Treatment of Proximal Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Aneurysms by Intrasaccular Flow Disruption: A Multicenter Experience

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Hudgins RJ,
   2. Day AL,
   3. Quisling RG, et al

   . Aneurysms of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery: a clinical and anatomical analysis. J Neurosurg 1983;58:381–87 doi:10.3171/jns.1983.58.3.0381 pmid:6827323

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Al-Khayat H,
   2. Al-Khayat H,
   3. Beshay J, et al

   . Vertebral artery-posteroinferior cerebellar artery aneurysms: clinical and lower cranial nerve outcomes in 52 patients. Neurosurgery 2005;56:2–11 pmid:15617580

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Kabbasch C,
   2. Goertz L,
   3. Siebert E, et al

   . WEB embolization versus stent-assisted coiling: comparison of complication rates and angiographic outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:812–16 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014555 pmid:30674636

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Pierot L,
   2. Szikora I,
   3. Barreau X, et al

   . Aneurysm treatment with WEB in the cumulative population of two prospective, multicenter series: 3-year follow-up. J Neurointerv Surg 2021;13:363–68 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016151 pmid:32532858

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Al Saiegh F,
   2. Hasan D,
   3. Mouchtouris N, et al

   . Treatment of acutely ruptured cerebral aneurysms with the Woven EndoBridge device: experience post-FDA approval. Neurosurgery 2020;87:E16–22 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyaa092 pmid:30862582

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Kabbasch C,
   2. Goertz L,
   3. Siebert E, et al

   . Comparison of WEB embolization and coiling in unruptured intracranial aneurysms: safety and efficacy based on a propensity score analysis. World Neurosurg 2019;126:e937–43 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.016 pmid:30862582

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Goertz L,
   2. Liebig T,
   3. Siebert E, et al

   . Low-profile intra-aneurysmal flow disruptor WEB 17 versus WEB predecessor systems for treatment of small intracranial aneurysms: comparative analysis of procedural safety and feasibility. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1766–72 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6183 pmid:31488499

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Horowitz M,
   2. Kopitnik T,
   3. Landreneau F, et al

   . Posteroinferior cerebellar artery aneurysms: surgical results for 38 patients. Neurosurgery 1998;43:1026–31 doi:10.1097/00006123-199811000-00012 pmid:9802845

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Chalouhi N,
   2. Jabbour P,
   3. Starke RM, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of proximal and distal posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2013;118:991–99 doi:10.3171/2012.12.JNS121240 pmid:23350778

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Lewis SB,
    2. Chang DJ,
    3. Peace DA, et al

    . Distal posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms: clinical features and management. J Neurosurg 2002;97:756–66 doi:10.3171/jns.2002.97.4.0756 pmid:12405360

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Peluso J,
    2. Van Rooij W,
    3. Sluzewski M, et al

    . Posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms: incidence, clinical presentation, and outcome of endovascular treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:86–90 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0758 pmid:17928380

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Samaniego EA,
    2. Abdo G,
    3. Hanel RA, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of PICA aneurysms with a Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS Jr) device. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:1030–33 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012070 pmid:26534868

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Goertz L,
    2. Liebig T,
    3. Siebert E, et al

    . Woven EndoBridge embolization versus microsurgical clipping for unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms: a propensity score analysis. Neurosurgery 2021;88:779–84 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyaa539 pmid:33372215

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Pennig L,
    2. Goertz L,
    3. Hoyer UCI, et al

    . The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) versus conventional coiling for treatment of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: propensity score-matched analysis of clinical and angiographic outcome data. World Neurosurg 2021;146:e1326–34 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2020.11.158 pmid:33290897

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Moret J,
    3. Barreau X, et al

    . Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB in the cumulative population of three prospective, multicenter series. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:553–59 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013448 pmid:28965106

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Goertz L,
    2. Liebig T,
    3. Siebert E, et al

    . Extending the indication of Woven EndoBridge (WEB) embolization to internal carotid artery aneurysms: a multicenter safety and feasibility study. World Neurosurg 2019;126:e965–74 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.1989 pmid:30876989

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Goertz L,
    2. Liebig T,
    3. Siebert E, et al

    . Intrasaccular flow disruption with the Woven EndoBridge for narrow-necked aneurysms: a safety and feasibility study. World Neurosurg 2021;151:e278–85 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.018 pmid:33866026

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Khattar NK,
    2. White AC,
    3. Cruz AS, et al

    . Woven EndoBridge device for treatment of dissection-related PICA aneurysm. Interv Neuroradiol 2021;27:388–90 doi:10.1177/1591019920968349 pmid:33070683

    CrossRefPubMed