The FRED for Cerebral Aneurysms of the Posterior Circulation: A Subgroup Analysis of the EuFRED Registry

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Petr O,
   2. Brinjikji W,
   3. Cloft H, et al

   . Current trends and results of endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms at a single institution in the flow-diverter era. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1106–13 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4699 pmid:26797138

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.
   1. Ogilvy CS,
   2. Jordan NJ,
   3. Ascanio LC, et al

   . Surgical and endovascular comprehensive treatment outcomes of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: reduction of treatment bias. World Neurosurg 2019;126:e878–87 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.0 pmid:30872200

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Wang CB,
   2. Shi WW,
   3. Zhang GX, et al

   . Flow diverter treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms: a meta-analysis. Neuroradiology 2016;58:391–400 doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1649-2 pmid:26801480

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Bender MT,
   2. Colby GP,
   3. Jiang B, et al

   . Flow diversion of posterior circulation cerebral aneurysms: a single-institution series of 59 cases. Neurosurgery 2019;84:206–16 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyy076 pmid:29608702

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Griessenauer CJ,
   2. Ogilvy CS,
   3. Adeeb N, et al

   . Pipeline embolization of posterior circulation aneurysms: a multicenter study of 131 aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2018;130:923–35 doi:10.3171/2017.9.JNS171376 pmid:29726768

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Kiyofuji S,
   2. Graffeo CS,
   3. Perry A, et al

   . Meta-analysis of treatment outcomes of posterior circulation non-saccular aneurysms by flow diverters. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:493–99 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013312 pmid:28965108

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Killer-Oberpfalzer M,
   2. Kocer N,
   3. Griessenauer CJ, et al

   . European multicenter study for the evaluation of a dual-layer flow-diverting stent for treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: the European Flow-Redirection Intraluminal Device Study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:841–47 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5592 pmid:29545252

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Piano M,
   2. Valvassori L,
   3. Lozupone E, et al

   . FRED Italian Registry: a multicenter experience with the Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device for intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2019;1–8 doi:10.3171/2019.1.JNS183005 pmid:31075778

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Pierot L,
   2. Spelle L,
   3. Berge J, et al

   . SAFE study (Safety and efficacy Analysis of FRED Embolic device in aneurysm treatment): 1-year clinical and anatomical results. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:184–89 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014261 pmid:30297539

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Griessenauer CJ,
    2. Thomas AJ,
    3. Enriquez-Marulanda A, et al

    . Comparison of Pipeline Embolization Device and Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device flow diverters for internal carotid artery aneurysms: a propensity score-matched cohort study. Neurosurgery 2019;85:E249–55 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyy572 pmid:30541114

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Bhogal P,
    2. Pérez MA,
    3. Ganslandt O, et al

    . Treatment of posterior circulation non-saccular aneurysms with flow diverters: a single-center experience and review of 56 patients. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:471–81 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012781 pmid:27836994

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Adeeb N,
    2. Moore JM,
    3. Wirtz M, et al

    . Predictors of incomplete occlusion following Pipeline embolization of intracranial aneurysms: is it less effective in older patients? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:2295–300 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5375 pmid:28912285

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Adeeb N,
    2. Griessenauer CJ,
    3. Dmytriw AA, et al

    . Risk of branch occlusion and ischemic complications with the Pipeline embolization device in the treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1303–09 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5696 pmid:29880475

    Abstract/FREE Full Text