Feasibility and Added Value of Fetal DTI Tractography in the Evaluation of an Isolated Short Corpus Callosum: Preliminary Results

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Nunez S,
   2. Mantilla MT,
   3. Bermudez S

   . Midline congenital malformations of the brain and skull. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2011;21:429–82, vii doi:10.1016/j.nic.2011.05.001 pmid:21807309

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Achiron R,
   2. Achiron A

   . Development of the human fetal corpus callosum: a high-resolution, cross-sectional sonographic study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:343–47 doi:10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00512.x pmid:11778993

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Mahallati H,
   2. Sotiriadis A,
   3. Celestin C, et al

   . Heterogeneity in defining fetal callosal pathology: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021;58:11–18 doi:10.1002/uog.22179

   CrossRef
4. 4.↵
   1. Edwards TJ,
   2. Sherr EH,
   3. Barkovich AJ, et al

   . Clinical, genetic and imaging findings identify new causes for corpus callosum development syndromes. Brain 2014;137:1579–613 doi:10.1093/brain/awt358 pmid:24477430

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Garel C,
   2. Cont I,
   3. Alberti C, et al

   . Biometry of the corpus callosum in children: MR imaging reference data. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1436–43 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2542 pmid:21799035

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Filippi CG,
   2. Cauley KA

   . Lesions of the corpus callosum and other commissural fibers: diffusion tensor studies. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2014;35:445–58 doi:10.1053/j.sult.2014.06.004 pmid:25217298

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Achiron R,
   2. Lipitz S,
   3. Achiron A

   . Sex-related differences in the development of the human fetal corpus callosum: in utero ultrasonographic study. Prenat Diagn 2001;21:116–20 pmid:11241538

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Meidan R,
   2. Bar-Yosef O,
   3. Ashkenazi I, et al

   . Neurodevelopmental outcome following prenatal diagnosis of a short corpus callosum. Prenat Diagn 2019;39:477–83 doi:10.1002/pd.5460 pmid:30980563

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Volpe P,
   2. Paladini D,
   3. Resta M, et al

   . Characteristics, associations and outcome of partial agenesis of the corpus callosum in the fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:509–16 doi:10.1002/uog.2774 pmid:16619387

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Le Bihan D

    . Intravoxel incoherent motion perfusion MR imaging: a wake-up call. Radiology 2008;249:748–52 doi:10.1148/radiol.2493081301 pmid:19011179

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Tovar-Moll F,
    2. Moll J,
    3. de Oliveira-Souza R, et al

    . Neuroplasticity in human callosal dysgenesis: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Cereb Cortex 2007;17:531–41 doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj178 pmid:16627861

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Benezit A,
    2. Hertz-Pannier L,
    3. Dehaene-Lambertz G, et al

    . Organising white matter in a brain without corpus callosum fibres. Cortex 2015;63:155–71 doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.08.022 pmid:25282054

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Song JW,
    2. Gruber GM,
    3. Patsch JM, et al

    . How accurate are prenatal tractography results? A postnatal in vivo follow-up study using diffusion tensor imaging. Pediatr Radiol 2018;48:486–98 doi:10.1007/s00247-017-3982-y pmid:29550863

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Jakab A,
    2. Tuura R,
    3. Kellenberger C, et al

    . In utero diffusion tensor imaging of the fetal brain: a reproducibility study. Neuroimage Clin 2017;15:601–12 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2017.06.013 pmid:28652972

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Tepper R,
    2. Leibovitz Z,
    3. Garel C, et al

    . A new method for evaluating short fetal corpus callosum. Prenat Diagn 2019;39:1283–90 doi:10.1002/pd.5598

    CrossRef
16. 16.↵
    1. Kasprian G,
    2. Brugger PC,
    3. Schöpf V, et al

    . Assessing prenatal white matter connectivity in commissural agenesis. Brain 2013;136:168–79 doi:10.1093/brain/aws332 pmid:23365096

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Abessa TG,
    2. Worku BN,
    3. Kibebew MW, et al

    . Adaptation and standardization of a Western tool for assessing child development in non-Western low-income context. BMC Public Health 2016;16:652 doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3288-2 pmid:27465679

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Machado-Rivas F,
    2. Afacan O,
    3. Khan S, et al

    . Tractography of the cerebellar peduncles in second- and third-trimester fetuses. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:194–200 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6869 pmid:33431505

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Mitter C,
    2. Prayer D,
    3. Brugger PC, et al

    . In vivo tractography of fetal association fibers. PLoS One 2015;10:e0119536 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0119536 pmid:25742520

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Mitter C,
    2. Jakab A,
    3. Brugger PC, et al

    . Validation of in utero tractography of human fetal commissural and internal capsule fibers with histological structure tensor analysis. Front Neuroanat 2015;9:164 doi:10.3389/fnana.2015.00164 pmid:26732460

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Riggs ER,
    2. Andersen EF,
    3. Cherry AM, et al

    . Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen). Genet Med 2020;22:245–57 doi:10.1038/s41436-019-0686-8 pmid:31690835

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Elliman AM,
    2. Bryan EM,
    3. Elliman AD, et al

    . Denver developmental screening test and preterm infants. Arch Dis Child 1985;60:20–24 doi:10.1136/adc.60.1.20 pmid:2578772

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Leombroni M,
    2. Khalil A,
    3. Liberati M, et al

    . Fetal midline anomalies: diagnosis and counselling, Part 1: corpus callosum anomalies. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2018;22:951–62 doi:10.1016/j.ejpn.2018.08.007 pmid:30448279

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Das S,
    2. Bhansali A,
    3. Dutta P, et al

    . An unusual association of corpus callosum agenesis in a patient with acromegaly. BMJ Case Rep 2010;2010;bcr012010265 doi:10.1136/bcr.01.2010.2625] pmid:22802364

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Paul LK,
    2. Brown WS,
    3. Adolphs R, et al

    . Agenesis of the corpus callosum: genetic, developmental and functional aspects of connectivity. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007;8:287–99 doi:10.1038/nrn2107 pmid:17375041

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Diogo MC,
    2. Glatter S,
    3. Prayer D, et al

    . Improved neurodevelopmental prognostication in isolated corpus callosal agenesis: fetal magnetic resonance imaging-based scoring system. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021;58:34–41 doi:10.1002/uog.22102 pmid:32484578

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Atallah A,
    2. Lacalm A,
    3. Massoud M, et al

    . Prenatal diagnosis of pericallosal curvilinear lipoma: specific imaging pattern and diagnostic pitfalls. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018;51:269–73 doi:10.1002/uog.17400 pmid:28067000

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Shinar S,
    2. Lerman-Sagie T,
    3. Telleria ME, et al

    . Fetal pericallosal lipomas: clues to diagnosis in the second trimester. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2018;22:929–34 doi:10.1016/j.ejpn.2018.07.011 pmid:30104143

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Chougar L,
    2. Blondiaux E,
    3. Moutard ML, et al

    . Variability of T1-weighted signal intensity of pericallosal lipomas in the fetus. Pediatr Radiol 2018;48:383–91 doi:10.1007/s00247-017-4028-1 pmid:29184973

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Glatter S,
    2. Kasprian G,
    3. Bettelheim D, et al

    . Beyond isolated and associated: a novel fetal MR imaging-based scoring system helps in the prenatal prognostication of callosal agenesis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:782–86 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7064 pmid:33707281

    Abstract/FREE Full Text