013;3:512–22 doi:10.1089/brain.2013.0171 pmid:23937233

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Cools MJ,
    2. Tang AR,
    3. Pruthi S, et al

    . A comparison of MRI appearance and surgical detethering rates between intrauterine and postnatal myelomeningocele closures: a single-center pilot matched cohort study. Childs Nerv Syst 2023;39:647–53 doi:10.1007/s00381-022-05627-z pmid:35927592

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Worley G,
    2. Greenberg RG,
    3. Rocque BG, et al

    . Neurosurgical procedures for children with myelomeningocele after fetal or postnatal surgery: a comparative effectiveness study. Dev Med Child Neurol 2021;63:1294–1301 doi:10.1111/dmcn.14792 pmid:33386749

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Dias MS,
    2. Wang M,
    3. Rizk EB, et al

    ; National Spina Bifida Patient Registry Group. Tethered spinal cord among individuals with myelomeningocele: an analysis of the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2023;7:1–7 doi:10.3171/2023.5.PEDS20868a pmid:33962385

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Corroenne R,
    2. Zhu KH,
    3. Johnson E, et al

    . Impact of the size of the lesion in prenatal neural tube defect repair on imaging, neurosurgical and motor outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG 2021;128:392–99 doi:10.1111/1471-0528.16316 pmid:32406575

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Nagaraj UD,
    2. Bierbrauer KS,
    3. Stevenson CB, et al

    . Myelomeningocele versus myelocele on fetal MR images: are there differences in brain findings? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018;211:1376–80 doi:10.2214/AJR.18.20088 pmid:30332293

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Fletcher JM,
    2. Copeland K,
    3. Frederick JA, et al

    . Spinal lesion level in spina bifida: a source of neural and cognitive heterogeneity. J Neurosurg 2005;102:268–79 doi:10.3171/ped.2005.102.3.0268 pmid:15881750

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    1. Fletcher JM,
    2. Houtrow AJ,
    3. MacPherson C

    . Hydrocephalus and school-age neuropsychological outcomes in the Management of Myelomeningocele prenatal surgery trial: a secondary analysis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2023 Mar 3. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.3171/2022.10.PEDS22358 pmid:36883627

    CrossRefPubMed