Use of the Woven EndoBridge Device for Sidewall Aneurysms: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Wang F,
   2. Chen X,
   3. Wang Y, et al

   . Stent-assisted coiling and balloon-assisted coiling in the management of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci 2016;364:160–66 doi:10.1016/j.jns.2016.03.041 pmid:27084238

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Zhao B,
   2. Yin R,
   3. Lanzino G, et al

   . Endovascular coiling of wide-neck and wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1700–05 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4834 pmid:27256850

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Pierot L,
   2. Biondi A

   . Endovascular techniques for the management of wide-neck intracranial bifurcation aneurysms: a critical review of the literature. J Neuroradiol 2016;43:167–75 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2016.02.001 pmid:26976346

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Arthur AS,
   2. Molyneux A,
   3. Coon AL

   ; et al. WEB-IT Study Investigators. The safety and effectiveness of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) system for the treatment of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms: final 12-month results of the pivotal WEB Intrasaccular Therapy (WEB-IT) study. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:924–30 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014815 pmid:30992395

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Pierot L,
   2. Costalat V,
   3. Moret J, et al

   . Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB: results of the WEBCAST study. J Neurosurg 2016;124:1250–56 doi:10.3171/2015.2.JNS142634 pmid:26381253

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Pierot L,
   2. Gubucz I,
   3. Buhk JH, et al

   . Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with the WEB: results of the WEBCAST 2 study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1151–55 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5178 pmid:28450432

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Pierot L,
   2. Moret J,
   3. Turjman F, et al

   . WEB treatment of intracranial aneurysms: feasibility, complications, and 1-month safety results with the WEB DL and WEB SL/SLS in the French Observatory. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:922–27 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4230 pmid:25655876

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   US FDA. Premarket Approval (PMA). 2019. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpma/pma.cfm?id=P190014. Accessed July 15, 2022
9. 9.↵
   1. Pierot L,
   2. Szikora I,
   3. Barreau X, et al

   . Aneurysm treatment with the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device in the combined population of two prospective, multicenter series: 5-year follow-up. J Neurointerv Surg 2022 July 8. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018414 pmid:5803731

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Zimmer S,
    2. Maus V,
    3. Maurer C, et al

    . Widening the indications for intrasaccular flow disruption: WEB 17 in the treatment of aneurysm locations different from those in the good clinical practice trials. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:524–29 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6946 pmid:33509918

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Stanca C,
    2. Carriero S,
    3. Negroni D, et al

    . Woven EndoBridge in wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms: digital subtraction angiography at 3-year follow-up. J Clin Med 2022;11:2879 doi:10.3390/jcm11102879 pmid:35629006

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. van Rooij SB,
    2. Peluso JP,
    3. Sluzewski M, et al

    . The new low-profile WEB 17 system for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: first clinical experiences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:859–63 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5608 pmid:29567650

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Adeeb N,
    2. Dibas M,
    3. Diestro JD, et al

    . Multicenter study for the treatment of sidewall versus bifurcation intracranial aneurysms with use of Woven EndoBridge (WEB). Radiology 2022;304:372–82 doi:10.1148/radiol.212006 pmid:35438564

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Goertz L,
    2. Liebig T,
    3. Siebert E, et al

    . Extending the indication of Woven EndoBridge (WEB) embolization to internal carotid artery aneurysms: a multicenter safety and feasibility study. World Neurosurg 2019;126:e965–74 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.198 pmid:30876989

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Biondi A,
    3. Narata AP, et al

    . Should indications for WEB aneurysm treatment be enlarged? Report of a series of 20 patients with aneurysms in “atypical” locations for WEB treatment. J Neuroradiol 2017;44:203–09 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2016.12.011 pmid:28262374

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Zanaty M,
    2. Roa JA,
    3. Tjoumakaris SI, et al

    . Off-label use of the WEB device. World Neurosurg 2020;134:e1047–52 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.11.076 pmid:31759154

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Moher D,
    2. Liberati A,
    3. Tetzlaff J

    ; et al; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 pmid:19621072

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Higgins JP,
    2. Thomas J,
    3. Chandler J, et al., eds.

    Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. John Wiley & Sons; 2019
19. 19.↵
    1. Ansari S,
    2. Zevallos CB,
    3. Farooqui M, et al

    . Optimal Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device size selection using automated volumetric software. Brain Sci 2021;11:901 doi:10.3390/brainsci11070901 pmid:34356135

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Aguiar G,
    2. Caroff J,
    3. Mihalea C, et al

    . WEB device for treatment of posterior communicating artery aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2022;14:362–65 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017405 pmid:33975921

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Algin O,
    2. Corabay S,
    3. Ayberk G

    . Long-term efficacy and safety of WovenEndoBridge (WEB)-assisted cerebral aneurysm embolization. Interv Neuroradiol 2022;28:695–701 doi:10.1177/15910199211060970 pmid:35098767

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Kewlani B,
    2. Ryan DJ,
    3. Henry J, et al

    . A single centre retrospective analysis of short- and medium-term outcomes using the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device and identification of the device-to-aneurysm volume ratio as a potential predictor of aneurysm occlusion status. Interv Neuroradiol 2022 Apr 22. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1177/15910199221092578 pmid:35404152

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Mouchtouris N,
    2. Hasan D,
    3. Samaniego EA, et al

    . The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device: feasibility, techniques, and outcomes after FDA approval. J Neurosurg 2022;136:1266–72 doi:10.3171/2021.5.JNS21889 pmid:34624864

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Monteiro A,
    2. Lazar AL,
    3. Waqas M, et al

    . Treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Woven EndoBridge device: a systematic review. J NeuroInterv Surg 2022;14:366–70 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017613 pmid:34266907

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Xie Y,
    2. Tian H,
    3. Xiang B, et al

    . Woven EndoBridge device for the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review of clinical and angiographic results. Interv Neuroradiol 2022;28:240–49 doi:10.1177/15910199211026712 pmid:34159820

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Harker P,
    2. Regenhardt RW,
    3. Alotaibi NM, et al

    . The Woven EndoBridge device for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: international multicenter experience and updated meta-analysis. Neuroradiology 2021;63:1891–99 doi:10.1007/s00234-021-02727-6 pmid:34031704

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Essibayi MA,
    2. Lanzino G,
    3. Brinjikji W

    . Safety and efficacy of the Woven EndoBridge device for treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:1627–32 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7174 pmid:34117016

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Moret J,
    3. Barreau X, et al

    . Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB in the cumulative population of three prospective, multicenter series. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:553–59 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013448 pmid:28965106

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Zhang SM,
    2. Liu LX,
    3. Ren PW, et al

    . Effectiveness, safety and risk factors of Woven EndoBridge device in the treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2020;136:e1–23 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.023 pmid:31419591

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Asnafi S,
    2. Rouchaud A,
    3. Pierot L, et al

    . Efficacy and safety of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:2287–92 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4900 pmid:27516237

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. van Rooij S,
    2. Sprengers ME,
    3. Peluso JP, et al

    . A systematic review and meta-analysis of Woven EndoBridge single layer for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol 2020;26:455–60 doi:10.1177/1591019920904421 pmid:32028824

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Gache L,
    3. Frame D, et al

    . How safe and effective are flow diverters for the treatment of unruptured small/medium intracranial aneurysms of the internal carotid artery? Meta-analysis for evidence-based performance goals. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:869–73 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015535 pmid:32005761

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    1. Abbasi M,
    2. Savasatano LE,
    3. Brinjikji W, et al

    . Endoluminal flow diverters in the treatment of sidewall and bifurcation aneurysm: a systematic review and meta-analysis of complications and angiographic outcomes. Interv Neuroradiol 2022;28:229–39 doi:10.1177/15910199211026713 pmid:34154429

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Cagnazzo F,
    2. di Carlo DT,
    3. Cappucci M, et al

    . Acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with flow-diverter stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1669–75 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5730 pmid:30049721

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    1. Tau N,
    2. Sadeh-Gonik U,
    3. Aulagner G, et al

    . The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) for endovascular therapy of intracranial aneurysms: update of a systematic review with meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2018;166:110–15 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.025 pmid:29408767

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Fujimoto M,
    2. Lylyk I,
    3. Bleise C, et al

    . Long-term outcomes of the WEB device for treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:1031–36 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6548 pmid:32467180

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    1. Cortese J,
    2. Caroff J,
    3. Chalumeau V, et al

    . Determinants of cerebral aneurysm occlusion after embolization with the WEB device: a single-institution series of 215 cases with angiographic follow-up. J Neurointerv Surg 2022 Apr 15. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-018780 pmid:31537514

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    1. Cagnazzo F,
    2. Ahmed R,
    3. Zannoni R, et al

    . Predicting factors of angiographic aneurysm occlusion after treatment with the Woven EndoBridge device: a single-center experience with midterm follow-up. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1773–78 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6221 pmid:31537514

    Abstract/FREE Full Text