4D Flat Panel Conebeam CTA for Analysis of the Angioarchitecture of Cerebral AVMs with a Novel Software Prototype

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Müller-Forell W,
   2. Valavanis A

   . How angioarchitecture of cerebral arteriovenous malformations should influence the therapeutic considerations. Minim Invas Neurosurg 1995;38:1430–42 doi:10.1055/s-2008-1053458 pmid:7627583

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Atkinson RP,
   2. Awad IA,
   3. Batjer HH, et al

   ; Joint Writing Group of the Technology Assessment Committee American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology; Joint Section on Cerebrovascular Neurosurgery a Section of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons; Section of Stroke and the Section of Interventional Neurology of the American Academy of Neurology. Reporting terminology for brain arteriovenous malformation: clinical and radiographic features for use in clinical trials. Stroke 2001;32:1430–42 doi:10.1161/01.str.32.6.1430 pmid:11387510

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Houdart E,
   2. Gobin YP,
   3. Casasco A, et al

   . A proposed angiographic classification for intracranial arteriovenous fistulae and malformations. Neuroradiologiy 1993;35:381–85 doi:10.1007/BF00588376 pmid:8327118

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Berenstein AL,
   2. Lasjaunias P,
   3. ter Brugge KG

   1. Berenstein AL,
   2. ter Brugge KG

   . Clinical and Endovascular Treatment Aspects in Adults. In: Berenstein AL, Lasjaunias P, ter Brugge KG, Surgical Neuroangiography. Vol 2.1. 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag; 2004
5. 5.↵
   1. Yasargil MG

   . Microneurosurgery, Vol 4; AVM of the Brain, History, Embryology, Pathological Considerations, Hemodynamics, Diagnostic Studies, Microsurgical Anatomy, Thieme; 1987
6. 6.↵
   1. Orlowski P,
   2. Mahmud I,
   3. Kamran M, et al

   . An approach to the symbolic representation of brain arteriovenous malformations for management and treatment planning. Neuroradiology 2014;56:195–209 doi:10.1007/s00234-013-1307-x pmid:24449133

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Mohr JP,
   2. Parides MK,
   3. Stapf C, et al

   ; International ARUBA Investigators. Medical management with or without interventional therapy for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (ARUBA): a multicentre, non-blinded, randomised trial. Lancet 2014;383:614–21 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62302-8 pmid:24268105

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Choudhri O,
   2. Ivan ME,
   3. Lawton MT

   . Transvenous approach to intracranial arteriovenous malformations: challenging the axioms of arteriovenous malformation therapy? Neurosurgery 2015;77:644–52 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000869 pmid:26120797

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Al-Shahi R,
   2. Pal N,
   3. Lewis SC, et al

   ; Observer Agreement Study Group. Agreement in the angiographic assessment of arteriovenous malformations of the brain. Stroke 2002;33:1501–09 doi:10.1161/01.str.0000018318.83802.18 pmid:12052982

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Spetzler RF,
    2. Ponce FA

    . A 3-tier classification of cerebral arteriovenous malfromations. J Neurosurg 2011;114:842–49 doi:10.3171/2010.8.JNS10663 pmid:20932095

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Dumont TM,
    2. Kan P,
    3. Snyder KV, et al

    . A proposed grading system for endovascular treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: Buffalo score. Surg Neurol Int 2015;6:3 doi:10.4103/2152-7806.148847 pmid:25657856

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Lescher S,
    2. Gehrisch S,
    3. Klein S, et al

    . Time-resolved 3D-rotational angiography display of detailed neurovascular anatomy in patients with intracranial vascular malformations. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:887–94 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012462 pmid:27492375

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Tritt S,
    2. Ommer B,
    3. Gehrisch S, et al

    . Optimization of the surgical approach in AVMs using MRI and 4D DSA fusion technique. Clin Neuroradiol 2017;27:443–50 doi:10.1007/s00062-017-0571-2 pmid:28289757

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Lang S,
    2. Gölitz P,
    3. Struffert T, et al

    . 4D DSA of dynamic visualization of cerebral vasculature: a single-center experience in 26 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1169–76 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5161 pmid:28408632

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Ognard J,
    2. Magro E,
    3. Caroff J, et al

    . A new time-resolved 3D angiographic technique (4D-DSA): description, and assessment of its reliablity in Spetzler-Martin grading of cerbral arteriovenous malformations. J Neuroradiol 2018;45:177–85 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2017.11.004 pmid:29274362

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Sandoval-Garcia C,
    2. Royalty K,
    3. Yang P, et al

    . 4D DSA a new technique for arteriovenous malformation evaluation: a feasibility study. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:300–04 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011534 pmid:25583531

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Geibprasert S,
    2. Pongpech S,
    3. Jiarakongmun P, et al

    . Radiologic assessment for brain arteriovenous malformations: what clinicians need to know. Radiographics 2010;30:483–501 doi:10.1148/rg.302095728 pmid:20228330

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Valavanis A,
    2. Pangalu A,
    3. Tanaka M

    . Endovascular treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations with emphasis on the curative role of embolization. Interv Neuroradiol 2005;11:37–43 doi:10.1177/15910199050110S107 pmid:20584458

    CrossRefPubMed