Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleAdult Brain
Open Access

Choroid Plexus Calcification Correlates with Cortical Microglial Activation in Humans: A Multimodal PET, CT, MRI Study

T. Butler, X.H. Wang, G.C. Chiang, Y. Li, L. Zhou, K. Xi, N. Wickramasuriya, E. Tanzi, E. Spector, I. Ozsahin, X. Mao, Q.R. Razlighi, E.K. Fung, J.P. Dyke, T. Maloney, A. Gupta, A. Raj, D.C. Shungu, P.D. Mozley, H. Rusinek and L. Glodzik
American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2023, 44 (7) 776-782; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7903
T. Butler
aFrom the Brain Health Imaging Institute (T.B., X.H.W., G.C.C., Y.L., L.Z., K.X., N.W., E.T., E.S., I.O., X.M., Q.R.R., T.M., A.G., L.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for T. Butler
X.H. Wang
aFrom the Brain Health Imaging Institute (T.B., X.H.W., G.C.C., Y.L., L.Z., K.X., N.W., E.T., E.S., I.O., X.M., Q.R.R., T.M., A.G., L.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for X.H. Wang
G.C. Chiang
aFrom the Brain Health Imaging Institute (T.B., X.H.W., G.C.C., Y.L., L.Z., K.X., N.W., E.T., E.S., I.O., X.M., Q.R.R., T.M., A.G., L.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for G.C. Chiang
Y. Li
aFrom the Brain Health Imaging Institute (T.B., X.H.W., G.C.C., Y.L., L.Z., K.X., N.W., E.T., E.S., I.O., X.M., Q.R.R., T.M., A.G., L.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Y. Li
L. Zhou
aFrom the Brain Health Imaging Institute (T.B., X.H.W., G.C.C., Y.L., L.Z., K.X., N.W., E.T., E.S., I.O., X.M., Q.R.R., T.M., A.G., L.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for L. Zhou
K. Xi
aFrom the Brain Health Imaging Institute (T.B., X.H.W., G.C.C., Y.L., L.Z., K.X., N.W., E.T., E.S., I.O., X.M., Q.R.R., T.M., A.G., L.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for K. Xi
N. Wickramasuriya
aFrom the Brain Health Imaging Institute (T.B., X.H.W., G.C.C., Y.L., L.Z., K.X., N.W., E.T., E.S., I.O., X.M., Q.R.R., T.M., A.G., L.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for N. Wickramasuriya
E. Tanzi
aFrom the Brain Health Imaging Institute (T.B., X.H.W., G.C.C., Y.L., L.Z., K.X., N.W., E.T., E.S., I.O., X.M., Q.R.R., T.M., A.G., L.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for E. Tanzi
E. Spector
aFrom the Brain Health Imaging Institute (T.B., X.H.W., G.C.C., Y.L., L.Z., K.X., N.W., E.T., E.S., I.O., X.M., Q.R.R., T.M., A.G., L.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for E. Spector
I. Ozsahin
aFrom the Brain Health Imaging Institute (T.B., X.H.W., G.C.C., Y.L., L.Z., K.X., N.W., E.T., E.S., I.O., X.M., Q.R.R., T.M., A.G., L.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for I. Ozsahin
X. Mao
aFrom the Brain Health Imaging Institute (T.B., X.H.W., G.C.C., Y.L., L.Z., K.X., N.W., E.T., E.S., I.O., X.M., Q.R.R., T.M., A.G., L.G.)
bDepartment of Radiology (X.M., E.K.F., J.P.D., D.C.S., P.D.M.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for X. Mao
Q.R. Razlighi
aFrom the Brain Health Imaging Institute (T.B., X.H.W., G.C.C., Y.L., L.Z., K.X., N.W., E.T., E.S., I.O., X.M., Q.R.R., T.M., A.G., L.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Q.R. Razlighi
E.K. Fung
bDepartment of Radiology (X.M., E.K.F., J.P.D., D.C.S., P.D.M.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for E.K. Fung
J.P. Dyke
bDepartment of Radiology (X.M., E.K.F., J.P.D., D.C.S., P.D.M.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.P. Dyke
T. Maloney
aFrom the Brain Health Imaging Institute (T.B., X.H.W., G.C.C., Y.L., L.Z., K.X., N.W., E.T., E.S., I.O., X.M., Q.R.R., T.M., A.G., L.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for T. Maloney
A. Gupta
aFrom the Brain Health Imaging Institute (T.B., X.H.W., G.C.C., Y.L., L.Z., K.X., N.W., E.T., E.S., I.O., X.M., Q.R.R., T.M., A.G., L.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Gupta
A. Raj
cDepartment of Radiology (A.R.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.C. Shungu
bDepartment of Radiology (X.M., E.K.F., J.P.D., D.C.S., P.D.M.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D.C. Shungu
P.D. Mozley
bDepartment of Radiology (X.M., E.K.F., J.P.D., D.C.S., P.D.M.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P.D. Mozley
H. Rusinek
dDepartment of Radiology (H.R.), New York University, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for H. Rusinek
L. Glodzik
aFrom the Brain Health Imaging Institute (T.B., X.H.W., G.C.C., Y.L., L.Z., K.X., N.W., E.T., E.S., I.O., X.M., Q.R.R., T.M., A.G., L.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for L. Glodzik
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The choroid plexus (CP) within the brain ventricles is well-known to produce cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Recently, the CP has been recognized as critical in modulating inflammation. MRI–measured CP enlargement has been reported in neuroinflammatory disorders like MS as well as with aging and neurodegeneration. The basis of MRI–measured CP enlargement is unknown. On the basis of tissue studies demonstrating CP calcification as a common pathology associated with aging and disease, we hypothesized that previously unmeasured CP calcification contributes to MRI–measured CP volume and may be more specifically associated with neuroinflammation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 60 subjects (43 healthy controls and 17 subjects with Parkinson’s disease) who underwent PET/CT using 11C-PK11195, a radiotracer sensitive to the translocator protein expressed by activated microglia. Cortical inflammation was quantified as nondisplaceable binding potential. Choroid plexus calcium was measured via manual tracing on low-dose CT acquired with PET and automatically using a new CT/MRI method. Linear regression assessed the contribution of choroid plexus calcium, age, diagnosis, sex, overall volume of the choroid plexus, and ventricle volume to cortical inflammation.

RESULTS: Fully automated choroid plexus calcium quantification was accurate (intraclass correlation coefficient with manual tracing = .98). Subject age and choroid plexus calcium were the only significant predictors of neuroinflammation.

CONCLUSIONS: Choroid plexus calcification can be accurately and automatically quantified using low-dose CT and MRI. Choroid plexus calcification—but not choroid plexus volume—predicted cortical inflammation. Previously unmeasured choroid plexus calcium may explain recent reports of choroid plexus enlargement in human inflammatory and other diseases. Choroid plexus calcification may be a specific and relatively easily acquired biomarker for neuroinflammation and choroid plexus pathology in humans.

ABBREVIATIONS:

AD
Alzheimer disease
BMI
body mass index
BPnd
nondisplaceable binding potential
CP
choroid plexus
HU
Hounsfield units
ICC
intraclass correlation coefficient
PD
Parkinson disease
PK
11C-PK11195
TSPO
translocator protein

The choroid plexus (CP), a highly vascularized filamentous structure within the brain ventricular system, is well-known to produce CSF. Recently, additional, important CP functions have been recognized, including the regulation of inflammation. The CP both initiates and modulates neuroinflammation, and CP dysfunction is considered highly relevant to the pathophysiology of disorders characterized by excess inflammation such as MS1⇓⇓⇓⇓-6 and Alzheimer disease (AD)7⇓-9 as well as normal aging.10

Unlike virtually all brain parenchymal structures, which atrophy in association with aging and dysfunction, CP enlargement appears to be pathologic, and recent MRI studies have demonstrated larger CP volume in patients with neuropsychiatric disorders, including MS,4⇓-6 AD,7,8 depression,11 and stroke,12 and normal aging.10 The basis of CP enlargement remains uncertain, but on the basis of postmortem and animal studies, it has been posited to relate to CP basement membrane thickening and fibrous stroma expansion with protein, inflammatory cells, and deposition of metal, in particular calcium.13⇓⇓-16 While most of these CP components are detectable and quantifiable only through direct examination of tissue, the assessment of calcium using in vivo neuroimaging is relatively simple because of its vastly higher photon attenuation compared with water and brain, making it easily visible on CT.

For decades, CP calcification has been recognized as a normal phenomenon, with gradually increasing calcification noted with increasing age. CP calcification may have been the first age-related brain change ever detected in living humans. In 1930, Cornelius Dyke, considered the world’s first neuroradiologist, noticed that CP calcification on skull radiographs was rare in children but common in the elderly.17 This finding was demonstrated in 1980 using CT.18 Markedly increased calcification of the CP, basal ganglia, and other brain structures in association with neuropsychiatric decline constitutes the still-poorly-understood and underdiagnosed syndrome of Fahr disease.19 CP calcification has received less research attention in recent years, in large part because MRI, with its submillimeter spatial resolution and lack of radiation has supplanted CT as the technique of choice for human neuroimaging research, and the variable signal of calcium on typical MRI makes calcium quantification on MRI challenging20,21 (though novel quantitative susceptibility mapping sequences under development may, in the future, support MRI quantification of calcium with an accuracy approaching that of CT22).

To our knowledge, decades-old recognition of increasing CP calcification with aging and certain diseases has not been linked to the more recent understanding that CP has important roles beyond CSF production, in particular the regulation of neuroinflammation.1⇓⇓⇓⇓-6 Neuroinflammation can currently be measured in vivo in humans using PET with radiotracers sensitive to the translocator protein (TSPO) expressed by activated microglia, the resident immune cell type of the brain.23⇓-25 Increased regional TSPO PET signal has been demonstrated in a number of human neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative disorders.23,25 However, despite the development of several new TSPO radiotracers during the past 15 years, there remain significant challenges associated with TSPO PET implementation, quantification, and interpretation, motivating research to identify additional biomarkers for neuroinflammation appropriate for human use.25,26 Intriguingly, 2 recent PET studies showed that cortical TSPO expression correlated with MRI–measured CP volume in patients with MS6 and depression.11 On the basis of neuropathologic evidence that calcium deposition is associated with CP basement membrane thickening and fibrous stroma expansion in aging and disease,13⇓⇓-16 we wondered whether this correlation between CP volume and TSPO PET–measured neuroinflammation could be due to calcium. If so, CP calcium, which is easily detectable using CT, could represent a simple biomarker of neuroinflammation.

We, therefore, took a multimodal imaging approach, combining CT, MRI, and TSPO PET to measure the relationship between CP calcium and cortical neuroinflammation in a convenience sample of subjects (healthy controls and patients with Parkinson disease [PD]) who had undergone PET using the TSPO radiotracer 11C-PK11195 (PK) at our institution and who had agreed to their data being included in a local neuroimage repository.

We developed an automated method for measuring CP calcium volume using low-dose CT (routinely acquired during PET/CT studies) and MRI, which we validated against semimanual tracing. We hypothesized that the volume of calcium within the CP would be an independent predictor of PET-measured neuroinflammation.

Although the purpose of this study was to assess the contribution of CP calcium to cortical neuroinflammation as a general phenomenon, rather than as a function of disease, we also assessed the possible effects of the diagnosis (PD or control) on CP calcium, TSPO PET, and their interaction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects

Subjects (n = 60) who underwent PK PET for several different studies conducted on a single PET/CT scanner between 2013 and 2019 were included in this analysis. This was a convenience sample based on available scan data. Subjects were either healthy controls (n = 43) or had been diagnosed with PD without dementia (n = 17) on the basis of standard criteria.27 Most subjects with PD were taking ≥1 medication for PD. Healthy subjects were free from serious medical or neurologic disease including substance abuse. Common medical conditions in older subjects such as hypertension and hypercholesteremia and medications to treat these conditions were not exclusionary. No subjects were taking anti-inflammatory medication. All subjects provided informed consent to participate in a disease-focused research study and for their data to be included in a registry for future analyses such as this one.

PET and MR Image Acquisition

PET images were acquired during 1 hour in list mode, starting at the time of injection of ∼370 MBq of PK on a Biograph PET/CT scanner (Siemens) (voxel size: 1.0182 × 1.0182 × 2.025 mm3). Low-dose CT was acquired immediately before the PET acquisition (voxel size: 0.488 × 0.488 × 1.5 mm3). 3D volumetric T1-weighted BRAVO (GE Healthcare) (voxel size: 0.9375 × 0.9375 × 1.5 mm3) or MPRAGE (voxel size: 1 mm3 isotropic) MR images were acquired using a Discovery MR750 (GE Healthcare) or Tim Trio 3T (Siemens) scanner, respectively.

PET Image Processing

PET images were reconstructed into 22 frames and motion-corrected using MCFLIRT28 (https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/MCFLIRT) in FSL (http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl).29 Nondisplaceable binding potential (BPnd) images reflecting the concentration of TSPO expressed by activated microglia, irrespective of tracer delivery and blood flow, were generated from dynamic PET using a multilinear reference tissue model30 implemented in the freely available software package FireVoxel (https://firevoxel.org). The reference tissue time-activity curve was identified via optimized supervised cluster analysis,31 which is considered the method of choice for analyzing PK PET scans.32

MR Image Processing

FreeSurfer, Version 7 (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu),33 was used to segment MR images for 3 purposes: to define the bilateral cortical ROI as well as other regions for quantifying PET signal; to segment the bilateral lateral ventricles for the automated calcium-quantification method described below; and to quantify CP and lateral ventricle volume to be included as predictors of cortical inflammation. For this latter purpose, CP and ventricular volumes were divided by each subject’s whole-brain volume, calculated using SPM 12 (http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm12), to account for head size. To quantify inflammation (average BPnd) over the cortical ROI, each subject’s T1-weighted MRI was linearly coregistered to his or her summed PET image with rigid body transformation in FSL.29 ROIs were transformed to PET space with the inverse transformation matrix from the coregistration step and eroded 1 mm in-plane to minimize partial volume effects.

Semimanual Quantification of CP Calcium on CT

Using FireVoxel, CT images were windowed at width = 100 Hounsfield units (HU) and level = 50 HU to clearly visualize CP calcifications, which typically have a signal of >100 HU.34 3D ROIs of CP calcification within all horns of the bilateral lateral ventricles were drawn using an electronic paint brush on contiguous axial images. ROIs were then thresholded at 60 HU to exclude any noncalcified voxels. Semimanual tracing was performed by one rater on a random subset of scans (n = 44).

Automated Quantification of CP Calcium Using MRI and CT

T1 MRI and FreeSurfer segmentations were coregistered to CT using rigid transformation with the Advanced Normalization Tools software package (http://stnava.github.io/ANTs/).35 An ROI mask consisting of the bilateral CPs and the posterior portion of the bilateral lateral ventricles (posterior to the most anterior extent of the CP) was generated. Excluding the most anterior portion of this mask prevented erroneous misidentification of parenchymal voxels as calcified and was found to improve correlation with manual tracing. Voxels with Hounsfield units of >100 within this combined CP/posterior lateral ventricle mask were used as seeds to build a weighted image based on the intensity difference. This weighted image was segmented into background and foreground using the fast marching method.36 Clusters from the segmentation were then divided into 2 groups using k-means clustering,37 and the one with higher signal was selected as the calcified CP voxels.

Statistical Analyses

Analyses were performed in SPSS, Version 26 (IBM). Results were considered significant at P < .05.

Subject demographic factors were summarized using means and SDs. Although between-group differences were not the focus of this study, possible demographic differences between subjects with PD and controls were assessed using 2-sample t test (age) and χ2 test (sex).

The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) assessed agreement between semimanual and automated CP calcium volumes.

Multiple linear regression was used to assess the contribution of CP calcium, CP overall volume, ventricle volume, age, sex, body mass index (BMI; previously shown to affect TSPO PET38), and diagnosis (control or PD) to the dependent variable of cortical BPnd. Because disease effects on these measures are unknown, we also assessed whether the interaction between diagnosis and any of these variables contributed significantly to cortical BPnd.

In exploratory analyses using Mann-Whitney tests, we assessed whether any measured neuroimaging parameters differed between subjects with PD and controls.

RESULTS

Subject Demographics

Subjects (n = 60) ranged in age from 23 to 78 (mean, 57.0 [SD, 14.3]) years and included 24 (40%) women. The 2 types of subjects included in our convenience sample (PD [n = 17] and control [n = 43]) did not differ significantly by age, sex, or BMI. Details of subject demographics are presented in the Online Supplemental Data.

Comparison between Semimanual and Automated CP Calcium Measurements

There was excellent absolute agreement between semimanual and automated calcium measurements (ICC = 0.982, F[43, 43] = 71.42, P < .001). On the basis of this agreement, for all subsequent analyses, CP calcium refers to the automated value. Figure 1 shows an example of CP semimanual and automated segmentation.

FIG 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1.

Example of CP calcification segmentation. A, Axial section from a low-dose CT acquired with PET/CT shows CP calcification in the occipital horn of the lateral ventricles bilaterally. B, Semimanually traced CP calcification is shown in yellow; fully-automated segmentation, in blue; and the overlap, in green. C, Magnified view of B shows close correspondence between semimanual and automated CP calcification segmentation.

Association of CP Calcium, CP Overall Volume, Ventricle Volume, Age, Sex, BMI, and Diagnosis with Cortical BPnd

A multiple regression model (R2 = 0.298, adjusted R2 = 0.203 F[7, 52] = 3.15, P = .008; details provided in the Table and Fig 2) showed that only age (P = .017) and CP calcium (P = .017) were significant predictors of cortical BPnd. Neither CP volume, ventricle volume, sex, nor diagnosis (control versus PD) was a significant predictor of cortical BPnd, and no interaction terms were significant.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Linear regression model predicting cortical BPnd in 60 subjectsa

FIG 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2.

Partial regression plot showing the relation of CP calcium to PK BPnd in 60 subjects when controlling for the other variables (CP overall volume, ventricle volume, age, sex, BMI, and diagnosis [PD or control]).

Exploratory Group Differences

As shown in the Online Supplemental Data, there were no significant differences in the neuroimaging parameters of interest (CP calcium volume, CP overall volume, PK PET cortical BPnd) between subjects with PD and controls, though there was a nonsignificant trend (P = .078) for subjects with PD to have greater cortical BPnd than controls. BPnd in other brain regions also did not differ between subjects with PD and controls (all P > .1). These results are shown in the Online Supplemental Data, along with an example of a PK PET scan with normal findings illustrating typical regional TSPO expression.

DISCUSSION

We show that the volume of calcium within CP—but not CP overall volume—is associated with TSPO PET–measured cortical neuroinflammation and provides a method for accurately and automatically measuring CP calcium volume using MRI and low-dose CT. This method was highly congruent (ICC = 0.98) with the gold standard of manual tracing. We discuss implications of these findings as well as important limitations.

CP Calcification May Account for Prior Findings of CP Enlargement in Association with Neuroinflammatory Disease

Our results shed light on the basis of pathologic CP enlargement increasingly recognized in association with human inflammatory and neurodegenerative diseases.6⇓-8,10,11 It is possible that unmeasured CP calcium can explain prior findings of CP enlargement in human aging and disease, including highly relevant recent findings of CP enlargement in association with TSPO PET–measured inflammation in MS and depression.6,11 Additional work, including studies linking in vivo or ex vivo neuroimaging of the human CP to direct tissue assessment, would be needed to determine more precisely the contribution of calcium and other CP histologic features to MRI–measured volume of the CP and its relation with neuroinflammation. It will also be important to determine whether our finding that CP calcification but not CP overall volume predicts cortical TSPO expression, which we have demonstrated in subjects without known neuroinflammatory disease, holds true in subjects with more prominent neuroinflammation as occurs in MS.

CP Calcification as a Potential Biomarker for Neuroinflammation

Assessing neuroinflammation in humans is challenging, and current methods are limited to TSPO PET, which has well-known limitations, including a low SNR and poor availability outside academic medical centers.25,26 Our finding that CP calcification correlated significantly with cortical TSPO expression, coupled with our automated method for quantifying CP calcification using low-dose CT, suggests the potential for CP calcification to serve as a relatively easily acquired biomarker or proxy for neuroinflammation. Because our results are based on a convenience sample of subjects and do not include subjects with overt neuroinflammatory disease, additional work would be needed to determine whether CP calcification correlates with TSPO PET in diseases associated with more severe neuroinflammation like MS. It would also be important to determine whether CP calcification changes in response to anti-inflammatory therapy. While brain calcium deposits are often considered permanent and life-long, a recent study using [18F]-NaF PET showed that the calcium in the CP may be uniquely metabolically active and potentially dynamic.39 Furthermore, parenchymal calcification associated with neonatal toxoplasmosis has been shown to diminish with antimicrobial treatment.40

CP Calcification Explains Interindividual Variability in TSPO PET

Wide and unexplained interindividual variability in TSPO PET is a known limitation of this technique, making detection of disease-specific alterations challenging.25,26 Our multiple regression model including age and CP calcium explained 30% of the variability in cortical TSPO expression. While this explanatory power may seem modest, it is similar to the effect of the TSPO gene rs6971 polymorphism that defines high-, low-, and mixed-affinity binders in studies using second-generation TSPO PET tracers (but not studies like this one using the first-generation tracer PK).41,42 Studies using second-generation TSPO tracers must genetically screen all subjects because accounting for this polymorphism is essential for data interpretation. Similarly, accounting for CP calcification would be expected to reduce unexplained variability in TSPO PET studies, improving interpretability and facilitating detection of effects of interest.

No Significant Differences between Subjects with PD and Controls

Although not the focus of this study, in exploratory analyses, we assessed CP calcification, CP volume, and cortical neuroinflammation in subjects with PD compared with controls and did not find any significant differences. Normal CP volume in PD is in accord with 1 prior study.8 There was a trend (P = .078) for subjects with PD to have greater cortical TSPO expression than controls. Prior TSPO PET studies of PD have provided variable results: Some show increased TSPO expression in regions including the cortex, basal ganglia, and midbrain compared with controls,43,44 though others show no significant differences.45 Current negative results in this relatively small sample of subjects with PD cannot resolve the controversy over this issue. Our finding that subject diagnosis did not affect the correlation between CP calcification and cortical neuroinflammation suggests that this correlation may be a general phenomenon, potentially broadly relevant in human health and disease. Additional work in larger and more diagnostically diverse groups of subjects is needed.

Usefulness of Low-Dose CT Acquired with PET to Measure CP Calcification

Because most human PET studies are currently performed using PET/CT machines, an association of CP calcification with any type of PET-measured molecular information can be assessed with no additional cost or radiation exposure. For example, CP dysfunction has been posited to play an early etiologic role in AD.7⇓-9 Whether CP calcification predicts AD protein deposition could be assessed using existing longitudinal neuroimage repositories if the CT portion of the PET/CT were recognized as valuable and made available.

Limitations

This study has several important limitations.

This is a cross-sectional study demonstrating a correlation between CP calcification and cortical neuroinflammation. Results suggest that CP calcification, which is simple to measure, could serve as a biomarker for cortical inflammation, which is much more difficult to measure. However, this study cannot clarify causality, the mechanism linking these 2 measures, nor whether increased cortical TSPO expression may be detrimental or beneficial. While PET-measured TSPO expression has traditionally been considered to reflect an activated, proinflammatory, detrimental microglial phenotype termed M2 (versus a resting M1 phenotype associated with the maintenance of homeostasis), it is now recognized that this bimodal scheme is an oversimplification and that microglial phenotypes and functions cannot be fully characterized using a probe for a single molecule.46 A recent study using an animal model of Fahr disease found that activated microglia were beneficial in regulating calcification and preventing neurodegeneration.47 The question of whether such homeostatic interplay between microglia and calcification occurs in humans and whether it may be altered in diseases such as MS and AD associated with microglial dysfunction1⇓⇓⇓⇓-6,48 requires additional longitudinal study.

Another limitation of this study is that TSPO is expressed in the brain not just by microglia but by several cell types including other brain macrophages, astrocytes, vascular endothelial cells, and possibly neurons.24,49,50 Meningeal macrophages51 bordering the cortical ROI in this study may contribute to the cortical signal. Because of these limitations of TSPO PET imaging, there is intense interest in identifying new neuroimaging methods to quantify neuroinflammation in vivo in humans.24⇓-26 However, currently, TSPO PET remains the only available research option, and we apply optimal image processing and analysis methods in this study.32

It is a limitation that our analysis is retrospective and based on a relatively small convenience sample of heterogeneous subjects (controls and subjects with PD) scanned for different projects and that we did not include subjects with a definite neuroinflammatory disease like MS. Future prospective studies including additional patient populations are needed to determine whether the association of CP calcification with cortical TSPO expression that we have demonstrated holds true when the range of neuroinflammation across subjects is greater. Replication and extension of our findings in greater numbers of subjects and in different disease states is necessary and would be facilitated by the inclusion of the CT portion of PET/CT studies in public neuroimage repositories. Our results show that information about CP calcification present in low-dose CT is valuable and should not be discarded.

CONCLUSIONS

CP calcification volume can be reliably quantified using semimanual tracing on low-dose CT acquired with PET/CT and fully automatically using our new, accurate (ICC with semimanual tracing = 0.98) CT/MRI method. CP calcification and age—but not overall CP volume—significantly predicted PK PET-measured cortical neuroinflammation in this study. CP calcification is a relatively easily assessed, previously overlooked potential biomarker for neuroinflammation and CP pathology.

Acknowledgment

We are grateful to Steve Poulin, PhD, for assistance with statistical analyses.

Footnotes

  • This work was funded by National Institutes of Health grants K23NS057579, R01NS105541, R01NS092802, R01AG072753 and a Department of Defense grant W81XWH-15-1-0437.

  • Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text and PDF of this article at www.ajnr.org.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Reboldi A,
    2. Coisne C,
    3. Baumjohann D, et al
    . C-C chemokine receptor 6-regulated entry of TH-17 cells into the CNS through the choroid plexus is required for the initiation of EAE. Nat Immunol 2009;10:514–23 doi:10.1038/ni.1716 pmid:19305396
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Kunis G,
    2. Baruch K,
    3. Rosenzweig N, et al
    . IFN-γ-dependent activation of the brain’s choroid plexus for CNS immune surveillance and repair. Brain 2013;136:3427–40 doi:10.1093/brain/awt259 pmid:24088808
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Schwartz M,
    2. Baruch K
    . The resolution of neuroinflammation in neurodegeneration: leukocyte recruitment via the choroid plexus. EMBO J 2014;33:7–22 doi:10.1002/embj.201386609 pmid:24357543
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Manouchehri N,
    2. Stuve O
    . Choroid plexus volumetrics and brain inflammation in multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021;118:e2115221118 doi:10.1073/pnas.2115221118 pmid:34583997
    FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Fleischer V,
    2. Gonzalez-Escamilla G,
    3. Ciolac D, et al
    . Translational value of choroid plexus imaging for tracking neuroinflammation in mice and humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021;118:e2025000118 doi:10.1073/pnas.2025000118 pmid:34479997
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Ricigliano VA,
    2. Morena E,
    3. Colombi A, et al
    . Choroid plexus enlargement in inflammatory multiple sclerosis: 3.0-T MRI and translocator protein PET evaluation. Radiology 2021;301:166–77 doi:10.1148/radiol.2021204426 pmid:34254858
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Choi JD,
    2. Moon Y,
    3. Kim HJ, et al
    . Choroid plexus volume and permeability at brain MRI within the Alzheimer disease clinical spectrum. Radiology 2022;304:635–45 doi:10.1148/radiol.212400 pmid:35579521
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Tadayon E,
    2. Pascual-Leone A,
    3. Press D, et al
    ; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Choroid plexus volume is associated with levels of CSF proteins: relevance for Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 2020;89:108–17 doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.01.005 pmid:32107064
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Alvira-Botero X,
    2. Carro EM
    . Clearance of amyloid-beta peptide across the choroid plexus in Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Aging Sci 2010;3:219–29 doi:10.2174/1874609811003030219 pmid:20735345
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Alisch JS,
    2. Kiely M,
    3. Triebswetter C, et al
    . Characterization of age-related differences in the human choroid plexus volume, microstructural integrity, and blood perfusion using multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging. Front Aging Neurosci 2021;13:734992 doi:10.3389/fnagi.2021.734992 pmid:34603011
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Althubaity N,
    2. Schubert J,
    3. Martins D, et al
    . Choroid plexus enlargement is associated with neuroinflammation and reduction of blood brain barrier permeability in depression. Neuroimage Clin 2022;33:102926 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102926 pmid:34972034
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Egorova N,
    2. Gottlieb E,
    3. Khlif MS, et al
    . Choroid plexus volume after stroke. Int J Stroke 2019;14:923–30 doi:10.1177/1747493019851277 pmid:31096870
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Živković VS,
    2. Stanojković MM,
    3. Antić MM
    . Psammoma bodies as signs of choroid plexus ageing: a morphometric analysis. Vojnosanitetski Pregled 2017;74:1054–59 doi:10.2298/VSP160321205Z
    CrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    1. Alcolado JC,
    2. Moore IE,
    3. Weller RO
    . Calcification in the human choroid plexus, meningiomas and pineal gland. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 1986;12:235–50 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2990.1986.tb00137.x pmid:3736772
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Wolburg H,
    2. Paulus W
    . Choroid plexus: biology and pathology. Acta Neuropathol 2010;119:75–88 doi:10.1007/s00401-009-0627-8 pmid:20033190
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Emerich DF,
    2. Skinner SJ,
    3. Borlongan CV, et al
    . The choroid plexus in the rise, fall and repair of the brain. Bioessays 2005;27:262–74 doi:10.1002/bies.20193 pmid:15714561
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Dyke CG
    . Indirect signs of brain tumor as noted in routine roentgen examinations: displacement of the pineal shadow (a survey of 3000 consecutive skull examinations). AJR Am J Roentgenol 1930;23:598–606
  18. 18.↵
    1. Modic M,
    2. Weinstein M,
    3. Rothner A, et al
    . Calcification of the choroid plexus visualized by computed tomography. Radiology 1980;135:369–72 doi:10.1148/radiology.135.2.7367628 pmid:7367628
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Nicolas G,
    2. Charbonnier C,
    3. Campion D, et al
    . Estimation of minimal disease prevalence from population genomic data: application to primary familial brain calcification. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2018;177:68–74 doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.32605 pmid:29152850
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Adams LC,
    2. Bressem K,
    3. Böker SM, et al
    . Diagnostic performance of susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of calcifications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2017;7:15506 doi:10.1038/s41598-017-15860-1 pmid:29138506
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Wehrli FW
    . Magnetic resonance of calcified tissues. J Magn Reson 2013;229:35–48 doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2012.12.011 pmid:23414678
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Wen Y,
    2. Spincemaille P,
    3. Nguyen T, et al
    . Multiecho complex total field inversion method (mcTFI) for improved signal modeling in quantitative susceptibility mapping. Magn Reson Med 2021;86:2165–78 doi:10.1002/mrm.28814 pmid:34028868
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Kreisl WC,
    2. Kim MJ,
    3. Coughlin JM, et al
    . PET imaging of neuroinflammation in neurological disorders. Lancet Neurol 2020;19:940–50 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30346-X pmid:33098803
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Guilarte TR,
    2. Rodichkin AN,
    3. McGlothan JL, et al
    . Imaging neuroinflammation with TSPO: a new perspective on the cellular sources and subcellular localization. Pharmacol Ther 2022;234:108048 doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.108048 pmid:34848203
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Jain P,
    2. Chaney AM,
    3. Carlson ML, et al
    . Neuroinflammation PET imaging: current opinion and future directions. J Nucl Med 2020;61:1107–12 doi:10.2967/jnumed.119.229443 pmid:32620705
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Janssen B,
    2. Vugts DJ,
    3. Windhorst AD, et al
    . PET imaging of microglial activation: beyond targeting TSPO. Molecules 2018;23:607 doi:10.3390/molecules23030607 pmid:29518005
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Hughes AJ,
    2. Daniel SE,
    3. Kilford L, et al
    . Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992;55:181–84 doi:10.1136/jnnp.55.3.181 pmid:1564476
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Jenkinson M,
    2. Bannister P,
    3. Brady M, et al
    . Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 2002;17:825–41 doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1132 pmid:12377157
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Smith SM,
    2. Jenkinson M,
    3. Woolrich MW, et al
    . Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 2004;23:S208–19 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 pmid:15501092
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Butler T,
    2. Li Y,
    3. Tsui W, et al
    . Transient and chronic seizure-induced inflammation in human focal epilepsy. Epilepsia 2016;57:e191–94 doi:10.1111/epi.13457 pmid:27381590
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Schubert J,
    2. Tonietto M,
    3. Turkheimer F, et al
    . Supervised clustering for TSPO PET imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021;49:257–68 doi:10.1007/s00259-021-05309-z pmid:33779770
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Wimberley C,
    2. Lavisse S,
    3. Hillmer A, et al
    . Kinetic modeling and parameter estimation of TSPO PET imaging in the human brain. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021;49:246–56 doi:10.1007/s00259-021-05248-9 pmid:33693967
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Fischl B,
    2. Salat DH,
    3. Busa E, et al
    . Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 2002;33:341–55 doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00569-x pmid:11832223
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Yalcin A,
    2. Ceylan M,
    3. Bayraktutan OF, et al
    . Age and gender related prevalence of intracranial calcifications in CT imaging; data from 12,000 healthy subjects. J Chem Neuroanat 2016;78:20–24 doi:10.1016/j.jchemneu.2016.07.008 pmid:27475519
    CrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Avants BB,
    2. Tustison NJ,
    3. Song G, et al
    . A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration. Neuroimage 2011;54:2033–44 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.025 pmid:20851191
    CrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Sethian JA
    . Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods: Evolving interfaces in computational geometry, fluid mechanics, computer vision, and materials science. Cambridge University Press; 1999
  37. 37.↵
    1. Arthur D,
    2. Vassilvitskii S
    . k-means++ the advantages of careful seeding. Proceedings of the eighteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms (2007, January, pp 1027–1035).
  38. 38.↵
    1. Tuisku J,
    2. Plavén-Sigray P,
    3. Gaiser EC, et al
    ; HRRT [11C] PBR28 Study Group. Effects of age, BMI and sex on the glial cell marker TSPO: a multicentre [11C] PBR28 HRRT PET study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019;46:2329–38 doi:10.1007/s00259-019-04403-7 pmid:31363804
    CrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Al-Zaghal A,
    2. Seraj SM,
    3. Werner TJ, et al
    . Assessment of physiologic intracranial calcification in healthy adults using 18F-NaF PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2018 Jul 12. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.2967/jnumed.118.213678
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Patel DV,
    2. Holfels EM,
    3. Vogel NP, et al
    . Resolution of intracranial calcifications in infants with treated congenital toxoplasmosis. Radiology 1996;199:433–40 doi:10.1148/radiology.199.2.8668790 pmid:8668790
    CrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Suridjan I,
    2. Rusjan P,
    3. Voineskos AN, et al
    . Neuroinflammation in healthy aging: a PET study using a novel translocator protein 18 kDa (TSPO) radioligand, [18F]-FEPPA. Neuroimage 2014;84:868–75 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.021 pmid:24064066
    CrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Owen DR,
    2. Yeo AJ,
    3. Gunn RN, et al
    . An 18-kDa translocator protein (TSPO) polymorphism explains differences in binding affinity of the PET radioligand PBR28. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2012;32:1–5 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2011.147 pmid:22008728
    CrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Gerhard A
    . TSPO imaging in parkinsonian disorders. Clin Transl Imaging 2016;4:183–90 doi:10.1007/s40336-016-0171-1 pmid:27340650
    CrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Zhang PF,
    2. Gao F
    . Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis of PET imaging studies. J Neurol 2022;269:2304–14 doi:10.1007/s00415-021-10877-z pmid:34724571
    CrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Ghadery C,
    2. Koshimori Y,
    3. Coakeley S, et al
    . Microglial activation in Parkinson’s disease using [18 F]-FEPPA. J Neuroinflammation 2017;14:8 doi:10.1186/s12974-016-0778-1 pmid:28086916
    CrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Salter MW,
    2. Stevens B
    . Microglia emerge as central players in brain disease. Nat Med 2017;23:1018–27 doi:10.1038/nm.4397 pmid:28886007
    CrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Zarb Y,
    2. Sridhar S,
    3. Nassiri S, et al
    . Microglia control small vessel calcification via TREM2. Sci Adv 2021;7:eabc4898 doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc4898 pmid:34848203
    FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Hansen DV,
    2. Hanson JE,
    3. Sheng M
    . Microglia in Alzheimer’s disease. J Cell Biol 2018;217:459–72 doi:10.1083/jcb.201709069 pmid:29196460
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    1. Gui Y,
    2. Marks JD,
    3. Das S, et al
    . Characterization of the 18 kDa translocator protein (TSPO) expression in post‐mortem normal and Alzheimer’s disease brains. Brain Pathol 2020;30:151–64 doi:10.1111/bpa.12763 pmid:31276244
    CrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    1. Notter T,
    2. Schalbetter SM,
    3. Clifton NE, et al
    . Neuronal activity increases translocator protein (TSPO) levels. Mol Psychiatry 2021;26:2025–37 doi:10.1038/s41380-020-0745-1 pmid:32398717
    CrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    1. Mildenberger W,
    2. Stifter SA,
    3. Greter M
    . Diversity and function of brain-associated macrophages. Curr Opin Immunol 2022;76:102181 doi:10.1016/j.coi.2022.102181 pmid:35462276
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received January 11, 2023.
  • Accepted after revision May 4, 2023.
  • © 2023 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 44 (7)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 44, Issue 7
1 Jul 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Choroid Plexus Calcification Correlates with Cortical Microglial Activation in Humans: A Multimodal PET, CT, MRI Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
T. Butler, X.H. Wang, G.C. Chiang, Y. Li, L. Zhou, K. Xi, N. Wickramasuriya, E. Tanzi, E. Spector, I. Ozsahin, X. Mao, Q.R. Razlighi, E.K. Fung, J.P. Dyke, T. Maloney, A. Gupta, A. Raj, D.C. Shungu, P.D. Mozley, H. Rusinek, L. Glodzik
Choroid Plexus Calcification Correlates with Cortical Microglial Activation in Humans: A Multimodal PET, CT, MRI Study
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jul 2023, 44 (7) 776-782; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7903

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Choroid Plexus Calcification&Microglial Activation
T. Butler, X.H. Wang, G.C. Chiang, Y. Li, L. Zhou, K. Xi, N. Wickramasuriya, E. Tanzi, E. Spector, I. Ozsahin, X. Mao, Q.R. Razlighi, E.K. Fung, J.P. Dyke, T. Maloney, A. Gupta, A. Raj, D.C. Shungu, P.D. Mozley, H. Rusinek, L. Glodzik
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jul 2023, 44 (7) 776-782; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7903
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

Adult Brain

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology of Monoclonal Antibodies
  • Clinical Outcomes After Chiari I Decompression
  • Segmentation of Brain Metastases with BLAST
Show more Adult Brain

Functional

  • Kurtosis and Epileptogenic Tubers: A Pilot Study
  • Glutaric Aciduria Type 1: DK vs. Conventional MRI
  • WM Neuroaxonal Loss in Type 1 Diabetes
Show more Functional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire