Advertisement

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleAdult Brain

Association between Early Ischemic Changes and Collaterals in Acute Stroke: A Retrospective Study

M. Laflamme, S. Carrondo-Cottin, M.-M. Valdès, D. Simonyan, M.-È. Audet, J.-L. Gariépy, M.-C. Camden, C. Gariépy, S. Verreault and P. Lavoie
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2022, 43 (10) 1424-1430; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7632

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Berkhemer OA,
    2. Fransen PS,
    3. Beumer D, et al
    . MR CLEAN Investigators. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:11–20 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1411587 pmid:25517348
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.
    1. Campbell BC,
    2. Mitchell PJ,
    3. Kleinig TJ, et al
    . Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1009–18 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414792 pmid:25671797
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Jovin TG,
    2. Chamorro A,
    3. Cobo E, et al
    . REVASCAT Trial Investigators. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2296–306 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1503780 pmid:25882510
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.
    1. Goyal M,
    2. Demchuk AM,
    3. Menon BK, et al
    . Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1019–30 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414905 pmid:25671798
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.
    1. Saver JL,
    2. Goyal M,
    3. Bonafe A, et al
    . Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2285–95 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1415061 pmid:25882376
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Bracard S,
    2. Ducrocq X,
    3. Mas JL, et al
    ; THRACE Investigators. Mechanical thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase versus alteplase alone after stroke (THRACE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2016;15:1138–47 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30177-6 pmid:27567239
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Pexman JH,
    2. Barber PA,
    3. Hill MD, et al
    . Use of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) for assessing CT scans in patients with acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1534–42 pmid:11559501
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Powers WJ,
    2. Derdeyn CP,
    3. Biller J, et al
    . American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2015 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Focused Update of the 2013 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Regarding Endovascular Treatment: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2015;46:3020–35 doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000074 pmid:26123479
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Fanou EM,
    2. Knight J,
    3. Aviv RI, et al
    . Effect of collaterals on clinical presentation, baseline imaging, complications, and outcome in acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:2285–91 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4453 pmid:26471754
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Liebeskind DS,
    2. Tomsick TA,
    3. Foster LD, et al
    . Collaterals at angiography and outcomes in the Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III trial. Stroke 2014;45:759–64 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.004072 pmid:24473178
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.
    1. Yeo LL,
    2. Paliwal P,
    3. Teoh HL, et al
    . Assessment of intracranial collaterals on CT angiography in anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:289–94 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4117 pmid:25324493
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Yeo LL,
    2. Paliwal P,
    3. Low AF, et al
    . How temporal evolution of intracranial collaterals in acute stroke affects clinical outcomes. Neurology 2016;86:434–41 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002331 pmid:26740681
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Wufuer A,
    2. Wubuli A,
    3. Mijiti P, et al
    . Impact of collateral circulation status on favorable outcomes in thrombolysis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med 2018;15:707–18 doi:10.3892/etm.2017.5486 pmid:29399075
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.
    1. Ravindran AV,
    2. Killingsworth MC,
    3. Bhaskar S
    . Cerebral collaterals in acute ischaemia: implications for acute ischaemic stroke patients receiving reperfusion therapy. Eur J Neurosci 2021;53:1238–61 doi:10.1111/ejn.14955 pmid:32871623
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.
    1. Bang OY,
    2. Saver JL,
    3. Kim SJ, et al
    . Collateral flow predicts response to endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2011;42:693–99 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.595256 pmid:21233472
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.
    1. Berkhemer OA,
    2. Jansen IG,
    3. Beumer D, et al
    ; MR CLEAN Investigators. Collateral status on baseline computed tomographic angiography and intra-arterial treatment effect in patients with proximal anterior circulation stroke. Stroke 2016;47:768–76 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011788 pmid:26903582
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Boers AM,
    2. Jansen IG,
    3. Berkhemer OA, et al
    ; MR CLEAN Trial Investigators. Collateral status and tissue outcome after intra-arterial therapy for patients with acute ischemic stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2017;37:3589–98 doi:10.1177/0271678X16678874 pmid:27864462
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Broocks G,
    2. Kniep H,
    3. Schramm P, et al
    . Patients with low Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) but good collaterals benefit from endovascular recanalization. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:747–52 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015308 pmid:31772043
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Tan BY,
    2. Wan-Yee K,
    3. Paliwal P, et al
    . Good intracranial collaterals trump poor ASPECTS (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score) for intravenous thrombolysis in anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2016;47:2292–98 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013879 pmid:27491731
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Consoli A,
    2. Andersson T,
    3. Holmberg A, et al
    ; CAPRI Collaborative Group. CT perfusion and angiographic assessment of pial collateral reperfusion in acute ischemic stroke: the CAPRI study. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:1211–16 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012155 pmid:26801947
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.
    1. Dehkharghani S,
    2. Bammer R,
    3. Straka M, et al
    . Performance of CT ASPECTS and collateral score in risk stratification: can target perfusion profiles be predicted without perfusion imaging? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1399–404 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4727 pmid:26965466
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Mehrkhani F,
    2. Berkhemer OA,
    3. Majoie C, et al
    . Combined evaluation of noncontrast CT ASPECTS and CT angiography collaterals improves detection of large infarcts in proximal artery occlusive stroke. J Neuroimaging 2018;28:524–59 doi:10.1111/jon.12522 pmid:29749671
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Sarraj A,
    2. Hassan AE,
    3. Grotta J, et al
    ; for the SELECT Investigators. Early infarct growth rate correlation with endovascular thrombectomy clinical outcomes: analysis from the SELECT Study. Stroke 2021;52:57–69 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030912 pmid:33280550
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Regenhardt RW,
    2. Gonzalez RG,
    3. He J, et al
    . Symmetric CTA collaterals identify patients with slow-progressing stroke likely to benefit from late thrombectomy. Radiology 2022;302:400–07 doi:10.1148/radiol.2021210455 pmid:34726532
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Kimmel ER,
    2. Al Kasab S,
    3. Harvey JB, et al
    . Absence of collaterals is associated with larger infarct volume and worse outcome in patients with large vessel occlusion and mild symptoms. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 2019;28:1987–92 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.03.032 pmid:31036341
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. de Havenon A,
    2. Mlynash M,
    3. Kim-Tenser MA, et al
    ; DEFUSE 3 Investigators. Results from DEFUSE 3: good collaterals are associated with reduced ischemic core growth but not neurologic outcome. Stroke 2019;50:632–38 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023407 pmid:30726184
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Jiang B,
    2. Ball RL,
    3. Michel P, et al
    . Factors influencing infarct growth including collateral status assessed using computed tomography in acute stroke patients with large artery occlusion. Int J Stroke 2019;14:603–12 doi:10.1177/1747493019851278 pmid:31096871
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Vagal A,
    2. Aviv R,
    3. Sucharew H, et al
    . Collateral clock is more important than time clock for tissue fate. Stroke 2018;49:2102–27 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021484 pmid:30354992
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Benchimol EI,
    2. Smeeth L,
    3. Guttmann A, et al
    ; RECORD Working Committee. The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement. PLoS Med 2015;12:e1001885 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885 pmid:26440803
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Barber PA,
    2. Demchuk AM,
    3. Zhang J, et al
    . Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy: ASPECTS Study Group—Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score. Lancet 2000;355:1670–74 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02237-6 pmid:10905241
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Menon BK,
    2. d’Esterre CD,
    3. Qazi EM, et al
    . Multiphase CT angiography: a new tool for the imaging triage of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Radiology 2015;275:510–20 doi:10.1148/radiol.15142256 pmid:25633505
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Williams LS,
    2. Yilmaz EY,
    3. Lopez-Yunez AM
    . Retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity with the NIH Stroke Scale. Stroke 2000;31:858–62 doi:10.1161/01.STR.31.4.858 pmid:10753988
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Landis JR,
    2. Koch GG
    . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74 doi:10.2307/2529310 pmid:843571
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    1. Portney LG,
    2. Watkins MP
    . Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. Prentice Hall; 4th Edition, 2020
  35. 35.↵
    1. Boulanger JM,
    2. Lindsay MP,
    3. Gubitz G, et al
    . Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations for Acute Stroke Management: Prehospital, Emergency Department, and Acute Inpatient Stroke Care, 6th Edition, Update 2018. Int J Stroke 2018;13:949–84 doi:10.1177/1747493018786616 pmid:30021503
    CrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Powers WJ,
    2. Rabinstein AA,
    3. Ackerson T, et al
    . Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2019;50:e344–418 doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000211 pmid:31662037
    CrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Nannoni S,
    2. Sirimarco G,
    3. Cereda CW, et al
    . Determining factors of better leptomeningeal collaterals: a study of 857 consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients. J Neurol 2019;266:582–88 doi:10.1007/s00415-018-09170-3 pmid:30610425
    CrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Renu A,
    2. Laredo C,
    3. Montejo C, et al
    . Greater infarct growth limiting effect of mechanical thrombectomy in stroke patients with poor collaterals. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:989–93 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014668
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Boulouis G,
    2. Lauer A,
    3. Siddiqui AK, et al
    . Clinical imaging factors associated with infarct progression in patients with ischemic stroke during transfer for mechanical thrombectomy. JAMA Neurol 2017;74:1361–67 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.2149 pmid:28973081
    CrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Puhr-Westerheide D,
    2. Tiedt S,
    3. Rotkopf LT, et al
    . Clinical and imaging parameters associated with hyperacute infarction growth in large vessel occlusion stroke. Stroke 2019;50:2799–804 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025809 pmid:31426729
    CrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Ospel JM,
    2. Hill MD,
    3. Kappelhof M, et al
    . Which acute ischemic stroke patients are fast progressors? Results from the ESCAPE Trial Control Arm. Stroke 2021;52:1847–50 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032950 pmid:33813863
    CrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Rocha M,
    2. Desai SM,
    3. Jadhav AP, et al
    . Prevalence and temporal distribution of fast and slow progressors of infarct growth in large vessel occlusion stroke. Stroke 2019;50:2238–40 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024035 pmid:31203787
    CrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Prakkamakul S,
    2. Yoo AJ
    . ASPECTS CT in acute ischemia: review of current data. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2017;26:103–12 doi:10.1097/RMR.0000000000000122 pmid:28277460
    CrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Ben Hassen W,
    2. Malley C,
    3. Boulouis G, et al
    . Inter- and intraobserver reliability for angiographic leptomeningeal collateral flow assessment by the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology (ASITN/SIR) scale. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:338–41 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014185 pmid:30131382
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Grunwald IQ,
    2. Kulikovski J,
    3. Reith W, et al
    . Collateral automation for triage in stroke: evaluating automated scoring of collaterals in acute stroke on computed tomography scans. Cerebrovasc Dis 2019;47:217–22 doi:10.1159/000500076 pmid:31216543
    CrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Barber PA,
    2. Hill MD,
    3. Eliasziw M, et al
    . Imaging of the brain in acute ischaemic stroke: comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:1528–33 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2004.059261 pmid:16227545
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Menon BK,
    2. Qazi E,
    3. Nambiar V, et al
    . Differential effect of baseline computed tomographic angiography collaterals on clinical outcome in patients enrolled in the Interventional Management of Stroke III Trial. Stroke 2015;46:1239–44 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009009 pmid:25791716
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Zhu J,
    2. Ma M,
    3. Guo Y, et al
    . Pre-stroke warfarin enhancement of collateralization in acute ischemic stroke: a retrospective study. BMC Neurol 2018;18:194 doi:10.1186/s12883-018-1200-7 pmid:30497406
    CrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Wirtz MM,
    2. Hendrix P,
    3. Goren O, et al
    . Predictor of 90-day functional outcome after mechanical thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion stroke: NIHSS score of 10 or less at 24 hours. J Neurosurg 2019 Dec 20 [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.3171/2019.10.JNS191991 pmid:31860816
    CrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    1. Verma RK,
    2. Gralla J,
    3. Klinger-Gratz PP, et al
    . Infarction distribution pattern in acute stroke may predict the extent of leptomeningeal collaterals. PLoS One 2015;10:e0137292 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137292 pmid:26327519
    CrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article
Cite this article
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Bookmark this article
Early Ischemic Changes and Collaterals in Stroke
M. Laflamme, S. Carrondo-Cottin, M.-M. Valdès, D. Simonyan, M.-È. Audet, J.-L. Gariépy, M.-C. Camden, C. Gariépy, S. Verreault, P. Lavoie
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2022, 43 (10) 1424-1430; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7632
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Purchase

Jump to section

Advertisement