Neuroimaging Advances in Deep Brain Stimulation: Review of Indications, Anatomy, and Brain Connectomics

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Franzini A,
   3. Cordella R,
   4. Messina G, et al

   . Targeting the brain: considerations in 332 consecutive patients treated by deep brain stimulation (DBS) for severe neurological diseases. Neurol Sci 2012;33:1285–1303 doi:10.1007/s10072-012-0937-9 pmid:22271259

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. DeLong MR,
   3. Wichmann T

   . Basal ganglia circuits as targets for neuromodulation in Parkinson's disease. JAMA Neurol 2015;72:1354–60 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.2397 pmid:26409114

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Edlow BL,
   3. Mareyam A,
   4. Horn A, et al

   . 7 Tesla MRI of the ex vivo human brain at 100 micron resolution. Sci Data 2019;6:244 doi:10.1038/s41597-019-0254-8 pmid:31666530

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Yeh FC,
   3. Panesar S,
   4. Fernandes D, et al

   . Population-averaged atlas of the macroscale human structural connectome and its network topology. Neuroimage 2018;178:57–68 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.027 pmid:29758339

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Yeh FC,
   3. Tseng WY

   . NTU-90: a high angular resolution brain atlas constructed by q-space diffeomorphic reconstruction. Neuroimage 2011;58:91–99 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.021 pmid:21704171

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Yeh FC,
   3. Wedeen VJ,
   4. Tseng WY

   . Generalized q-sampling imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2010;29:1626–35 doi:10.1109/TMI.2010.2045126 pmid:20304721

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Ewert S,
   3. Plettig P,
   4. Li N, et al

   . Toward defining deep brain stimulation targets in MNI space: a subcortical atlas based on multimodal MRI, histology and structural connectivity. Neuroimage 2018;170:271–82 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.015 pmid:28536045

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Horn A,
   3. Wenzel G,
   4. Irmen F, et al

   . Deep brain stimulation induced normalization of the human functional connectome in Parkinson's disease. Brain 2019;142:3129–43 doi:10.1093/brain/awz239 pmid:31412106

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Horn A,
   3. Li N,
   4. Dembek TA, et al

   . Lead-DBS v2: Towards a comprehensive pipeline for deep brain stimulation imaging. Neuroimage 2019;184:293–316 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.068 pmid:30179717

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Flora ED,
    3. Perera CL,
    4. Cameron AL, et al

    . Deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: a systematic review. Mov Disord 2010;25:1550–59 doi:10.1002/mds.23195 pmid:20623768

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Blomstedt P,
    3. Stenmark Persson R,
    4. Hariz GM, et al

    . Deep brain stimulation in the caudal zona incerta versus best medical treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease: a randomised blinded evaluation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2018;89:710–16 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2017-317219 pmid:29386253

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Eisinger RS,
    3. Wong J,
    4. Almeida L, et al

    . Ventral intermediate nucleus versus zona incerta region deep brain stimulation in essential tremor. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2018;5:75–82 doi:10.1002/mdc3.12565

    CrossRef
13. 13.↵
    2. Foote KD,
    3. Okun MS

    . Ventralis intermedius plus ventralis oralis anterior and posterior deep brain stimulation for posttraumatic Holmes tremor: two leads may be better than one: technical note. Neurosurgery 2005;56:E445 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000157104.87448.78 pmid:15794849

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Sammartino F,
    3. Krishna V,
    4. King NK, et al

    . Tractography-based ventral intermediate nucleus targeting: novel methodology and intraoperative validation. Mov Disord 2016;31:1217–25 doi:10.1002/mds.26633 pmid:27214406

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Middlebrooks E,
    3. Tuna I,
    4. Grewal S, et al

    . Segmentation of the globus pallidus internus using probabilistic diffusion tractography for deep brain stimulation targeting in Parkinson's disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1127–34 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5641 pmid:29700048

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Schlaier J,
    3. Anthofer J,
    4. Steib K, et al

    . Deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: targeting the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract? Neuromodulation 2015;18:105–12 doi:10.1111/ner.12238 pmid:25209587

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Meola A,
    3. Comert A,
    4. Yeh FC, et al

    . The nondecussating pathway of the dentatorubrothalamic tract in humans: human connectome-based tractographic study and microdissection validation. J Neurosurg 2016;124:1406–12 doi:10.3171/2015.4.JNS142741 pmid:26452117

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Marques JP,
    3. Kober T,
    4. Krueger G, et al

    . MP2RAGE, a self bias-field corrected sequence for improved segmentation and T1-mapping at high field. Neuroimage 2010;49:1271–81 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.002 pmid:19819338

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Tourdias T,
    3. Saranathan M,
    4. Levesque IR, et al

    . Visualization of intra-thalamic nuclei with optimized white-matter-nulled MPRAGE at 7T. Neuroimage 2014;84:534–45 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.069 pmid:24018302

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Jorge J,
    3. Gretsch F,
    4. Najdenovska E, et al

    . Improved susceptibility-weighted imaging for high contrast and resolution thalamic nuclei mapping at 7T. Magn Reson Med 2020;84:1218–34 doi:10.1002/mrm.28197 pmid:32052486

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Middlebrooks EH,
    3. Tuna IS,
    4. Almeida L, et al

    . Structural connectivity-based segmentation of the thalamus and prediction of tremor improvement following thalamic deep brain stimulation of the ventral intermediate nucleus. Neuroimage Clin 2018;20:1266–73 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.10.009 pmid:30318403

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.
    2. Kim W,
    3. Sharim J,
    4. Tenn S, et al

    . Diffusion tractography imaging-guided frameless linear accelerator stereotactic radiosurgical thalamotomy for tremor: case report. J Neurosurg 2018;128:215–21 doi:10.3171/2016.10.JNS161603 pmid:28298033

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.
    2. Pouratian N,
    3. Zheng Z,
    4. Bari AA, et al

    . Multi-institutional evaluation of deep brain stimulation targeting using probabilistic connectivity-based thalamic segmentation. J Neurosurg 2011;115:995–1004 doi:10.3171/2011.7.JNS11250 pmid:21854118

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Tsolaki E,
    3. Downes A,
    4. Speier W, et al

    . The potential value of probabilistic tractography-based for MR-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor. Neuroimage Clin 2018;17:1019–27 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2017.12.018 pmid:29527503

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Akram H,
    3. Dayal V,
    4. Mahlknecht P, et al

    . Connectivity derived thalamic segmentation in deep brain stimulation for tremor. Neuroimage Clin 2018;18:130–42 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.01.008 pmid:29387530

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Calabrese E,
    3. Hickey P,
    4. Hulette C, et al

    . Postmortem diffusion MRI of the human brainstem and thalamus for deep brain stimulator electrode localization. Hum Brain Mapp 2015;36:3167–78 doi:10.1002/hbm.22836 pmid:26043869

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Behrens TE,
    3. Johansen-Berg H,
    4. Woolrich MW, et al

    . Non-invasive mapping of connections between human thalamus and cortex using diffusion imaging. Nat Neurosci 2003;6:750–57 doi:10.1038/nn1075 pmid:12808459

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    2. Middlebrooks EH,
    3. Holanda VM,
    4. Tuna IS, et al

    . A method for pre-operative single-subject thalamic segmentation based on probabilistic tractography for essential tremor deep brain stimulation. Neuroradiology 2018;60:303–09 doi:10.1007/s00234-017-1972-2 pmid:29307012

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Al-Fatly B,
    3. Ewert S,
    4. Kubler D, et al

    . Connectivity profile of thalamic deep brain stimulation to effectively treat essential tremor. Brain 2019;142:3086–98 doi:10.1093/brain/awz236 pmid:31377766

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Middlebrooks EH,
    3. Grewal SS,
    4. Holanda VM

    . Complexities of connectivity-based DBS targeting: rebirth of the debate on thalamic and subthalamic treatment of tremor. Neuroimage Clin 2019;22:101761 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101761 pmid:30987840

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Anderson JS,
    3. Dhatt HS,
    4. Ferguson MA, et al

    . Functional connectivity targeting for deep brain stimulation in essential tremor. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1963–68 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2638 pmid:21885716

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    2. Greene DJ,
    3. Marek S,
    4. Gordon EM, et al

    . Integrative and network-specific connectivity of the basal ganglia and thalamus defined in individuals. Neuron 2020;105:742–58.e6 doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.11.012 pmid:31836321

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Gibson WS,
    3. Jo HJ,
    4. Testini P, et al

    . Functional correlates of the therapeutic and adverse effects evoked by thalamic stimulation for essential tremor. Brain 2016;139:2198–210 doi:10.1093/brain/aww145 pmid:27329768

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Ramirez-Zamora A,
    3. Ostrem JL

    . Globus pallidus interna or subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: a review. JAMA Neurol 2018;75:367–72 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.4321 pmid:29356826

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Holanda VM,
    3. Okun MS,
    4. Middlebrooks EH, et al

    . Postmortem dissections of common targets for lesion and deep brain stimulation surgeries. Neurosurgery 2020;86:860–72 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyz318 pmid:31504849

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    2. Parent A,
    3. Hazrati L-N

    . Functional anatomy of the basal ganglia. II. The place of subthalamic nucleus and external pallidium in basal ganglia circuitry. Brain Res Rev 1995;20:128–54 doi:10.1016/0165-0173(94)00008-D pmid:7711765

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. 37.↵
    2. Alho EJL,
    3. Alho A,
    4. Horn A, et al

    . The ansa subthalamica: a neglected fiber tract. Mov Disord 2020;35:75–80 doi:10.1002/mds.27901 pmid:31758733

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    2. Petersen MV,
    3. Mlakar J,
    4. Haber SN, et al

    . Holographic reconstruction of axonal pathways in the human brain. Neuron 2019;104:1056–64 doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.09.030 pmid:31708306

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    2. Eisinger RS,
    3. Cernera S,
    4. Gittis A, et al

    . A review of basal ganglia circuits and physiology: application to deep brain stimulation. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2019;59:9–20 doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.01.009 pmid:30658883

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    2. Grewal SS,
    3. Holanda VM,
    4. Middlebrooks EH

    . Corticopallidal connectome of the globus pallidus externus in humans: an exploratory study of structural connectivity using probabilistic diffusion tractography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:2120–25 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5816 pmid:30262639

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
41. 41.↵
    2. Parent A,
    3. De Bellefeuille L

    . Organization of efferent projections from the internal segment of globus pallidus in primate as revealed by flourescence retrograde labeling method. Brain Res 1982;245:201–13 doi:10.1016/0006-8993(82)90802-2 pmid:7127069

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. 42.↵
    2. Maier-Hein KH,
    3. Neher PF,
    4. Houde JC, et al

    . The challenge of mapping the human connectome based on diffusion tractography. Nat Commun 2017;8:1349 doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01285-x pmid:29116093

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    2. Aquino CC,
    3. Duffley G,
    4. Hedges DM, et al

    . Interleaved deep brain stimulation for dyskinesia management in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2019;34:1722–27 doi:10.1002/mds.27839 pmid:31483534

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    2. Accolla EA,
    3. Herrojo Ruiz M,
    4. Horn A, et al

    . Brain networks modulated by subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation. Brain 2016;139:2503–15 doi:10.1093/brain/aww182 pmid:27412387

    CrossRefPubMed
45. 45.↵
    2. Akram H,
    3. Sotiropoulos SN,
    4. Jbabdi S, et al

    . Subthalamic deep brain stimulation sweet spots and hyperdirect cortical connectivity in Parkinson's disease. Neuroimage 2017;158:332–45 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.012 pmid:28711737

    CrossRefPubMed
46. 46.↵
    2. Horn A,
    3. Reich M,
    4. Vorwerk J, et al

    . Connectivity predicts deep brain stimulation outcome in Parkinson disease. Ann Neurol 2017;82:67–78 doi:10.1002/ana.24974 pmid:28586141

    CrossRefPubMed
47. 47.↵
    2. Lin H,
    3. Na P,
    4. Zhang D, et al

    . Brain connectivity markers for the identification of effective contacts in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation. Hum Brain Mapp 2020;41:2028–36 doi:10.1002/hbm.24927 pmid:31951307

    CrossRefPubMed
48. 48.↵
    2. Albanese A,
    3. Bhatia K,
    4. Bressman SB, et al

    . Phenomenology and classification of dystonia: a consensus update. Mov Disord 2013;28:863–73 doi:10.1002/mds.25475 pmid:23649720

    CrossRefPubMed
49. 49.↵
    2. Vidailhet M,
    3. Vercueil L,
    4. Houeto JL, et al

    . Bilateral deep-brain stimulation of the globus pallidus in primary generalized dystonia. N Engl J Med 2005;352:459–67 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa042187 pmid:15689584

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
50. 50.↵
    1. Vercueil L,
    2. Houeto JL, et al

    2. Vidailhet M

    , French SPIDY Study Group, Vercueil L, Houeto JL, et al. Bilateral, pallidal, deep-brain stimulation in primary generalised dystonia: a prospective 3 year follow-up study. Lancet Neurol 2007;6:223–29 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70035-2 pmid:17303528

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
51. 51.↵
    2. Kupsch A,
    3. Benecke R,
    4. Muller J, et al

    . Pallidal deep-brain stimulation in primary generalized or segmental dystonia. N Engl J Med 2006;355:1978–90 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa063618 pmid:17093249

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
52. 52.↵
    2. Artusi CA,
    3. Dwivedi A,
    4. Romagnolo A, et al

    . Differential response to pallidal deep brain stimulation among monogenic dystonias: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2020;91:426–33 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2019-322169 pmid:32079672

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
53. 53.↵
    2. Okromelidze L,
    3. Tsuboi T,
    4. Eisinger RS, et al

    . Functional and structural connectivity patterns associated with clinical outcomes in deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus internus for generalized dystonia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:508–14 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6429 pmid:32054614

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
54. 54.↵
    2. Rozanski VE,
    3. Vollmar C,
    4. Cunha JP, et al

    . Connectivity patterns of pallidal DBS electrodes in focal dystonia: a diffusion tensor tractography study. Neuroimage 2014;84:435–42 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.009 pmid:24045076

    CrossRefPubMed
55. 55.↵
    2. Reese R,
    3. Volkmann J

    . Deep brain stimulation for the dystonias: evidence, knowledge gaps, and practical considerations. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2017;4:486–94 doi:10.1002/mdc3.12519 pmid:30363085

    CrossRefPubMed
56. 56.↵
    2. Tastevin M,
    3. Spatola G,
    4. Régis J, et al

    . Deep brain stimulation in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder: current perspectives. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2019;15:1259–72 doi:10.2147/NDT.S178207 pmid:31190832

    CrossRefPubMed
57. 57.↵
    2. Greenberg BD,
    3. Gabriels LA,
    4. Malone DA, Jr., et al

    . Deep brain stimulation of the ventral internal capsule/ventral striatum for obsessive-compulsive disorder: worldwide experience. Mol Psychiatry 2010;15:64–79 doi:10.1038/mp.2008.55 pmid:18490925

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
58. 58.↵
    2. Ahmari SE,
    3. Spellman T,
    4. Douglass NL, et al

    . Repeated cortico-striatal stimulation generates persistent OCD-like behavior. Science 2013;340:1234–39 doi:10.1126/science.1234733 pmid:23744948

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
59. 59.↵
    2. Coenen VA,
    3. Panksepp J,
    4. Hurwitz TA, et al

    . Human medial forebrain bundle (MFB) and anterior thalamic radiation (ATR): imaging of two major subcortical pathways and the dynamic balance of opposite affects in understanding depression. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2012;24:223–36 doi:10.1176/appi.neuropsych.11080180 pmid:22772671

    CrossRefPubMed
60. 60.↵
    2. Hartmann CJ,
    3. Lujan JL,
    4. Chaturvedi A, et al

    . Tractography activation patterns in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex suggest better clinical responses in OCD DBS. Front Neurosci 2015;9:519 doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00519 pmid:26834544

    CrossRefPubMed
61. 61.↵
    2. Baldermann JC,
    3. Melzer C,
    4. Zapf A, et al

    . Connectivity profile predictive of effective deep brain stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2019;85:735–43 doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.12.019 pmid:30777287

    CrossRefPubMed
62. 62.↵
    2. Coenen VA,
    3. Schlaepfer TE,
    4. Goll P, et al

    . The medial forebrain bundle as a target for deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder. CNS Spectr 2017;22:282–89 doi:10.1017/S1092852916000286 pmid:27268576

    CrossRefPubMed
63. 63.↵
    2. Liebrand LC,
    3. Caan MWA,
    4. Schuurman PR, et al

    . Individual white matter bundle trajectories are associated with deep brain stimulation response in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Brain Stimul 2019;12:353–60 doi:10.1016/j.brs.2018.11.014 pmid:30522916

    CrossRefPubMed
64. 64.↵
    2. Ding SL,
    3. Royall JJ,
    4. Sunkin SM, et al

    . Comprehensive cellular-resolution atlas of the adult human brain. J Comp Neurol 2016;524:3127–481 doi:10.1002/cne.24080 pmid:27418273

    CrossRefPubMed
65. 65.↵
    2. Tyagi H,
    3. Apergis-Schoute AM,
    4. Akram H, et al

    . A randomized trial directly comparing ventral capsule and anteromedial subthalamic nucleus stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder: clinical and imaging evidence for dissociable effects. Biol Psychiatry 2019;85:726–34 doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.01.017 pmid:30853111

    CrossRefPubMed
66. 66.↵
    2. Salanova V,
    3. Witt T,
    4. Worth R, et al

    . Long-term efficacy and safety of thalamic stimulation for drug-resistant partial epilepsy. Neurology 2015;84:1017–25 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001334 pmid:25663221

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
67. 67.↵
    2. Lehtimaki K,
    3. Coenen VA,
    4. Goncalves Ferreira A, et al

    . The surgical approach to the anterior nucleus of thalamus in patients with refractory epilepsy: experience from the international multicenter registry (MORE). Neurosurgery 2019;84:141–50 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyy023 pmid:29554309

    CrossRefPubMed
68. 68.
    2. Wu C,
    3. D'Haese P-F,
    4. Pallavaram S, et al

    . Variations in thalamic anatomy affect targeting in deep brain stimulation for epilepsy. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2016;94:387–96 doi:10.1159/000449009 pmid:27846633

    CrossRefPubMed
69. 69.↵
    2. Grewal SS,
    3. Middlebrooks EH,
    4. Kaufmann TJ, et al

    . Fast gray matter acquisition T1 inversion recovery MRI to delineate the mammillothalamic tract for preoperative direct targeting of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus for deep brain stimulation in epilepsy. Neurosurg Focus 2018;45:E6 doi:10.3171/2018.4.FOCUS18147 pmid:30064328

    CrossRefPubMed
70. 70.↵
    2. Wang YC,
    3. Grewal SS,
    4. Middlebrooks EH, et al

    . Targeting analysis of a novel parietal approach for deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus for epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 2019;153:1–6 doi:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2019.03.010 pmid:30913474

    CrossRefPubMed
71. 71.↵
    2. Yang L,
    3. Li H,
    4. Zhu L, et al

    . Localized shape abnormalities in the thalamus and pallidum are associated with secondarily generalized seizures in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2017;70:259–64 doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.02.011 pmid:28427841

    CrossRefPubMed
72. 72.↵
    2. Grewal SS,
    3. Middlebrooks EH,
    4. Okromelidze L, et al

    . Variability between direct and indirect targeting of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus. World Neurosurg 2020 Apr 14. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.107 pmid:32302732

    CrossRefPubMed
73. 73.↵
    2. Baydin S,
    3. Gungor A,
    4. Tanriover N, et al

    . Fiber tracts of the medial and inferior surfaces of the cerebrum. World Neurosurg 2017;98:34–49 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2016.05.016 pmid:27184897

    CrossRefPubMed
74. 74.↵
    2. Choi SH,
    3. Kim YB,
    4. Paek SH, et al

    . Papez circuit observed by in vivo human brain with 7.0T MRI super-resolution track density imaging and track tracing. Front Neuroanat 2019;13:17 doi:10.3389/fnana.2019.00017 pmid:30833891

    CrossRefPubMed
75. 75.↵
    2. Guo W,
    3. Koo BB,
    4. Kim JH, et al

    . Defining the optimal target for anterior thalamic deep brain stimulation in patients with drug-refractory epilepsy. J Neurosurg 2020;1–10 doi:10.3171/2020.2.JNS193226 pmid:32384279

    CrossRefPubMed
76. 76.↵
    2. Schaper F,
    3. Plantinga BR,
    4. Colon AJ, et al

    . Deep brain stimulation in epilepsy: a role for modulation of the mammillothalamic tract in seizure control? Neurosurgery 2020 May 18. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1093/neuros/nyaa141 pmid:32421806

    CrossRefPubMed
77. 77.↵
    2. Kamali A,
    3. Zhang CC,
    4. Riascos RF, et al

    . Diffusion tensor tractography of the mammillothalamic tract in the human brain using a high spatial resolution DTI technique. Sci Rep 2018;8:5229 doi:10.1038/s41598-018-23452-w pmid:29588461

    CrossRefPubMed
78. 78.↵
    2. Middlebrooks EH,
    3. Grewal SS,
    4. Stead M, et al

    . Differences in functional connectivity profiles as a predictor of response to anterior thalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for epilepsy: a hypothesis for the mechanism of action and a potential biomarker for outcomes. Neurosurg Focus 2018;45:E7 doi:10.3171/2018.5.FOCUS18151 pmid:30064322

    CrossRefPubMed
79. 79.↵
    2. Wang YC,
    3. Kremen V,
    4. Brinkmann BH, et al

    . Probing circuit of Papez with stimulation of anterior nucleus of the thalamus and hippocampal evoked potentials. Epilepsy Res 2020;159:106248 doi:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2019.106248 pmid:31841958

    CrossRefPubMed
80. 80.↵
    2. Middlebrooks EH,
    3. Lin C,
    4. Okromelidze L, et al

    . Functional activation patterns of deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus. World Neurosurg 2020;136:357–63 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.108 pmid:32001414

    CrossRefPubMed