Reliability and Agreement of 2D and 3D Measurements on MRAs for Growth Assessment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Vlak MH,
   2. Algra A,
   3. Brandenburg R, et al

   . Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2011;10:626–36 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70109-0 pmid:21641282

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Greving JP,
   2. Wermer MJ,
   3. Brown RD, et al

   . Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies. Lancet Neurol 2014;13:59–66 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70263-1 pmid:24290159

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Tominari S,
   2. Morita A,
   3. Ishibashi T, et al

   . Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysm Study Japan Investigators. Prediction model for 3-year rupture risk of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in Japanese patients. Ann Neurol 2015;77:1050–59 doi:10.1002/ana.24400 pmid:25753954

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Villablanca JP,
   2. Duckwiler GR,
   3. Jahan R, et al

   . Natural history of asymptomatic unruptured cerebral aneurysms evaluated at CT angiography: growth and rupture incidence and correlation with epidemiologic risk factors. Radiology 2013;269:258–65 doi:10.1148/radiol.13121188 pmid:23821755

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Takao H,
   2. Murayama Y,
   3. Ishibashi T, et al

   . Comparing accuracy of cerebral aneurysm size measurements from three routine investigations: computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and digital subtraction angiography. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2010;50:893–99 doi:10.2176/nmc.50.893 pmid:21030800

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Thompson BG,
   2. Brown RD,
   3. Amin-Hanjani S, et al

   . American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; American Heart Association; American Stroke Association. Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2015;46:2368–2400 doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000070 pmid:26089327

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Malhotra A,
   2. Wu X,
   3. Gandhi D, et al

   . Management of small, unruptured intracranial aneurysms. World Neurosurg 2020;135:379–80 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.12.139 pmid:32143243

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Kim HJ,
   2. Yoon DY,
   3. Kim ES, et al

   . Intraobserver and interobserver variability in CT angiography and MR angiography measurements of the size of cerebral aneurysms. Neuroradiology 2017;59:491–97 doi:10.1007/s00234-017-1826-y pmid:28343249

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Forbes G,
   2. Fox AJ,
   3. Huston J, et al

   . Interobserver variability in angiographic measurement and morphologic characterization of intracranial aneurysms: a report from the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:1407–15 pmid:8883634

   PubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Hackenberg KA,
    2. Algra A,
    3. Salman RA; the Unruptured Aneurysms and SAH CDE Project Investigators, et al

    . Definition and prioritization of data elements for cohort studies and clinical trials on patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms: proposal of a multidisciplinary research group. Neurocrit Care 2019;30:87–101 doi:10.1007/s12028-019-00729-0 pmid:31102238

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Backes D,
    2. Vergouwen MDI,
    3. Tiel Groenestege AT, et al

    . PHASES score for prediction of intracranial aneurysm growth. Stroke 2015;46:1221–26 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.008198 pmid:25757900

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Backes D,
    2. Rinkel GJ,
    3. Greving JP, et al

    . ELAPSS score for prediction of risk of growth of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurology 2017;88:1600–06 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000003865 pmid:28363976

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Koo TK,
    2. Li MY

    . A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016;15:155–63 doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 pmid:27330520

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Kottner J,
    2. Audigé L,
    3. Brorson S, et al

    . Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:96–106 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002 pmid:21130355

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. de Vet HC,
    2. Terwee CB,
    3. Knol DL, et al

    . When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:1033–39 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.015 pmid:16980142

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Vallat R

    . Pingouin: statistics in Python. JOSS 2018;3:1026 doi:10.21105/joss.01026

    CrossRef
17. 17.↵
    1. White PM,
    2. Teasdale EM,
    3. Wardlaw JM, et al

    . Intracranial aneurysms: CT angiography and MR angiography for detection: prospective blinded comparison in a large patient cohort. Radiology 2001;219:739–49 doi:10.1148/radiology.219.3.r01ma16739 pmid:11376263

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Mine B,
    2. Pezzullo M,
    3. Roque G, et al

    . Detection and characterization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: comparison of 3T MRA and DSA. J Neuroradiol 2015;42:162–68 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2014.08.002 pmid:25454398

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Algra AM,
    2. Lindgren A,
    3. Vergouwen MD, et al

    . Procedural clinical complications, case-fatality risks, and risk factors in endovascular and neurosurgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:282–93 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4165

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Leemans EL,
    2. Cornelissen BM,
    3. Slump CH, et al

    . Comparing morphology and hemodynamics of stable-versus-growing and grown intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:2102–10 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6307 pmid:31780462

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.
    1. Chan SH,
    2. Wong KS,
    3. Woo YM, et al

    . Volume measurement of the intracranial aneurysm: a discussion and comparison of the alternatives to manual segmentation. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg 2014;16:358 doi:10.7461/jcen.2014.16.4.358 pmid:25599044

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Piotin M,
    2. Gailloud P,
    3. Bidaut L, et al

    . CT angiography, MR angiography and rotational digital subtraction angiography for volumetric assessment of intracranial aneurysms: an experimental study. Neuroradiology 2003;45:404–09 doi:10.1007/s00234-002-0922-8 pmid:12719951

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. D’Argento F,
    2. Pedicelli A,
    3. Ciardi C, et al

    . Intra- and inter-observer variability in intracranial aneurysm segmentation: comparison between CT angiography (semi-automated segmentation software stroke VCAR) and digital subtraction angiography (3D rotational angiography. Radiol Med 2021;126:484–93 doi:10.1007/s11547-020-01275-y pmid:32902826

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Lindgren AE,
    2. Koivisto T,
    3. Björkman J, et al

    . Irregular shape of intracranial aneurysm indicates rupture risk irrespective of size in a population-based cohort. Stroke 2016;47:1219–26 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012404 pmid:27073241

    Abstract/FREE Full Text