Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticlePediatric Neuroimaging

A Longitudinal Analysis of Early Lesion Growth in Presymptomatic Patients with Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy

E.J. Mallack, G. Askin, S. van de Stadt, P.A. Caruso, P.L. Musolino, M. Engelen, S.N. Niogi and F.S. Eichler
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2021, 42 (10) 1904-1911; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7250
E.J. Mallack
aFrom the Department of Neurology (E.J.M., P.L.M, F.S.E.), Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
bDepartment of Pediatrics (E.J.M.), Division of Child Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for E.J. Mallack
G. Askin
cDepartment of Population Health Sciences (G.A.), Division of Biostatistics
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for G. Askin
S. van de Stadt
eAmsterdam Leukodystrophy Center (S.v.d.S, M.E.), Department of Pediatric Neurology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S. van de Stadt
P.A. Caruso
fDepartment of Radiology (P.A.C.), Division of Neuroradiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P.A. Caruso
P.L. Musolino
aFrom the Department of Neurology (E.J.M., P.L.M, F.S.E.), Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P.L. Musolino
M. Engelen
eAmsterdam Leukodystrophy Center (S.v.d.S, M.E.), Department of Pediatric Neurology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Engelen
S.N. Niogi
dDepartment of Radiology (S.N.N.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
gDepartment of Radiology (S.N.N.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S.N. Niogi
F.S. Eichler
aFrom the Department of Neurology (E.J.M., P.L.M, F.S.E.), Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for F.S. Eichler
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy is a devastating neurological disorder caused by mutations in the ABCD1 gene. Our aim was to model and compare the growth of early cerebral lesions from longitudinal MRIs obtained in presymptomatic patients with progressive and arrested cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy using quantitative MR imaging–based lesion volumetry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively quantified and modeled the longitudinal growth of early cerebral lesions from 174 MRIs obtained from 36 presymptomatic male patients with cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy. Lesions were manually segmented using subject-specific lesion-intensity thresholding. Volumes were calculated and plotted across time. Lesion velocity and acceleration were calculated between sequentially paired and triplet MRIs, respectively. Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess differences in growth parameters between progressive and arrested phenotypes.

RESULTS: The median patient age was 7.4 years (range, 3.9–37.0 years). Early-stage cerebral disease progression was inversely correlated with age (ρ = −0.6631, P < .001), early lesions can grow while appearing radiographically stable, lesions undergo sustained acceleration in progressive cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy (β = 0.10 mL/month2 [95% CI, 0.05−0.14 mL/month2], P < .001), and growth trajectories diverge between phenotypes in the presymptomatic time period.

CONCLUSIONS: Measuring the volumetric changes in newly developing cerebral lesions across time can distinguish cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy phenotypes before symptom onset. When factored into the overall clinical presentation of a patient with a new brain lesion, quantitative MR imaging–based lesion volumetry may aid in the accurate prediction of patients eligible for therapy.

ABBREVIATIONS:

CALD
cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy
HSCT
hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
LS
Loes score
t0
time-zero

X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy is a devastating neurologic disorder caused by mutations in the ABCD1 gene, which lead to an accumulation of very long chain fatty acids in plasma and tissue.1 Multiple phenotypes emerge with no genotype-phenotype relationship having been established.2 Most patients will develop cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy (CALD), with the highest incidence occurring in childhood.3 Lesions most often occur in the splenium (60%–80%) or genu (10%–15%) of the corpus callosum and spread confluently into the surrounding subcortical white matter.4,5 More than 80% of children with CALD will experience inflammatory demyelination, “progressive CALD,” followed by rapid neurodegeneration and death without treatment in 2–3 years.6,7 Conversely, 15%–20% of children and most adults will undergo spontaneous arrest of disease, “arrested CALD” without evidence of brain inflammation and are ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).8

HSCT is most successful when initiated in the window before the onset of neurologic symptoms.7,9⇓-11 However, the presymptomatic window is narrow,12,13 and only a minority of patients with progressive CALD are identified in time for HSCT.7 HSCT itself is associated with significant toxicity, morbidity, and mortality, the latter 2 of which increase with disease burden.7,10 Early identification and treatment of CALD is a challenge.7,12 Most important, the addition of adrenoleukodystrophy to the Recommended Uniform Screening Program has provided a new opportunity to alter the natural history of the disease by monitoring for CALD from birth.14

The MR imaging score, or Loes score (LS), is the standard metric for brain demyelination in CALD.15 Previous work has quantified the increase in the MR imaging score per year stratified by lesion distribution.5 However, the LS is not specific nor predictive of progression early in CALD and underestimates the true burden of cerebral disease.4,16 There is an explicitly stated need for early biomarkers to aid in the accurate prediction of patients with CALD appropriate for therapy.7,17

Few prior studies focused on the kinetics of 3D CALD lesion growth in presymptomatic patients. We recently demonstrated that lesion growth is rapid when lesions are small, the growth rate is inversely correlated with age, and older patients tend to stabilize and undergo spontaneous arrest of disease.4 The primary aim of this study was to model the growth of early cerebral lesions from longitudinal MRIs obtained in presymptomatic patients with CALD using lesion volumetry, a quantitative MR imaging approach. We hypothesized that the trajectories of lesion growth diverge between the progressive and arrested phenotypes before symptom onset. Hence tracking the growth of de novo cerebral lesions may enable the early diagnosis of patients with CALD appropriate for HSCT and thereby facilitate clinical decision-making around this progressive disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Standard Protocol Approvals, Registrations, and Consents

Patient data were retrospectively reviewed and de-identified, and storage was encrypted and password-protected. Due to anonymization, consent was waived. This study was approved by each institution's ethics/institutional review board.

Subjects

We performed a retrospective review of patients with CALD evaluated at 3 institutions (Massachusetts General Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, and Weill Cornell Medicine) to select cases for study inclusion. The inclusion criteria were the following: 1) confirmed diagnosis of adrenoleukodystrophy by genetic testing (ABCD1 gene mutation) or high levels of plasma very long chain fatty acids;18 2) early-stage CALD7,19 defined as no cerebral symptoms as defined by the neurologic functional score (range, 0–25) and the LS on first MR imaging with abnormal findings (ie, MR imaging at diagnosis) between 0.5 and nine; 3) ≥2 available brain MRIs per subject; 4) at least 1 axial T2-weighted sequence per MR imaging; 5) MRIs obtained in the pretreatment time period (no history of hematopoietic stem cell or gene therapy); and 6) pattern 1 or 2 lesion distributions only (genu or splenium of corpus callosum).

Patients were divided into 2 study cohorts by clinical diagnosis: progressive CALD versus arrested CALD. Diagnosis of arrested CALD was defined by ≥2 consecutive MRIs spanning a minimum of 6 months with no increase in LS and no contrast enhancement.8 Analyses were limited to callosal lesions to compare growth parameters accurately between subjects over similar neuroanatomic boundaries. Included patients could have a neurologic functional score of >0 if the symptoms were attributed to adrenomyeloneuropathy. Treatment with Lorenzo Oil did not exclude patients from participation in the study.1 MR imaging surveillance every 6 months between 3 and 10 years of age, published by the New York State Newborn Screening workgroup, was followed.14 Otherwise, MR imaging and clinical follow-up were completed per clinical determination.

MR Imaging Parameters

MR imaging studies of the brain in the Amsterdam University Medical Center cohort were performed on a 3T MR imaging unit (Ingenia; Phillips Healthcare). MR imaging studies in the Weill Cornell Medicine cohort were performed on a 3T MR imaging unit (MR750; GE Healthcare). One-hundred forty-two of the 150 MR imaging studies in the Massachusetts General Hospital cohort were performed on a 3T MR imaging unit (Tim Trio [Siemens] until 2017, Prisma 2017 to present, [Siemens]). Eight studies obtained before 2015 were performed on 1.5T MR imaging units (Signa HDxt, GE Healthcare; or Ingenia, Philips Healthcare). Each subject was scanned longitudinally according to their site's standard clinical protocol. Axial conventional T2, conventional FLAIR, or sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts by using different flip angle evolution (SPACE, Siemens) FLAIR volumetric sequences were analyzed. Parameter ranges were the following: TR = 5000–6500 ms, TE = 100–393 ms, frequency = 192–512, phase = 75%–100%, section thickness = 1–5 mm, gap = 0–1 mm, FOV = 180–220 × 180 – 220 mm.

MR Imaging Analysis

Loes Score.

Loes scores were assigned by neuroradiologists (P.A.C., A.L., K.B.) or neurologists (F.S.E., P.L.M, M.E.) with a minimum of 10 years of experience in cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy. Reviewers evaluated the images according to the Loes scoring system for abnormal signal hyperintensity or atrophy involving specific brain structures known to be involved in CALD.15

Lesion Pattern.

The lesions were subdivided into 5 patterns according to their primary anatomic distribution as previously published:5 1) parieto-occipital lobe white matter and splenium of the corpus callosum; 2) frontal lobe white matter and genu of the corpus callosum; 3) frontopontine or corticospinal projection fibers; 4) cerebellar white matter; and 5) simultaneous parieto-occipital and frontal white matter involvement. Only patients in whom the MR imaging showed at least either pattern 1 or pattern 2 lesions were included in this study. Pattern 3 lesions were included only if they were continuous with a frontal or parieto-occipital lesion.

Lesion Volume Calculation.

3D Slicer software (https://www.slicer.org/) was used to create 3D label maps of the lesion by thresholding the label intensity to match the lesion intensity on the source axial T2, conventional FLAIR, or SPACE FLAIR sequence.20,21 Lesions were then manually segmented section-by-section according to the subject-specific threshold value. Lesion volumes were automatically calculated from the compiled section-by-section lesion segmentations (ie, area of the segmentation × section thickness) and are reported in milliliters (mL).

Interrater Reliability.

To assess the interrater reliability of lesion segmentation between 2 raters (E.J.M. and A.L.) on the dataset, we calculated the intraclass correlation coefficient using a 2-way random-effects model with a consistency definition.

Statistical Analyses

Descriptive Statistics.

All continuous variables are reported as median and range. Discrete variables are summarized as frequency (%). The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to calculate differences in median values among skewed samples. Two-tailed P values < .05 were considered statistically significant. SPSS Statistics (Version 25; IBM) was used to perform this section of the analyses.

Population-Level Analysis of Cerebral Lesion Growth.

Raw lesion volumes versus age were plotted. Lesion velocity was defined as a change in lesion volume between 2 sequential MRIs divided by the difference in months between scans and is reported in milliliters per month (mL/month). Lesion acceleration was defined as the difference in lesion velocities between the 2 scans divided by the time interval between scans and is reported in milliliters squared per month (mL/month2). The Spearman rank correlation coefficient (ρ) was calculated to quantify the relationship between patient age and lesion velocity. Similarly, ρ was calculated to quantify the correlation between patient age and lesion acceleration.

Longitudinal Analysis of Individual Cerebral Lesion Growth.

Time-zero (t0) was defined as the date of first abnormal MR imaging. Fold change was calculated as the ratio of lesion volume on the nth MR imaging at tn over the initial volume at t0. Fold change in lesion volume for each patient was then plotted from t0. Similarly, lesion velocity was plotted for each patient from t0.

Lesion Growth Curve Modeling.

The trajectory of each dependent variable was visualized using the nonparametric local-weighted regression curve with 95% confidence intervals and a smoothing parameter (α) of 0.75. Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess the difference in fold change and lesion velocity between the progressive and arrested phenotypes. Individual differences in baseline lesion volume and number/intervals of follow-up scans were addressed by assuming random intercepts for each patient. The model was fit with the main effects for phenotype group and time as well as an interaction term between phenotype and time: Embedded Image Embedded Image Embedded Image Embedded Image where Embedded Image Embedded Image

The regression coefficient (β), (95% CI), and P value are reported for each parameter estimate from the linear mixed effect (LME) models.

Restricted Data Set Analysis

To understand the growth of small lesions from the earliest time points, we recalculated the nonparametric local-weighted regression curves and linear mixed-effects model analyses from a subset of the data meeting more restricted criteria: LS ≤ 2 on the first MRI with abnormal findings.13 To illustrate lesion growth across time, we plotted raw volumes in months from t0. This section of the analysis was performed by a biostatistician using R statistical and computing software, Version 3.5.3 (http://www.r-project.org/).

Data Availability

Following publication, any data not published within this article will be anonymized and shared by request from any qualified investigator.

RESULTS

Clinical Characteristics

Thirty-six patients met the inclusion criteria, resulting in 174 scans available for analysis. The total LS range across all MRIs with abnormal findings was 0.5–7.5. At the time of first MR imaging with abnormal findings, patients had a median age of 89.1 months (range, 47.2–449 months), with a median MR imaging LS of 1 (range, 0.5–7.5, Online Supplemental Data). Twenty-three patients were diagnosed with progressive CALD, accounting for 101 MRIs in the study. The median age at first MR imaging with abnormal findings was 71.8 months (range, 47.2–137.5 months), with an initial LS of 1 (range, 1–7). Thirteen patients underwent spontaneous arrest of cerebral disease, accounting for the remaining 73 MRIs. The median age at first MR imaging with abnormal findings was 185.6 months (range, 96.3–449 months), with an initial LS of 3 (range, 0.5–7.5). Patients with arrested CALD were older at the time of diagnosis (15.5 versus 6.0 years of age, P < .001).

A total of 23 patients met the more restricted criteria (LS ≤ 2 at first MR imaging with abnormal findings), resulting in 125 MRIs eligible for analysis. The LS range was 0.5–6. Nineteen patients with progressive CALD were identified, accounting for 90 MRIs. They were 69.5 months of age (range, 47.2–137.5 months) at diagnosis and had an initial LS of 1 (range, 1–2). Four of the patients with arrested CALD were identified, accounting for the remaining 35 MRIs. They were 136.3 months of age (range, 96.3–185.6 months) and had an initial LS of 1 (range, 0.5–2). Patients with arrested CALD were older at the time of diagnosis (11.4 versus 5.8 years of age, P = .003).

Lesion Segmentation

The intraclass correlation coefficient between lesion segmentations produced by 2 raters (E.J.M. and A.L.) on 39 MRIs from the data set was 0.874 (95% CI, 0.772–0.932; P < .001), indicating a significant, good-to-excellent degree of reliability between segmentations produced by different raters.

Disease Progression is Inversely Correlated with Age

Patient-specific lesion volumes were plotted across time against patient age in months (Fig 1). There was a moderate-to-strong negative correlation between patient age and lesion velocity (n = 112, ρ = −0.6631, P < .001, Fig 2A). Accordingly, lesion acceleration inversely correlated with patient age (n = 89, ρ = −0.4010, P < .001, Fig 2B).

FIG 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1.

A, Patient-specific lesion trajectories of each cohort plotted against patient age. B, Zoomed view of outlined area in 1A): 0–18 years of age on the x-axis and 0- to 10-mL lesion volume on the y-axis. Note the exponential growth trajectories for patients with progressive CALD.

FIG 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2.

A, Lesion growth velocities over sequential MR imaging pairs and B, acceleration over sequential MR imaging triplets, stratified by age in patients with progressive CALD (red) and arrested CALD (blue). Presymptomatic lesion progression is inversely correlated with age (P < .001).

The Loes Score is Insensitive to Early Lesion Growth

There was a very strong correlation between lesion volume and LS (n = 132, ρ = 0.8086, P < .001). The median volume of a lesion with an LS of 1 was 0.51 mL (interquartile range, 0.36–1.46 mL; range, 0.05–8.26 mL). The median volume of a lesion with an LS of 2 was 3.18 mL (interquartile range, 2.45–3.67 mL; range, 0.68–11.41 mL). The median fold change on longitudinal MRIs with an LS of 1 (ie, ΔLS = 0) was 1.83 (n = 16; interquartile range, 1.47–5.71; range, 1.11–29.14). Similarly, the median rate of lesion growth on longitudinal MRIs with an LS of 1 was 0.08 mL/month (n = 30; interquartile range, 0.05–0.25 mL/month; range, 0.01–2.58 mL/month; Fig 3).

FIG 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3.

Serial MRIs demonstrating accelerated lesion growth without a change in the LS in patient 11.

Lesions in Progressive CALD Undergo Early, Sustained Acceleration

The 2-way interaction term between phenotype and time was significant for the rate of lesion growth (Table). For every 1 month, lesion velocity increased by 0.10 mL/month in patients with progressive CALD (β = 0.10 [95% CI 0.05–0.14], P < .001). There was a marginally larger effect in the restricted cohort (β = 0.11 [95% CI, 0.06–0.15], P < .001). The rate of lesion growth in patients with progressive CALD increased with time, consistent with exponential growth kinetics.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Estimates produced by the linear mixed-effects models for fold change and lesion velocity in the full and restricted cohorts

Lesion Growth Trajectories Diverge between Phenotypes before the Onset of Cerebral Symptoms

The 2-way interaction term between phenotype and time was significant for lesion growth measured by fold change (Table). Lesion volume increases by a factor of 2.5 from baseline every month in patients with progressive CALD (fold change β = 2.49 [95% CI, 2.10–2.89], P < .001). This model is limited to MRIs of asymptomatic patients, with a median initial LS of 1 (range, 1–7), and an LS range of 1–7 on subsequent MRIs (Fig 4).

FIG 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4.

A, Lesion growth trajectories from the time of the first abnormal MR imaging finding in presymptomatic patients with progressive (n = 23, red) versus arrested (n = 13, blue) CALD. Lesion volume increased 2.5× per month (fold change β = 2.49 [95% CI, 2.10–2.89], P < .001) in the patients with progressive CALD. B, In the cohort of patients with an initial LS ≤ 2 (restricted cohort; n = 19 progressive, n = 4 arrested), lesion growth was similar (β = 2.54 [95% CI, 2.04–3.04], P < .001) for the patients with progressive CALD.

The results of the phenotype and time interaction from the restricted cohort were similar to those of the full cohort (Table): There was a marginally larger effect for fold change in lesion volume across time (β = 2.54 [95% CI, 2.04–3.04], P < .001). This model is limited to MRIs of asymptomatic patients with a median initial LS of 1 (range, 1–2) and an LS range of 1–6 on subsequent MRIs (Fig 4).

In both linear mixed-effects models, the main effect term for phenotype was not significant, indicating that the 2 groups did not differ at onset. This is expected because baseline MRIs with abnormal findings have a common corrected value for both phenotypes (ie, fold change = 1, lesion velocity = 0 mL/month). The median rate of lesion growth directly following the first MR imaging with abnormal findings in the progressive group was significantly faster than that in the arrested group (0.448 mL/month versus 0.003 mL/month, P = .001).

To approximate real-time Newborn Screening MR imaging surveillance of early CALD, we plotted raw volumes from t0 in the restricted cohort of patients (Fig 5).

FIG 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5.

Nonparametric local-weighted regression curves demonstrating the early lesion growth trajectories between phenotypes measured by raw lesion volume across time in the cohort of patients with an initial LS ≤ 2.

DISCUSSION

Our study aimed to explore cerebral lesion growth as a potential early biomarker for progressive CALD. The implementation of the adrenoleukodystrophy Newborn Screening has provided the opportunity to monitor for new cerebral lesions from birth.14,22 The early, accurate diagnosis of progressive disease is paramount because HSCT is most successful when initiated in the window before the onset of neurologic symptoms.7,9,10,23 This may be equally important for other treatment approaches as well; a recent trial of autologous hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy has produced encouraging results in boys with early CALD.19 Because symptoms accelerate with time in patients with progressive CALD,3,5,6 we hypothesized that disease acceleration could be radiographically captured before symptom onset. We completed the primary aim by modeling the 3D expansion of early cerebral lesions from longitudinal MRIs obtained in presymptomatic patients with progressive and arrested CALD. Our results demonstrate that disease progression is inversely correlated with age, early lesions can grow while appearing radiographically stable, lesions undergo sustained acceleration in early-stage progressive CALD, and growth trajectories diverge between phenotypes in the presymptomatic time period.

To further understand lesion expansion from the earliest time points, thus approximating what may be found by Newborn Screening MR imaging surveillance, we repeated the analysis on the subset of longitudinal MRIs that had an LS ≤ 2 at diagnosis. In this restricted cohort, patients with both progressive and arrested CALD were diagnosed at a younger age with smaller lesions. Again, all measures of growth differed between phenotypes, indicating that trajectories diverge very early in disease and may be detected by calculating lesion velocity and fold change from the MR imaging following diagnosis.

Suspicion for progressive CALD should be highest in younger patients whose lesions follow an exponential growth curve. Our recent work demonstrated the inverse relationship between rates of demyelinating lesion growth and age in a cohort of asymptomatic patients with CALD.4 The current study validates our previous results in a larger, international cohort. Biologically, our findings are consistent with the timing of dynamic myelination into late adolescence and adulthood24 and the suggestion that following transplantation, more developed white matter tracts in adolescence protect against further neurocognitive decline compared with children with CALD undergoing the procedure.17 Stated another way, younger children with younger myelin may be more vulnerable to cerebral disease progression than older patients with more developed myelin.

The proposed model has identified features of early lesion growth that have the potential to inform the timely selection of patients appropriate for rescue therapy. This feature is pertinent to recent observations that altered cerebral microvascular perfusion in perilesional normal-appearing white matter precedes lesion progression.16 Early patient identification would help mitigate risk and maximize neurologic outcomes, decrease the number of MRIs required to identify the correct patients for treatment, reduce patient exposures to anesthesia and contrast agents, and widen the presymptomatic treatment window. Patients treated expeditiously with an LS ≤ 2 have demonstrated superior posttransplantation neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric outcomes and less posttransplantation disease progression on MRI.13 Lesion volumetry may also prove to be a more sensitive method to monitor for disease activity posttreatment. In terms of feasibility, the biomarker itself is based on the acquisition of standard T2-weighted images and, therefore, makes the analysis paradigm possible across all platforms. Conceptually, an analysis of growth kinetics can be applied to other leukodystrophies, as it has been in other white matter diseases.25,26

Longitudinal imaging within subjects provides strength to the analysis. The statistical analyses accounted for the correlation between repeat patient measures, thus allowing each patient to act as an internal control for his or her lesion-specific changes across time. Sequential pair and triplet data points are required to calculate lesion growth velocity and acceleration, respectively, which improve the accuracy of the study conclusions. However, important limitations apply. First, we analyzed retrospective data and are limited by when subjects came to medical attention. The result is lesion onset (the transition from a normal MR imaging finding with a LS = 0 to an abnormal MR imaging finding with a LS ≥ 0.5) is not available for most of the arrested CALD cohort. This issue limits the comparison with the patients with progressive CALD for whom lesion onset was factored into the model. Only a standardized, prospective imaging surveillance program will reveal the true growth trajectory and behavior of cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy lesions across time. Second, there were an unequal number of scans per patient and unequal time between repeat measures. This intra- and intersubject heterogeneity precluded the use of more preferable methods of longitudinal mathematic modeling, including fitting more complex, nonlinear models. Third, the number of subjects, specifically in the arrested cohort, is limited. As with many rare diseases, the generalizability of the study conclusions is limited due to the number of available cases. Fourth, while most scans were sequentially obtained on the same MR imaging scanner for each subject, 5 subjects had their 1–2 MRIs obtained on a 1.5T unit. This may have introduced variability in the interpretation of disease onset and the degree of white matter involvement. If present, the variability is small: Sicotte et al27 demonstrated a 10% average difference in total white matter lesion volume between 1.5T and 3T scanners. A similar effect may have been introduced by performing some measurements on the axial T2-weighted sequence versus 3D T2 FLAIR sequences. Fifth, our analysis did not include isolated pattern 3, 4, or 5 lesions because they are exceedingly rare in this age group.5 Sixth, manual lesion segmentations are time- and resource-intensive, making integration into clinical workflow difficult. Adaptation of pre-existing volume measurement methodologies or automated deep learning approaches to lesion segmentation may support workflow integration.28,29 Finally, the proposed models require validation before entertaining their use in clinical practice. While our models provide insight into early lesion behavior, we emphasize caution when interpreting the results in the context of clinical practice. If validated, our results lay the foundation for diagnostic criteria aimed at identifying early-stage progressive CALD in a fashion similar to that of other progressive neurologic diseases.30

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of adrenoleukodystrophy to Newborn Screening has provided clinicians a novel, presymptomatic approach to disease. Understanding early lesion evolution is paramount for the accurate, early diagnosis of patients with progressive CALD. Our study indicates that measuring the volumetric changes in newly developing cerebral lesions across time can distinguish CALD phenotypes before symptom onset. When factored into the overall clinical presentation of a patient with a new brain lesion, our method may aid in the accurate prediction of patients eligible for therapy.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to Afonso Liberato, MD, for providing lesion segmentations on the data set; Wouter van Ballegoij, MD, and Karen Buch, MD, for providing additional help scoring patient MR imaging scans; Arne Lauer, MD for providing guidance on the data set and analysis; and Jerry W. Harper for editing the manuscript.

Footnotes

  • S.N. Niogi and F.S. Eichler are senior authors.

  • Statistical analysis was performed by Eric Mallack, MD, 175 Cambridge Street, Suite 340, Boston, MA 02114, and Gulce Askin, MPH, 402 E. 67th St, Level C2, New York, NY 10065.

  • All phases of this study were supported by the National Institute of Health and the Leblang Charitable Foundation. Dr Musolino is supported by a K08 (1K08NS094683-01), and Dr Mallack, by a K12 (5 K12 NS066274), both from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.

  • Disclosures: Eric J. Mallack—RELATED: Grant: National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke K12 Neurological Sciences Academic Development Award.* Patricia L. Musolino—RELATED: Grant: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Comments: K08.*. Marc Engelen—UNRELATED: Consultancy: Minoryx Therapeutics, Autobahn, bluebird bio, Comments: research collaboration with pharmaceutical companies developing drugs for X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy*; Grants/Grants Pending: Vidi Grant, Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, Comments: grant for natural history study in adrenoleukodystrophy; Payment for Development of Educational Presentations: cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy education video on Medscape, Comments: commissioned by bluebird bio. Sumit N. Niogi—RELATED: Grant: K12 National Institutes of Health Award, Comments: The study was funded, in part, by a K12 National Institutes of Health Award to Weill Cornell Medicine with Dr Mallack as the Principal Investigator of the grant. I received no support through this grant mechanism.* Florian S. Eichler—UNRELATED: Consultancy: SwanBio Therapeutics; Patents (Planned, Pending Or Issued): adenoassociated virus serotype–mediated ABCD1 gene correction; Payment for Development of Educational Presentations: PRIME medical education company, Comments: for live webinars on adrenoleukodystrophy; OTHER RELATIONSHIPS: Principal Investigator of the adrenoleukodystrophy gene therapy sponsored by bluebird bio, site Principal Investigator of the trial MIN102 sponsored by Minoryx Therapeutics. *Money paid to the institution.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Moser HW
    . Adrenoleukodystrophy: phenotype, genetics, pathogenesis and therapy. Brain 1997;120:1485–1508 doi:10.1093/brain/120.8.1485
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Huffnagel IC,
    2. Laheji FK,
    3. Aziz-Bose R, et al
    . The natural history of adrenal insufficiency in X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy: an international collaboration. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2019;104:118–26 doi:10.1210/jc.2018-01307 pmid:30252065
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Moser HW,
    2. Loes DJ,
    3. Melhem ER, et al
    . X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy: overview and prognosis as a function of age and brain magnetic resonance imaging abnormality—a study involving 372 patients. Neuropediatrics 2000;31:227–39 doi:10.1055/s-2000-9236 pmid:11204280
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Liberato AP,
    2. Mallack EJ,
    3. Aziz-Bose R, et al
    . MRI brain lesions in asymptomatic boys with X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy. Neurology 2019;92:e1698–1708 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000007294 pmid:30902905
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Loes DJ,
    2. Fatemi A,
    3. Melhem ER, et al
    . Analysis of MRI patterns aids prediction of progression in X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy. Neurology 2003;61:369–74 doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000079050.91337.83 pmid:12913200
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Melhem ER,
    2. Loes DJ,
    3. Georgiades CS, et al
    . X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy: the role of contrast-enhanced MR imaging in predicting disease progression. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:839–44 pmid:10815658
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Raymond GV,
    2. Aubourg P,
    3. Paker A, et al
    . Survival and functional outcomes in boys with cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy with and without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019;25:538–48 doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.09.036 pmid:30292747
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Mallack EJ,
    2. van de Stadt S,
    3. Caruso PA, et al
    . Clinical and radiographic course of arrested cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy. Neurology 2020;94:e2499–2507 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000009626 pmid:32482842
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Peters C,
    2. Charnas LR,
    3. DeFor T, et al
    . Cerebral X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy: the University of Minnesota hematopoietic cell transplantation experience from 1991 to 2004. Blood 2004;104:2153 doi:10.1182/blood.V104.11.2153.2153
    CrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Miller WP,
    2. Rothman SM,
    3. Nascene D, et al
    . Outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for childhood cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy: the largest single-institution cohort report. Blood 2011;118:1971–78 doi:10.1182/blood-2011-01-329235 pmid:21586746
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Miller W,
    2. Bjoraker K,
    3. Charnas L, et al
    . Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for adrenoleukodystrophy: ten-year experience with 62 patients. Ann Neurol 2010;68:S121 doi:10.1002/ana.22200
    CrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    1. Mahmood A,
    2. Raymond GV,
    3. Dubey P, et al
    . Survival analysis of haematopoietic cell transplantation for childhood cerebral X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy: a comparison study. Lancet Neurol 2007;6:687–92 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70177-1 pmid:17618834
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Pierpont EI,
    2. Nascene DR,
    3. Shanley R, et al
    . Neurocognitive benchmarks following transplant for emerging cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy. Neurology 2020;95:e591–600 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000009929 pmid:32616675
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Vogel BH,
    2. Bradley SE,
    3. Adams DJ, et al
    . Newborn screening for X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy in New York State: diagnostic protocol, surveillance protocol and treatment guidelines. Mol Genet Metab 2015;114:599–603 doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2015.02.002 pmid:25724074
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Loes DJ,
    2. Hite S,
    3. Moser H, et al
    . Adrenoleukodystrophy: a scoring method for brain MR observations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:1761–66 pmid:7847225
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Musolino PL,
    2. Rapalino O,
    3. Caruso P, et al
    . Hypoperfusion predicts lesion progression in cerebral X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy. Brain 2012;135:2676–83 doi:10.1093/brain/aws206 pmid:22961546
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Pierpont EI,
    2. Eisengart JB,
    3. Shanley R, et al
    . Neurocognitive trajectory of boys who received a hematopoietic stem cell transplant at an early stage of childhood cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy. JAMA Neurol 2017;74:710–17 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.0013 pmid:28418523
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Moser AB,
    2. Kreiter N,
    3. Bezman L, et al
    . Plasma very long chain fatty acids in 3,000 peroxisome disease patients and 29,000 controls. Ann Neurol 1999;45:100–10 doi:10.1002/1531-8249(199901)45:1<100::AID-ART16>3.0.CO;2-U pmid:9894883
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Eichler F,
    2. Duncan C,
    3. Musolino PL, et al
    . Hematopoietic stem-cell gene therapy for cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1630–38 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1700554 pmid:28976817
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Jolesz FA
    1. Kikinis R,
    2. Pieper SD,
    3. Vosburgh Kg 3D
    . Slicer a platform for subject-specific image analysis, visualization, and clinical support. In: Jolesz FA, ed. Intraoperative Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy. Springer-Verlag New York; 2014:277–89
  21. 21.↵
    1. Egger J,
    2. Kapur T,
    3. Fedorov A, et al
    . GBM volumetry using the 3D slicer medical image computing platform. Sci Rep 2013;3:1364–67 doi:10.1038/srep01364 pmid:23455483
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Mallack EJ,
    2. Turk BR,
    3. Yan H, et al
    . MRI surveillance of boys with X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy identified by newborn screening: meta-analysis and consensus guidelines. J Inherit Metab Dis 2021;44:728–39 doi:10.1002/jimd.12356 pmid:33373467
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Shapiro E,
    2. Krivit W,
    3. Lockman L, et al
    . Long-term effect of bone-marrow transplantation for childhood-onset cerebral X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy. Lancet 2000;356:713–18 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02629-5 pmid:11085690
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Lebel C,
    2. Beaulieu C
    . Longitudinal development of human brain wiring continues from childhood into adulthood. J Neurosci 2011;31:10937–47 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5302-10.2011 pmid:21795544
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Aubert-Broche B,
    2. Fonov V,
    3. Narayanan S, et al
    . Canadian Pediatric Demyelinating Disease Network. Onset of multiple sclerosis before adulthood leads to failure of age-expected brain growth. Neurology 2014;83:2140–46 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001045 pmid:25378667
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Tillema JM,
    2. Derks MG,
    3. Pouwels PJ, et al
    . Volumetric MRI data correlate to disease severity in metachromatic leukodystrophy. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2015;2:932–40 doi:10.1002/acn3.232 pmid:26401514
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Sicotte NL,
    2. Voskuhl RR,
    3. Bouvier S, et al
    . Comparison of multiple sclerosis lesions at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla. Invest Radiol 2003;38:423–27 doi:10.1097/01.RLI.0000065426.07178.f1 pmid:12821856
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Kothari RU,
    2. Brott T,
    3. Broderick JP, et al
    . The ABCs of measuring intracerebral hemorrhage volumes. Stroke 1996;27:1304–05 doi:10.1161/01.str.27.8.1304 pmid:8711791
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Chang K,
    2. Beers AL,
    3. Bai HX, et al
    . Automatic assessment of glioma burden: a deep learning algorithm for fully automated volumetric and bidimensional measurement. Neuro Oncol 2019;21:1412–22 doi:10.1093/neuonc/noz106 pmid:31190077
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Wattjes MP,
    2. Rovira À,
    3. Miller D, et al
    . MAGNIMS study group. Evidence-based guidelines: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines on the use of MRI in multiple sclerosis: establishing disease prognosis and monitoring patients. Nat Rev Neurol 2015;11:597–606 doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2015.157 pmid:26369511
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received January 29, 2021.
  • Accepted after revision May 18, 2021.
  • © 2021 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 42 (10)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 42, Issue 10
1 Oct 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Longitudinal Analysis of Early Lesion Growth in Presymptomatic Patients with Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
E.J. Mallack, G. Askin, S. van de Stadt, P.A. Caruso, P.L. Musolino, M. Engelen, S.N. Niogi, F.S. Eichler
A Longitudinal Analysis of Early Lesion Growth in Presymptomatic Patients with Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2021, 42 (10) 1904-1911; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7250

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
A Longitudinal Analysis of Early Lesion Growth in Presymptomatic Patients with Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy
E.J. Mallack, G. Askin, S. van de Stadt, P.A. Caruso, P.L. Musolino, M. Engelen, S.N. Niogi, F.S. Eichler
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2021, 42 (10) 1904-1911; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7250
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Presymptomatic Lesion in Childhood Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy: Timing and Treatment
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Frontal Paraventricular Cysts
  • Sodium MRI in Pediatric Brain Tumors
  • FRACTURE MR in Congenital Vertebral Anomalies
Show more Pediatric Neuroimaging

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire