4D-DSA: Development and Current Neurovascular Applications

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Vertinsky AT,
   2. Schwartz NE,
   3. Fischbein NJ, et al

   . Comparison of multidetector CT angiography and MR imaging of cervical artery dissection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1753–60 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1189 pmid:18635617

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Veldhoen S,
   2. Schöllchen M,
   3. Hanken H, et al

   . Performance of cone-beam computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in diagnostic imaging of the midface: a comparative study on phantom and cadaver head scans. Eur Radiol 2017;27:790–800 doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4387-2 pmid:27169574

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Fahrig R,
   2. Fox AJ,
   3. Lownie S, et al

   . Use of a C-arm system to generate true three-dimensional computed rotational angiograms: preliminary in vitro and in vivo results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1507–14 pmid:9296192

   Abstract
4. 4.↵
   1. Fahrig R,
   2. Holdsworth DW

   . Three-dimensional computed tomographic reconstruction using a C-arm mounted XRII: image-based correction of gantry motion nonidealities. Med Phys 2000;27:30–38 doi:10.1118/1.598854 pmid:10659735

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Davis B,
   2. Royalty K,
   3. Kowarschik M, et al

   . 4D digital subtraction angiography: implementation and demonstration of feasibility. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1914–21 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3529 pmid:23620072

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Akpek S,
   2. Brunner T,
   3. Benndorf G, et al

   . Three-dimensional imaging and cone beam volume CT in C-arm angiography with flat panel detector. Diagn Interv Radiol 2005;11:10–13 pmid:15795836

   PubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Baba R,
   2. Konno Y,
   3. Ueda K, et al

   . Comparison of flat-panel detector and image-intensifier detector for cone-beam CT. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2002;26:153–18 doi:10.1016/S0895-6111(02)00008-3 pmid:11918976

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Schmitt H,
   2. Grass M,
   3. Suurmond R, et al

   . Reconstruction of blood propagation in three-dimensional rotational x-ray angiography (3D-RA). Comput Med imaging Graph 2005;29:507–20 doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2005.03.006 pmid:16140501

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Copeland AD,
   2. Mangoubi RS,
   3. Desai MN, et al

   . Spatio-temporal data fusion for 3D+T image reconstruction in cerebral angiography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2010;29:1238–51 doi:10.1109/TMI.2009.2039645 pmid:20172817

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Mistretta CA

    . Sub-Nyquist acquisition and constrained reconstruction in time resolved angiography. Med Phys 2011;38:2975–85 doi:10.1118/1.3589132 pmid:21815371

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Lieber BB,
    2. Sadasivan C,
    3. Hao Q, et al

    . The mixability of angiographic contrast with arterial blood. Med Phys 2009;36:5064–78 doi:10.1118/1.3243079 pmid:19994517

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Ruedinger KL,
    2. Harvey EC,
    3. Schafer S, et al

    . Optimizing the quality of 4D-DSA temporal information. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:2124–29 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6290 pmid:31672837

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Sandoval-Garcia C,
    2. Royalty K,
    3. Aagaard-Kienitz B, et al

    . A comparison of 4D DSA with 2D and 3D DSA in the analysis of normal vascular structures in a canine model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1959–63 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4359 pmid:26089314

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Sandoval-Garcia C,
    2. Royalty K,
    3. Yang P, et al

    . 4D DSA a new technique for arteriovenous malformation evaluation: a feasibility study. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:300–04 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011534 pmid:25583531

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Lescher S,
    2. Gehrisch S,
    3. Klein S, et al

    . Time-resolved 3D rotational angiography: display of detailed neurovascular anatomy in patients with intracranial vascular malformations. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:887–94 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012462 pmid:27492375

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Sandoval-Garcia C,
    2. Yang P,
    3. Schubert T, et al

    . Comparison of the diagnostic utility of 4D-DSA with conventional 2D- and 3D-DSA in the diagnosis of cerebrovascular abnormalities. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:729–34 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5137 pmid:28279986

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Lang S,
    2. Gölitz P,
    3. Struffert T, et al

    . 4D DSA for dynamic visualization of cerebral vasculature: a single-center experience in 26 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1169–76 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5161 pmid:28408632

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Chen KK,
    2. Guo WY,
    3. Yang HC, et al

    . Application of time-resolved 3D digital subtraction angiography to plan cerebral arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:740–46 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5074 pmid:28126751

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Yang P,
    2. Schafer S,
    3. Royalty K, et al

    . Measurement in the angiography suite: evaluation of vessel sizing techniques. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:965–68 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011920 pmid:26453606

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Bescós JO,
    2. Slob MJ,
    3. Slump CH, et al

    . Volume measurement of intracranial aneurysms from 3D rotational angiography: improvement of accuracy by gradient edge detection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2569–72 pmid:16286402

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Ruedinger KL,
    2. Rutkowski DR,
    3. Schafer S, et al

    . Impact of image reconstruction parameters when using 3D DSA reconstructions to measure intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:285–89 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013080 pmid:28385725

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Kammerer S,
    2. Mueller-Eschner M,
    3. Berkefeld J, et al

    . Time-resolved 3D rotational angiography (4D DSA) of the lenticulostriate arteries: display of normal anatomic variants and collaterals in cases with chronic obstruction of the MCA. Clin Neuroradiol 2017;27:451–57 doi:10.1007/s00062-017-0578-8 pmid:28352979

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Xu J,
    2. Shaughnessy G,
    3. Schafer S, et al

    . Assessing the reliability of pulsatility in four-dimensional digital subtraction angiography time concentration curves. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2018;4:35021 doi:10.1088/2057-1976/aab5e4

    CrossRef
24. 24.↵
    1. Waechter I,
    2. Bredno J,
    3. Hermans R, et al

    . Model-based blood flow quantification from rotational angiography. Med Image Anal 2008;12:586–602 doi:10.1016/j.media.2008.06.003 pmid:18640068

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Wu Y,
    2. Shaughnessy G,
    3. Hoffman CA, et al

    . Quantification of blood velocity with 4D digital subtraction angiography using the shifted least-squares method. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1871–77 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5793 pmid:30213811

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Shaughnessy G,
    2. Schafer S,
    3. Speidel MA, et al

    . Measuring blood velocity using 4D‐DSA: a feasibility study. Med Phys 2018;45:4510–18 doi:10.1002/mp.13120 pmid:30102773

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Shaughnessy G,
    2. Hoffman C,
    3. Schafer S, et al

    . Precision blood flow measurements in vascular networks with conservation constraints. In: Medical Imaging 2018: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling. Vol 10576. International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2018;105762Q doi:10.1117/12.2293637

    CrossRef
28. 28.↵
    1. Lin CJ,
    2. Yang HC,
    3. Chien AC, et al

    . In-room assessment of intravascular velocity from time-resolved rotational angiography in patients with arteriovenous malformation: a pilot study. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:583–88 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013387 pmid:28993442

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Lang S,
    2. Hoelter P,
    3. Birkhold AI, et al

    . Quantitative and qualitative comparison of 4D-DSA with 3D-DSA using computational fluid dynamics simulations in cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1505–10 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6172 pmid:31467234

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    1. Huizinga N,
    2. Keil F,
    3. Birkhold A, et al

    . 4D flat panel conebeam CTA for in vivo imaging of the microvasculature of the human cortex with a novel software prototype. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:976–79 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6574 pmid:32439643

    Abstract/FREE Full Text