The Safety and Efficacy of Flow Diversion versus Conventional Endovascular Treatment for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Meta-analysis of Real-world Cohort Studies from the Past 10 Years

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Guglielmi G,
   2. Viñuela F,
   3. Dion J, et al

   . Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach, Part 2: preliminary clinical experience. J Neurosurg 1991;75:8–14 doi:10.3171/jns.1991.75.1.0008 pmid:2045924

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Higashida RT,
   2. Smith W,
   3. Gress D, et al

   . Intravascular stent and endovascular coil placement for a ruptured fusiform aneurysm of the basilar artery: case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 1997;87:944–49 doi:10.3171/jns.1997.87.6.0944 pmid:9384409

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Moret J,
   2. Cognard C,
   3. Weill A, et al

   . Reconstruction technic in the treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: long-term angiographic and clinical results—apropos of 56 cases. J Neuroradiol 1997;24:30–44 pmid:9303942

   PubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Zhang X,
   2. Zhong J,
   3. Gao H, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the LVIS device: a systematic review. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:553–57 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012403 pmid:27206450

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Becske T,
   2. Kallmes DF,
   3. Saatci I, et al

   . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Nelson PK,
   2. Lylyk P,
   3. Szikora I, et al

   . The Pipeline Embolization Device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:34–40 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2421 pmid:21148256

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Chalouhi N,
   2. Jabbour P,
   3. Singhal S, et al

   . Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms: predictors of complications, recanalization, and outcome in 508 cases. Stroke 2013;44:1348–53 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000641 pmid:23512976

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Kan P,
   2. Siddiqui AH,
   3. Veznedaroglu E, et al

   . Early postmarket results after treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device: a U.S. multicenter experience. Neurosurgery 2012;71:1080–87; discussion 7–8 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827060d9 pmid:22948199

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Li W,
   2. Tian Z,
   3. Zhu W, et al

   . Hemodynamic analysis of postoperative rupture of unruptured intracranial aneurysms after placement of flow-diverting stents: a matched case-control study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1916–23 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6256 pmid:31624118

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Moher D,
    2. Liberati A,
    3. Tetzlaff J, et al

    ; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 pmid:19621072

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Stang A

    . Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010;25:603–05 doi:10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z pmid:20652370

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Adeeb N,
    2. Griessenauer CJ,
    3. Foreman PM, et al

    . Comparison of stent-assisted coil embolization and the Pipeline Embolization Device for endovascular treatment of ophthalmic segment aneurysms: a multicenter cohort study. World Neurosurg 2017;105:206–12 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.05.104 pmid:28559080

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Chalouhi N,
    2. Daou B,
    3. Barros G, et al

    . Matched comparison of flow diversion and coiling in small, noncomplex intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2017;81:92–97 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyw070 pmid:28402491

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Chalouhi N,
    2. Starke RM,
    3. Yang S, et al

    . Extending the indications of flow diversion to small, unruptured, saccular aneurysms of the anterior circulation. Stroke 2014;45:54–58 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003038 pmid:24253543

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Chalouhi N,
    2. Tjoumakaris S,
    3. Starke RM, et al

    . Comparison of flow diversion and coiling in large unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2013;44:2150–54 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001785 pmid:23723311

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Di Maria F,
    2. Pistocchi S,
    3. Clarençon F, et al

    . Flow diversion versus standard endovascular techniques for the treatment of unruptured carotid-ophthalmic aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:2325–30 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4437 pmid:26272972

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Durst CR,
    2. Starke RM,
    3. Clopton D, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of ophthalmic artery aneurysms: ophthalmic artery patency following flow diversion versus coil embolization. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:919–22 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011887 pmid:26354944

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Enriquez-Marulanda A,
    2. Salem MM,
    3. Ascanio LC, et al

    . No differences in effectiveness and safety between Pipeline Embolization Device and stent-assisted coiling for the treatment of communicating segment internal carotid artery aneurysms. Neuroradiol J 2019;32:344–52 doi:10.1177/1971400919845368 pmid:30998116

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Kim LJ,
    2. Tariq F,
    3. Levitt M, et al

    . Multimodality treatment of complex unruptured cavernous and paraclinoid aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2014;74:51–61; discussion 61; quiz 61 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000192 pmid:24089048

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Lanzino G,
    2. Crobeddu E,
    3. Cloft HJ, et al

    . Efficacy and safety of flow diversion for paraclinoid aneurysms: a matched-pair analysis compared with standard endovascular approaches. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:2158–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3207 pmid:22790243

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Liu JM,
    2. Zhou Y,
    3. Li Y, et al

    . Parent artery reconstruction for large or giant cerebral aneurysms using the Tubridge flow diverter: a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial (PARAT). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:807–16 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5619 pmid:29599173

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Lu P,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Niu H, et al

    . Comparison of endovascular treatment for middle cerebral artery aneurysm with a low-profile visualized intraluminal support stent or Pipeline Embolization Device. Exp Ther Med 2019;18:2072–78 doi:10.3892/etm.2019.7775 pmid:31410163

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Petr O,
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Cloft H, et al

    . Current trends and results of endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms at a single institution in the flow-diverter era. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1106–13 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4699 pmid:26797138

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Salem MM,
    2. Ravindran K,
    3. Enriquez-Marulanda A, et al

    . Pipeline Embolization Device versus stent-assisted coiling for intracranial aneurysm treatment: a retrospective propensity score-matched study. Neurosurgery 2020;87:516–22 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyaa041 pmid:32133521

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Silva MA,
    2. See AP,
    3. Khandelwal P, et al

    . Comparison of flow diversion with clipping and coiling for the treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms in 115 patients. J Neurosurg 2019;130:1505–08 doi:10.3171/2018.1.JNS171774 pmid:29932380

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Wang J,
    2. Jia L,
    3. Duan Z, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of large or giant non-saccular vertebrobasilar aneurysms: Pipeline Embolization Devices versus conventional stents. Front Neurosci 2019;13:1253 doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.01253 pmid:31849580

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Zanaty M,
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Starke RM, et al

    . Flow diversion versus conventional treatment for carotid cavernous aneurysms. Stroke 2014;45:2656–61 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006247 pmid:25052318

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Yupeng Zhang Y,
    2. Liang F,
    3. Zhang Y, et al

    . Exploring the feasibility of Pipeline Embolization Device compared with stent-assisted coiling to treat non-saccular, unruptured, intradural vertebral artery aneurysms. Front Neurol 2019;10:275 doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.00275 pmid:30972007

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Zhou Y,
    3. Yang P, et al

    . Comparison of the flow diverter and stent-assisted coiling in large and giant aneurysms: safety and efficacy based on a propensity score-matched analysis. Eur Radiology 2016;26:2369–77 doi:10.1007/s00330-015-4052-1 pmid:26471273

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Park HK,
    2. Horowitz M,
    3. Jungreis C, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms: experience with 73 patients. Neurosurgery 2003;53:14–23; discussion 24 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000068789.08955.1c pmid:12823869

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Hetts SW,
    2. Turk A,
    3. English JD, et al

    ; Matrix and Platinum Science Trial Investigators. Stent-assisted coiling versus coiling alone in unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the Matrix and Platinum Science Trial: safety, efficacy, and mid-term outcomes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:698–705 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3755 pmid:24184523

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. Malek AM,
    2. Halbach VV,
    3. Phatouros CC, et al

    . Balloon-assist technique for endovascular coil embolization of geometrically difficult intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2000;46:1397–406; discussion 406–07 doi:10.1097/00006123-200006000-00022 pmid:10834645

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    1. Amenta PS,
    2. Dalyai RT,
    3. Kung D, et al

    . Stent-assisted coiling of wide-necked aneurysms in the setting of acute subarachnoid hemorrhage: experience in 65 patients. Neurosurgery 2012;70:1415–29; discussion 29 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318246a4b1 pmid:22186840

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. Moret J,
    2. Cognard C,
    3. Weill A, et al

    . The “Remodelling Technique” in the treatment of wide neck intracranial aneurysms. angiographic results and clinical follow-up in 56 cases. Interv Neuroradiol 1997;3:21–35 doi:10.1177/159101999700300103 pmid:20678369

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Ferns SP,
    2. Sprengers ME,
    3. van Rooij WJ, et al

    . Late reopening of adequately coiled intracranial aneurysms: frequency and risk factors in 400 patients with 440 aneurysms. Stroke 2011;42:1331–37 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.605790 pmid:21454823

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    1. Nossek E,
    2. Chalif DJ,
    3. Chakraborty S, et al

    . Concurrent use of the Pipeline Embolization Device and coils for intracranial aneurysms: technique, safety, and efficacy. J Neurosurg 2015;122:904–11 doi:10.3171/2014.12.JNS141259 pmid:25658781

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Xiang J,
    2. Ma D,
    3. Snyder KV, et al

    . Increasing flow diversion for cerebral aneurysm treatment using a single flow diverter. Neurosurgery 2014;75:286–94; discussion 94 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000409 pmid:24867201

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    1. Bonney PA,
    2. Connor M,
    3. Fujii T, et al

    . Failure of flow diverter therapy: predictors and management strategies. Neurosurgery 2020;86:S64–73 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyz305 pmid:31838530

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. Townsend RK,
    2. Wolfe SQ,
    3. Anadani M, et al

    . Endovascular management of acute postprocedural flow diverting stent thrombosis. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:67–71 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014944 pmid:31530652

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
40. 40.↵
    1. Domingo RA,
    2. Tripathi S,
    3. Perez-Vega C, et al

    . Treatment of posterior circulation non-saccular aneurysms with flow diversion versus stent-assisted coiling: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2021;13:159–63 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016294 pmid:32651184

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
41. 41.↵
    1. Rouchaud A,
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Lanzino G, et al

    . Delayed hemorrhagic complications after flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms: a literature overview. Neuroradiology 2016;58:171–77 doi:10.1007/s00234-015-1615-4 pmid:26553302

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    1. Turowski B,
    2. Macht S,
    3. Kulcsár Z, et al

    . Early fatal hemorrhage after endovascular cerebral aneurysm treatment with a flow diverter (SILK-Stent): do we need to rethink our concepts? Neuroradiology 2011;53:37–41 doi:10.1007/s00234-010-0676-7 pmid:20339842

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
43. 43.↵
    1. Cebral JR,
    2. Mut F,
    3. Raschi M, et al

    . Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:27–33 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2398 pmid:21071533

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
44. 44.↵
    1. Hassan T,
    2. Ahmed YM,
    3. Hassan AA

    . The adverse effects of flow-diverter stent-like devices on the flow pattern of saccular intracranial aneurysm models: computational fluid dynamics study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011;153:1633–40 doi:10.1007/s00701-011-1055-9 pmid:21647821

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
45. 45.↵
    1. Brinjikji W,
    2. Murad MH,
    3. Lanzino G, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2013;44:442–47 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.678151 pmid:23321438

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
46. 46.↵
    1. Pistocchi S,
    2. Blanc R,
    3. Bartolini B, et al

    . Flow diverters at and beyond the level of the circle of Willis for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2012;43:1032–38 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.636019 pmid:22282890

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
47. 47.↵
    1. Ocal O,
    2. Peker A,
    3. Balci S, et al

    . Placement of a stent within a flow diverter improves aneurysm occlusion rates. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1932–38 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6237 pmid:31582390

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
48. 48.↵
    1. Mazur MD,
    2. Kilburg C,
    3. Wang V, et al

    . Pipeline Embolization Device for the treatment of vertebral artery aneurysms: the fate of covered branch vessels. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:1041–47 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012040 pmid:26491041

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
49. 49.↵
    1. Bhatia KD,
    2. Kortman H,
    3. Orru E, et al

    . Periprocedural complications of second-generation flow diverter treatment using Pipeline Flex for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:817–24 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014937 pmid:31147438

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
50. 50.↵
    1. Cagnazzo F,
    2. di Carlo DT,
    3. Cappucci M, et al

    . Acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with flow-diverter stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1669–75 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5730 pmid:30049721

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
51. 51.↵
    1. Cagnazzo F,
    2. Perrini P,
    3. Dargazanli C, et al

    . Treatment of unruptured distal anterior circulation aneurysms with flow-diverter stents: a meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:687–93 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6002 pmid:30872418

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
52. 52.
    1. Rouchaud A,
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Cloft HJ, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of ruptured blister-like aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis with focus on deconstructive versus reconstructive and flow-diverter treatments. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:2331–39 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4438 pmid:26381557

    Abstract/FREE Full Text