Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleInterventional

Incidence and Risk Factors of In-Stent Restenosis for Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

G. Peng, Y. Zhang and Z. Miao
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2020, 41 (8) 1447-1452; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6689
G. Peng
aFrom the Interventional Neuroradiology Center (G.P., Y.Z., Z.M.), Beijing Tiantan Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for G. Peng
Y. Zhang
aFrom the Interventional Neuroradiology Center (G.P., Y.Z., Z.M.), Beijing Tiantan Hospital
bBeijing Neurosurgical Institute (Y.Z.), Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Y. Zhang
Z. Miao
aFrom the Interventional Neuroradiology Center (G.P., Y.Z., Z.M.), Beijing Tiantan Hospital
cChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (Z.M.), Beijing, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Z. Miao
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Sacco RL,
    2. Kargman DE,
    3. Gu Q, et al
    . Race-ethnicity and determinants of intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Stroke 1995;26:14–20 doi:10.1161/01.str.26.1.14 pmid:7839388
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Wityk RJ,
    2. Lehman D,
    3. Klag M, et al
    . Race and sex differences in the distribution of cerebral atherosclerosis. Stroke 1996;27:1974–80 doi:10.1161/01.str.27.11.1974 pmid:8898801
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Chimowitz MI,
    2. Lynn MJ,
    3. Derdeyn CP, et al
    ; SAMMPRIS Trial Investigators. Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med 2011;365:993–1003 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1105335 pmid:21899409
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Zaidat OO,
    2. Fitzsimmons BF,
    3. Woodward BK, et al
    ; VISSIT Trial Investigators. Effect of a balloon-expandable intracranial stent vs medical therapy on risk of stroke in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis: the VISSIT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015;313:1240–48 doi:10.1001/jama.2015.1693 pmid:25803346
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Chimowitz MI,
    2. Lynn MJ,
    3. Howlett-Smith H, et al
    ; Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease Trial Investigators. Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1305–16 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa043033 pmid:15800226
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Alexander MJ,
    2. Zauner A,
    3. Chaloupka JC, et al
    ; WEAVE Trial Sites and Interventionalists. WEAVE trial: final results in 152 on-label patients. Stroke 2019;50:889–94 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023996 pmid:31125298
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Jin M,
    2. Fu X,
    3. Wei Y, et al
    . Higher risk of recurrent ischemic events in patients with intracranial in-stent restenosis. Stroke 2013;44:2990–94 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001824 pmid:23963335
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Levy EI,
    2. Turk AS,
    3. Albuquerque FC, et al
    . Wingspan in-stent restenosis and thrombosis: incidence, clinical presentation, and management. Neurosurgery 2007;61:644–50; discussion 50–51 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000290914.24976.83 pmid:17881980
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Alurkar A,
    2. Karanam LS,
    3. Oak S, et al
    . Role of balloon-expandable stents in intracranial atherosclerotic disease in a series of 182 patients. Stroke 2013;44:2000–03 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001446 pmid:23696549
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Li J,
    2. Zhao ZW,
    3. Gao GD, et al
    . Wingspan stent for high-grade symptomatic vertebrobasilar artery atherosclerotic stenosis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2012;35:268–78 doi:10.1007/s00270-011-0163-5 pmid:21516376
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Zhang L,
    2. Huang Q,
    3. Zhang Y, et al
    . Wingspan stents for the treatment of symptomatic atherosclerotic stenosis in small intracranial vessels: safety and efficacy evaluation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:343–47 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2772 pmid:22173759
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Moher D,
    2. Liberati A,
    3. Tetzlaff J, et al
    ; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:1006–12 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 pmid:19631508
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Slim K,
    2. Nini E,
    3. Forestier D, et al
    . Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 2003;73:712–76 doi:10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x pmid:12956787
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Wells GA,
    2. Shea B,
    3. O’Connell D, et al
    . The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonradomized studies in meta-analyses. 2014. Ottawal Hospital Research Institute. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288802810_The_Newcastle-Ottawa_Scale_NOS_for_Assessing_The_Quality_of_Nonrandomised_Studies_in_Meta-analyses. Assessed November 19, 2019
  15. 15.↵
    1. Bai WX,
    2. Gao BL,
    3. Li TX, et al
    . Wingspan stenting can effectively prevent long-term strokes for patients with severe symptomatic atherosclerotic basilar stenosis. Interv Neuroradiol 2016;22:318–24 doi:10.1177/1591019915623797 pmid:26823331
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.
    1. Bose A,
    2. Hartmann M,
    3. Henkes H, et al
    . A novel, self-expanding, nitinol stent in medically refractory intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses: the Wingspan study. Stroke 2007;38:1531–57 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.477711 pmid:1739586
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.
    1. Du Z,
    2. Mang J,
    3. Yu S, et al
    . Weighing in on the off-label use: initial experience of Neuroform EZ stenting for intracranial arterial stenosis in 45 patients. Front Neurol 2018;9:852 doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.00852 pmid:30364175
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.
    1. Durst CR,
    2. Geraghty SR,
    3. Southerland AM, et al
    . Stenting of symptomatic intracranial stenosis using balloon mounted coronary stents: a single center experience. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:245–49 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011185 pmid:24646693
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.
    1. Feng Z,
    2. Duan G,
    3. Zhang P, et al
    . Enterprise stent for the treatment of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: an initial experience of 44 patients. BMC Neurol 2015;15:187 doi:10.1186/s12883-015-0443-9 pmid:26449986
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Chow MM,
    3. Anderson M, et al
    . A 7-year experience with balloon-mounted coronary stents for the treatment of symptomatic vertebrobasilar intracranial atheromatous disease. Neurosurgery 2007;61:236–42; discussion 42–43 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000255521.42579.31 pmid:17762735
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.
    1. Freitas JM,
    2. Zenteno M,
    3. Aburto-Murrieta Y, et al
    . Intracranial arterial stenting for symptomatic stenoses: a Latin American experience. Surg Neurol 2007;68:378–86 doi:10.1016/j.surneu.2006.11.062 pmid:17905061
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.
    1. Gandini R,
    2. Chiaravalloti A,
    3. Pampana E, et al
    . Intracranial atheromatous disease treatment with the Wingspan stent system: evaluation of clinical, procedural outcome and restenosis rate in a single-center series of 21 consecutive patients with acute and mid-term results. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013;115:741–47 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.08.037 pmid:22989778
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.
    1. Guo XB,
    2. Ma N,
    3. Hu XB, et al
    . Wingspan stent for symptomatic M1 stenosis of middle cerebral artery. Eur J Radiol 2011;80:e356–60 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.11.029 pmid:21163599
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.
    1. He Y,
    2. Wang Z,
    3. Li T, et al
    . Preliminary findings of recanalization and stenting for symptomatic vertebrobasilar artery occlusion lasting more than 24h: a retrospective analysis of 21 cases. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:1481–86 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.04.021 pmid:23706495
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.
    1. Jiang WJ,
    2. Cheng-Ching E,
    3. Abou-Chebl A, et al
    . Multicenter analysis of stenting in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis. Neurosurgery 2012;70:25–30; discussion 31 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31822d274d
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.
    1. Jiang WJ,
    2. Xu XT,
    3. Du B, et al
    . Comparison of elective stenting of severe vs moderate intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. Neurology 2007;68:420–26 doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000252939.60764.8e pmid:17283316
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.
    1. Jiang WJ,
    2. Yu W,
    3. Du B, et al
    . Outcome of patients with ≥70% symptomatic intracranial stenosis after Wingspan stenting. Stroke 2011;42:1971–75 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.595926 pmid:21636814
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.
    1. Kim KS,
    2. Hwang DH,
    3. Ko YH, et al
    . Usefulness of stent implantation for treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses. Neurointervention 2012;7:27–33 doi:10.5469/neuroint.2012.7.1.27 pmid:22454782
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.
    1. Lee KY,
    2. Chen DY,
    3. Hsu HL, et al
    . Undersized angioplasty and stenting of symptomatic intracranial tight stenosis with Enterprise: evaluation of clinical and vascular outcome. Interv Neuroradiol 2016;22:187–95 doi:10.1177/1591019915609165 pmid:26542728
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.
    1. Li G,
    2. Wang N,
    3. Li X, et al
    . Balloon-mounted versus self-expanding stent outcomes in symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis combined with poor collaterals in China: a multicenter registry study. World Neurosurg 2019 Jan 16 [Epub ahead of Print] doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.189 pmid:30659967
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.
    1. Li TX,
    2. Gao BL,
    3. Cai DY, et al
    . Wingspan stenting for severe symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis in 433 patients treated at a single medical center. PLoS One 2015;10:e0139377 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139377 pmid:26422692
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.
    1. Li Y,
    2. Tang L,
    3. Qi D, et al
    . Correlation between high perfusion syndrome and stent restenosis after stent implantation. Exp Ther Med 2016;12:3675–79 doi:10.3892/etm.2016.3813 pmid:28101162
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.
    1. Lylyk P,
    2. Vila JF,
    3. Miranda C, et al
    . Endovascular reconstruction by means of stent placement in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. Neurol Res 2005;27(Suppl 1):S84–88 doi:10.1179/016164105X35495 pmid:16197831
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.
    1. Maier IL,
    2. Karch A,
    3. Lipke C, et al
    . Transluminal angioplasty and stenting versus conservative treatment in patients with symptomatic basilar artery stenosis: perspective for future clinical trials. Clin Neuroradiol 2018;28:33–38 doi:10.1007/s00062-016-0528-x pmid:27506672
    CrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.
    1. Miao ZR,
    2. Feng L,
    3. Li S, et al
    . Treatment of symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis with balloon-mounted stents: long-term follow-up at a single center. Neurosurgery 2009;64:79–84 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000335648.31874.37 pmid:19050657
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    1. Park S,
    2. Kim JH,
    3. Kwak JK, et al
    . Intracranial stenting for severe symptomatic stenosis: self-expandable versus balloon-expandable stents. Interv Neuroradiol 2013;19:276–82 doi:10.1177/159101991301900303 pmid:24070075
    CrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.
    1. Park SC,
    2. Cho SH,
    3. Kim MK, et al
    . Long-term outcome of angioplasty using a Wingspan stent, post-stent balloon dilation and aggressive restenosis management for intracranial arterial stenosis. Clin Neuroradiol 2020;30:159–69 doi:10.1007/s00062-019-00793-1 pmid:31123775
    CrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.
    1. Qureshi AI,
    2. Hussein HM,
    3. El-Gengaihy A, et al
    . Concurrent comparison of outcomes of primary angioplasty and of stent placement in high-risk patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis. Neurosurgery 2008;62:1053–60; discussion 60–62 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000325867.06764.3a pmid:18580803
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.
    1. Salik AE,
    2. Selcuk HH,
    3. Zalov H, et al
    . Medium-term results of undersized angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic high-grade intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis with Enterprise. Interv Neuroradiol 2019;25:484–90 doi:10.1177/1591019919832244 pmid:30991867
    CrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.
    1. Samaniego EA,
    2. Tari-Capone F,
    3. Linfante I, et al
    . Wingspan experience in the treatment of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease after antithrombotic failure. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5:302–05 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010321 pmid:22544819
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.
    1. Shin YS,
    2. Kim BM,
    3. Suh SH, et al
    . Wingspan stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: clinical outcomes and risk factors for in-stent restenosis. Neurosurgery 2013;72:596–604; discussion 604 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182846e09 pmid:23277374
    CrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.
    1. Suh DC,
    2. Kim JK,
    3. Choi JW, et al
    . Intracranial stenting of severe symptomatic intracranial stenosis: results of 100 consecutive patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:781–85 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0922
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.
    1. Tang CW,
    2. Chang FC,
    3. Chern CM, et al
    . Stenting versus medical treatment for severe symptomatic intracranial stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:911–16 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2409 pmid:21393399
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.
    1. Wang X,
    2. Wang Z,
    3. Wang C, et al
    . Application of the Enterprise stent in atherosclerotic intracranial arterial stenosis: a series of 60 cases. Turk Neurosurg 2016;26:69–76 doi:10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.13350-14.1 pmid:26768871
    CrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Wang ZL,
    2. Gao BL,
    3. Li TX, et al
    . Symptomatic intracranial vertebral artery atherosclerotic stenosis (≥70%) with concurrent contralateral vertebral atherosclerotic diseases in 88 patients treated with the intracranial stenting. Eur J Radiol 2015;84:1801–04 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.05.033
    CrossRef
  46. 46.
    1. Wang ZL,
    2. Gao BL,
    3. Li TX, et al
    . Outcomes of middle cerebral artery angioplasty and stenting with Wingspan at a high-volume center. Neuroradiology 2016;58:161–69 doi:10.1007/s00234-015-1611-8
    CrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.
    1. Wolfe TJ,
    2. Fitzsimmons BF,
    3. Hussain SI, et al
    . Long term clinical and angiographic outcomes with the Wingspan stent for treatment of symptomatic 50-99% intracranial atherosclerosis: single center experience in 51 cases. J Neurointerv Surg 2009;1:40–43 doi:10.1136/jnis.2009.000331 pmid:21994104
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.
    1. Yu J,
    2. Wang L,
    3. Deng JP, et al
    . Treatment of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis with a normal-sized Gateway TM balloon and Wingspan TM stent. J Int Med Res 2010;38:1968–74 doi:10.1177/147323001003800610 pmid:21227000
    CrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.
    1. Yu SC,
    2. Leung TW,
    3. Lee KT, et al
    . Angioplasty and stenting of atherosclerotic middle cerebral arteries with Wingspan: evaluation of clinical outcome, restenosis, and procedure outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:753–58 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2363 pmid:21436335
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.
    1. Yu SC,
    2. Leung TW,
    3. Lee KT, et al
    . Angioplasty and stenting of intracranial atherosclerosis with the Wingspan system: 1-year clinical and radiological outcome in a single Asian center. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;6:96–102 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010608 pmid:23512176
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    1. Yue X,
    2. Xi G,
    3. Lu T, et al
    . Influence of residual stenosis on clinical outcome and restenosis after middle cerebral artery stenting. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiology 2011;34:744–50 doi:10.1007/s00270-010-9989-5 pmid:20927521
    CrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    1. Zhang L,
    2. Huang Q,
    3. Zhang Y, et al
    . A single-center study of Wingspan stents for symptomatic atherosclerotic stenosis of the middle cerebral artery. J Clin Neurosci 2013;20:362–66 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2012.03.033 pmid:23228656
    CrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Rajah GB,
    3. Liu P, et al
    . Balloon-mounted versus self-expanding stents for symptomatic intracranial vertebrobasilar artery stenosis combined with poor collaterals. Neurol Res 2019;41:704–13 doi:10.1080/01616412.2019.1610837 pmid:31030623
    CrossRefPubMed
  54. 54.
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Sun Y,
    3. Li X, et al
    . Early versus delayed stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic artery stenosis with ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:274–78 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015035 pmid:31285375
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  55. 55.
    1. Zhou Y,
    2. Hua Y,
    3. Jia L, et al
    . Evaluation of interventional therapy for patients with intracranial vertebral artery stenosis by transcranial color-coded sonography. Ultrasound Med Biol 2016;42:44–50 doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.08.006 pmid:26410007
    CrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.
    1. Zhu SG,
    2. Zhang RL,
    3. Liu WH, et al
    . Predictive factors for in-stent restenosis after balloon-mounted stent placement for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010;40:499–506 doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.05.007 pmid:20554461
    CrossRefPubMed
  57. 57.
    1. Zi W,
    2. Gong Z,
    3. Shuai J
    . Novel approaches in evaluating and predicting the potential benefit of middle cerebral artery angioplasty and stenting. J Neuroimaging 2015;25:620–25 doi:10.1111/jon.12176
    CrossRef
  58. 58.↵
    1. Turk AS,
    2. Levy EI,
    3. Albuquerque FC, et al
    . Influence of patient age and stenosis location on Wingspan in-stent restenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:23–27 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0869 pmid:7989366
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  59. 59.↵
    1. Duan G,
    2. Feng Z,
    3. Zhang L, et al
    . Solitaire stents for the treatment of complex symptomatic intracranial stenosis after antithrombotic failure: safety and efficacy evaluation. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:680–84 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011734 pmid:26041096
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  60. 60.↵
    1. Derdeyn CP,
    2. Fiorella D,
    3. Lynn MJ, et al
    ; SAMMPRIS Investigators. Nonprocedural symptomatic infarction and in-stent restenosis after intracranial angioplasty and stenting in the SAMMPRIS Trial (Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for the Prevention of Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis). Stroke 2017;48:1501–06 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014537 pmid:28455321
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  61. 61.↵
    1. Alenghat FJ
    . The prevalence of atherosclerosis in those with inflammatory connective tissue disease by race, age, and traditional risk factors. Sci Rep 2016;6:20303 doi:10.1038/srep20303 pmid:26842423
    CrossRefPubMed
  62. 62.↵
    1. Yue X,
    2. Yin Q,
    3. Xi G, et al
    . Comparison of BMSs with SES for symptomatic intracranial disease of the middle cerebral artery stenosis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011;34:54–60 doi:10.1007/s00270-010-9885-z pmid:20458585
    CrossRefPubMed
  63. 63.↵
    1. Gröschel K,
    2. Schnaudigel S,
    3. Pilgram SM, et al
    . A systematic review on outcome after stenting for intracranial atherosclerosis. Stroke 2009;40:e340–47 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.532713 pmid:19182081
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 41 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 41, Issue 8
1 Aug 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Incidence and Risk Factors of In-Stent Restenosis for Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
G. Peng, Y. Zhang, Z. Miao
Incidence and Risk Factors of In-Stent Restenosis for Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2020, 41 (8) 1447-1452; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6689

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Incidence and Risk Factors of In-Stent Restenosis for Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
G. Peng, Y. Zhang, Z. Miao
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2020, 41 (8) 1447-1452; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6689
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Outcomes of flow diversion in intracranial aneurysms accompanied by parent artery stenosis
  • Comparison of drug-coated balloon with bare-metal stent in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: the AcoArt sICAS randomized clinical trial
  • Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Evaluation of safety and efficacy of intracranial self-expanding drug-eluting stents for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled, superiority clinical trial protocol
  • Correspondence on "Antithrombotic Treatment after Carotid Stenting in Patients with Concomitant Atrial Fibrillation"
  • Baseline vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging characteristics associated with in-stent restenosis for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Safety, Efficacy, and Durability of Stent-Assisted Coiling Treatment of M2 (Insular) Segment MCA Aneurysms
  • Endovascular Management of Intracranial Dural AVFs: Transvenous Approach
  • A Meta-analysis of Combined Aspiration Catheter and Stent Retriever versus Stent Retriever Alone for Large-Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke
Show more INTERVENTIONAL

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire